An extensive literature has investigated the link between living in an area with an academically selective schooling system and young people’s educational outcomes. In contrast, evidence on the link between selective education and young people’s wider outcomes is relatively sparse. This article uses rich survey data to test whether young people living in selective education areas in England have better academic, social, and emotional outcomes than their peers who live in nonselective areas. Results show that exposure to the selection process has limited impact upon young people’s socioemotional outcomes. We do find, however, that selective systems increase the socioeconomic gradient of educational aspirations, driven by divergence between those who do and do not gain entry to the selective track.
AhmavaaraA.HoustonD. M. (2007). The effects of selective schooling and self-concept on adolescents’ academic aspiration: An examination of Dweck’s self-theory. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 613–632.
AllenR.BurgessS.KeyT. (2010). Choosing secondary school by moving house: School quality and the formation of neighbourhoods (CMPO Working Paper No. 10/238). Bristol, England: University of Bristol.
5.
AndersJ. (2012). The link between household income, university applications and university attendance. Fiscal Studies, 33, 185–210.
AtkinsonA.GreggP.McConnellB. (2006). The result of 11 plus selection: An investigation into equity and efficiency of outcomes for pupils in selective LEAs (CMPO Working Paper No. 06/150). Bristol, England: University of Bristol.
8.
BallS. J. (1997). On the cusp. Parents choosing between state and private schools in the UK: Action within an economy of symbolic goods. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 1, 1-17.
9.
BealS. J.CrockettL. J. (2010). Adolescents’ occupational and educational aspirations and expectations: Links to high school activities and adult educational attainment. Developmental Psychology, 46, 258–265.
10.
BlessH.BurgerA. M. (2016). Assimilation and contrast in social priming. Current Opinion in Psychology, 12, 26–31.
11.
BlundellR.DeardenL.GoodmanA.ReedH. (2000). The returns to higher education in Britain: Evidence from a British cohort. Economic Journal, 110(461), 82–99.
12.
BoliverV.SwiftA. (2011). Do comprehensive schools reduce social mobility?British Journal of Sociology, 62, 89–110.
13.
BoltonP. (2015). Grammar school statistics (House of Common Library Briefing Paper No. 1398). London, England: House of Commons Library.
BrunelloG.ChecchiD. (2007). Does school tracking affect equality of opportunity? New international evidence. Economic Policy, 22, 782–861.
16.
BrunelloG.SchlotterM. (2011). Non-cognitive skills and personality traits: Labour market relevance and their development in education & training systems (IZA Discussion Paper No. 5743). Bonn, Germany: IZA.
17.
BuchmannC.ParkH. (2009). Stratification and the formation of expectations in highly differentiated educational systems. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility,27, 245–267.
18.
BurgessS.DicksonM.MacmillanL. (2014). Selective schooling systems increase inequality (CMPO Working Paper No. 14/323). Bristol, England: University of Bristol.
19.
ByrneG.GallagherT. (2004). Systemic factors in school improvement. Research Papers in Education, 19, 161–183.
20.
CardD. (1999). The causal effect of education on earnings. In AshenfelterO.CardD. (Eds.), Handbook of labor economics (Vol. 3, pp. 1801–1863). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
ChmielewskiA. K.DumontH.TrautweinU. (2013). Tracking effects depend upon tracking type. American Education Research Journal, 50, 925–957.
23.
ChowdryH.CrawfordC.GoodmanA. (2011). The role of attitudes and behaviours in explaining socio-economic differences in attainment at age 16. Longitudinal and Life Course Studies, 2, 59–76.
24.
ClarkD. (2010). Selective schools and academic achievement. BE Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 10(1), 1–38.
25.
CoeR.JonesK.SearleJ.KokotsakiD.KosninA.SkinnerP. (2008, October). Evidence on the effects of selective educational systems. London, England: Sutton Trust. Retrieved from https://www.gov.gg/CHttpHandler.ashx?id=97485&p=0
DuckworthA. L.YeagerD. S. (2015). Measurement matters: Assessing personal qualities other than cognitive ability for educational purposes. Educational Researcher, 44, 237–251.
29.
DupriezV.MonseurC.Van CampenhoudtM.LafontaineD. (2012). Social inequalities of post-secondary educational aspirations: Influence of social background, school composition and institutional context. European Educational Research Journal, 11, 504–519.
30.
FriedmanM.FriedmanR. (1980). Free to choose: A personal statement. New York, NY: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
31.
