Using eight waves of longitudinal data on a statewide kindergarten cohort of English learners (ELs), I examined ELs’ tenure in language-learning programs and their academic performance following reclassification as fluent English proficient. I employed discrete-time survival analysis to estimate the average time to and grade of reclassification with and without controlling for socioeconomic status and home language. The average EL exited 3 years after school entry or in second grade; however, the odds that a non-Spanish-speaking EL was reclassified were nearly twice that of their Spanish-speaking EL classmates after controlling for income. Despite reclassification in the early elementary grades, large percentages of the kindergarten cohort experienced later academic difficulties and 22% of the sample was retained in grade.
AbediJ. (2002). Standardized achievement tests and English language learners: Psychometric issues. Educational Assessment, 8(3), 231–257.
2.
AriasM. B.FaltisC. (2012). Implementing educational language policy in Arizona: Legal, historical and current practices in SEI. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
3.
BatalovaJ.FixM.MurrayJ. (2007). Measures of change: The demography and literacy of adolescent English language learners—A report to the Carnegie Corporation of New York. Washington, DC: National Center on Immigration Integration Policy, Migration, Migration Policy Institute.
4.
Bowman-PerrotL. JHerreraS.MurryK. (2010). Reading difficulties and grade retention: What’s the connection for English language learners?Reading & Writing Quarterly, 26, 91–107.
5.
CappsR.FixM.MurrayJ.OstJ.PasselJ. S.HerwantoroS. (2005). The new demography of America’s schools: Immigration and the No Child Left Behind Act (research report). Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
6.
Castañeda v. Pickard, 648 F.2d 989 (U.S. Ct. App. 1981).
7.
Center on Education Policy. (2008). State high school exit exams: Moving toward end-of-course exams. Washington, DC: Author.
8.
CollierV. P. (1987). Age and rate of acquisition of second language for academic purposes. TESOL Quarterly, 21(4), 617–641.
9.
Cosentino de CohenC.DeterdingN.Chu ClewellB. (2005). Who’s left behind? Immigrant children in high and low LEP schools (policy report). Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
10.
de JongE. (2004). After exit: Academic achievement patterns of former English language learners. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 12(50), 1–20.
11.
FloresE.PainterG.Harlow-NashZ.PachonH. (2009). Qué pasa? Are English language-learning students remaining in English learning classes too long? (policy brief). Los Angeles: Tomas Rivera Policy Institute.
12.
FryR.GonzalesF. (2008). One-in-five and growing fast: A profile of Hispanic public school students. Washington, DC: Pew Hispanic Center.
13.
GándaraP.LosenD.AugustD.UriarteM.GómezM. C.HopkinsM. (2010). Forbidden language: A brief history of U.S. language policy. In GándaraP.HopkinsM. (Eds.), English learners and restrictive language policies (pp. 20–49). New York: Teachers College Press.
14.
GándaraP.MerinoB. (1993). Measuring the outcomes of LEP programs: Test scores, exit rates, and other mythological data. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15(3), 320–338.
15.
GándaraP.RumbergerR.Maxwell-JollyJ.CallahanR. (2003). English learners in California schools: Unequal resources, unequal outcomes. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 11(36). Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v11n36/
16.
GoldenbergC.RuedaR. S.AugustD. (2006). Sociocultural influences on the literacy attainment of language-minority children and youth. In AugustD.ShanahanT. (Eds.), Developing literacy in second-language learners: Report of the National Literacy Panel on Language-Minority Children and Youth (pp. 365–414). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
17.
GrissomJ. B. (2004). Reclassification of English language learners. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 12(26).
18.
HakutaK.Goto ButlerY.WittD. (2000). How long does it take English learners to attain proficiency? (Policy report). Berkeley: University of California Linguistic Minority Research Institute.
19.
KaoG.Taggart RutherfordL. (2007). Does social capital still matter? Immigrant minority disadvantage in school-specific social capital and its effects on academic achievement. Sociological Perspectives, 50(1), 27–52.
20.
KiefferM. J. (2008). Catching up or falling behind? Initial English proficiency, concentrated poverty, and the reading growth of language minority learners in the United States. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(4), 851–868.
21.
KiefferM. J. (2011). Converging trajectories: Reading growth in language minority learners and their classmates, kindergarten to grade 8. American Educational Research Journal, 48, 1187–1225.
22.
KiefferM. J.LesauxN. K.SnowC. E. (2008). Promises and pitfalls: Implications of NCLB for identifying, assessing, and educating English language learners. In SundermanG. L. (Ed.), Holding NCLB accountable: Achieving accountability, equity, & school reform (pp. 57–74). Thousand Oaks, CA: Kindler.
23.
