Despite consensus regarding critical design elements for professional development (PD), numerous PD studies have not shown anticipated effects for teachers or students. Mixed methods studies investigating when and why PD is successful are needed. The qualitative study reported here was part of a larger, mixed methods study of PD for self-regulated strategy development (SRSD) in writing; the randomized controlled trial found significant and meaningful outcomes for teachers and students. In the current qualitative study, 14 Grades 2 and 3 teachers discussed semistructured, open-ended questions in small focus groups regarding their experiences with, reactions to, and evaluations of aspects and components of PD and SRSD. These teachers’ voices contribute to our understanding of critical aspects of effective PD as well as SRSD.
ApplebeeA. N.LangerJ. A. (2011). A snapshot of writing instruction in middle schools and high schools. English Journal, 100, 14–27.
2.
Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. (2002). Teaching students with learning disabilities in the regular classroom: Using learning strategies [DVD]. Alexandria, VA: Author.
3.
BallD. L.CohenD. K. (1999). Developing practice, developing practitioners: Toward a practice-based theory of professional education. In Darling-HammondL.SykesG. (Eds.), Teaching as a learning profession: Handbook for policy and practice (pp. 3–31). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
4.
BallD. L.ForzaniF. M. (2009). The work of teaching and the challenge for teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 60, 497–511.
5.
BorkoH. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 3–15.
6.
Boston Consulting Group. (2014). Teachers’ know best: Teachers’ views on professional development. Commissioned by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
7.
BrantlingerE.JimenezR.KlingnerJ.PugachM.RichardsonV. (2005). Qualitative studies in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 195–207. doi:10.1177/001440290507100205
8.
BrindleM.HarrisK. R.GrahamS.HebertM. (2016). Third and fourth grade teachers’ classroom practices in writing: A national survey. Reading & Writing: An International Journal, 9, 929–954.
9.
BrunsteinJ. C.GlaserC. (2011). Testing a path-analytic mediation model of how self-regulated writing strategies improve fourth graders’ composition skills: A randomized control trial. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, 922–938. doi:10.1037/a0024622
10.
Cochran-SmithM.& Boston College Evidence Team. (2009). “Re-culturing” teacher education: Inquiry, evidence, and action. Journal of Teacher Education, 60, 458–468.
11.
CorbinJ.StraussA. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques to developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12.
DesimoneL. M.GaretM.S. (2015). Best practices in teachers’ professional development in the United States. Psychology, Society, & Education, 7, 252–263.
13.
DesimoneL. M.StuckeyD. (2014). Sustaining teacher professional development. In MartinL.KraglerS.QuatrocheD.BausermanK. (Eds.), Handbook of professional development in education: Successful models and practices pre-K-12 (pp. 467–482). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
14.
DrewS. V.OlinghouseN. G.Faggella-LubyM.WelshM. (2017). Framework for disciplinary writing in science grades 6–12: A national survey. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109, 935–955.
15.
DunstC. J.BruderM. B.HambyD. W. (2015). Metasynthesis of in-service professional development research: Features associated with positive educator and student outcomes. Educational Research and Reviews, 10, 1731–1744.
16.
FestasI.OliveiraA.RebeloJ.DamiãoM.HarrisK. R.GrahamS. (2015). Professional development in self-regulated strategy development: Effects on the writing performance of eighth grade Portuguese students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 40, 17–27.
17.
FettermanD. M. (1989). Ethnography: Step by step (13th ed.). Newbury Park: CA: Sage.
18.
GallagherH. A.ArshanN.WoodworthK. (2017). Impact of the National Writing Project’s college-ready writers program in high-need rural districts. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 10, 570–595.
19.
GlaserB. G.StraussA. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
20.
GrahamS.BollingerA.OlsonC. B.D’AoustC.MacArthurC.McCutchenD.OlinghouseN. (2012). Teaching elementary school students to be effective writers: Educator’s practice guide. Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences.
21.
GrahamS.HarrisK. R.McKeownD. (2013). The writing of students with LD and a meta-analysis of SRSD writing intervention studies: Redux. In SwansonL.HarrisK. R.GrahamS. (Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (2nd ed., pp. 405–438). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
22.
