This article investigates the civic writing practices of more than 11,000 students writing letters to the next president in the lead up to the 2016 U.S. election. We analyze how letter topics are associated with socioeconomic factors and reveal that 43 topics—including ones prevalent among students such as immigration, guns, and school costs—were significantly associated with socioeconomic and racial majority indicators. Furthermore, we conducted a qualitative analysis of the kinds of arguments and evidence developed in letters from five schools serving predominantly lower income students and/or students of color in different regions of the country. Student arguments and types of evidence used were site dependent, suggesting the importance of teacher instruction. This analysis expands previous conceptions of youth civic learning.
AllenD. S. (2016). Education and equality. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
2.
AtkinsR.HartD. (2003). Neighborhoods, adults, and the development of civic identity in urban youth. Applied Developmental Science, 7, 156–164.
3.
AyersR.AyersW. (2011). Teaching the taboo: Courage and imagination in the classroom. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
4.
BakhtinM. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.
5.
BarronB.GomezK.PinkardN.MartinC. K. (2014). The Digital Youth Network: Cultivating digital media citizenship in urban communities. Cambridge: MIT Press.
BoyteH. (2003). A different kind of politics: John Dewey and the meaning of citizenship in the 21st century. The Good Society, 12(2), 1–15.
9.
BurkeK. (1966). Language as symbolic action: Essays on life, literature, and method. Berkeley: University of California Press.
10.
Carnegie Corporation of New York & Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement. (2003). The civic mission of schools. New York, NY: Author.
DamonW. (2001). To not fade away: Restoring civil identity among the young. In RavitchD.VitteritiJ. (Eds.), Making good citizens: Education and civil society (pp. 122–141). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
14.
DeweyJ. (1988). Creative democracy: The task before us. In BoydstonJ. A. (Ed.), John Dewey: The later works, 1925-1953 (Vol. 14, pp. 224–230). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press. (Original work published 1939)
15.
FlanaganC.LevineP. (2010). Civic engagement and the transition to adulthood. The Future of Children, 20, 159–179.
16.
GarciaA. (2017). Good reception: Teens, teachers, and mobile media in a Los Angeles high school. Cambridge: MIT Press.
17.
GarciaA.GargroetziE. (2019). Teachers’ civic beliefs in practice: Exploring civic writing pedagogy during the Letters to the Next President project. Manuscript in preparation.
18.
GarciaA.MirraN. (2019). “Signifying nothing”: Identifying conceptions of youth civic identity in the English Language Arts Common Core State Standards and the National Assessment of Educational Progress’ Reading Framework. Berkeley Review of Education, 8, 195–223.
GouldJ. (2011). Guardian of democracy: The civic mission of schools. Philadelphia: Leonore Annenberg Institute for Civics of the Annenberg Public Policy Center, University of Pennsylvania.
HobbsR. (2011). Digital and media literacy: Connecting culture and classroom. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
28.
IvaničR. (1998). Writing and identity: The discoursal construction of identity in academic writing. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Benjamins.
29.
JenkinsH.ShresthovaS.Gamber-ThompsonL.Kligler-VilenchikN.ZimmermanA. M. (2016). By any media necessary: The new youth activism. New York, NY: New York University Press.
30.
KahneJ.MiddaughE. (2008). Democracy for some: The civic opportunity gap in high school (Circle Working Paper No. 59). College Park, MD: Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning and Engagement.
31.
KingM. L.Jr. (1994). Letter from the Birmingham jail. San Francisco, CA: Harper San Francisco.
32.
KirshnerB. (2015). Youth activism in an era of education inequality. New York, NY: New York University Press.
LevinsonA.GarciaA. (2019). Immigration as a focus in youth letters to the president: Arguments and argumentation in student writing in a polarized debate. Manuscript in preparation.
36.
LevinsonM. (2010). The civic empowerment gap: Defining the problem and locating solutions. In SherrodL.Torney-PurtaJ.FlanaganC. A. (Eds.), Handbook of research on civic engagement (pp. 331–361). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
37.
LevinsonM. (2012). No citizen left behind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
38.
LiteratI.Kligler-VilenchikN.BroughM.Blum-RossA. (2018). Analyzing youth digital participation: Aims, actors, contexts and interests. Information Society, 34, 261–273.
39.
McDonnellL. M. (2000). Defining democratic purposes. In McDonnellL.TimpaneP. M.BenjaminR. W. (Eds.), Rediscovering the democratic purposes of education (pp. 1–18). Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
40.
McLuhanM. (1962). The Gutenberg galaxy: The making of typographic man. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
41.
MirraN. (2018). Educating for empathy: Literacy learning and civic engagement. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
42.
MirraN.GarciaA. (2017). Re-imagining civic participation: Youth interrogating and innovating in the multimodal public sphere. Review of Research in Education, 41, 136–158.
43.
MonaghanJ.SaulW. (1987). The reader and the scribe, the thinker: A critical look at the history of American reading and writing instruction. In PopkewitzT. S. (Ed.), The formation of the school subjects: The struggle for creating an American institution (pp. 85–122). London, England: Falmer Press.
44.
National Assessment Governing Board. (2014). Civics framework for the 2014 National Assessment Educational Program. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
45.
National Writing Project. (2017). Civically engaged writing analysis continuum. National Writing Project. Retrieved from https://cewac.nwp.org/
46.
NieN. H.JunnJ.Stehlik-BarryK. (1996). Education and democratic citizenship in America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
47.
PayneK. A.JournellW. (2019). “We have those kinds of conversations here . . .”: Addressing contentious politics with elementary students. Teaching and Teacher Education, 79, 73–82.
48.
PermanM. (2001). Struggle for mastery: Disfranchisement in the South, 1888-1908. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
49.
PetroneR.SarigianidesS. T.LewisM. A. (2015). The youth lens: Analyzing adolescence/ts in literary texts. Journal of Literacy Research, 46, 506–533.
50.
SaldañaJ. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
SchwartzS. E. O.ChanC. S.RhodesJ. E.ScalesP. C. (2013). Community developmental assets and positive youth development: The role of natural mentors. Research in Human Development, 10, 141–162.
StraussA.CorbinJ. (1994). Grounded theory methodology. In DenzinN.LincolnY. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 273–285). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
57.
SwalwellK.SchweberS. (2016). Teaching through turmoil: Social studies teachers and local controversial current events. Theory & Research in Social Education, 44, 283–315.
WattsR.FlanaganC. (2007). Pushing the envelope on civic engagement: A developmental and liberation psychology perspective. Journal of Community Psychology, 35, 779–792.
61.
WestheimerJ.KahneJ. (2004). What kind of citizen? The politics of educating for democracy. American Educational Research Journal, 41, 237–269.
62.
WineburgS. S. (2018). Why learn history (When it’s already on your phone). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
63.
Wray-LakeL.HartD. (2012). Growing social inequalities in youth civic engagement? Evidence from the National Election Study. Political Science & Politics, 45, 456–461.
64.
ZummoL.GargroetziE.GarciaA. (2019). Youth voice on climate change: Using factor analysis to understand the intersection of science, politics, and emotion. Manuscript in preparation.
