Do Relative Advantages in STEM Grades Explain the Gender Gap in Selection of a STEM Major in College? A Multimethod Answer

Abstract

Using a multimethod approach, we investigate whether gender gaps in STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) major declaration in college are explained by differences in the grades that students earn in STEM versus non-STEM subjects. With quantitative data, we find that relative advantages in college academic performance in STEM versus non-STEM subjects do not contribute to the gender gap in STEM major declaration. To explore alternative explanations for gender gaps in major declaration, we analyze interviews with college seniors, finding that they recognize many other factors, including their interests in subject matter and confidence, are key in pushing them from STEM or pulling them into non-STEM majors. We conclude that future research seeking to account for gender gaps in STEM majors must extend beyond academic performance.

Keywords

gender studies higher education science education mixed methods

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alon

Gelbgiser

(2011). The female advantage in college academic achievements and horizontal sex segregation. Social Science Research, 40, 107–119.

Anelli

Peri

(2013). Peer gender composition and choice of college major (NBER Working Paper). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

Armstrong

E. A.

Hamilton

L. T.

(2013). Paying for the party: How college maintains inequality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Bandura

(Ed.). (1994). Self-efficacy (Vol. 4). New York, NY: Academic Press.

Barone

(2011). Some things never change: Gender segregation in higher education across eight nations and three decades. Sociology of Education, 84, 157–176.

Berryman

S. E.

(1983). Who will do science? Trends, and their cause in minority and female representation among holders of advanced degrees in science and mathematics. New York, NY: Rockefeller Foundation.

Bobbitt-Zeher

(2007). The gender income gap and the role of education. Sociology of Education, 80, 1–22.

Bottia

Mickelson

R. A.

Giersch

Stearns

Moller

(2018). The role of high school racial composition and opportunities to learn in students’ STEM college participation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55, 446–476.

Bottia

Stearns

Mickelson

R. A.

Moller

Parker

A. D.

(2015). The relationships among high school STEM learning experiences and students’ intent to declare and declaration of a STEM major in college. Teachers College Record, 117(3), 1–46.

10.

Bottia

Stearns

Mickelson

R. A.

Moller

Valentino

(2015). Growing the roots of STEM majors: Female math and science high school faculty and the participation of students in STEM. Economics of Education Review, 45, 14–27.

11.

Boudon

(2003). Beyond rational choice theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 29, 1–21.

12.

Breen

Goldthorpe

J. H.

(1997). Explaining educational differentials: Toward a formal rational action theory. Rationality and Society, 8, 275–305.

13.

Buchmann

DiPrete

T. A.

(2006). The growing female advantage in college completion: The role of family background and academic achievement. American Sociological Review, 71, 515–541.

14.

Catsambis

(1994). The path to math: Gender and racial-ethnic differences in mathematics participation from middle school to high school. Sociology of Education, 67, 199–215.

15.

Charles

Bradley

(2002). Equal but separate? A cross-national study of sex segregation in higher education. American Sociological Review, 67, 573–599.

16.

Charles

Bradley

(2009). Indulging our gendered selves? Sex segregation by field of study in 44 countries. American Journal of Sociology, 114, 924–976.

17.

Chen

(2013). STEM attrition: College students’ paths into and out of STEM fields. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2014/2014001rev.pdf

18.

Correll

S. J.

(2001). Gender and the career choice process: The role of biased self-assessments. American Journal of Sociology, 106, 1691–1730.

19.

Crisp

Nora

Taggart

(2009). Student characteristics, pre-college, college, and environmental factors as predictors of majority in and earning a STEM degree: An analysis of students attending a Hispanic serving institution. American Educational Research Journal, 46, 924–942.

20.

DeBoer

(1984). Factors related to the decision of men and women to continue taking science courses in college. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 21, 325–329.

21.

DiPrete

T. A.

Buchmann

(2013). The rise of women: The female advantage in education and what it means for American schooling. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.

22.

Eccles

J. S.

(2009). Who am I and what am I going to do with my life? Personal and collective identities as motivators of action. Educational Psychologist, 44, 78–89.

23.

Eccles

J. S.

Wigfield

Schiefele

(1998). Motivation to succeed. In Damon

Eisenberg

(Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (pp. 1017–1095). New York, NY: Wiley.

24.

Emerson

T. L.

McGoldrick

Mumford

K. J.

(2012). Women and the choice to study economics. Journal of Economic Education, 43, 349–362.

25.

Freeman

(2004). Trends in educational equity of girls and women: 2004. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.

26.

Fryer

R. G.

Jr. Levitt

S. D.

(2010). An empirical analysis of the gender gap in mathematics. Applied Economics, 2, 210–240.

27.

Giersch

Bottia

Mickelson

R. A.

Stearns

(2016). Exposure to school and classroom racial segregation in Charlotte-Mecklenburg high schools and students’ college achievement. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 24(32). Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1100148.pdf

28.

