How much of a difference does it make whether a student of a given academic ability enters a more or a less selective four-year college? Some studies claim that attending a more academically selective college markedly improves one's graduation prospects. Others report the reverse: an advantage from attending an institution where one's own skills exceed most other students. Using multilevel models and propensity score matching methods to reduce selection bias, we find that selectivity does not have an independent effect on graduation. Instead, we find relatively small positive effects on graduation from attending a college with higher tuition costs. We also find no evidence that students not attending highly selective colleges suffer reduced chances of graduation, all else being equal.
AdelmanC. (1999). Answers in the toolbox: Academic intensity, attendance patterns, and Bachelor's degree attainment. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
2.
AlonS.TiendaM. (2005). Assessing the “mismatch” hypothesis: Differences in college graduation rates by institutional selectivity. Sociology of Education, 78(4), 294–315.
3.
AttewellP. (2001). The winner-take-all high school: Organizational adaptations to educational stratification. Sociology of Education, 74, 267–295.
4.
BlackD. A.SmithJ. A. (2004). How robust is the evidence on the effects of college quality? Evidence from matching. Journal of Econometrics, 121, 99–124.
5.
BowenW. G.BokD. C. (1998). The shape of the river: Long-term consequences of considering race in college and university admissions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
6.
BowenW. G.ChingosM.McPhersonM. S. (2009). Crossing the finish line: Completing college at America's public universities. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
ChangM. J.CernaO.HanJ.SàenzV. (2008). The contradictory roles of institutional status in retaining underrepresented students in biomedical and behavioral science majors. Review of Higher Education, 31(4), 433–464.
9.
CohodesS.GoodmanJ. (2012). First degree earns: The impact of college quality on college completion rates (No. RWP12-033). Boston, MA: Harvard Kennedy School Faculty Research Working Papers.
10.
ColeS.BarberE. (2003). Increasing faculty diversity. The occupational choices of high-achieving minority students. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
11.
DaleS.KruegerA. B. (2002). Estimating the payoff to attending a more selective college: An application of selection on observables and unobservables. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(4), 1491–1527.
12.
DaleS.KruegerA. B. (2011). Estimating the return to college selectivity over the career using administrative earnings data (Working Paper No. 17159). Cambridge, MA: NBER.
13.
DavisJ. (1966). The campus as a frog pond: An application of the theory of relative deprivation to career decisions of college men. American Journal of Sociology, 72, 17–31.
EspenshadeT. J.RadfordA. W. (2009). No longer separate, not yet equal. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
16.
GoethalsG.WinstonG.ZimmermanD. (1999). Students educating students: The emerging role of peer effects in higher education (Working Paper No. 50). Williams College, MA: Williams Project on the Economics of Higher Education. Retrieved from http://sites.williams.edu/wpehe/files/2011/06/DP-50.pdf
17.
LightA.StrayerW. (2000). Determinants of college completion: School quality or student ability?The Journal of Human Resources, 35(2), 299–332.
18.
LongM. C. (2008). College quality and early adult outcomes. Economics of Education Review, 27, 588–602.
19.
MarshH. W. (2005). Big fish little pond effect on academic self-concept. German Journal of Educational Psychology, 19, 119–128.
20.
MarshH. W.HauK. T. (2003). Big fish little pond effect on academic self-concept: A crosscultural (26 country) test of the negative effects of academically selective schools. American Psychologist, 58(5), 364–376.
21.
MelguizoT. (2008). Quality matters: Assessing the impact of attending more selective institutions on college completion rates of minorities. Research in Higher Education, 49(3), 214–236.
22.
MorganS.ToddJ. (2008). A diagnostic routine for the detection of consequential heterogeneity of effects. Sociological Methodology, 38(1), 231–281.
23.
MorganS.WinshipC. (2007). Counterfactuals and causal inference. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
24.
RaudenbushS.BrykA.CheongY.CongdonR.Du ToitM. (2004). HLM 6: Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
25.
ReynoldsC. L.DesJardinsS. (2009). The use of matching methods in higher education research: Answering whether attendance at a two-year institution results in differences in educational attainment. In SmartJ. C. (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research 24 (pp. 47–97). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
26.
SanderR. H. (2004). A systemic analysis of affirmative action in American law schools. Stanford Law Review, 57(2), 367–483.
27.
SanderR. H.TaylorS.Jr. (2012). Mismatch: How affirmative action hurts students it's intended to help, and why universities won't admit it. New York, NY: Basic Books.
28.
SmallM.WinshipC. (2007). Black students’ graduation from elite colleges: Institutional characteristics and between-institution differences. Social Science Research, 36(3), 1257–1275.
StinebricknerR.StinebricknerT. R. (2006). What can be learned about peer effects using college roommates? Evidence from new survey data and students from disadvantaged backgrounds. Journal of Public Economics, 90, 1435–1454.
31.
ThernstromS.ThernstromA. (1997). America in Black and White: One nation indivisible. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
32.
Van LaarC.SidaniusJ. (2001). Social status and the academic achievement gap: A social dominance perspective. Social Psychology of Education, 4, 235–258.
33.
WineJ. R.HeuerE.WheelessS. C.FrancisT. L.FranklinJ. W. (2002). Beginning Postsecondary Students Longitudinal Study: 1996-2001 (BPS:1996/2001) methodology report (NCES 2002-171). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
34.
WinstonG.ZimmermanD. J. (2004). Peer effects in higher education. In HoxbyC. (Ed.), College choices: The economics of where to go, when to go, and how to pay for it (pp. 395–424). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
35.
ZhangL. (2005). Advance to graduate education: The effect of college quality and undergraduate majors. Review of Higher Education, 28(3), 313–338.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
