Exploring the Situated and Cultural Aspects of Communication in the Professions: Implications for Teaching,Student Employability,and Equity in Higher Education
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online December, 2019
Exploring the Situated and Cultural Aspects of Communication in the Professions: Implications for Teaching,Student Employability,and Equity in Higher Education
One of the problematic features of the “skills discourse” is the view that skills are decontextualized bits of knowledge and disposition. Instead, how skills such as communication are defined and used are shaped by cultural, political, and situational factors. In this article, we integrate theory from communication studies, critical discourse analysis, and cognitive anthropology to examine how 96 students, educators, and employers in nursing and engineering define and describe communication skills. Thematic and social network analyses revealed multiple “genres” of communication, their association with specific situations, variation in the structure of situated notions of communication by role group, and cultural models underlying their use. Results suggest new approaches for research and practice regarding teaching and cultural diversity in higher education.
AdlerR. B.RodmanG. R.DuPréA. (2017). Understanding human communication (13th ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
2.
AnaniadouK.ClaroM. (2009). 21st Century skills and competences for new millennium learners in OECD countries (OECD Education Working Papers, No. 41). Paris, France: OECD.
3.
BeckettC. D.KipnisG. (2009). Collaborative communication: Integrating SBAR to improve quality/patient safety outcomes. Journal for Healthcare Quality, 31(5), 19–28.
4.
BerkenkotterC.HuckinT. N. (2016). Genre knowledge in disciplinary communication: Cognition/culture/power. New York, NY: Routledge.
5.
BernardH. R. (2011). Research methods in anthropology. Lanham, MD: Rowman Altamira.
6.
BorgattiS. P. (2002). Netdraw network visualization. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.
7.
BorgattiS. P.EverettM. G.FreemanL. C. (2002). UCINET for windows: Software for social network analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.
8.
BrownJ. S.CollinsA.DuguidP. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18, 32–42.
9.
Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2016, May). Metropolitan and nonmetropolitan area occupational employment and wage estimates. Retrieved from https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oessrcma.htm
ClarkeM. (2018). Rethinking graduate employability: The role of capital, individual attributes and context. Studies in Higher Education, 43, 1923–1937.
12.
CohenP. N.HuffmanM. L. (2003). Individuals, jobs, and labor markets: The devaluation of women’s work. American Sociological Review, 68, 443–457.
13.
CollinR. (2012). Genre in discourse, discourse in genre: A new approach to the study of literate practice. Journal of Literacy Research, 44, 76–96.
14.
CrandallB.KleinG.HoffmanR. R. (2006). Working minds: A practitioner’s guide to cognitive task analysis. Cambridge: MIT Press.
15.
D’AndradeR. G. (1995). The development of cognitive anthropology. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
16.
DannelsD. P. (2001). Time to speak up: A theoretical framework of situated pedagogy and practice for communication across the curriculum. Communication Education, 50, 144–158.
17.
DannelsD. P. (2002). Communication across the curriculum and in the disciplines: Speaking in engineering. Communication Education, 51, 254–268.
18.
DannelsD. P.Housley GaffneyA. L. (2009). Communication across the curriculum and in the disciplines: A call for scholarly cross-curricular advocacy. Communication Education, 58, 124–153.
19.
DannelsD. P.Housley GaffneyA. H.MartinK. N. (2008). Beyond content, deeper than delivery: What critique feedback reveals about communication expectations in design education. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 2, 1–16.
20.
DannelsD. P.PalmertonP. R.Housley GaffneyA. L. (2017). Oral communication in the disciplines: A resource for teacher development and training. Anderson, SC: Parlor Press.
21.
DarlingA. L.DannelsD. P. (2003). Practicing engineers talk about the importance of talk: A report on the role of oral communication in the workplace. Communication Education, 52, 1–16.
22.
Deloitte and the Manufacturing Institute. (2011). Boiling point? The skills gap in U.S. manufacturing. Washington, DC: Manufacturing Institute.
23.
De MeesterK.VerspuyM.MonsieursK. G.Van BogaertP. (2013). SBAR improves nurse–physician communication and reduces unexpected death: A pre and post intervention study. Resuscitation, 84, 1192–1196.
24.
DowB. J.ConditC. M. (2005). The state of the art in feminist scholarship in communication. Journal of Communication, 55, 448–478.
25.
EndsleyM. R. (1995). Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors, 37, 32–64.
26.
FaircloughN. (2013). Language and power (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
27.
FarkasG. (2003). Cognitive skills and noncognitive traits and behaviors in stratification processes. Annual Review of Sociology, 29, 541–562.
28.
FerrareJ. J.HoraM. T. (2014). Cultural models of teaching and learning in math and science: Exploring the intersections of culture, cognition, and pedagogical situations. Journal of Higher Education, 85, 792–825.
29.
FoucaultM. (2002). Archaeology of knowledge. New York, NY: Routledge.
30.
GeeJ. P. (2004). Discourse analysis: What makes it critical? In RogersR. (Ed.), An introduction to critical discourse analysis in education (pp. 19–50). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
31.
GeeJ. P. (2014). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method (4th ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
32.
GeeJ. P.GreenJ. L. (1997). Discourse analysis, learning, and social practice: A methodological study. Review of Research in Education, 23, 119–169.
33.
GlaserB. G.StraussA. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Piscataway, NJ: AldineTransaction.
34.
GlenbergA. M. (2010). Embodiment as a unifying perspective for psychology. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 1, 586–596.
35.
GreenoJ. G. (1994). Gibson’s affordances. Psychological Review, 101, 336–342.
36.
GrubbW. N.LazersonM. (2005). Vocationalism in higher education: The triumph of the education gospel. Journal of Higher Education, 76, 1–25.