Glaser

Strauss

(1967). The discovery of grounded theory. New York, NY: Aldine.

29.

Graf

Brown

Patten

(2018). The narrowing, but persistent, gender gap in pay. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/03/22/gender-pay-gap-facts/

30.

Griffith

(2010). Persistence of women and minorities in STEM field majors: Is it the school that matters? Economics of Education Review, 29, 911–922.

31.

Gross

(2009). A pragmatist theory of social mechanisms. American Sociological Review, 74, 358–379.

32.

Hardin

E. E.

Longhurst

M. O.

(2016). Understanding the gender gap: Social cognitive changes during an introductory STEM course. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 63, 233.

33.

Harris

D. N.

(2010). How do school peers influence student educational outcomes? Theory and evidence from economics and other social sciences. Teachers College Record, 112, 1163–1197.

34.

Hedstrom

(2005). Dissecting the social: Principles of analytical sociology. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

35.

Hegewisch

Williams-Baron

(2018). The gender wage gap: 2017; Earnings differences by gender, race, and ethnicity. Retrieved from https://iwpr.org/publications/gender-wage-gap-2017-race-ethnicity/

36.

Hilton

T. L.

Lee

V. E.

(1988). Student interest and persistence in science: Changes in the educational pipeline in the last decade. Journal of Higher Education, 59, 510–526.

37.

Holland

Eisenhart

M. A.

(1990). Educated in romance: Women, achievement, and college culture. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

38.

Hyde

J. S.

Lindberg

S. M.

Linn

M. C.

Ellis

A. B.

Williams

C. C.

(2008). Gender similarities characterize math performance. Science, 321, 494–495.

39.

Inda

Rodriguez

Peña

J. V.

(2013). Gender differences in applying social cognitive career theory in engineering students. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 83, 346–355.

40.

Jackson

C. K.

(2009). Student demographics, teaching sorting, and teacher quality: Evidence from the end of school desegregation. Journal of Labor Economics, 27, 213–256.

41.

Jacobs

(1996). Gender inequality and higher education. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 153–185.

42.

Jonsson

J. O.

(1999). Explaining sex differences in educational choice: An empirical assessment of a rational choice model. European Sociological Review, 15, 391–404.

43.

Justman

Mendez

S. J.

(2018). Gendered choices of STEM subjects for matriculation are not driven by prior differences in mathematical achievement. Economics of Education Review, 64, 282–297. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2018.02.002

44.

Kugler

Tinsley

Ukhaneva

(2017, August). Choice of majors: Are women really different from men? (NBER Working Paper). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w23735

45.

Legewie

DiPrete

T. A.

(2014). The high school environment and the gender gap in science and engineering. Sociology of Education, 87, 259–280.

46.

Lent

R. W.

Brown

S. D.

Hackett

(2000). Contextual supports and barriers to career choice: A social cognitive analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 47, 36–49.

47.

Little

(2012). Analytical sociology and the rest of sociology. Sociologica, 1/2012, 1–47.

48.

Long

J. S.

Fox

M. F.

(1995). Scientific careers: Universalism and particularism. Annual Review of Sociology, 21, 4–71.

49.

Savas

(2014). Which is more consequential: Fields of study or institutional selectivity? Review of Higher Education, 37, 221–247.

50.

Maltese

A. V.

Tai

R. H.

(2011). Pipeline persistence: Examining the association of educational experiences with earned degrees in STEM among U.S. students. Science Education, 5, 877–907.

51.

Mickelson

R. A.

(2003). Gender, Bourdieu, and the anomaly of women’s achievement redux. Sociology of Education, 76, 373–375.

52.

Mickelson

R. A.

(2013). Gender and education. In Ballantine

J. H.

Spade

J. Z.

(Ed.), Schools and society: A sociological approach to education (5th ed., pp. 292–304). New York, NY: Prentice Hall.

53.

Moller

Banerjee

Bottia

Stearns

Mickelson

R. A.

Dancy

. . . Valentino

(2014). Moving Latino/a students into STEM fields: The role of teachers and professional communities in secondary schools. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 14, 3–33.

54.

Mood

(2009). Problems without ends: How rational choice theory escapes its explanatory task. In Cherkaoui

Hamilton

(Eds.), Raymond Boudon: A life in sociology, Part two: Toward a general theory of rationality (pp. 271–287). Oxford, England: Bardwell Press.

55.

Mullen

A. L.

(2013). Gender, social background, and the choice of college major in a liberal arts context. Gender & Society, 28, 289–312.

56.

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2016). Barriers and opportunities for 2-year and 4-year STEM degrees: Systemic change to support students’ diverse pathways (Consensus Study Report). doi:10.17226/21739

57.

Nowell

Alston

R. M.

(2007). I thought I got an A! Overconfidence across the economics curriculum. Journal of Economic Education, 38, 131–142.

58.

