We examine whether the legal decision to grant unitary status to the Charlotte–Mecklenburg school district, which led to the end of race-conscious student assignment policies, increased the probability that families with children enrolled in the district would move to neighborhoods with a greater proportion of student residents of the same race as their own children. Motivated by the rich but inconclusive literature on the consequences of educational and residential segregation, we make use of a natural policy experiment—a judicial decision to end court-ordered busing—to estimate the causal impacts of this policy shift on household residential decisions. We find that, for those who moved, the legal decision made White families with children in the Charlotte–Mecklenburg Schools substantially more likely than they were during desegregation to move to a neighborhood with a greater proportion of White residents than their own neighborhood.
AllportG. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
2.
AnanatE. O. (2007). The wrong side(s) of the tracks: Estimating the causal effects of racial segregation on city outcomes (NBER Working Paper No. 13343). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
3.
AngristJ. D.LangK. (2004). Does school integration generate peer effects? Evidence from Boston’s METCO program. American Economic Review, 94, 1613–1634.
4.
ArmorD. J.ThernstromA.ThernstromS. (2006, August21). Amicus curia brief to the Supreme Court on the educational and social benefits of racial diversity.
5.
Baum-SnowN.LutzB. (2011). School desegregation, school choice and changes in residential location patterns by race. American Economic Review, 101, 3019–3046.
6.
BayerP.RossS.TopaG. (2008). Place of work and place of residence: Informal hiring networks and labor market outcomes. Journal of Political Economy, 116, 1150–1196.
7.
Belk v. Charlotte–Mecklenburg Schools, 269 F. 3d 305 (2001).
8.
BillingsS.DemingD.RockoffJ. (2014). School segregation, educational attainment and crime: Evidence from the end of busing in Charlotte-Mecklenburg. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 129(1), 435–476.
9.
Board of Education of Oklahoma City v. Dowell, 498 U.S. 237 (1991).
10.
BogartW. T.CromwellB. A. (2000). How much is a neighborhood school worth?Journal of Urban Economics, 47, 280–305.
11.
BorjasG. J. (1995). Ethnicity, neighborhoods, and human-capital externalities. American Economic Review, 85, 365–390.
12.
BoustanL. P. (2012). School desegregation and urban change: Evidence from city boundaries. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 4, 85–108.
13.
BraddockJ. H. I.EitleT. M. (2004). The effects of school desegregation. In BanksJ. A.McGee BanksC. A. (Eds.), Handbook of research on multicultural education (2nd ed., pp. 828–846). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
14.
Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954).
15.
BruchE.MareR. (2006). Neighborhood choice and neighborhood change. American Journal of Sociology, 112, 667–709.
16.
CardD.RothsteinJ. (2007). Racial segregation and the Black–White test score gap. Journal of Public Economics, 91, 2158–2184.
17.
CarnoyM.LoebS. (2003). Does external accountability affect student outcomes? A cross-state analysis. Education Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24, 305–331.
ClarkK.DrinkwaterS. (2002). Enclaves, neighbourhood effects, and employment outcomes: Ethnic minorities in England and Wales. Journal of Population Economics, 15, 5–29.
20.
ClotfelterC. H. (2004). After Brown: The rise and retreat of school desegregation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
21.
CrainR. L.StraussJ. (1985). School desegregation and Black occupational attainments: Results from a long-term experiment (Rep. No. 359). Baltimore, MD: Center for the Social Organization of Schools.
22.
CutlerD. M.GlaeserE. L. (1997). Are ghettos good or bad?Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112, 827–872.
23.
DahlbergM.EklöfM. (2003). Relaxing the IIA assumption in locational choice models: A comparison between conditional logit model, mixed logit, and multinomial probit models (Working Paper 2003: 9). Uppsala, Sweden: Uppsala University, Department of Economics.
24.
DardenJ.RahbarM.JezierskiL.LiM.VelieE. (2009). The measurement of neighborhood socioeconomic characteristics and Black and White residential segregation in metropolitan Detroit: Implications for the study of social disparities in health. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 100, 137–158.
25.
Doss HelmsA.MellnikT.SmithC. (2002, August18). Historic day dawns in CMS classrooms; with Monday’s opening bell, schools face new challenges. Charlotte Observer, p. 1A.
26.
DurlaufS. N. (2004). Neighborhood effects. In HendersonJ. V.ThisseJ. F. (Eds.), Handbook of regional and urban economics (Vol. 4, pp. 2173–2242). Amsterdam, Netherlands: North Holland.
27.
EllisonC. G.PowersD. A. (1994). The contact hypothesis and racial relations among Black Americans. Social Science Quarterly, 75, 385–400.
28.
Freeman v. Pitts, 503 U.S. 495 (1992).
29.
Green v County School Board, 391 U.S. 438 (1968).
30.
GuryanJ. (2004). Desegregation and Black dropout rates. American Economic Review, 94, 919–943.
31.
