In this article, we argue that co-constructing knowledge, co-creating relationships, and exchanging stories are central to educational research. Relying on humanizing and Indigenous research methods to locate relational interactions in educational research allows us to engage in transformative praxis and storying, or Projects in Humanization (PiH). We contend that PiH focus on the creation and sustenance of relationships; the human capacity to listen to, story with, and care about each other; and the establishment of more inclusive, interconnected, and decolonizing methodologies that disrupt systemic inequalities found in Western constructs of educational research. More specifically, in this article, we rely on research vignettes to argue for a necessary commitment that researchers must have to sustain, extend, and revitalize the richness of the languages, literacies, histories, cultures, and stories of and by those with whom they work.
AlimH. S. (2005). Critical language awareness in the United States: Revisiting issues and revising pedagogies in a resegregated society. Educational Researcher, 34(7), 24–31.
2.
ArchibaldJ. (2008). Indigenous storywork: Educating the heart, mind, body, and spirit. Vancouver: UBC Press.
3.
BartolomaeL. (1994). Beyond the methods fetish: Toward a humanizing pedagogy. Harvard Educational Review, 62(2), 173–194.
4.
BrayboyB. M. J. (2005). Toward a tribal critical race theory in education. The Urban Review, 37(5), 425–446.
5.
BrayboyB.GoughH.LeonardB.RoehlR.IISolyomJ. (2012). Reclaiming scholarship: Critical Indigenous research methodologies. In LapanS. D.QuartaroliM. T.RiemerF. J. (Eds.). Qualitative research: An introduction to methods and designs (pp. 423–450). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
6.
BrownL.StregaS. (2005). Research as resistance: Critical, Indigenous and anti-oppressive approaches. Toronto, ON: Canadian Scholars’ Press.
7.
BrownR. M. (1984). Unexpected news: Reading the Bible with third world eyes. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press.
8.
CharmazK. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
9.
CollinsP. H. (2008). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. New York, NY: Routledge.
10.
DeloriaV. (1970). We talk, you listen: New tribes, new turf. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
11.
DeloriaV.WildcatD. R. (2001). Power and place: Indian education in America. Golden, CO: Fulcrum Publishing.
12.
FreireP.MacedoD. (1987). Literacy: Reading the word and the world. New York, NY: Bergin and Garvey.
13.
GarciaJ.ShirleyV. (2013). Performing decolonization: Lessons learned from indigenous youth, teachers and leaders’ engagement with critical indigenous pedagogy. Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 28(2), 76–91.
14.
GrandeS.San PedroT.WindchiefH. (2015). 21st century Indigenous identity location: Remembrance, reclamation, and regeneration. In KoslowD.SalettL. (Eds.), Multicultural perspectives on race, ethnicity, and identity (pp. 105–122). Washington, DC: NASW Press.
15.
HalifaxJ. (1999). Learning as initiation: Not knowing, bearing witness, and healing. In GlazerS. (Ed.), The heart of learning: Spirituality in education. (pp. 173–188). New York, NY: Penguin.
16.
HamptonE. (1995). Memory comes before knowledge: Researchmayimprove if researchers remember their motives. Canadian Journal of Native Education, 21, 46–54.
17.
hooksb. (1990). Marginality as a site of resistance. In FergusonR.GeverM.Minh-haT. T.WestC. (Eds.), Out there: Marginalization and contemporary cultures (pp. 341–344). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18.
IrizarryJ.BrownT. (2014). Humanizing research in dehumanizing spaces: The challenges and opportunities of conducting participatory action research with youth in schools. In ParisD.WinnM. (Eds.), Humanizing research: Decolonizing qualitative inquiry with youth and communities (pp. 63–80). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
19.
JordanJ. (2003). Some of us did not die: New and selected essays. New York, NY: Basic Civitas Books.
20.
JosephD. H.WindchiefS. R. (2015). Nahongvita: A conceptual model to support rural American Indian youth in pursuit of higher education. Journal of American Indian Education, 54(3), 76–97.
