Families in deindustrialized cities with high crime rates report prioritizing school safety when opting for charter schools. Yet, very little research has investigated whether charter schools are safer than traditional public schools. This study compares charter and traditional public schools in Detroit, Michigan, on perceived school safety by linking student surveys to data on school, neighborhood, and parent-related characteristics. Charter schools exhibited higher perceived school safety than traditional public schools. However, controls for student commute distance and parental involvement largely diminished this difference. Neighborhood charter schools were an exception, maintaining higher perceived school safety net of controls. Overall results suggest that differences in perceived school safety between schools become less prominent after the attributes of school choosers are considered.
AngristJ. D.PathakP. A.WaltersC. R. (2013). Explaining charter school effectiveness. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 5(4), 1–27.
2.
ArsenD.NiY. (2012). The effects of charter school competition on school district resource allocation. Educational Administration Quarterly, 48(1), 3–38.
3.
AstorR. A.GuerraN.Van AckerR. (2010). How can we improve school safety research?Educational Researcher, 39(1), 69–78.
4.
BauchP. A.GoldringE. B. (1995). Parent involvement and school responsiveness: Facilitating the home-school connection in schools of choice. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 17(1), 1–21.
5.
BellC. (2009). Geography in parental choice. American Journal of Education, 115(4), 493–521.
6.
BerendsM. (2015). Sociology and school choice: What we know after two decades of charter schools. Annual Review of Sociology, 41, 159–180.
7.
BerendsM.SpringerM. G.BallouD.WalbergH. J. (Eds.). (2009). Handbook of research on school choice. New York, NY: Routledge.
8.
BettsJ. R.TangY. E. (2014). A meta-analysis of the literature on the effect of charter schools on student achievement. Seattle, WA: National Charter School Research Project, Center on Reinventing Public Education, University of Washington Bothell.
9.
BettingerE. P. (2005). The effect of charter schools on charter students and public schools. Economics of Education Review, 24(2), 133–147.
10.
BettisP. J. (1994). Deindustrialization and urban schools: Some theoretical considerations. The Urban Review, 26(2), 75–94.
11.
BifulcoR.LaddH. F. (2006a). The impacts of charter schools on student achievement: Evidence from North Carolina. Education Finance and Policy, 1(1), 50–90.
12.
BifulcoR.LaddH. F. (2006b). Institutional change and coproduction of public services: The effect of charter schools on parental involvement. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(4), 553–576.
13.
BrykA. S.SebringP. B.AllensworthE.EastonJ. Q.LuppescuS. (2010). Organizing schools for improvement: Lessons from Chicago. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
14.
BuckleyJ.SchneiderM. (2005). Are charter school students harder to educate? Evidence from Washington, DC. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 27(4), 365–380.
15.
BuckleyJ.SchneiderM. (2009). Charter schools: Hope or hype?Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
16.
BuddeR. (1988). Education by charter: Restructuring school districts: Key to long-term continuing improvement in American education. Andover, MA: Regional Laboratory for Educational Improvement of the Northeast & Islands.
17.
BurasK. (2011). Race, charter schools, and conscious capitalism: On the spatial politics of Whiteness as property (and the unconscionable assault on Black New Orleans). Harvard Educational Review, 81(2), 296–331.
18.
Burdick-WillJ.KeelsM.SchubleT. (2013). Closing and opening schools: The association between neighborhood characteristics and the location of new educational opportunities in a large urban district. Journal of Urban Affairs, 35(1), 59–80.
19.
BynumT. S.McCluskeyJ. D. (2007). Strategic Approaches to Community Safety Initiative (SACSI): Detroit, Michigan. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University, School of Criminal Justice.
20.
Center for Educational Performance and Information. (2014). Where Detroit residents attend school, fall 2014–2015. Lansing, MI: Michigan Department of Education.
21.
Center for Research on Education Outcomes. (2013). Charter School Performance in Michigan. Palo Alto, CA: Author.
CornellD. G.MayerM. J. (2010). Why do school order and safety matter?Educational Researcher, 39(1), 7–15.
24.
CowenJ. (2010). Who chooses, who refuses? Learning more from students who decline private school vouchers. American Journal of Education, 117(1), 1–24.
25.
CucchiaraM. (2013). Marketing schools, marketing cities: Who wins and who loses when schools become urban amenities. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
26.
Data Driven Detroit. (2014a). Student daily commute distance for Detroit schools. Detroit, MI: Author.
DauterL.FullerB. (2016). Student movement in social context the influence of time, peers, and place. American Educational Research Journal, 53(1), 33–70.
29.