GallagherT.SmithA. (2000, September). The effects of the selective system of secondary education in Northern Ireland. Belfast, England: Department for Education Northern Ireland. Retrieved from http://cain.ulst.ac.uk/issues/education/selection/mainreport.pdf
GorardS. (2015). The uncertain future of comprehensive schooling in England. European Educational Research Journal, 14, 257–268.
34.
GorardS.SiddiquiN. (2018). Grammar schools in England: A new analysis of social segregation and academic outcomes. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 39, 1–16.
35.
GorardS.SmithE. (2004). An international comparison of equity in education systems. Comparative Education, 40, 15–28.
36.
GreggP.WashbrookE. (2011). The role of attitudes and behaviours in explaining socio-economic differences in attainment at age 11. Longitudinal and Life Course Studies, 2, 41–58.
GuyonN.MaurinE.McNallyS. (2012). The effect of tracking students by ability into different schools. A natural experiment. Journal of Human Resources, 47, 684–721.
39.
HanushekE.WossmannL. (2006). Does educational tracking affect performance and inequality? Differences-in-differences evidence across countries. Economic Journal, 116(510), 63–76.
40.
HigginsE. T.StangorC. (1988). A “change-of-standard” perspective on the relations among context, judgment, and memory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 181–192.
KraftM. A. (2017). Teacher effects on complex cognitive skills and social-emotional competencies. Journal of Human Resources. Advance online publication. doi:10.3368/jhr.54.1.0916.8265R3
45.
LanceL. (2011). Nonproduction benefits of education: Crime, health, and good citizenship. In HanushekE.MachinS.WoessmannL. (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of education (Vol. 4, pp. 183–282). Oxford, England: Elsevier.
46.
LeuvenE.SianesiB. (2003). PSMATCH2: Stata module to perform full Mahalanobis and propensity score matching, common support graphing, and covariate imbalance testing (Statistical Software Components S432001). Retrieved from https://ideas.repec.org/c/boc/bocode/s432001.html
47.
LynchK.BakerJ. (2005). Equality in education: An equality of condition perspective. Theory and Research in Education, 3, 131–164.
48.
MarshH. W.HauK. T. (2003). Big-fish–little-pond effect on academic self-concept: A cross-cultural (26-country) test of the negative effects of academically selective schools. American Psychologist, 58, 364–376.
49.
MarshH. W.KöllerO.BaumertJ. (2001). Reunification of East and West German school systems: Longitudinal multilevel modelling study of the big-fish-little-pond effect on academic self-concept. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 321–350.
50.
MarshH. W.KongC. K.HauK. T. (2000). Longitudinal multilevel models of the big-fish-little-pond effect on academic self-concept: Counterbalancing contrast and reflected-glory effects in Hong Kong schools. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 337–349.
51.
MarshH. W.SeatonM.TrautweinU.LüdtkeO.HauK. T.O’MaraA. J.CravenR. G. (2008). The big-fish–little-pond-effect stands up to critical scrutiny: Implications for theory, methodology, and future research. Educational Psychology Review, 20(3), 319–350.
52.
OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 results: What makes schools successful?Paris, France: OECD.
53.
PekkarinenT.UusitaloR.KerrS. (2009). School tracking and intergenerational income mobility: Evidence from the Finnish comprehensive school reform. Journal of Public Economics, 93, 965–973.
54.
PlewisI. (Ed). (2007). Millennium Cohort Study First Survey: Technical report on sampling (4th edition). London: Centre for Longitudinal Studies, Institute of Education.
55.
RemediosR.RitchieK.LiebermanD. A. (2005). I used to like it but now I don’t: The effect of the transfer test in Northern Ireland on pupils’ intrinsic motivation. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 435–452.
56.
Smith-WoolleyE.PingaultJ. B.SelzamS.RimfeldK.KrapohlE.von StummS.. . . KovasY. (2018). Differences in exam performance between pupils attending selective and non-selective schools mirror the genetic differences between them. NPJ Science of Learning, 3(1), 3.
57.
TaftR. (1957). A psychological model for the study of social assimilation. Human Relations, 10, 141–156.
58.
TrautweinU.LüdtkeO.MarshH. W.KöllerO.BaumertJ. (2006). Tracking, grading, and student motivation: Using group composition and status to predict self-concept and interest in ninth-grade mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 788–806.
59.
Van HoutteM.StevensP. A. (2009). Study involvement of academic and vocational students: Does between-school tracking sharpen the difference?American Educational Research Journal, 46, 943–973.
60.
VernonP. E. (2017). Secondary school selection: A British Psychological Society inquiry. New York, NY: Routledge.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
