Using nationally representative parent surveys over a 10-year period, this article asks if there were differences in parent engagement and satisfaction at public charter and district schools. It then examines whether any such differences persisted when accounting for observable school and family characteristics, including whether parents conducted a school search prior to selecting their child’s school. It finds that charter parents volunteered more but, in aggregate, were not more engaged in school-related activities, relative to district parents. In contrast, charter parents reported higher levels of satisfaction than district parents throughout the period. These differences persisted even when accounting for observable ways in which these families and schools differed.
BaileyD.ScarboroughA.HebbelerK. (2003). Families’ first experiences with early intervention. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
2.
BarrowsS.ChengA.PetersonP.WestM. (2017). Parental perceptions of charter schools: Evidence from two nationally representative surveys of us parents (PEPG 17-01). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Kennedy School.
3.
BeckD.MarantoR.LoW. (2014). Determinants of student and parent satisfaction at a cyber charter school. Journal of Educational Research, 107, 209–216.
4.
BeckerH.NakagawaK.CorwinR. (1997). Parent involvement contracts in California’s charter schools: Strategy for educational improvement or method of exclusion?Teachers College Record, 98, 511–536.
5.
BettsJ.TangY. (2014). The effect of charter schools on student achievement: A meta-analysis of the literature. Seattle, WA: Center on Reinventing Public Education.
6.
BifulcoR.LaddH. (2006). Institutional change and coproduction of public services: The effect of charter schools on parental involvement. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16, 553–576.
7.
BosettiL. (2004). Determinants of school choice: Understanding how parents choose elementary schools in Alberta. Journal of Education Policy, 19, 387–405.
8.
BozemanB. (2004). All organizations are public: Bridging public and private organizational theories. Washington, DC: Beard Books.
9.
BuckleyJ. (2007). Choosing schools, building communities? The effect of schools of choice on parental involvement. Fayetteville: University of Arkansas, Department of Education Reform. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED508943
10.
BuckleyJ.SchneiderM. (2006). Are charter school parents more satisfied with schools? Evidence from Washington, DC. Peabody Journal of Education, 81(1), 57–78.
11.
BuckleyJ.SchneiderM. (2007). Charter schools: Hope or hype?Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
12.
BuddeR. (1988). Education by charter: Restructuring school districts. Andover, MA: Regional Laboratory for Educational Improvement of the Northeast and Islands.
13.
BulkleyK.FislerJ. (2003). A decade of charter schools: From theory to practice. Educational Policy, 17, 317–342.
14.
BurasK. (2014). Charter schools, race, and urban space: Where the market meets grassroots resistance. New York, NY: Routledge.
15.
CarpenterD. (2006). Modeling the charter school landscape. Journal of School Choice, 1, 47–82.
DonahueJ. (1989). The privatization decision: Public ends, private means. New York, NY: Basic Books.
20.
EppleD.RomanoR.ZimmerR. (2016). Charter schools: A survey of research on their characteristics and effectiveness. In HanushekE.MachinS.WoessmannL. (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of education (Vol. 5, pp. 139–208). New York, NY: Elsevier.
21.
EpsteinJ. (1995). School/family/community partnerships: Caring for the children we share. Phi Delta Kappan, 92(3), 81–96.
22.
EpsteinJ. (2010). School, family, and community partnerships: Preparing educators and improving schools. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
23.
FantuzzoJ.PerryM.ChildsS. (2006). Parent satisfaction with educational experiences scale: A multivariate examination of parent satisfaction with early childhood education programs. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 21, 142–152.
24.
FeeneyM.BozemanB. (2009). Stakeholder red tape: Comparing perceptions of public managers and their private consultants. Public Administration Review, 69, 710–726.
25.
FinnC.Jr.MannoB.VanourekG. (2000). Charter schools in action: Renewing public education. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
26.
FinnC.Jr.MannoB.WrightB. (2016). Charter schools at the crossroads: Predicaments, paradoxes, possibilities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
27.
FriedmanB.BobrowskiP.GeraciJ. (2006). Parents’ school satisfaction: Ethnic similarities and differences. Journal of Educational Administration, 44, 471–486.
28.
GawlikM.BickmoreD. (Eds.). (2017). Unexplored conditions of charter school principals: An examination of the issues and challenges for leaders. New York, NY: Rowman & Littlefield.
29.
GibbonsS.SilvaO. (2011). School quality, child wellbeing and parents’ satisfaction. Economics of Education Review, 30, 312–331.
30.
GleasonP.ClarkM.TuttleC.DwoyerE. (2010). The evaluation of charter school impacts: Final report. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance.
31.
HamlinD. (2017). Parental involvement in high choice deindustrialized cities: A comparison of charter and public schools in Detroit. Urban Education. doi:10.1177/0042085917697201
32.
HammelH. (2014). Charging for access: How California charter schools exclude vulnerable students by imposing illegal family work quotas. San Francisco, CA: Public Advocates.
33.
