Reclassification is a crucial outcome for English learner (EL) students’ academic progress. Though ELs spend a large portion of their academic time with general education teachers, we know little about the role general education teachers play in developing ELs’ English language proficiency. Drawing from a longitudinal administrative dataset from Tennessee, this study uses discrete-time survival analysis to estimate the relationship between ELs’ likelihood of reclassification and characteristics of their general education English language arts (ELA) teachers in Grades 3–8. The study finds that several measures of teacher effectiveness consistently predict EL reclassification. Sensitivity and robustness checks substantiate these relationships. Findings have important policy implications for the identification and assignment of ELs to effective general education ELA teachers.
BakerS.LesauxN.JayanthiM.DiminoJ.ProctorC. P.MorrisJ.GerstenR.HaymondK.KiefferM. J.Linan-ThompsonS.Newman-GoncharR. (2014). Teaching academic content and literacy to English learners in elementary and middle school (NCEE 2014-4012). National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance (NCEE), Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/publications_reviews.aspx
2.
BallouD.SpringerM. G. (2015). Using student test scores to measure teacher performance: Some problems in the design and implementation of evaluation systems. Education Researcher, 44(2), 77–86. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X15574904
3.
Box-SteffensmeierJ. M.ReiterD.ZornC. (2003). Nonproportional hazards and event history analysis in international relations. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 47(1), 33–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002702239510
4.
BoydD. J.GrossmanP. L.LankfordH.LoebS.WyckoffJ. (2009). Teacher preparation and student achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 31(4), 416–440. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373709353129
5.
BunchG. C. (2013). Pedagogical language knowledge: Preparing mainstream teachers for English learners in the new standards era. Review of Research in Education, 37(1), 298–341. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X12461772
6.
BurkeA. M.Morita-MullaneyT.SinghM. (2016). Indiana emergent bilingual student time to reclassification: A survival analysis. American Education Research Journal, 53(5), 1310–1342. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312166674
7.
CallahanR. M. (2005). Tracking and high school English learners: Limiting opportunity to learn. American Educational Research Journal, 42(2), 305–328. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312042002305
8.
CallahanR. M.ShifrerD. (2016). Equitable access for secondary English learner students: Course taking as evidence of EL program effectiveness. Educational Administration Quarterly, 52(3), 463–496. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X1664819
9.
CarlsonD.KnowlesJ. E. (2016). The effect of English language learner reclassification on student ACT scores, high school graduation, and postsecondary enrollment: Regression discontinuity evidence from Wisconsin. Journal of Policy Analysis & Management, 35(3), 559–586. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.21908
10.
ChingosM. M.PetersonP. E. (2011). It’s easier to pick a good teacher than to train one: Familiar and new results on the correlates of teacher effectiveness. Economics of Education Review, 30(3), 449–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econ edurev.2010.12.010
11.
CimpianJ. R.ThompsonK. D.MakowskiM. B. (2017). Evaluating English learner reclassification policy effects across districts. American Educational Research Journal, 54(1 Suppl.), 255S-278S. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831216635796
12.
CirinoP. T.Pollard-DurodolaS. D.FoormanB. R.CarlsonC. D.FrancisD. J. (2007). Teacher characteristics, classroom instruction, and student literacy and language outcomes in bilingual kindergartners. Elementary School Journal, 107(4), 341–364. https://doi.org/10.1086/516668
13.
ClotfelterC. T.LaddH. F.VigdorJ. L. (2010). Teacher credentials and student achievement in high school: A cross-subject analysis with student fixed effects. Journal of Human Resources, 45(3), 655–681. https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.45.3.655
14.
CohenJ.GoldhaberD. (2016). Building a more complete understanding of teacher evaluation using classroom observations. Educational Researcher, 45(6), 378–387. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X166594
EgaliteA. J.KisidaB. (2018). The effects of teacher match on students’ academic perceptions and attitudes. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 40(1), 59–81. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373717714056
HakutaK.PecheoneR. (2016). Supporting English learners and treating bilingualism as an asset. In HansenM.ValantJ. (Eds.), Memos to the president on the future of U.S. education policy. Brookings Institution.
19.
HunterS. (2018). History of TEAM teacher evaluation policy (pp. 1–98). Tennessee Education Research Alliance.
20.
JohnsonA. (2019). The effects of English learner classification on high school graduation and college attendance. AERA Open, 5(2), 233285841985080.
21.
JohnsonA. (2020). The impact of English learner reclassification on high school reading and academic progress. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 42(1), 46–65. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373719877197
22.
JoshiE.DoanS.SpringerM. G. (2018). Student-teacher race congruence: New Evidence and insight from Tennessee. AERA Open, 4(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858418817528
23.
KarabenickS. A.NodaP. A. C. (2004). Professional development implications of teachers’ beliefs and attitudes toward English language learners. Bilingual Research Journal, 28(1), 55–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/15235882.2004.10162612
24.
KiefferM. J.ParkerC. E. (2016). Patterns of English learner student reclassification in New York City public schools (REL 2017–200). U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Northeast & Islands. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs/regions/northeast/project.asp?projectID=4487
25.
LeiderC. M.ColomboM. W.NerlinoE. (2021). Decentralization, teacher quality, and the education of English learners: Do state education agencies effectively prepare teachers of ELs?Education Policy Analysis Archives, 29(100), 1–44. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.29.5279
26.
