In 2008, the Council of Australian governments (COAG) agreed to a set of reforms focused on teacher quality. These reforms aim to make teaching a more attractive career, lift the quality of teacher training, retain and reward quality teachers, promote effective professional learning and support workforce mobility. Australia has made several attempts to develop a system for identifying and rewarding accomplished teachers, as a means of furthering such reforms. This paper traces efforts from the 1970s to strengthen the role of the profession in developing a system of professional certification and outlines some issues that will need to be dealt with if such a system is to gain professional support and meet the aims of the COAG reforms.
Allen Consulting Group. (2004). National Institute for Quality Teaching and School Leadership: Implementation strategy report: Report to the Australian Government Department of Education, Science and Training, Canberra. Retrieved 11 January 2010 from http://www.allenconsult.com.au/publications/download.php?id=293&type=pdf&file=1
2.
Australian College of Educators. (2000). Standards of professional practice for accomplished teaching in Australian classrooms: A national discussion paper. Canberra: Author.
BishopA.ClarkeB.MoronyW. (2006). Professional learning using the mathematics standards. Canberra: Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership.
BrophyJ. (1991). Advances in research on teaching: Teachers' knowledge of subject matter as it relates to their teaching practice. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
7.
BurrowS. (1996). Award restructuring: The teaching profession. In SeddonT. (Ed.), Pay, professionalism and politics: Reforming teachers reforming education (Australian Education Review No. 37) (pp. 87–115). Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.
8.
Business Council of Australia. (2008). Teaching talent: The best teachers for Australia's classrooms. Melbourne: Author.
9.
Center for Policy Research in Education/Strategic Management of Human Capital. (2009). Taking human capital seriously: Talented teachers in every classroom, talented principals in every school. Principles and recommendations for the strategic management of human capital in public education. Center for Policy Research in Education, University of Wisconsin. Retrieved 11 January 2010 from http://www.smhc-cpre.org/resources/
10.
ConnellyG.McMahonM. (2007). Chartered teacher: Accrediting professionalism for Scotland's teachers—a view from the inside. Journal of In-service Education, 33(1), 91–105.
CrowleyR.C. (1998). A class act: Inquiry into the status of the teaching profession. Canberra: Report from the Senate Employment, Workplace Relations, Small Business, and Education Reference Committee.
13.
DarlingJ. (1959, November 20). [Address at the inauguration of the South Australian chapter of the Australian College of Education.] Copy in possession of Australian College of Educators.
14.
Darling-HammondL. (1989). Accountability for professional practice. Teachers College Press, 91, 59–80.
15.
Department of Education and Early Childhood Development. (2009). Rewarding teacher excellence: Blueprint implementation paper. Melbourne: Author.
16.
Department of Education, Science and Training. (2003). Australia's teachers: Australia's future. Canberra: Author.
17.
DinhamS.IngvarsonL.KleinhenzE. (2008). Investing in teacher quality: Doing what matters most. InTeaching talent: The best teachers for Australia's classrooms. Business Council of Australia. Retrieved 11 January from http://www.bca.com.au/Content/101446.aspx
18.
DinhamS.ScottC. (1997). The advanced skills teacher: An opportunity missed?Unicorn, 23(3), pp. 36–49.
19.
EwingM. (2001). An evaluation of the assessment processes used to select Level 3 classroom teachers in Western Australia government schools. Perth: Department of Education and University of Western Australia.
20.
GillM. (1999). If we don't do it, someone else will…English in Australia, 124, 70–75.
21.
GitomerD. (2008). Reliability and NBPTS assessments. In IngvarsonL.C.HattieJ. (Eds.), Assessing teachers for professional certification: The first decade of the National Board for Professional Teaching Standards: Vol. 11. Advances in program evaluation (pp. 231–253). Amsterdam: Elsevier Press.
22.
HayesT. (2006). Professional teaching associations and professional standards: Embedding standards in the ‘discourse of the profession‘. Canberra: Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership.
23.
HillH.RowanB.BallD. (2005). Effects of teachers' mathematical knowledge for teaching on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 42(2), 371–406.
24.
IngvarsonL.C. (1995). Professional credentials: Standards for primary and secondary science teaching in Australia. Canberra: Australian Science Teachers Association.
25.
IngvarsonL.C. (2009a). Identifying and rewarding excellent teachers: The Scottish chartered teacher scheme. Professional Development in Education, 35(3), 451–468.
26.
IngvarsonL.C. (2009b). National curriculum and national professional teaching standards: Potentially a powerful partnership. Melbourne: Centre for Strategic Education.
27.
IngvarsonL.C.ChadbourneR. (1997). Reforming teachers' pay systems: The advanced skills teacher in Australia. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 11(1), 7–30.
28.
IngvarsonL.C.HattieJ. (Eds.). (2008). Assessing teachers for professional certification: The first decade of the National Board for Professional Teaching Standards: Vol. 11. Advances in program evaluation. Amsterdam: Elsevier Press.
29.
