Political interest is one of the most consistent predictors of political participation, but little research has examined how it develops. This study explores adolescents’ political interest development during the 2012 U.S. presidential election. The research team collected and analyzed longitudinal data (surveys, interviews, observations) in high schools located in conservative, liberal, and centrist communities within one swing state. Findings indicate that students’ political interest increased during the election. These increases were related to greater public attention to politics and having opportunities to explore multiple sides of political issues and express political opinions. When guiding such experiences, some teachers struggled with various challenges, including one-sided political environments and students’ political cynicism. This study has numerous implications for education in democratic societies.
AbramowitzA. I.SaundersK. L. (2008). Is polarization a myth?Journal of Politics, 70(2), 542–555.
2.
BartelsL. M. (2008). Unequal democracy: The political economy of the new gilded age. New York, NY: Russell Sage.
3.
BouzaL. (2014). Addressing youth absenteeism in European elections. Stockholm, Sweden: International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance.
4.
CampbellD. E. (2008). Voice in the classroom: How an open classroom climate fosters political engagement among adolescents. Political Behavior, 30, 437–454.
CoffeyD. D.MillerW. J.FeuersteinD. (2011). Classroom as reality: Demonstrating campaign effects through live simulation. Journal Of Political Science Education, 7(1), 14–33.
7.
ConoverP. J.SearingD. D. (2000). A political socialization perspective. In McDonnellL. M.TimpaneP. M.BenjaminR. (Eds.), Rediscovering the democratic purposes of education (pp. 91–124). Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.
CreswellJ. W. (2003). Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10.
DayJ.BoeckelmanK.LaFranceC.HardyR.RohallD. (2012). Stimulating civic engagement through a mock presidential election. National Civic Review, 101(2), 34–37.
11.
DeciE. (1992). The relation of interest to the motivation for behavior: A self-determination theory perspective. In RenningerK. A.HidiS.KrappA. (Eds.), The role of interest in learning and development (pp. 43–70). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
12.
Delli CarpiniM. X.KeeterS. (1996). What Americans know about politics and why it matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
13.
EhmanL. H. (1979, November). Social education by example: A social organizational perspective on student learning. Paper presented at the National Council for the Social Studies, Portland, OR.
14.
Eurydice. (2012). Citizenship education in Europe. Brussels, Belgium: Education and Culture Executive Agency.
15.
FlanaganC.LevineP. (2010). Civic engagement and the transition to adulthood. The future of Children, 20(1), 159–179.
16.
FowlerE. F.RidoutT. N. (2012). Negative, angry, and ubiquitous: Political advertising in 2012. Forum, 10(4), 51–61.
17.
FranklinM. N. (2004). Voter turnout and the dynamics of electoral competition in established democracies since 1945. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
18.
GlaserB.StraussA. (1967). Discovery of grounded theory. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
19.
GordonH. R.TaftJ. K. (2011). Rethinking youth political socialization: Teenage activists talk back. Youth & Society, 43(4), 1499–1527.
HaasM. E.LaughlinM. A. (2002). Teaching the 2000 Election: A K–12 survey. Journal of Social Studies Research, 26(2), 20–30.
22.
HahnC. L. (1998). Becoming political: Comparative perspectives on citizenship education. Albany: State University of New York.
23.
HausslerP.HoffmannL. (2002). An intervention study to enhance girls’ interest, self concept, and achievement in physics classes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 870–888.
24.
HessD. E. (2009). Controversy in the classroom: The Democratic power of discussion. New York, NY: Routledge.
25.
HessD. E.McAvoyP. (2015). The political classroom: Evidence and ethics in democratic education. New York, NY: Routledge.
26.
HidiS.RenningerK. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111–127.
27.
HoferJ.ChasiotisA. (2011). Implicit motives across cultures. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 4(1), 5.
28.
JournellW. (2011). Teachers’ controversial issue decisions related to race, gender, and religion during the 2008 presidential election. Theory & Research in Social Education, 39(3), 348–392.
29.
KahneJ.CrowD.LeeN. (2012). Different pedagogy, different politics: High school learning opportunities and youth political engagement. Political Psychology, 34(3), 419–441.
30.
