We examine the impact of charter schools on school integration in the Little Rock, Arkansas metropolitan area. We find that charters are less likely to be hyper-segregated than traditional public schools (TPS), but TPS have compositions more closely reflecting the region. However, differences in each case are slight. Using student-level data to follow students who left TPS for charters, we find that most transfers improve integration levels at the schools they left. This finding is attributed to the fact that most transfers involve minority students leaving predominately minority schools or White students leaving predominantly White schools.
BerlinerD.FarrellW.HuertaL.MickelsonR. (2000). Will vouchers work for low-income students? Center for education research, analysis, and innovations (CERAI-00-31). Retrieved from http://nepc.colorado.edu/files/cerai-00-37.htm
2.
BifulcoR.LaddH. F.RossS. (2009). Public school choice and integration evidence from Durham, North Carolina. Social Science Research, 38(1), 71-85. /
EcheniqueF.FryerR. G. (2005). On the measurement of segregation (NBER Working Paper No. 11258). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
6.
EcheniqueF.FryerR. G. (2007). A measure of segregation based on social interactions. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122, 441-485.
7.
EgaliteA. J.MillsJ. N. (2014). The Louisiana scholarship program: Contrary to justice department claims, student transfers improve racial integration. Education Next, 14, 66-69.
8.
FrankenbergE.LeeC. (2003). Charter schools and race: A lost opportunity for integrated education. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 11(32). Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v11n32/
GarciaD. R. (2008). The impact of school choice on racial segregation in charter schools. Educational Policy, 22, 805-829.
11.
GreeneJ. P. (2005). Choosing integration. In ScottJ. T. (Ed.), School choice and diversity: What the evidence says (pp. 24-41). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
12.
GreeneJ. P.MellowN. (2000). Integration where it counts: A study of racial integration in public and private school lunchrooms. Texas Education Review, 1(1), 15-26.
13.
HenigJ. R.MacDonaldJ. A. (2002). Locational decisions of charter schools: Probing the market metaphor. Social Science Quarterly, 83, 962-980.
14.
MironG.UrschelJ.MathisW. J.TornquistE. (2010). Schools without diversity: Education management organizations, charter schools, and the demographic stratification of the American school system. Boulder, CO: Education and the Public Interest Center. Retrieved from http://nepc.colorado.edu/publication/schools-without-diversity
RappK. E.EckesS. E. (2007). Dispelling the myth of “white flight”: An examination of minority enrollment in charter schools. Educational Policy, 21, 615-661.
17.
RitterG.JensenN.KisidaB.McGeeJ. B. (2010). A closer look at charter schools and segregation. Education Next, 10(3), 69-73.
18.
U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2011). Digest of education statistics: Number and enrollment of public elementary and secondary schools, by school type, level, and charter and magnet status. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d12/tables/dt12_108.asp
19.
ZimmerR.GillB.BookerK.LavertuS.SassT. R.WitteJ. (2009). Charter schools in eight states: Effects on achievement, attainment, integration, and competition. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