IngvarsonL.C.KleinhenzE. (2006). Advanced teaching standards and certification: A review of national and international developments. Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership. Retrieved from http://www.teachingaustralia.edu.au/ta/go/home/op/edit/pid/301
30.
IngvarsonL.C.KleinhenzE.WilkinsonJ. (2008). Research on performance pay for teachers. Melbourne: ACER Press.
31.
IngvarsonL.C.RoweK. (2008). Conceptualising and evaluating teacher quality: Substantive and methodological issues. Australian Journal of Education, 52(1), 5–35.
32.
IngvarsonL.C.WrightJ. (1999). Science teachers are developing their own standards. Australian Science Teachers Journal, 45(4), 27–34.
33.
JohnsonS.M.PapayJ.P. (2009). Redesigning teacher pay: A system for the next generation of educators. EPI Series on Alternative Teacher Compensation Systems, No. 2. Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.
34.
KarmelP. (Chair) (1973). Schools in Australia: Report of the Interim Committee of the Australian Schools Commission. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.
35.
LeithwoodK.LouisK.S.AndersonS.WahlstromK. (2004). How leadership influences student learning: A review of research for the Learning from Leadership project. New York: Wallace Foundation.
36.
McCaffreyD.LockwoodJ.R.KoretzD.M.HamiltonL.S. (2003). Evaluating value-added models for teacher accountability. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.
37.
McCullaN.DinhamS.ScottC. (2007). Stepping out from the crowd: Some findings from the NSW quality teaching awards on seeking recognition for professional accomplishment. Unicorn, 51, 3–32.
38.
McMahonM.ReevesJ. (2008, September). Identifying and rewarding accomplished teachers: Evaluating impact. Paper presented at the European Conference on Educational Research, Gothenberg.
39.
MilanowskiA.T.HenemanH.G.KimballS.M. (2009). Review of teaching performance assessments for use in human capital management. Consortium for Policy Research in Education, Wisconsin Center for Education Research, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
40.
Ministerial Council for Education, Employment and Training and Youth Affairs. (2003). A national framework for professional standards of teaching. Melbourne: Author.
41.
Ministerial Council for Education, Employment and Training and Youth Affairs. (2008). Melbourne declaration on educational goals for young Australians. Melbourne: Author.
MoronyW. (2009). Effective teaching of mathematics by teachers, for teachers: An Australian case study. In CaiJ.KaiserG.PerryB.WongN.-Y. (Eds.), Effective mathematics teaching from teachers' perspectives: National and cross-national studies (pp. 259–280). Rotterdam: Sense.
44.
MurnaneR.J.CohenD. (1986). Merit pay and the evaluation problem: Why most merit pay plans fail and few survive. Harvard Education Review, 56, 1–17.
National Board of Employment, Education and Training. (1990a). Australia's teachers: An agenda for the next decade. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.
47.
National Board of Employment, Education and Training. (1990b). Teacher quality. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.
48.
National Board of Employment, Education and Training. (1991). A National professional body for teachers: A discussion paper. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.
49.
National Research Council. (2008). Assessing accomplished teaching: Advanced level certification programs. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
50.
OddenA.WallaceM. (2007). Rewarding teacher excellence: A teacher compensation handbook for state and local policymakers. Madison, WI: Wisconsin Center for Education Research, University of Wisconsin—Madison.
51.
Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development. (2005). Teachers matter: Attracting, developing and retaining effective teachers. Paris: Author.
52.
RamseyG. (2002). Quality matters. Revitalising teaching: critical times, critical choices. Report of the review of teacher education. Sydney: New South Wales Department of Education.
53.
ReevesJ. (2007). Inventing the chartered teacher. British Journal of Educational Studies, 55(1), 56–76.
54.
RobinsonV.TimperleyH. (2007). The leadership of the improvement of teaching and learning: Lessons from initiatives with positive outcomes for students. Australian Journal of Education, 51(3), 247–62.
55.
RothsteinJ. (2009). Teacher quality in educational production: Tracking, decay and student achievement. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 14442. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
56.
Scottish Executive Education Department. (2001). A teaching profession for the 21st century: The agreement following the recommendations of the McCrone Report. Edinburgh: Author.
ScrivenM. (1994). Using the duties-based approach to teacher evaluation. In IngvarsonL.C.ChadbourneR. (Eds.), Valuing teachers' work: New directions in teacher appraisal (pp. 70–95). Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.
59.
SempleA.IngvarsonL.C. (2006, August). How can professional standards improve the quality of teaching and learning science? Paper presented at ACER Research Conference, Boosting science learning: What will it take? Retrieved 11 January 2010 from http://www.acer.edu.au/research_conferences/2006.html
60.
ShulmanL. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22.
StrikeK.A. (1990). The ethics of educational evaluation. In MillmanJ.Darling-HammondL. (Eds.), The new handbook of teacher evaluation (pp. 356–373). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
63.
Teaching Australia. (March, 2009). Standards for accomplished teachers and principals: A foundation for public confidence and respect. Canberra: Author.
64.
WatkinsP. (1994). Advanced skills teachers: Progress and problems in their establishment in Australia. International Journal of Educational Management, 8(4), 5–10.
