The for-profit college sector is arguably the most controversial and least understood sector of higher education today. The past decade has ushered in a wealth of public concern and scrutiny as to whether for-profit colleges and universities are providing a quality education to underserved student populations. While their politicization has captured immense attention, there is far less empirical research on student experiences at for-profit institutions to better inform conceptual, institutional, and practical understanding of this sector of postsecondary education. Using ethnographic data from one midsize for-profit college in a suburban city, the author spent seven months exploring educational culture from the perspective of enrolled students. The findings illuminate four themes: (a) student desire for institutional transparency, (b) the perception of high-quality in-person instruction, (c) varied experiences based on student schedule and learning needs, and (d) the role of age in shaping peer interactions.
AgarM. H. (1980). The professional stranger: An informal introduction to ethnography. New York, NY: Academic Press.
2.
AnfaraV. A.BrownK. M.MangioneT. L. (2002). Qualitative research on stage: Making the research process more public. Educational Researcher, 31(7), 28–38.
3.
AtkinsonP.DelamontS.CoffeyA.LoflandJ.LoflandL. (2001). Handbook of ethnography. London: SAGE.
4.
BaileyT.BadwayN.GumportP. J. (2003). For-profit higher education and community colleges. Stanford, CA: National Center for Postsecondary Improvement.
5.
BennettD. L.LucchesiA. R.VedderR. K. (2010). For-profit higher education: Growth, innovation, and regulation. Washington, DC: Center for College Affordability and Productivity.
6.
BergG. A. (2005). Lessons from the edge: For-profit and nontraditional higher education in America. Westport, CT: Praeger.
7.
BogdanR. C.BiklenS. K. (2003). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education Group, Inc.
8.
BrenemanD. W.PusserB.TurnerS. E. (2006). Earnings from learning: The rise of for-profit universities. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
9.
BrewerJ. (2000). Ethnography. Buckingham: Open University Press.
ChungA. (2012). The choice of for-profit college. Economics of Education Review, 31(6), 1084–1101.
16.
CookR.FennellM. (2001). Capital gains: Surviving in an increasingly for-profit-world. The Presidency, 4(1), 28–33.
17.
CreswellJ. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18.
CreswellJ. W.MillerD. L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory Into Practice, 39, 124–130.
19.
DahlkeS.HallW.PhinneyA. (2015). Maximizing theoretical contributions of participant observation while managing challenges. Qualitative Health Research, 25, 1117–1122.
20.
DealT. E.KennedyA. A. (1982). Corporate cultures: The rites and rituals of corporate life. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing.
21.
DemingD.GoldinC.KatzL. F. (2012). The for-profit postsecondary school sector: Nimble critters or agile predators?Journal of Economic Perspectives, 26(1), 139–164.
22.
DenzinN. K. (Ed.). (1978). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
23.
ElliottR.FischerC. T.RennieD. L. (1999). Evolving guidelines for publication of qualitative research studies in psychology and related fields. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38, 215–299.
24.
EllisC.AdamsT.BochnerA. (2011). Autoethnography: An overview. Historical Social Research / Historische Sozialforschung, 36(4), 273–290.
25.
EricksonF. (1984). What makes school ethnography “ethnographic:?Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 15, 51–66.
26.
GeertzC. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. New York, NY: Basic Books.
27.
GilpinG.SaundersJ.StoddardC. (2015). Why has for-profit colleges’ share of higher education expanded so rapidly? Estimating the responsiveness to labor market changes. Economics of Education Review, 45, 53–63.
28.
HammersleyM.AtkinsonP. (2007). Ethnography: Principles in practice (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.
29.
HarperS. R. (2007). Using qualitative methods to assess student trajectories and college impact. In HarperS. R.MuseusS. D. (Eds.), Using qualitative methods in institutional assessment. New directions for institutional research (No. 136, pp. 55–68). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
30.
Health, Education, Labor and Pensions [HELP] Committee. (2012). For profit higher education: The failure to safeguard the federal investment and ensure student success. Washington, DC: U.S. Senate. Retrieved from http://www.help.senate.gov/imo/media/for_profit_report/PartI.pdf
31.
HellerD. E. (2011). The impact of gainful employment regulations. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 43(5), 58–64.
32.
HentschkeG. C. (2011). Innovations in business models and organizational cultures: The for-profit sector. In WildavskyB.KellyA.CareyK. (Eds.), Reinventing higher education: The promise of innovation (pp. 159–196). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
33.
IlohC. (2014). A critical comparison of website marketing at for-profit colleges & community colleges. National Association of Student Affairs Professionals Journal, 15(2), 91–106.
34.
IlohC. (in press). Mo money, mo problems? The rise and reform of for-profit higher education and implications for marginalized students. In MinorJ. TJonesT. (Eds.), Race and education policy. Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
35.
