Relying on the intersections of Indigenous Research Methodologies and Humanizing Research, the authors of this article argue that by re-centering relationships through critical listening and storying, we are better suited to co-construct our shared truths and realities in the space between the telling and hearing of stories. As we do so, we move beyond the sometimes dehumanizing “slash” of researcher/participant and professor/student and into more fertile spaces where our collective desires for educational, political, and social change are forged because of our commitment to sustaining meaningful relationships as well as our refusal to ignore our impact on each other.
BrayboyB. M. J. (2005). Toward a Tribal Critical Race Theory in Education. The Urban Review, 37(5), 425-446.
2.
BrayboyB. M. J.GoughH. R.LeonardB.RoehlR. F.IISolyomJ. A. (2012). Reclaiming scholarship: Critical Indigenous Research Methodologies. In LapanS. D.QuartaroliM. T.ReimerF. J. (Eds.), Qualitative research: An introduction to methods and design (pp. 423-450). San Francisco, CA: John Wiley.
3.
BrownD. (1970). Bury my heart at wounded knee: An Indian history of the American West. New York, NY: Henry Holt.
4.
CalderonD. (2014). Speaking back to Manifest Destinies: A land education-based approach to critical curriculum inquiry. Environmental Education Research, 20, 24-36.
5.
CharmazK. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
6.
CorntasselJ.Chaw-Win-isT’lakwadzi. (2009). Indigenous storytelling, truth-telling, and community approaches to reconciliation. English Studies in Canada, 35(1), 137-159.
7.
EllsworthE. (1989). Why doesn’t this feel empowering? Working through the repressive myths of critical pedagogy. Harvard Educational Review, 59, 297-325.
8.
FreireP. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York, NY: Continuum.
9.
GrandeS.San PedroT.WindchiefS. (2015). Indigenous peoples and identity in the 21st century: Remembering, reclaiming, and regenerating. In SalettE.KoslowD. (Eds.), Multicultural perspectives on race, ethnicity, and identity (pp. 105-122). Washington, DC: National Association of Social Workers (NASW) Press.
10.
GuishardM.TuckE. (2014). Youth resistance research methods and ethical challenges. In TuckE.YangK. W. (Eds.), Youth resistance research and theories of change (pp. 181-194). New York, NY: Routledge.
11.
HuertaT. M. (2011). Humanizing pedagogy: Beliefs and practices on the teaching of Latino children. Bilingual Research Journal, 34, 38-57.
12.
IrizarryJ. (2011). The Latinization of U.S. schools: Successful teaching and learning in shifting cultural contexts. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.
13.
KaomeaJ. (2015). Qualitative analysis as Ho’oku’iku’I or Bricolage: Analytical tools for research in Indigenous and historically oppressed communities. Qualitative Inquiry. Advance online publication. doi:
10.1177/1077800415620222
14.
KinlochV. (2010). Harlem on our minds: Place, race, and the literacies of urban youth. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
15.
KinlochV.San PedroT. (2014). The space between listening and storying: Foundations for projects in humanization. In ParisD.WinnM. (Eds.), Humanizing research: Decolonizing qualitative inquiry with youth and communities (pp. 21-42). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16.
KirknessV. J.BarnhardtR. (2001). First nations and higher education: The four R’s—Respect, relevance, reciprocity, responsibility. Journal of American Indian Education, 30(3), 1-8.
17.
KovachM. (2005). Emerging from the margins: Indigenous methodologies. In BrownL.StregaS. (Eds.), Research as resistance: Critical, indigenous, and anti-oppressive approaches (pp. 19-36). Toronto, Ontario: Canadian Scholars’ Press.
18.
KovachM. (2009). Indigenous methodologies: Characteristics, conversations, and contexts. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
19.
LomawaimaK. T.McCartyT. (2006). “To remain an Indian”: Lessons in democracy from a century of Native American education. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
20.
MarkerM. (2006). After the Makah whale hunt: Indigenous knowledge and limits to multicultural discourse. Urban Education, 41, 482-505.
ParisD. (2012). Culturally sustaining pedagogy: A needed change in stance, terminology, and practice. Educational Researcher, 41, 93-97.
23.
ParisD.AlimH. S. (2014). What are we seeking to sustain through culturally sustaining pedagogy? A loving critique forward. Harvard Educational Review, 84(1), 85-100.
24.
ParisD.WinnM. T. (Eds.). (2014). Humanizing research: Decolonizing qualitative inquiry with youth and communities. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25.
PenetitoW.HindleR.HyndsA.SavageC.KusL. (2011). The impact of culturally responsive pedagogies on students and families. In SleeterC. E. (Ed.), Professional development for culturally responsive and relationship-based pedagogy(pp. 139-162). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
26.
Salish Kootenai College Tribal History Project. (2008). Challenge to survive: History of the Salish tribes of the Flathead Indian Reservation—From time immemorial: Traditional life, Unit 1 Pre-1800. Pablo, MT: Salish Kootenai College Press.
27.
San PedroT. (2014). Internal and environmental safety zones: Navigating expansions and contractions of identity between Indigenous and colonial paradigms, pedagogies and classrooms. Journal of American Indian Education, 53(3), 42-62.
28.
San PedroT. (2015). Silence as weapons: Transformative praxis among Native American students in the urban Southwest. Equity & Excellence in Education, 48(4), 511-528.
SmithG. (2004). Mai I te maramatanga kit e putanga mai o te tahuritangi: From conscientization to transformation. Educational Perspectives Journal of the College of Education, 37(1), 46-52.
31.
SmithL. T. (1999). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and Indigenous peoples. New York, NY: Zed Books.
32.
Souto-ManningM. (2010). Freire, teaching, and learning: Culture circles across contexts (1st printing ed.). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
33.
Souto-ManningM. (2014). Critical for whom? Theoretical and methodological dilemmas in critical approaches to language research. In ParisD.WinnM. (Eds.), Humanizing research: Decolonizing qualitative inquiry with youth and communities (pp. 201-222). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
34.
TatumB. D. (2003). “Why are all the black kids sitting together in the cafeteria?” And other conversations about race. New York, NY: Basic Books.
35.
TuckE. (2009). Suspending damage: A letter to communities. Harvard Educational Review, 79(3), 409-427.
36.
WilsonS. (2008). Research is ceremony: Indigenous research methods. Black Point, Nova Scotia, Canada: Fernwood Pub.
37.
WindchiefS.JosephD. H. (2015). The act of claiming higher education as Indigenous space: American Indian/Alaska Native examples. Diaspora, Indigenous, and Minority Education, 9(4), 267-283.
