Anonymous Versus Self-Identified Response Formats for School Mental Health Screening

Abstract

Schools are an essential setting for mental health supports and services for students. To support student well-being, schools engage in universal mental health screening to identify students in need of support and to provide surveillance data for district-wide or state-wide policy changes. Mental health data have been collected via anonymous and self-identified response formats depending on the purpose of the screening (i.e., surveillance and screening, respectively). However, most surveys do not provide psychometric evidence for use in both types of response formats. The current study examined whether responses to the Social Emotional Health Survey–Secondary (SEHS-S), a school mental health survey, are comparable when administered using anonymous versus self-identified response formats. The study participants were from one high school and completed the SEHS-S using self-identified (n = 1,700) and anonymous (n = 1,667) formats. Full measurement invariance was found across the two response formats. Both substantial and minimal latent mean differences were detected. Implications for the use and interpretation of the SEHS-S for schoolwide mental health are discussed.

Keywords

universal screening school-based anonymous identified Social Emotional Health Survey–Secondary

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bates

McKay Boren

(2020). Assessing wellbeing in schools: An educators practical guide to measuring wellbeing in schools. EdTech Books. https://edtechbooks.org/wellbeing

Beebe

T. J.

Harrison

P. A.

Park

McRae

J. A.

Jr. Evans

(2006). The effects of data collection mode and disclosure on adolescent reporting of health behavior. Social Science Computer Review, 24(4), 476–488. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439306288690

Browne

M. W.

Cudeck

(1989). Single sample cross-validation indices for covariance structures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 24(4), 445–455. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr2404_4

Bruhn

A. L.

Woods-Groves

Huddle

(2014). A preliminary investigation of emotional and behavioral screening practices in K-12 schools. Education and Treatment of Children, 37(4), 611–634. https://doi.org/10.1353/etc.2014.0039

Byrne

B. M.

(2012). Multivariate applications series.Structural equation modeling with Mplus: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.

Chandler

Sisso

Shapiro

(2020). Participant carelessness and fraud: Consequences for clinical research and potential solutions. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 129(1), 49–55. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000479

Chen

F. F.

(2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(3), 464–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834

Doll

Cummings

(2008). Best practices in population-based school mental health services. In Thomas

Grimes

(Eds.), Best practices in school psychology V (pp. 1333–1347). National Association of School Psychologists.

Furlong

M. J.

Nylund-Gibson

Dowdy

Wagle

Hinton

Carter

(2020). Modification and standardization of Social Emotional Health Survey-Secondary-2020 edition. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/337261781_Modification_and_standardization_of_Social_Emotional_Health_Survey-Secondary-2020_edition

10.

Furlong

M. J.

You

Renshaw

T. L.

Smith

D. C.

O’Malley

M. D.

(2014). Preliminary development and validation of the Social and Emotional Health Survey for secondary students. Social Indicators Research, 117, 1011–1032. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0373-0

11.

Gordon

R. A.

(1987). Social desirability bias: A demonstration and technique for its reduction. Teaching of Psychology, 14(1), 40–42. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328023top1401_11

12.

Bentler

P. M.

(1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/107055199095400118

13.

Joinson

(1999). Social desirability, anonymity, and Internet-based questionnaires. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 31(3), 433–438. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200723

14.

Levitt

J. M.

Saka

Romanelli

L. H.

Hoagwood

(2007). Early identification of mental health problems in schools: The status of instrumentation. Journal of School Psychology, 45(2), 163–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2006.11.005

15.

Muthén

L. K.

Muthén

B. O.

(1998-2017). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed.).

16.

Suldo

S. M.

Shaffer

E. J.

(2008). Looking beyond psychopathology: The dual-factor model of mental health in youth. School Psychology Review, 37(1), 52–68.

17.

You

Furlong

M. J.

Felix

O’Malley

M. D.

(2015). Validation of the Social and Emotional Health Survey for five sociocultural groups: Multigroup invariance and latent mean analyses. Psychology in the Schools, 52, 349–362. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21828/abstract