LoebS.SolandJ.FoxL. (2014). Is a good teacher a good teacher for all? Comparing value-added of teachers with their English learners and non-English learners. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 36(4), 457–475.
27.
LucasT.GrinbergJ. (2008). Responding to the linguistic reality of mainstream classrooms: Preparing all teachers to teach English language learners. In Cochran-SmithM.Feiman-NemserS.McIntyreJ. (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education: Enduring issues in changing contexts (3rd ed., pp. 606–636). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
28.
LucasT.VillegasA. M. (2010). The missing piece in teacher education: The preparation of linguistically responsive teachers. National Society for the Study of Education, 109(2), 297–318. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811011201402
29.
LucasT.VillegasA. M.Freedson-GonzalezM. (2008). Linguistically responsive teacher education: Preparing classroom teachers to teach English language learners. Journal of Teacher Education, 59(4), 361–373. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108322110
30.
MasterB.LoebS.WhitneyC.WyckoffJ. (2016). Different skills? Identifying differentially effective teachers of English language learners. Elementary School Journal, 117(2), 261–284. https://doi.org/10.1086/688871
31.
MartinkoM.HarveyP.MackeyJ. (2014). Conceptual and empirical confounds in the organizational sciences: An explication and discussion. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(8), 1052–1063. doi:10.1002/job.1961
32.
MavrogordatoM.WhiteR. (2017). Reclassification variation: How policy implementation guides the process of exiting students from English learner status. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 39(2), 281–310. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373716687
33.
MavrogordatoM.WhiteR. S. (2020). Leveraging policy implementation for social justice: How school leaders shape educational opportunity when implementing policy for English learners. Educational Administration Quarterly, 56(1), 3–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X18821364
34.
MotamediJ.SinghM.ThompsonK. D. (2016). English learner student characteristics and time to reclassification: An example from Washington State (REL 2016–128). U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Northwest. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/rel/Products/Publication/3728
35.
National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). (2012). Number of public school teachers and percentage of public school teachers who taught limited-English proficiency (LEP) or English-language learner (ELL) students, by selected school and teacher characteristics: 2011–12. In School and Staffing Survey (SASS). U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Services. https://nces.ed.gov/surveys/sass/tables/sass1112_498_t1n.asp
36.
National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). (2017). English language learner (ELL) students enrolled in public elementary and secondary schools, by state: Selected years, fall 2000 through fall 2015. U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d17/tables/dt17_204.20.asp
37.
National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). (2021). English language learners in public schools. In Condition of education. U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator/cgf
38.
PopeN. G. (2016). The marginal effect of K-12 English language development programs: Evidence from Los Angeles schools. Economics of Education Review, 53, 311–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2016.04.009
RobinsonJ. P. (2011). Evaluating criteria for English learner reclassification: A causal-effects approach using a binding-score regression discontinuity design with instrumental variables. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 33(3), 267–292. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373711407
41.
SantibañezL.UmanskyI. (2018). English learners: Charting their experiences and mapping their futures in California schools (pp. 1–18). Getting Down to Facts II.
42.
ShinN. (2018). The effects of the initial English language learner classification on students’ later academic outcomes. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 40(2), 175–195. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373717737378
43.
SingerJ. D.WillettJ. B. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence (1st ed.). Oxford University Press.
44.
SlamaR. B. (2014). Investigating whether and when English learners are reclassified into mainstream classrooms in the United States: A discrete-time survival analysis. American Education Research Journal, 51(2), 220–252. 10.3102/0002831214528277
45.
SlamaR.MolefeA.GerdemanR. DHerreraA.Brodziak de los ReyesI.AugustD.CavazosL. (2017). Time to proficiency for Hispanic English learner students in Texas (REL 2018–280). U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Central. http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs
46.
SteinbergM.GarrettR. (2016). Classroom composition and measured teacher performance: What do teacher observation scores really measure?Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 38(2), 293–317. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162 373715616249
47.
Tennessee Department of Education (TDOE). (2013a). Overview of TVAAS composites for teachers in tested subjects. Tennessee Department of Education.
48.
Tennessee Department of Education (TDOE). (2013b). Overview of Title III English as a Second Language: Service Requirements for Non-English Background Students. Tennessee Department of Education.
49.
Tennessee Department of Education (TDOE). (2016). English as a Second Language program guide in TN (pp. 1–121). Tennessee Department of Education.
50.
Tennessee Department of Education (TDOE). (2018). English as a Second Language manual (pp. 1–87). Tennessee Department of Education.
Torre GibneyD.HenryG. (2020). Who teaches English learners? A study of the quality, experience, and credentials of teachers of English learners in a new immigrant destination. Teaching and Teacher Education, 90, 102967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.102967
53.
UmanskyI. M.ReardonS. F. (2014). Reclassification patterns among Latino English learner students in bilingual, dual immersion, and English immersion classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 51(5), 879–912. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831214545110
54.
WayneA. J.YoungsP. (2003). Teacher characteristics and student achievement gains: A review. Review of Educational Research, 73(1), 89–122. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543073001089
55.
WolfM. K.KaoJ. C.GriffinN.HermanJ. L.BachmanP. L.ChangS. M.FarnsworthT. (2008). Issues in assessing English language learners: English language proficiency measures and accommodation uses (CRESST Report 732) (pp. 1–96). National Research for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST). https://doi.org/10.1037/e643572011-001
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
