The purpose of this qualitative study was to gain insights from educational leaders who had participated in a larger study and received extensive practice-based professional development on an evidence-based practice, self-regulated strategy development for informative writing. The participants also previously implemented the self-regulated strategy development strategies with elementary students with high incidence disabilities during a summer tutoring program. The current study included one-on-one video conferencing interviews with six educational leaders: a principal, a complex area specialist, three complex area coaches, and a student services coordinator about their reported impact of the practice-based professional development on implementation of self-regulated strategy development during a regular school year given their current job descriptions. Open coding of the transcripts resulted in five descriptive codes detailing the participants’ intention for enrolling, application of self-regulated strategy development, additional supports, barriers, and the impact of the evidence-based practice. Implications discussed include post-intervention supports needed to help educational leaders guide the sustained implementation of an evidence-based practice for writing instruction.
BakerS. K.ChardD. J.Ketterlin-GellerL. R.ApichatabutraC.DoablerC. (2009). Teaching writing to at-risk students: The quality of evidence for self-regulated strategy development. Exceptional Children, 75(3), 303–318. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290907500303
2.
BallD.CohenD. (1999). Developing practice, developing practitioners: Toward a practice-based theory of professional education. In Darling-HammondL.SykesG. (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook pf policy and practice (pp. 3–32). Jossey-Bass.
3.
BishopJ.Darling-HammondL.JaquithA.Learning Policy Institute & Stanford Center for Opportunity Policy in Education (SCOPE). (2015). Maximizing the use of new state professional learning investments to support student, educator, and school system growth. Executive Summary. In Learning policy institute. Learning Policy Institute.
BrindleM.GrahamS.HarrisK. R.HebertM. (2016). Third and fourth grade teacher’s classroom practices in writing: A national survey. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 29(5), 929–954. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9604-x
6.
CookB. G.OdomS. L. (2013). Evidence-based practices and implementation science in special education. Exceptional Children, 79(3), 135–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440291307900201
7.
CreswellJ. W.CreswellJ. D. (2018). Research design (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
8.
CreswellJ. W.PothC. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage.
9.
Darling-HammondL.HylerM. E.GardnerM. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. In Learning policy institute. Learning Policy Institute. https://doi.org/10.54300/122.311
10.
DunstC. J.BruderM. B.HambyD. W. (2015). Metasynthesis of in-service professional development research: Features associated with positive educator and student outcomes. Educational Research and Reviews, 10(12), 1731–1744. https://doi.org/10.5897/err2015.2306
11.
FixsenD. L.BlaséK. A.NaoomS. F.WallaceF. (2009). Core implementation components. Research on Social Work Practice, 19(5), 531–540. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731509335549
12.
Fletcher-WoodH.ZuccolloJ. (2020). The effects of high-quality professional development on teachers and students: A rapid review and meta-analysis. The Education Policy Institute. https://hdl.voced.edu.au/10707/531978
13.
GilbertJ.GrahamS. (2010). Teaching writing to elementary students in grades 4-6: A national survey. The Elementary School Journal, 110(4), 494–518. https://doi.org/10.1086/651193
14.
Gillespie RouseA.KiuharaS. A.KaraY. (2021). Writing-to-learn in elementary classrooms: A national survey of U.S. Teachers. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 34(9), 2381–2415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-021-10148-3
15.
GlesneC. (2016). Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction (5th ed.). Pearson.
16.
GoldschmidtP.PhelpsG. (2010). Does teacher professional development affect content and pedagogical knowledge: How much and for how long?Economics of Education Review, 29(3), 432–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2009.10.002
17.
GrahamS.HarrisK. R. (2018). An examination of the design principles underlying a self-regulated strategy development study. Journal of Writing Research, 10(2), 139–187. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2018.10.02.02
18.
GrahamS.PerinD. (2007). What we know, what we still need to know: Teaching adolescents to write. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11(4), 313–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888430701530664
19.
HarrisK.GrahamS.AdkinsM. (2015). Practice-based professional development and self-regulated strategy development for tier 2, at-risk writers in second grade. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 40(5), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.02.003
20.
HarrisK. R.GrahamS. (2018). Self-regulated strategy development: Theoretical bases, critical instructional elements, and future research. In FidalgoR.OliveT.FidalgoR.BraaksmaK. R. M. (Vol. Eds.) Studies in Writing Series: Vol. 34. Design principles for teaching effective writing (p. 119-151). Brill.
21.
HarrisK. R.LaneK. L.GrahamS.DriscollS. A.SandmelK.BrindleM.SchatschneiderC. (2012). Practice-based professional development for self-regulated strategies development in writing: A randomized controlled study. Journal of Teacher Education, 63(2), 103–119. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487111429005
22.
KretlowA. G.BartholomewC. C. (2010). Using coaching to improve the fidelity of evidence-based practices: A review of studies. Teacher Education and Special Education, 33(4), 279–299. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406410371643
McKeownD.BrindleM.HarrisK. R.GrahamS.CollinsA. A.BrownM. (2016). Illuminating growth and struggles using mixed methods: Practice-based professional development and coaching for differentiating srsd instruction in writing. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 29(6), 1105–1140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-016-9627-y
25.
McKeownD.BrindleM.HarrisK. R.SandmelK.SteinbrecherT. D.GrahamS.LaneK. L.OakesW. P. (2019). Teachers’ voices: Perceptions of effective professional development and classwide implementation of self-regulated strategy development in writing. American Educational Research Journal, 56(3), 753–791. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831218804146
26.
McKeownD.FitzPatrickE.SandmelK. (2014). SRSD in practice: Creating a professional development experience for teachers to meet the writing needs of students with EBD. Behavioral Disorders, 40(1), 15–25. https://doi.org/10.17988/0198-7429-40.1.15
27.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.
28.
National Policy Board for Educational Administration. (2015). Professional standards for educational leaders 2015. National Policy Board for Educational Administration.
29.
OlsonJ. D.McAllisterC.GrinnellL. D.WaltersK. G.AppunnF. (2016). Applying constant comparative methods with multiple investigators and intercoder reliability. Qualitative Report, 21(1), 26–42.
30.
RayAmber B.ConnorKate E. (In Press). Online PBPD and SRSD Writing Instruction for Elementary Students with High-Incidence Disabilities. Writing & Pedagogy, 16(1).
31.
RichardsK. A. R.HemphillM. A. (2018). A practical guide to collaborative qualitative data analysis. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 37(2), 225–231. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.2017-0084
32.
SaldañaJ. (2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (4th ed.). Sage Publications Ltd.
33.
StockardJ. (2020). The impact of administrative decisions on implementation fidelity of direct instruction and student achievement. Learning Disability Quarterly, 43(1), 18–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948719830346
WienerR.PimentelS.Aspen InstituteE. & S. P. (2017). Practice what you teach: Connecting curriculum & professional learning in schools. In Aspen institute. Aspen Institute.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