Ost

(2010). The role of peers and grades in determining major persistence in the sciences. Economics of Education Review, 29, 923–934.

59.

Owen

(2010). Grades, gender, and encouragement: A regression discontinuity analysis. Journal of Economic Education, 41, 217–234.

60.

Paglin

Rufolo

A. M.

(1990). Heterogeneous human capital, occupational choice, and male-female earnings differences. Journal of Labor Economics, 8, 123–144.

61.

Peske

H. G.

Haycock

(2006, June 1). Teaching inequity: How poor and minority students are shortchanged on teacher quality. Washington, DC: Education Trust.

62.

Rainey

Dancy

Mickelson

R. A.

Stearns

Moller

(2019). A descriptive study of race and gender differences in how instructional style and perceived professor care influence decisions to major in STEM. International Journal of STEM Education, 6, 6. Retrieved from https://stemeducationjournal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40594-019-0159-2

63.

Rask

(2010). Attrition in STEM fields at a liberal arts college: The importance of grades and pre-collegiate preferences. Economics of Education Review, 29, 892–900.

64.

Rask

Tiefenthaler

(2008). The role of grade sensitivity in explaining the gender imbalance in undergraduate economics. Economics of Education Review, 27, 676–687.

65.

Ready

D. D.

Silander

(2011). School racial composition and young children’s cognitive development: Isolating family, neighborhood, and school influences. In Frankenburg

DeBray

(Eds.), Integrating schools in a changing society: New policies and legal options for a multiracial generation (pp. 91–113). Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

66.

Riegle-Crumb

King

(2010). Questioning a White male advantage in STEM. Educational Researcher, 39, 656–664.

67.

Riegle-Crumb

King

Grodsky

Muller

(2012). The more things change, the more they stay the same? Prior achievement fails to explain gender inequality in entry into STEM college majors over time. American Educational Research Journal, 49, 1048–1073. doi:10.3102/0002831211435229

68.

Robinson

(2003). Student enrollment in high school AP sciences and calculus: How does it correlate with STEM careers? Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society, 23, 265–273.

69.

Sax

L. J.

(1995). Predicting gender and major-field differences in mathematical self-concept during college. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 1, 291–307.

70.

Seymour

(1995). The loss of women from science, mathematics, and engineering undergraduate majors: An explanatory account. Science Education, 79, 437–473.

71.

Seymour

Hewitt

N. M.

(1997). Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

72.

Smyth

Steinmetz

(2008). Field of study and gender segregation in European labour markets. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 49, 257–281.

73.

Stearns

Bottia

Davalos

Mickelson

R. A.

Moller

Valentino

(2016). Demographic characteristics of high school math and science teachers and girls’ success in STEM. Social Problems, 63, 87–110.

74.

Stearns

Mickelson

R. A.

Moller

Bottia

(2012). Roots of STEM: A dataset on students who attended North Carolina Public Schools, Grades 6 through 16. Unpublished manuscript.

75.

Teranishi

R. T.

Parker

T. L.

(2010). Social reproduction of inequality: Racial segregation, secondary schools, and postsecondary opportunities. Teachers College Record, 112, 1575–1602.

76.

Tyson

Lee

Borman

K. M.

Hanson

M. A.

(2007). Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) high school science and math coursework and postsecondary degree attainment. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 12, 243–270.

77.

Wai

Cacchio

Putallaz

Makel

M. C.

(2010). Sex differences in the right tail of cognitive abilities: A 30 year examination. Intelligence, 38, 412–423.

78.

Wang

M.-T.

(2012). Educational and career interests in math: A longitudinal examination of the links between classroom environment, motivational beliefs, and interests. Developmental Psychology, 48(6), 1–22.

79.

Wang

M.-T.

Eccles

J. S.

(2013). School context, achievement motivation, and academic engagement: A longitudinal study of school engagement using a multidimensional perspective. Learning and Instruction, 28, 12–23.

80.

Wang

(2013). Why students chose STEM majors: Motivation, high school learning, and postsecondary context of support. American Educational Research Journal, 50, 1081–1121.

81.

Westrick

P. A.

(2015). Differential grading: Meta-analyses of STEM and non-STEM fields, gender, and institutional admission selectivity. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED563775.pdf

82.

Wigfield

Eccles

J. S.

(2002). The development of competence beliefs, expectancies for success, and achievement values from childhood through adolescence. In Wigfield

Eccles

J. S.

(Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp. 91–120). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

83.

Wilson

K. L.

Boldizar

(1990). Gender segregation in higher education: Effects of aspirations, mathematics achievement, and income. Sociology of Education, 63, 62–74.

84.

Xie

Shauman

K. A.

(2003). Women in science: Career processes and outcomes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

85.

Zeldin

A. L.

Pajeres

(2000). Against the odds: Self-efficacy beliefs of women in mathematical, scientific, and technological careers. American Educational Research Journal, 37, 215–246.