KazeeT. A. (1981). Television exposure and attitude change: The impact of political interest. Public Opinion Quarterly, 45, 507–518.
31.
KoskimaaV.RapeliL. (2015). Political socialization and political interest: The role of school reassessed. Journal of Political Science Education, 11(2), 141–156.
32.
KrappA. (2007). An educational–psychological conceptualisation of interest. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Guidance, 7(1), 5–21.
33.
LeighlyJ. E.VedlitzA. (1999). Race, ethnicity, and political participation: Competing models and contrasting explanations. Journal of Politics, 61(4), 1092–1114.
34.
LevinsonM. (2012). No citizen left behind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
35.
LevyB. L. M. (2011). Fostering cautious political efficacy through civic advocacy projects: A mixed methods case study of an innovative high school class. Theory & Research in Social Education, 39(2), 238–277.
36.
LevyB. L. M. (2013). An empirical exploration of factors related to adolescents’ political efficacy. Educational Psychology, 33(3), 357–390.
37.
LevyB. L. M.JournellW.HeY.TownsB. (2015). Students blogging about politics: A study of students’ political engagement and a teacher’s pedagogy during a semester-long political blog assignment. Computers & Education, 88, 64–71.
38.
LupiaA.PhilpotT. S. (2005). Views from inside the Net: How websites affect young adults’ political interest. Journal of Politics, 67(4): 1122–1142.
39.
MutzD. (2006). Hearing the other side. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
40.
NeuendorfA.SmetsK.Garcia-AlbaceteG. M. (2013). Homemade citizens: The development of political interest during adolescence and young adulthood. Acta Politica, 48, 92–116.
NiemiN. S.NiemiR. G. (2007). Partisanship, participation, and political trust as taught (or not) in high school history and government classes. Theory and Research in Social Education, 35(1), 32–61.
43.
NystrandM.WuL.GamoranA.ZeiserS.LongD. (2003). Questions in time: Investigating the structure and dynamics of unfolding classroom discourse. Discourse Processes, 35, 135–198.
44.
PanZ.ShenL.PaekH.SunY. (2006). Mobilizing political talk in a presidential campaign: An examination of campaign effects in a deliberative framework. Communication Research, 33(5), 315–345.
45.
PattonM. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
46.
Pew Research Center. (2014). Political polarization in the American public: How increasing ideological uniformity and partisan antipathy affect politics, compromise, and everyday life. Washington, DC: Author.
47.
PriorM. (2010). You’ve either got it or you don’t? The Stability of political interest over the life cycle. Journal of Politics, 72(3), 747–766.
48.
RenningerK. A.HidiS. (2016). The power of interest for motivation and learning. New York, NY: Routledge.
49.
SchiefeleU. (1992). Topic interest and levels of text comprehension. In RenningerK. A.HidiS.KrappA. (Eds.), The role of interest in learning and development (pp. 151–182). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
50.
SchiefeleU. (2009). Situational and individual interest. In WentzelK. R.WigfieldA. (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 197–222). New York, NY: Routledge.
51.
SilviaP. J. (2006). Exploring the psychology of interest. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
52.
StraussA.CorbinJ. (1999). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. London, UK: Sage.
53.
StrombackJ.ShehataA. (2010). Media malaise or virtuous circle? Exploring the causal relationships between news media exposure, political news attention and political interest. European Journal of Political Research, 49, 575–597.
54.
SyvertsenA.StourM.FlanaganC.MitraD.OliverM.SundarS. (2009). Using elections as teachable moments: A randomized evaluation of the student voice civic education program. American Journal of Education, 116(1), 33–67.
55.
Torney-PurtaJ.LehmannR.OswaldH.SchultzW. (2001). Citizenship and education in twenty-eight countries. Amsterdam, Netherlands: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement.
VerbaS.BurnsN.SchlozmanK. L. (1997). Knowing and caring about politics: Gender and political engagement. Journal of Politics, 59(4), 1051–1072.
59.
VygotskyL. S. (1980). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
60.
WigfieldA.EcclesJ. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 68–81.
61.
WolfsfeldG. (2006). Political efficacy and political action: A change in focus using data from Israel. Social Science Quarterly, 66(3), 617–627.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