HanushekE.RivkinS. (2006). Teacher quality. In HanushekE.WelchF. (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of education (Vol. 2, pp. 1051–1078). Amsterdam, Netherlands: North-Holland.
34.
HendersonA.MappK. (2002). A new wave of evidence: The impact of school, family, and community connections on student achievement (Annual Synthesis 2002). Austin, TX: National Center for Family and Community Connections with Schools.
35.
HillP.LakeR.CelioM. (2002). Charter schools and accountability in public education. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
36.
JeynesW. (2012). A meta-analysis of the efficacy of different types of parental involvement programs for urban students. Urban Education, 47, 706–742.
37.
JochimA.DeArmondM.GrossB.LakeR. (2014). How parents experience public school choice. Seattle, WA: Center for Reinventing Public Education.
38.
KahlenbergR.PotterH. (2014). A smarter charter: Finding what works for charter schools and public education. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
39.
KelleyR.ThorntonB.DaughertyR. (2005, Fall). Relationships between measures of leadership and school climate. Education, 126(1), 17–23.
40.
KolderieT. (1990). Beyond choice to new public schools: Withdrawing the exclusive franchise in public education (Policy Report No. 8.) Washington, DC: Progressive Policy Institute.
41.
KraftM.RogersT. (2015). The underutilized potential of teacher-to-parent communication: Evidence from a field experiment. Economics of Education Review, 47, 49–63.
42.
MeierK.O’TooleL. (2011). Comparing public and private management: Theoretical expectations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(Suppl. 3), i283–i299.
43.
MintromM. (2003). Market organizations and deliberative democracy: Choice and voice in public service delivery. Administration & Society, 35, 52–81.
44.
MironG.NelsonC. (2002). What’s public about charter schools? Lessons learned about choice and accountability. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
45.
MironG.NelsonC.RisleyJ. (2002). Strengthening Pennsylvania’s charter school reform: Findings from the statewide evaluation and discussion of relevant policy issues. Year five report. Kalamazoo, MI: Evaluation Center.
46.
MommandiW.WelnerK. (2018). Shaping charter enrollment and access. In RotbergI.GlazerJ. (Eds.), Choosing charters: Better schools or more segregation? (pp. 61–81). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
47.
NathanJ. (1996). Charter schools: Creating hope and opportunity for American education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for education reform. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
50.
OberfieldZ. (2017). Are charters different? Public education, teachers, and the charter school debate. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
51.
OsborneD. (2017). Reinventing America’s schools: Creating a 21st century education system. New York, NY: Bloomsbury.
52.
OsborneD.GaeblerT. (1993). Reinventing government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. New York, NY: Plume.
53.
PetersonP. (2009). Voucher impacts: Differences between public and private schools. In BerendsM.SpringerM.BallouD.WalbergH. (Eds.), Handbook of research on school choice (pp. 249-266). New York, NY: Routledge.
54.
PodsakoffP.MacKenzieS.LeeJ.PodsakoffN. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903.
55.
RaineyH.ChunY. (2005). Public and private management compared. In FerlieE.LynnL.Jr.PollittC. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of public management (pp. 72–102). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
56.
RavitchD. (2013). Reign of error: The hoax of the privatization movement and the danger to America’s public schools. New York, NY: Knopf.
SchramS. (2015). The return of ordinary capitalism: Neoliberalism, precarity, occupy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
59.
ShankerA. (1988, July10). Where we stand: Convention plots new course; a charter for change. The New York Times.
60.
SmithJ.WohlstetterP.KuzinC.De PedroK. (2011). Parent involvement in urban charter schools: New strategies for increasing participation. School Community Journal, 21(1), 71–94.
61.
TeskeP.SchneiderM. (2001). What research can tell policymakers about school choice. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 20, 609–631.
62.
TuttleC. C.GillB.GleasonP.KnechtelV.Nichols-BarrerI.ReschA. (2013). KIPP middle schools: Impacts on achievement and other outcomes. Final report. Princeton, NJ: Mathematica Policy Research.
63.
U.S. Department of Education. (1994). Strong families, strong schools: Building community partnerships for learning. Washington, DC.
64.
VerbaS.SchlozmanK.BradyH. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
65.
VerkuilP. (2007). Outsourcing sovereignty: Why privatization of government functions threatens democracy and what we can do about it. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
66.
WeilerS.VogelL. (2015). Charter school barriers: Do enrollment requirements limit student access to charter schools?Equity & Excellence in Education, 48, 36–48.
67.
WellsA. (Ed.). (2002). Where charter school policy fails: The problems of accountability and equity. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
68.
WohlstetterP.NayfackM.Mora-FloresE. (2008). Charter schools and “customer” satisfaction: Lessons from field testing a parent survey. Journal of School Choice, 2, 66–84.
69.
WohlstetterP.SmithJ.FarrellC. (2013). Choices and challenges: Charter school performance in perspective. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
70.
ZimmerR.BuddinR. (2007). Getting inside the black box: Examining how the operation of charter schools affects performance. Peabody Journal of Education, 82, 231–273.