DaviesS.AuriniJ. (2011). Exploring school choice in Canada: Who chooses what and why?Canadian Public Policy, 37(4), 459–477.
30.
DavisT.OakleyD. (2013). Linking charter school emergence to urban revitalization and gentrification: A socio-spatial analysis of three cities. Journal of Urban Affairs, 35(1), 81–102.
DobbieW.FryerR. G. (2011). Are high-quality schools enough to increase achievement among the poor? Evidence from the Harlem Children’s Zone. American Economic Journal, 3(3), 158–187.
36.
EatonD. K.KannL.KinchenS.ShanklinS.FlintK. H.HawkinsJ., … Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2012). Youth risk behavior surveillance—United States, 2011. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. Surveillance Summaries, 61(4), 1–162.
37.
FlemingD. J.CowenJ. M.WitteJ. F.WolfP. J. (2015). Similar students, different choices: Who uses a school voucher in an otherwise similar population of students?. Education and Urban Society, 47(7).
38.
FriedmanB. A.BobrowskiP. E.GeraciJ. (2006). Parents’ school satisfaction: Ethnic similarities and differences. Journal of Educational Administration, 44(5), 471–486.
39.
FullerB. (2009). Inside charter schools: The paradox of radical decentralization. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
40.
GoldringE. B.PhillipsK. J. (2008). Parent preferences and parent choices: The public-private decision about school choice. Journal of Education Policy, 23(3), 209–230.
GulosinoC. A.LubienskiC. (2011). Schools’ strategic responses to competition in segregated urban areas: Patterns in school locations in Metropolitan Detroit. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 19(13).
43.
HammerP. (2011). The fate of the Detroit public schools: Governance, finance and competition. Journal of Law in Society, 13(1), 111–143.
44.
HansonT. L.AustinG.Lee-BayhaJ. (2004). Ensuring that no child is left behind. How are student health risks & resilience related to the academic progress of schools? (WestED NJ3). Retrieved from http://surveydata.wested.org/resources/EnsuringNCLB.pdf
45.
HansonT. L.VoightA. (2014). The appropriateness of a California student and staff survey for measuring middle school climate. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED546900.pdf
46.
HardingD. J. (2009). Collateral consequences of violence in disadvantaged neighborhoods. Social Forces, 88(2), 757–784.
47.
HaynesK. T.PhillipsK. J.GoldringE. B. (2010). Latino parents’ choice of magnet school: How school choice differs across racial and ethnic boundaries. Education and Urban Society, 42(6), 758–789.
48.
HessF. (2001). Whaddaya mean you want to close my school? The politics of regulatory accountability in charter schooling. Education and Urban Society, 33(2), 141–156.
49.
HoffD. J. (2006). Law’s “persistently dangerous” tag weighed. Education Week, 26(10), 24.
50.
HornJ. G.MironG. (1999). Evaluation of the Michigan public school academy initiative. Kalamazoo, MI: Evaluation Center, Western Michigan University.
51.
HowellW. G. (2004). Dynamic selection effects in means-tested, urban school voucher programs. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 23(2), 225–250.
52.
HoxbyC.MurarkaS. (2008). Methods for assessing achievement of students in charter schools. In BerendsM.SpringerM. G.WalbergH. J. (Eds.), Charter school outcomes (pp. 7–37). New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
JabbarH. (2015). Competitive networks and school leaders’ perceptions: The formation of an education marketplace in post-Katrina New Orleans. American Educational Research Journal, 52(6), 1093–1131.
55.
JacobsN. (2013). Understanding school choice: Location as a determinant of charter school racial, economic, and linguistic segregation. Education and Urban Society, 45(4), 459–482.
56.
JeynesW. (2012). A meta-analysis of the efficacy of different types of parental involvement programs for urban students. Urban Education, 47(4), 706–742.
57.
JohnsonS. L. (2009). Improving the school environment to reduce school violence: A review of the literature. Journal of School Health, 79(10), 451–465.
58.
JonesV. C.BradshawC. P.HaynieD. L.Simons-MortonB. G.GielenA. C.ChengT. L. (2009). A glimpse into urban middle schools on probation for “persistently dangerous” status: Identifying malleable predictors of fighting. Journal of School Violence, 8(4), 284–300.
KirkD. S.SampsonR. J. (2011). Crime and the production of safe schools. In DuncanG. J.MurnaneR. J. (Eds.), Whither opportunity? Rising inequality, schools, and children’s life chances (pp. 397–418). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation Press.
61.
KutsyurubaB.KlingerD. A.HussainA. (2015). Relationships among school climate, school safety, and student achievement and well-being: A review of the literature. Review of Education, 3(2), 103–135.