KindlerA. L. (2002, October). Survey of the states’ limited English proficient students and available educational programs and services 2000-2001 summary report. Silver Spring, MD: National Clearinghouse for English Language Acquisition & Language Instruction Educational Programs. Retrieved from http://www.ncela.gwu.edu/policy/states/reports/seareports/0001/sea0001.pdf
LesauxN. K. (with KodaK.SiegelL. S.ShanahanT.). (2006). Development of literacy. In AugustD.ShanahanT. (Eds.), Developing literacy in second-language learners: Report of the National Literacy Panel on Language-Minority Children and Youth (pp. 75–122). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
LinquantiR. (2001). The redesignation dilemma: Challenges and choices in fostering meaningful accountability for English learners (No. Policy Report 2000-1). Santa Barbara: University of California Linguistic Minority Research Institute.
28.
Mancilla-MartinezJ.LesauxN. K. (2011a). Early home language use and later vocabulary development. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(3), 535–546.
29.
Mancilla-MartinezJ.LesauxN. K. (2011b). The gap between Spanish speakers’ word reading and word knowledge: A longitudinal study. Child Development, 82(5), 1544–1560.
30.
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. (2003). SIMS Version 2.0 Data standards handbook for the Massachusetts Student Information Management System. Malden: Author.
31.
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. (2009). Guidance on using MEPA results to plan sheltered English immersion (SEI) instruction and to make reclassification decisions for limited English proficient (LEP) students. Retrieved from www.doe.mass.edu/mcas/mepa/2009/guidance.doc
32.
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. (2012). Transitioning English language learners in Massachusetts: An exploratory data review. Malden: Author.
33.
MitchellD. E.DestinoT.KaramR. T.Colón-MuñizA. (1999). The politics of bilingual education. Educational Policy, 13(1), 86–103.
34.
NakamotoJ.LindseyK. A.ManisF. R. (2007). A longitudinal analysis of English language learners’ word decoding and reading comprehension. Reading & Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 20, 691–719.
35.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2004). Language minority learners and their labor market indicators: Recent trends. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
New York City Board of Education Division of Assessment and Accountability. (2000). English language learner (EL) subcommittee research studies progress report. Retrieved from http://schools.nyc.gov/daa/reports/EL_Research_Studies.pdf
ParrishT. B.MerickelA.PerezM.LinquantiR.SociasM.SpainA.. (2006). Effects of the implementation of Proposition 227 on the education of English learners, K-12 findings from a five year evaluation (No. AB 56 and AB 1116). Palo Alto, CA: American Institutes for Research.
42.
PlantyM.HussarW.SnyderT.KenaG.Kewal RamaniA.KempJ.BiancoK.DinkesR. (2009). The Condition of Education 2009 (NCES 2009-081). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
43.
RaganA.LesauxN. K. (2006). Federal, state, and district level English language learner program entry and exit requirements: Effects on the education of language minority learners. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 14(20).
44.
RamirezD. J.YuenS. D.RameyD. R. (1991). Final report: Longitudinal study of structured immersion strategy, early-exit, and late-exit transitional bilingual education programs for language-minority children. San Mateo, CA: Aguirre International.
45.
RAND Reading Study Group. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward an R&D program in reading comprehension. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
46.
ReynoldsA. J.ChenC.- C.HebersJ. E. (2009). School mobility and educational success: A research synthesis and evidence on prevention. Paper commissioned by the National Academy of Sciences Committee on the Impact and Change in the Lives of Young Children, Schools, and Neighborhoods, Washington, DC, June 29–30.
47.
Rios-AguilarC.GándaraP. (2012). Horne v. Flores and the future of language policies. Teachers College Record, 114, 1–13.
48.
Rios-AguilarC.González-CanchéM. S.SabetghadamS. (2012). Evaluating the impact of restrictive language policies: The Arizona 4-hour English language development block. Language Policy, 11, 47–80.
49.
RolstadK.MahoneyK. S.GlassG. V. (2005): Weighing the evidence: A meta-analysis of bilingual education in Arizona. Bilingual Research Journal: The Journal of the National Association for Bilingual Education, 29(1), 43–67.
50.
Ruiz-de-VascoJ.FixM.Chu ClewellB. (2000). Overlooked and underserved: Immigrant students in U.S. secondary schools. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
51.
RumbergerR. W.TranL. (2010). State language policies, school language practices and the English learner achievement gap. In GándaraP.HopkinsM. (Eds.), English learners and restrictive language policies (pp. 86–101). New York: Teachers College Press.
52.
ScarcellaR. (2003). Academic English: A conceptual framework (University of California Linguistic Minority Research Institute Technical Report 2003–1). Retrieved from http://lmri.ucsb.edu/publications/03_scarcELa.pdf
53.
SingerJ. D.WillettJ. B. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence. New York: Oxford University Press.
54.
SlamaR. B. (2011). A longitudinal analysis of academic English proficiency outcomes for adolescent English language learners in the United States. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(2), 265–285.
55.
TungR.UriarteM.DiezV.LavanN.AugustiN.KarpF.. (2009). English learners in Boston public schools: Enrollment, engagement and academic outcomes, AY2003-AY2006. Boston: Mauricio Gastón Institute for Latino Community Development and Public Policy.
WilliamsM. L. (1991). Policy update on schools’ obligations towards national origin minority students with limited-English proficiency. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