21.
KinlochV. (2010). Harlem on our minds: Place, race, and the literacies of urban youth. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
22.
KinlochV. (2012). Crossing boundaries—Teaching and learning with urban youth. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
23.
KinlochV. (2015). Critically conscious teaching and instructional leadership as Projects in Humanization. Education Review4(3), 29–35.
24.
KinlochV.San PedroT. (2014). The space between listening and story-ing: Foundations for Projects in Humanization. In ParisD.WinnM. (Eds.), Humanizing research: Decolonizing qualitative inquiry with youth and communities (pp. 21–42). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
25.
KirknessV. J.BarnhardtR. (1991). First nations and higher education: The four R’s—respect, relevance, reciprocity, responsibility. Journal of American Indian Education, 30(3), 1–15.
26.
KovachM. E. (2009). Indigenous methodologies: Characteristics, conversations, and contexts. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.
27.
LambertL. (2014). Research for Indigenous survival: Indigenous research methodologies in the behavioral sciences. Pablo, MT: Salish Kootenai College Press.
28.
McCartyT. L.LeeT. S. (2014). Critical culturally sustaining/revitalizing pedagogy and Indigenous education sovereignty. Harvard Educational Review, 84(1), 101–124.
29.
McCartyT. L.Romero-LittleM. E.ZepedaO. (2006). Native American youth discourses on language shift and retention: Ideological cross-currents and their implications for language planning. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 9(5), 659–677.
30.
MorrisonT. (1993). Lecture and speech of acceptance, upon the award of the Nobel Prize for literature. New York, NY: A.A. Knopf.
31.
ParisD. (2012). Culturally sustaining pedagogy: A needed change in stance, terminology, and practice. Educational Researcher, 41(3), 93–97.
32.
ParisD.AlimH. S. (2014). What are we seeking to sustain through culturally sustaining pedagogy? A loving critique forward. Harvard Educational Review, 84(1), 85–100.
33.
ParisD.WinnM. T. (Eds.). (2014). Humanizing research: Decolonizing qualitative research with youth and communities. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
34.
PatelL. (2015). Decolonizing educational research: From ownership to answerability. New York, NY: Routledge.
35.
Romero-LittleM. E. (2012). Globalization from the bottom up, inside out, and outside in: Indigenous language planning and policy from an Indigenous perspective. International Multilingual Research Journal, 6(1), 79–81.
36.
San PedroT. (2013). Understanding youth cultures, stories, and resistances in the urban southwest: Innovations and implications of a Native American literature classroom. Retrieved from ProQuest Digital Dissertations. (UMI 3558673).
37.
San PedroT. (2015). Silence as shields: Agency and resistances among Native American students in the Urban Southwest. Research in the Teaching of English, 50(2), 132–153.
38.
San PedroT.CarlosE.MburuJ. (2016). Critical listening and storying fostering respect for difference and action within and beyond a Native American literature classroom [Advance online publication]. Urban Education. Doi:10.1177/0042085915623346
Souto-ManningM. (2014) Critical for whom? Theoretical and methodological dilemmas in critical approaches to language research. In ParisD.WinnM. (Eds.), Humanizing research: Decolonizing qualitative inquiry with youth and communities (pp. 214–219). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
41.
TatumB. D. (2003). “Why are all the Black kids sitting together in the cafeteria?”: And other conversations about race. New York, NY: Basic Books.
42.
TuckE. (2009). Suspending damage: A letter to communities. Harvard Educational Review, 79(3), 409–427.
43.
VillanuevaV. (1993). Bootstraps: From an American academic of color. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
44.
VizenorG. R. (1999). Manifest manners: Narratives on postindian survivance. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
45.
WestC. (1994). Race matters. New York, NY: Vintage.
46.
WilsonS. (2008). Research is ceremony: Indigenous research methods. Winnipeg, MB: Fernwood Publishers.