62.
Lacireno-PaquetN.HolyokeT. T.MoserM.HenigJ. R. (2002). Creaming versus cropping: Charter school enrollment practices in response to market incentives. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(2), 145–158.
63.
LacoeJ. R. (2015). Unequally safe the race gap in school safety. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 13(2), 143–168.
LeventhalT.Brooks-GunnJ. (2004). A randomized study of neighborhood effects on low-income children’s educational outcomes. Developmental Psychology, 40(4), 488–507.
66.
LindleJ. C. (2008). School safety: Real or imagined fear?Educational Policy, 22(1), 28–44.
67.
LubienskiC.LubienskiS. T. (2013). The public school advantage: Why public schools outperform private schools. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
68.
LubienskiC.WeitzelP. C. (Eds.). (2010). The charter school experiment: Expectations, evidence, and implications. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
69.
LubienskiC.LeeJ. (2016). Competitive incentives and the education market: How charter schools define themselves in metropolitan Detroit. Peabody Journal of Education, 91(1), 64–80.
70.
MagnusonK.DuncanG. J.LeeK. T.MetzgerM. W. (2016). Early school adjustment and educational attainment. American Educational Research Journal, 53(4), 1198–1228.
71.
MarantoR.RitterG. (2014). Why KIPP is not corporate: KIPP and social justice. Journal of School Choice, 8(2), 237–257.
72.
MayD. C.DunawayR. G. (2000). Predictors of fear of criminal victimization at school among adolescents. Sociological Spectrum, 20(2), 149–168.
MirelJ. (2009). The rise and fall of an urban school system: Detroit, 1907–81. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
75.
MironG. (2010). Public charter schools. In WelnerK. G. (Ed.), Think tank research quality: Lessons for policymakers, the media, and the public (pp. 165–178). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
76.
MironG.NelsonC. (2002). What’s public about charter schools?: Lessons learned about choice and accountability. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
77.
MowenT.BrentJ.KupchikA. (2016). School crime and safety. In HuebnerB. M.BynumT. S. (Eds.), The handbook of measurement issues in criminology and criminal justice (pp. 434–451). New York, NY: John Wiley.
78.
National Alliance for Public Charter Schools. (2014). Estimated number of public charter schools and students 2013–2014. Retrieved from http://www.publiccharters.org/
79.
NeimanS.HillM. R. (2011). Crime, violence, discipline, and safety in US public schools: Findings from the school survey on crime and safety, 2009–2010. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
80.
NiY. (2009). The impact of charter schools on the efficiency of traditional public schools: Evidence from Michigan. Economics of Education Review, 28(5), 571–584.
81.
OzerE. J.WeinsteinR. S. (2004). Urban adolescents’ exposure to community violence: The role of support, school safety, and social constraints in a school-based sample of boys and girls. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 33(3), 463–476.
82.
PrestonC.GoldringE.BerendsM.CannataM. (2012). School innovation in district context: Comparing traditional public schools and charter schools. Economics of Education Review, 31(2), 318–330.
83.
RaleighE.GalsterG. (2015). Neighborhood disinvestment, abandonment, and crime dynamics. Journal of Urban Affairs, 37(4), 367–396.
84.
RenzulliL. A.EvansL. (2005). School choice, charter schools, and White flight. Social Problems, 52(3), 398–418.
85.
RipskiM. B.GregoryA. (2009). Unfair, unsafe, and unwelcome: Do high school students’ perceptions of unfairness, hostility, and victimization in school predict engagement and achievement?Journal of School Violence, 8(4), 355–375.
86.
RitterG.JensenN.KisidaB.McGeeJ. B. (2010). A closer look at charter schools and segregation. Education Next, 10(3).
87.
RoseB. A.SteinM. L. (2014). Mechanisms for teacher outreach to parents in charter and traditional public schools. Journal of School Choice, 8(4), 589–617.
88.
SampsonR. J. (2012a). Great American city: Chicago and the enduring neighborhood effect. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
89.
SampsonR. J. (2012b). Neighborhood inequality, violence, and the social infrastructure of the American city. In TateW. F. (Ed.), Research on schools, neighborhoods, and communities: Toward civic responsibility (pp. 11–28). Lanham, MD: Rowan & Littlefield Publishers.
90.
SchlossbergM.GreeneJ.PhillipsP. P.JohnsonB.ParkerB. (2006). School trips: Effects of urban form and distance on travel mode. Journal of the American Planning Association, 72(3), 337–346.
91.