37.
HaigK. M.SuttonS.WhittingtonJ. (2006). SBAR: A shared mental model for improving communication between clinicians. Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, 32, 167–175.
38.
HeckmanJ. J.KautzT. (2012). Hard evidence on soft skills. Labour Economics, 19, 451–464.
39.
HenzeR.DavisK. A. (1999). Authenticity and identity: Lessons from indigenous language education. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 30, 3–21.
40.
HolmesL. (2013). Competing perspectives on graduate employability: Possession, position or process?Studies in Higher Education, 38, 538–554.
41.
HoraM. T.BenbowR.OlesonA. (2016). Beyond the skills gap: Educating college students for life and work. Boston, MA: Harvard Education Press.
42.
HoraM. T.BenbowR.SmolarekB. (2018). Re-thinking soft skills and student employability: A new paradigm for undergraduate education. Change, 50(6), 30–37.
43.
HutchinsE. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge: MIT Press.
44.
JacksonD. (2016). Re-conceptualising graduate employability: The importance of pre-professional identity. Higher Education Research & Development, 35, 925–939.
KedrowiczA. A. (2015). Clients and veterinarians as partners in problem solving during cancer management: Implications for veterinary education. Journal of Veterinary Medical education, 42, 373–381.
47.
KedrowiczA. A.TaylorJ. L. (2013). Engineering communication and the global workplace: Preparing professionals and global citizens. Connexions, 1, 81–105.
48.
KirchgaslerC. (2018). True grit? Making a scientific object and pedagogical tool. American Educational Research Journal, 55, 693–720.
49.
KressG. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication (1st ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
50.
LaveJ. (1988). Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics and culture in everyday practice. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
LizardoO. (2004). The cognitive origins of Bourdieu’s habitus. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 34(4), 375–401.
53.
MartinK. N.Housley GaffneyA. L.LeakA. E.NelsonJ.CervantesA. T.GardenerK. L.. . . ZwicklB. M. (2018). Spewing nonsense [or not]: Communication competence and socialization in optics and photonics workplaces. Communication Education, 67, 414–437.
54.
McDonaldJ. (2013). Conforming to and resisting dominant gender norms: How male and female nursing students do and undo gender. Gender, Work & Organization, 20, 561–579.
55.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M.SaldanaJ. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
56.
MillerC. R. (1984). Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70, 151–167.
57.
MoreauM.LeathwoodC. (2006). Graduates’ employment and the discourse of employability: A critical analysis. Journal of Education and Work, 19, 305–324.
58.
NathanM. J.EilamB.KimS. (2007). To disagree, we must also agree: How intersubjectivity structures and perpetuates discourse in a mathematics classroom. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16, 523–563.
59.
National Academies of Science, Engineering and Medicine. (2018). The integration of the humanities and arts with sciences, engineering, and medicine in higher education. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
60.
National Association of Colleges and Employers. (2017). Job outlook 2018. Bethlehem, PA: Author.
61.
NormanD. (1990). The design of everyday things. New York, NY: Doubleday Business.
62.
PalczewskiC. H.DeFranciscoV. P.McGeoughD. D. (Eds.). (2019). Gender in communication: A critical introduction (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
63.
PellegrinoJ. W.HiltonM. L. (Eds.). (2012). Education for life and work: Developing transferable knowledge and skills in the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
64.
QuinnN. (Ed.). (2005). Finding culture in talk: A collection of methods. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
65.
RuisA. R.RosserA. A.Quandt-WalleC.NathwaniJ. N.ShafferD. W.PughC. M. (2018). The hands and head of a surgeon: Modeling operative competency with multimodal epistemic network analysis. American Journal of Surgery, 216, 835–840.
66.
Savitz-RomerM.Rowan-KenyonH. T.FancsaliC. (2015). Social, emotional, and affective skills for college and career success. Change, 47(5), 18–27.
67.
ScottJ. (2017). Social network analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
68.
ShafferD. W.HatfieldD. L.SvarovskyG. N.NashP.NultyA.BagleyE.. . . MislevyR. (2009). Epistemic network analysis: A prototype for 21st century assessment of learning. International Journal of Learning and Media, 2, 1–21.
69.
ShoreB. (1998). Culture in mind: Cognition, culture, and the problem of meaning. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
70.
SpringJ. (2015). Economization of education: Human capital, global corporations, skills-based schooling. New York, NY: Routledge.
71.
StraussC.QuinnN. (1997). A cognitive theory of cultural meaning. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
72.
SwalesJ. M. (2009). World of genre: Metaphors of genre. In Charles BazermanA. B.FigueiredoD. (Eds.), Genre in a changing world (pp. 3–16). Fort Collins, CO: WAC Clearinghouse and Parlor Press.
73.
TomlinsonM. (2012). Graduate employability: A review of conceptual and empirical themes. Higher Education Policy, 25, 407–431.
74.
TymonA. (2013). The student perspective on employability. Studies in Higher Education, 38(6), 841–856.
75.
UrciuoliB. (2008). Skills and selves in the new workplace. American Ethnologist, 35, 211–228.
76.
VrchotaD. (2011). Communication in the disciplines: Interpersonal communication in dietetics. Communication Education, 60, 210–230.
77.
WellerS. C. (2007). Cultural consensus theory: Applications and frequently asked questions. Field Methods, 19, 339–368.
78.
WolffR.BoothM. (2017). Bridging the gap: Creating a new approach for assuring 21st century employability skills. Change, 49(6), 51–54.
79.
YinR. (2008). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
80.
YoderB. L. (2017). Engineering by the numbers. Washington, DC: American Society for Engineering Education.
