In the wake of political and legal challenges facing race-based integration, districts have turned to socioeconomic integration initiatives in an attempt to achieve greater racial balance across schools. Empirically, the extent to which these initiatives generate such balance is an open question. In this article, we leverage the school assignment system that the Wake County Public School System employed throughout the 2000s to provide evidence on this issue. Although our results show that Wake County Public School System’s socioeconomic-based assignment policy had negligible effects on average levels of segregation across the district, it substantially reduced racial segregation for students who would have attended majority-minority schools under a residence-based assignment policy. The policy also exposed these students to peers with different racial/ethnic backgrounds, higher mean achievement levels, and more advantaged neighborhood contexts. We explore how residential context and details of the policy interacted to produce this pattern of effects and close the article by discussing the implications of our results for research and policy.
AshenfelterO.CollinsW. J.YoonA. (2006). Evaluating the role of Brown v. Board of Education in school equalization, desegregation, and the income of African Americans. American Law and Economics Review, 8, 213–248.
3.
AyscueJ. B.Siegel-HawleyG.KucseraJ.WoodwardB. (2018). School segregation and resegregation in Charlotte and Raleigh, 1989-2010. Educational Policy, 32, 3–54.
4.
BenjaminK. (2012). Suburbanizing Jim Crow: The impact of school policy on residential segregation in Raleigh. Journal of Urban History, 38, 225–246.
BillingsS. B.DemingD. J.RockoffJ. (2014). School segregation, educational attainment, and crime: Evidence from the end of busing in Charlotte-Mecklenburg. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 129, 435–476.
7.
CardD.RothsteinJ. (2007). Racial segregation and the black-white test score gap. Journal of Public Economics, 91, 2158–2184.
8.
ColemanJ. S.KellyS. D.MooreJ. A. (1975). Trends in school segregation, 1968-73. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
9.
CorcoranS.EvansW. N. (2010). Income inequality, the median voter, and the support for public education (NBER Working Paper No. 16097). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
10.
EllisonG.PathakP. A. (2016). The efficiency of race-neutral alternatives to race-based affirmative action: Evidence from Chicago’s exam schools (NBER Working Paper No. 22589). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
11.
FielJ. E. (2013). Decomposing school resegregation social closure, racial imbalance, and racial isolation. American Sociological Review, 78, 828–848.
12.
FrankenbergE.LeeC. (2002). Race in American public schools: Rapidly resegregating school districts. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Civil Rights Project.
13.
GuryanJ. (2004). Desegregation and black dropout rates. American Economic Review, 94, 919–943.
14.
JohnsonR. C. (2011). Long-run impacts of school desegregation and school quality on adult attainments (NBER Working Paper No. 16664). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
15.
KahlenbergR. D. (Ed.). (2012). The future of school integration: Socioeconomic diversity as an education reform strategy. New York, NY: Century Foundation.
16.
LaFreeG.ArumR. (2006). The impact of racially inclusive schooling on adult incarceration rates among U.S. cohorts of African Americans and Whites since 1930. Criminology, 44, 73–103.
17.
LiebowitzD. D.PageL. C. (2014). Does school policy affect housing choices? Evidence from the end of desegregation in Charlotte–Mecklenburg. American Educational Research Journal, 51, 671–703.
18.
LutzB. (2011). The end of court-ordered desegregation. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 3(2), 130–168.
19.
MasseyD. S.DentonN. A. (1989). Hypersegregation in U.S. metropolitan areas: Black and Hispanic segregation along five dimensions. Demography, 26, 373–391.
20.
MickelsonR. A.BottiaM. C.LambertR. (2013). Effects of school racial composition on K-12 mathematics outcomes: A metaregression analysis. Review of Educational Research, 83, 121–158.
21.
MickelsonR. A.SmithS. S.NelsonA. H. (Eds.). (2015). Yesterday, today, and tomorrow: School desegregation and resegregation in Charlotte. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
22.
OrfieldG.LeeC. (2007). Historic reversals, accelerating resegregation, and the need for new integration strategies. Los Angeles: Civil Rights Project/Proyecto Derechos Civiles, University of California–Los Angeles.
23.
OwensA.ReardonS. F.JencksC. (2016). Income segregation between schools and school districts. American Educational Research Journal, 53(4), 1159–1197.
24.
ParcelT. L.HendrixJ. A.TaylorA. J. (2015). Race, politics, and school assignment policies in Charlotte-Mecklenburg and Wake County, North Carolina. In MickelsonR. A.SmithS. S.Hawn NelsonA. (Eds.), Yesterday, today, and tomorrow: School desegregation and resegregation in Charlotte (pp. 85–100). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
25.
ParcelT. L.TaylorA. J. (2015). The end of consensus: Diversity, neighborhoods, and the politics of public school assignments. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
26.
PotterH.QuickK.DaviesE. (2016). A new wave of school integration: Districts and charters pursuing socioeconomic diversity. New York, NY: Century Foundation.
27.
ReardonS. F. (2016). School segregation and racial academic achievement gaps. RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences, 2(5), 34–57.
ReardonS. F.GrewalE. T.KalogridesD.GreenbergE. (2012). Brown fades: The end of court-ordered school desegregation and the resegregation of American public schools. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 31, 876–904.
30.
ReardonS. F.HoA. D.ShearB. R.FahleE. M.KalogridesD.DiSalvoR. (2017). Stanford Education Data Archive (Version 2.0). Retrieved from http://purl.stanford.edu/db586ns4974
31.
ReardonS. F.OwensA. (2014). 60 years after Brown: Trends and consequences of school segregation. Annual Review of Sociology, 40, 199–218.
32.
ReardonS. F.RhodesL. (2011). The effects of socioeconomic school integration plans on racial school desegregation. In FrankenbergE.DeBrayE. (Eds.), Integrating schools in a changing society: New policies and legal options for a multiracial generation (pp. 187–208). Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
33.
ReardonS. F.YunJ. T. (2002). Segregation in church and state? Vouchers and racial enrollment patterns among public and private schools. Teachers College Record, 2002, 10968.
34.
ReardonS. F.YunJ. T.KurlaenderM. (2006). Implications of income-based school assignment policies for racial school segregation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 28, 49–75.
35.
ReberS. J. (2010). School desegregation and educational attainment for blacks. Journal of Human Resources, 45, 893–914.
36.
StroubK. J.RichardsM. P. (2013). From resegregation to reintegration: Trends in the racial/ethnic segregation of metropolitan public schools, 1993–2009. American Educational Research Journal, 50, 497–531.
WeinerD. A.LutzB. F.LudwigJ. (2009). The effects of school desegregation on crime (NBER Working Paper No. 15380). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
39.
WelchF.LightA. (1987). New evidence on school desegregation. Washington, DC: U.S. Commission on Civil Rights.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