SchneiderM.TeskeP.MarschallM. (2000). Consumer choice and the quality of American schools. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
92.
SchreckC. J.MillerJ. M. (2003). Sources of fear of crime at school: What is the relative contribution of disorder, individual characteristics, and school security?Journal of School Violence, 2(4), 57–79.
93.
SebringP. B.AllensworthE.BrykA. S.EastonJ. Q.LuppescuS. (2006). The essential supports for school improvement. Chicago, IL: Consortium on Chicago School Research, University of Chicago.
94.
SheldonS. B.EpsteinJ. L. (2002). Improving student behavior and school discipline with family and community involvement. Education and Urban Society, 35(1), 4–26.
95.
ShoberA. F.MannaP.WitteJ. F. (2006). Flexibility meets accountability: State charter school laws and their influence on the formation of charter schools in the United States. Policy Studies Journal, 34(4), 563–587.
96.
SkibaR. J.RauschM. K. (2006). Zero Tolerance, Suspension, and Expulsion: Questions of Equity and Effectiveness. In EvertsonC.M.WeinsteinC.S. (Eds.), Handbook for Classroom Management: Research, Practice, and Contemporary Issues (pp. 1063–89). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
97.
SkibaR.SimmonsA. B.PetersonR.FordeS. (2006). The SRS safe school survey: A broader perspective on school violence prevention. In JimersonS. R.FurlongM. J. (Eds.), Handbook of school violence and school safety: From research to practice (pp. 157–170). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
98.
SmithJ.WohlstetterP.KuzinC. A.De PedroK. (2011). Parent involvement in urban charter schools: New strategies for increasing participation. School Community Journal, 21(1), 71–94.
99.
SolomonL. D. (2014). Detroit: Three pathways to revitalization. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
100.
SteinbergM. P.AllensworthE.JohnsonD. W. (2011). Student and teacher safety in Chicago Public Schools: The roles of community context and school social organization. Chicago, IL: Consortium on Chicago School Research.
SugrueT. J. (2014). The origins of the urban crisis: Race and inequality in postwar Detroit. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
103.
TannerC. K. (2000). The influence of school architecture on academic achievement. Journal of Educational Administration, 38(4), 309–330.
104.
TeskeP.SchneiderM.BuckleyJ.ClarkS. (2000). Does charter school competition improve traditional public schools? (Civic Report No. 10). New York, NY: Center for Civic Education at the Manhattan Institute.
105.
TuttleC. C.GleasonP.ClarkM. (2012). Using lotteries to evaluate schools of choice: Evidence from a national study of charter schools. Economics of Education Review, 31(2), 237–253.
106.
TuzzoloE.HewittD. T. (2006). Rebuilding inequity: The re-emergence of the school-to-prison pipeline in New Orleans. The High School Journal, 90(2), 59–68.
U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2015). The condition of education 2015 (NCES 2015-144), charter school enrollment. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator_cgb.asp
111.
VoightA.AustinG.HansonT. (2013). A climate for academic success: How school climate distinguishes schools that are beating the achievement odds. Sacramento, CA: California Comprehensive Center WestEd.
112.
WhitlockJ. L. (2006). Youth perceptions of life at school: Contextual correlates of school connectedness in adolescence. Applied Developmental Science, 10(1), 13–29.
113.
WhitmanD. (2008). Sweating the small stuff: Inner-city schools and the new paternalism. Washington, DC: Thomas B. Fordham Foundation & Institute.
114.
WiebeD. J.GuoW.AllisonP. D.AndersonE.RichmondT. S.BranasC. C. (2013). Fears of violence during morning travel to school. Journal of Adolescent Health, 53(1), 54–61.
115.
WilsonE. J.MarshallJ.WilsonR.KrizekK. J. (2010). By foot, bus or car: Children’s school travel and school choice policy. Environment and Planning, 42(9), 2168–2185.
116.
WilsonW. J. (2012). The truly disadvantaged: The inner city, the underclass, and public policy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
117.
WohlstetterP.SmithJ.FarrellC. C. (2013). Choices and challenges: Charter school performance in perspective. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
118.
WoodsS.DoneJ.KalsiH. (2009). Peer victimization and internalizing difficulties: The moderating role of friendship quality. Journal of Adolescence, 32(2), 293–308.
119.
XiangY.TarasawaB. (2015). Propensity score stratification using multilevel models to examine charter school achievement effects. Journal of School Choice, 9(2), 179–196.
120.
ZimmerR. W.GuarinoC. M. (2013). Is there empirical evidence that charter schools “push out” low-performing students?Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 35(4), 461–480.