HanushekE.KainJ.RivkinS. (2009). New evidence aboutBrown v. Board of Education: The complex effects of school racial composition on achievement. Journal of Labor Economics, 27, 349–383.
32.
HastingsJ. S.KaneT. J.StaigerD. O. (2006). Preferences and heterogeneous treatment effects in a public school choice lottery (NBER Working Paper No. 12145). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
33.
HoxbyC. M. (2000). Does competition among public schools benefit students and taxpayers?American Economic Review, 90, 1209–1238.
34.
JacksonC. K. (2009). Student demographics, teacher sorting, and teacher quality: Evidence from the end of school desegregation. Journal of Labor Economics, 27, 213–256.
35.
JohnsonR. C. (2011). Long-run impacts of school desegregation & school quality on adult attainments (NBER Working Paper No. 16664). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
36.
KaneT. J.RieggS. K.StaigerD. O. (2006). School quality, neighborhoods, and housing prices. American Law and Economics Review, 8, 183–212.
37.
LauenD. L.GaddisS. M. (2010, November). Shining a light or fumbling in the dark? The effects of NCLB’s subgroup-specific accountability on student achievement gains. Paper presented at the Association for Public Policy Analysis & Management conference, Boston, MA. Retrieved from https://www.appam.org/conferences/fall/boston2010/sessions/downloads/1037.1.pdf
38.
LinnR. L.WelnerK. G. (2007). Race-conscious policies for assigning students to schools: Social science research and the Supreme Court cases. Washington, DC: National Academy of Education. Retrieved from http://www.naeducation.org/NAEd_Publications.html
39.
LongB. T. (2004). How have college decisions changed over time? An application of the conditional logistic choice model. Journal of Econometrics, 121, 271–296.
40.
LutzB. (2011). The end of court-ordered desegregation. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 3, 130–168.
41.
MareR. D.BruchE. E. (2003). Spatial inequality, neighborhood mobility, and residential segregation. Los Angeles: University of California, Los Angeles, California Center for Population Research. Retrieved from http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/8xm4q2q7
42.
McFaddenD. (1973). Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In ZarembkaP. (Ed.), Frontiers in econometrics (pp. 105–142). New York, NY: Academic Press.
43.
McFaddenD. (1979). Quantitative methods for analyzing travel behavior of individuals: Some recent developments. In HensherD.StopherP. (Eds.), Behavioural travel modeling (pp. 279–318). London, UK: Croom-Helm.
44.
MickelsonR. A. (2003). The academic consequences of desegregation and segregation: Evidence from the Charlotte–Mecklenburg schools. North Carolina Law Review, 81, 1513–1562.
45.
MickelsonR. A.SmithS. S.SouthworthS. (2009). Resegregation, achievement, and the chimera of choice in post-unitary Charlotte–Mecklenburg schools. In SmrekarC. E.GoldringE. B. (Eds.), From the courtroom to the classroom: The shifting landscape of school desegregation (pp. 129–156). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
46.
Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1 et al. (Seattle), 551 U.S. 701 (2007).
47.
Pasadena City Board of Education v. Spangler, 427 U.S. 424 (1976).
48.
PettigrewT. F.TroppL. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 751–783.
49.
ReberS. (2005). Court-ordered desegregation: Successes and failures in integrating American schools since Brown. Journal of Human Resources, 40, 559–590.
50.
SchellingT. C. (1972). A process of residential segregation: Neighborhood tipping. In PascalA. H. (Ed.), Racial discrimination in economic life (pp. 157–184). Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath.
51.
SchwartzH. (2010). Housing policy is school policy: Economically integrative housing promotes academic success in Montgomery County, Maryland. Washington, DC: Century Foundation.
52.
StroubK. J.RichardsM. P. (2013). From resegregation to reintegration: Trends in the racial/ethnic segregation of metropolitan schools, 1993–2009. American Educational Research Journal, 50, 497–531.
53.
Swann v. Charlotte–Mecklenburg Board of Ed., 401 U.S. 1 (1971).
54.
TieboutC. M. (1956). A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy, 64, 416–424.
55.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2000). Demographic profile highlights for selected population groups in Mecklenburg County, NC. Retrieved from www.factfinder.census.gov
56.
VigdorJ. L. (2011). School desegregation and the Black–White test score gap. In DuncanG. J.MurnaneR. J. (Eds.), Whither opportunity? Rising inequality, schools, and children’s life chances (pp. 443–464). New York, NY: Russell Sage.
57.
VigdorJ. L.LudwigJ. (2008). Segregation and the test score gap. In MagnusonK.WaldfogelJ. (Eds.), Steady gains and stalled progress: Inequality and the Black–White test score gap (pp. 181–211). New York, NY: Russell Sage.
58.
WeinbergB. A. (2000). Black residential centralization and the spatial mismatch hypothesis. Journal of Urban Economics, 48, 110–134.
WilliamsD. R.CollinsC. (2001). Racial residential segregation: A fundamental cause of racial disparities in health. Public Health Reports, 116, 404–416.