GrahamS.PerinD. (2007). Writing next: Effective strategies to improve writing of adolescents in middle and high schools. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellence in Education.
23.
GrossmanP.McDonaldM. (2008). Back to the future: Directions for research in teaching and teacher education. American Educational Research Journal, 45, 184–205.
24.
GubaE. G. (1981). Criteria for assessing trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries. Educational Communication and Technology, 29, 75–91.
25.
HarrisK. R.GrahamS. (2017). Self-regulated strategy development: Theoretical bases, critical instructional elements, and future research. In FidalgoR.HarrisK. R.BraaksmaM. (Eds.), Design principles for teaching effective writing: Theoretical and empirical grounded principles (pp. 119–151). Leiden, the Netherlands: Brill.
26.
HarrisK. R.GrahamS.AdkinsM. (2015). Practice-based professional development and self-regulated strategy development for tier 2, at-risk writers in second grade. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 40, 5–16.
27.
HarrisK. R.GrahamS.MasonL.FriedlanderB. (2008). Powerful writing strategies for all students. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
28.
HarrisK. R.LaneK. L.DriscollS.GrahamS.WilsonK.SandmelK.BrindleM.SchatschneiderC. (2012). Tier 1, teacher-implemented self-regulated strategy development for students with and without behavioral challenges. Elementary School Journal, 113, 160–191.
29.
HarrisK. R.LaneK. L.GrahamS.DriscollS.SandmelK.BrindleM.SchatschneiderC. (2012). Practice-based professional development for self-regulated strategies development in writing: A randomized controlled study. Journal of Teacher Education, 63, 103–119.
30.
HillH. C.BeisiegelM.JacobR. (2013). Professional development research: Consensus, crossroads, and challenges. Educational Researcher, 42, 476–487.
31.
KoellnerK.JacobsJ. (2014). Distinguishing models of professional development: The case of an adaptive model’s impact on teachers’ knowledge, instruction, and student achievement. Journal of Teacher Education, 66, 51–67.
32.
KruegerR. A.CaseyM. A. (2015). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
33.
McKeownD.BrindleM.HarrisK. R.GrahamS.CollinsA.BrownM. (2016). Illuminating growth and struggles in elementary classrooms using mixed methods: Practice-based professional development and coaching for differentiating SRSD instruction in writing. Reading & Writing: An International Journal, 29, 1105–1140.
34.
National Academy of Education. (2009). Education policy white paper on teacher quality. Washington, DC: Author.
35.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2012). The nation’s report card: Writing 2011. (NCES 2012-470). Washington, DC: IES, U.S. Department of Education.
36.
OlsonC. B.MatuchniakT.ChungH. Q.StumpfR.FarkasG. (2017). Reducing achievement gaps in academic writing for Latinos and English learners in Grades 7–12. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109, 1–21.
37.
OnwuegbuzieA. J.LeechN. L.CollinsK. M. T. (2010). Innovative data collection strategies in qualitative research. Qualitative Report, 15, 696–726.
38.
PowellD. R.DiamondK. E. (2011). Improving the outcomes of coaching-based professional development interventions. In NuemanS. B.DickinsonD. K. (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (Vol. 3, pp. 295–307). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
39.
RussR. S.SherinB. L.SherinM. G. (2016). What constitutes teacher learning? In GitomerD. H.BellC. A. (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching (5th ed., pp. 391–438). American Educational Research Association.
SpradleyJ. P. (1979). The ethnographic interview. Orlando, FL: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.
42.
TaylorJ. A.GettyS. R.KowalskiS. M.WilsonC. D.CarlsonJ.Van ScotterP. (2015). An efficacy trial of research-based curriculum materials with curriculum-based professional development. American Educational Research Journal, 52, 984–1017.
43.
The New Teacher Project (TNTP). (2015). The mirage: Confronting the hard truth about our quest for teacher development. New York, NY: Author.
44.
VaughnS.SchummJ. S.SinagubJ. (1996). Focus group interviews in education and psychology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