IlohC.TierneyW. G. (2013). A comparison of for-profit and community colleges’ admissions practices. College and University, 88(4), 2–12.
36.
IlohC.TierneyW. G. (2014a). Understanding for-profit college and community college choice through rational choice. Teachers College Record, 116(8), 1–34.
37.
IlohC.TierneyW. G. (2014b). Using ethnography to understand twenty-first century college life. Human Affairs, 24(1), 20–39.
38.
IlohC.ToldsonI. A. (2013). Black students in 21st century higher education: A closer look at the role of for-profit colleges and community colleges. Journal of Negro Education, 82(3), 205–212.
39.
Institute for Higher Education Policy. (2010). A snapshot of African Americans in higher education. Washington, DC: Institute for Higher Education Policy.
40.
Institute for Higher Education Policy. (2011). Initial college attendance of low-income adults. Washington, DC: Institute for Higher Education Policy.
KellyK. F. (2001). Meeting needs and making profits: The rise of for-profit degree-granting institutions (ECS Issue Paper). Denver, CO: Economic Commission of the States.
43.
KinserK. (2006). From main street to Wall Street: The transformation of for-profit higher education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, Inc.
KnappL. G.Kelly-ReidJ. E.GinderS. A. (2011). Enrollment in postsecondary institutions, fall 2009; graduation rates, 2003 & 2006 cohorts; and financial statistics, fiscal year 2009. Washington, DC: US Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
46.
KuhG. D.ArnoldJ. C. (1993). Liquid bonding: A cultural analysis of the role of alcohol in fraternity pledgeship. Journal of College Student Development, 34, 327–334.
47.
KuhG. D.WhittE. J. (1988). The invisible tapestry: Culture in American colleges and universities (ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, No. 1). Washington, DC: ERIC Clearinghouse on Higher Education.
48.
LechugaV. M. (2006). The changing landscape of the academic profession: The culture of faculty at for-profit colleges and universities. New York, NY: Routledge.
49.
LechugaV. M. (2008). Assessment, knowledge, and customer service: Contextualizing faculty work at for-profit colleges and universities. The Review of Higher Education, 31(3), 287–307. doi: 10.1353/rhe.2008.0004
50.
LechugaV. M.HentschkeG. C. (2003). Expanding the horizon: For-profit degree granting institutions in higher education: An annotated bibliography. Los Angeles, CA: Center for Higher Education Policy Analysis. Retrieved from http://www.usc.edu/dept/chepa/pdf/Annotated_bib.pdf
51.
LevineA.CuretonS. (1998). When hope and fear collide: A portrait of today’ college student. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
52.
LichtermanP. (2015). Interpretive reflexivity in ethnography. Ethnography, 1–11.
53.
LincolnY. S.GubaE. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
OsegueraL.KimballE.HwangJ. (2011). Low-income students’ predictors of for-profit versus not-for-profit college and university enrollment. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Indianapolis, IN.
62.
OsegueraL.MalaganM. C. (2011). For-profit colleges and universities and the Latina/o students who enroll in them. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 10(1), 66–91.
63.
PattonM. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
RayR.RosowJ. A. (2012). Two different worlds of Black and White fraternity men: Visibility and accountability as mechanisms of privilege. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 41(1), 66–95.
67.
RosenbaumJ. E.Deil-AmenR.PersonA. E. (2006). After admission: From college access to college success. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
68.
RuchR. S. (2001). Higher Ed, Inc.: The rise of the for-profit university. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
69.
SchneiderM. (2014). Are graduates from public universities gainfully employed? Analyzing student loan debt and gainful employment. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.
70.
SchwartzP.LeverJ. (1976). Fear and loathing at the college mixer. Urban Life, 4, 413–431.
71.
ShiremanR. (2015). The covert for-profit: How college owners escape oversight through a regulatory blind spot. Washington, DC: The Century Foundation.
72.
SilberJ.FisherA. (2005). Education and training. New York, NY: Harris Nesbitt.
73.
SoaresL. (2013). Post-traditional learners and the transformation of postsecondary education: A manifesto for college leaders. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
74.
SpradleyJ. P. (1980). Participant observation. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
75.
StraussA.CorbinJ. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. London: Sage.
76.
Terre BlancheM.KellyK. (1999). Interpretive methods. In Terre BlancheM.DurrheimK. (Eds.), Research in practice: Applied methods for the social sciences (pp. 123–172). Cape Town: University of Cape Town Press.
77.
Van Der WerfM.SabatierG. (2009). The college of 2020: Students. Washington, DC: Chronicle Research Services, Inc.
78.
WalfordG. (2008). How to do educational ethnography. London: Tufnell.
79.
ZaharlickA. (1992). Ethnography in anthropology and its value for education. Theory Into Practice, 31(2), 116–125.
80.
Zamani-GallaherE. M. (2004). Proprietary schools: Beyond the issue of profit. New Directions for Institutional Research, 124, 63–79.
