Placement of some students into the courses needed only for high school graduation and others into those that prepare them for college constitutes academic stratification. This study uses data from the Education Longitudinal Study of 2002 to investigate whether students labeled with learning disabilities complete fewer academic courses by the end of high school compared to their peers who are not labeled. Results indicate large disparities in completion of college preparatory coursework, especially in math, science, and foreign language, even net of students’ academic preparation for high school and their cognitive and noncognitive skills. The evidence supports the possibility that school processes contribute to the poorer course-taking outcomes of students labeled with learning disabilities.
AdelmanC. (1999). Answers in the tool box: Academic intensity, attendance patterns, and bachelor’s degree attainment. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
2.
AdelmanC. (2006). The toolbox revisited: Paths to degree completion from high school through college. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
3.
American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
4.
ArtilesA. J.Harris-MurriN.RostenbergD. (2006). Inclusion as social justice: Critical notes on discourses, assumptions, and the road ahead. Theory Into Practice, 45(3), 260–268.
5.
ArtilesA. J.KozleskiE. B.TrentS. C.OsherD.OrtizA. (2010). Justifying and explaining disproportionality, 1968–2008: A critique of underlying views of culture. Exceptional Children, 76(3), 279–299.
6.
BeckerH. S. (1997). Outsiders: Studies in the sociology of deviance. New York, NY: The Free Press. (Original work published 1963)
7.
BlanchettW. J. (2006). Disproportionate representation of African American students in special education: Acknowledging the role of White privilege and racism. Educational Researcher, 35(6), 24–28.
8.
BlanchettW. J.KlingnerJ. K.HarryB. (2009). The intersection of race, culture, language, and disability: Implications for urban education. Urban Education, 44(4), 389–409.
9.
CarrierJ. G. (1983). Explaining educability: An investigation of political support for the Children with Learning Disabilities Act of 1969. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 4(2), 125–140.
10.
CawthonS. W. (2007). Hidden benefits and unintended consequences of No Child Left Behind policies for students who are deaf or hard of hearing. American Educational Research Journal, 44(3), 460–492.
11.
CoutinhoM. J.OswaldD. P.BestA. M. (2002). The influence of sociodemographics and gender on the disproportionate identification of minority students as having learning disabilities. Remedial & Special Education, 23(1), 49–59.
12.
Dudley-MarlingC. (2004). The social construction of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37(6), 482–489.
13.
EideE. R.RonanN. (2001). Is participation in high school athletics an investment or a consumption good?Economics of Education Review, 20(5), 431–442.
14.
FletcherJ. M.DentonC.FrancisD. J. (2005). Validity of alternative approaches for the identification of learning disabilities: Operationalizing unexpected underachievement. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38(6), 545–552.
15.
GelbS. A.MizokawaD. T. (1986). Special education and social structure: The commonality of “exceptionality.”American Educational Research Journal, 23(4), 543–557.
16.
GoffmanE. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
17.
GrayK. (2002). The role of career and technical education in the American high school: A student centered analysis. Washington, DC: Office of Vocational and Adult Education, U.S. Department of Education.
18.
GreggN. (2007). Underserved and unprepared: Postsecondary learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 22(4), 219–228.
19.
HarwellM.PostT. R.CutlerA.MaedaY.AndersonE.NormanK. W.MedhanieA. (2009). The preparation of students from National Science Foundation-funded and commercially developed high school mathematics curricula for their first university mathematics course. American Educational Research Journal, 46(1), 203–231.
20.
HibelJ.FarkasG.MorganP. L. (2010). Who is placed into special education?Sociology of Education, 83(4), 312–332.
21.
HoA. (2004). To be labeled, or not to be labeled: That is the question. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32(2), 86–92.
22.
HoetkerG. (2007). The use of logit and probit models in strategic management research: Critical issues. Strategic Management Journal, 28, 331–343.
23.
HorvathM. J.KassC. E.FerrellW. R. (1980). An example of the use of fuzzy set concepts in modeling learning disability. American Educational Research Journal, 17(3), 309–324.
24.
IdolL. (2006). Toward inclusion of special education students in general education: A program evaluation of eight schools. Remedial and Special Education, 27(2), 77–94.
25.
IngelsS. J.PrattD. J.RogersJ. E.SiegelP. H.StuttsE. S. (2004). Education Longitudinal Study of 2002: Base year data file user’s manual (Vol. NCES 2004.405). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
26.
JenkinsJ. R.DaleP. S.MillsP. E.ColeK. N.PiousC.RonkJ. (2006). How special education preschool graduates finish: Status at 19 years of age. American Educational Research Journal, 43(4), 737–781.
27.
KliewerC.BiklenD.Kasa-HendricksonC. (2006). Whomaybe literate? Disability and resistance to the cultural denial of competence. American Educational Research Journal, 43(2), 163–192.
LipnevichA. A.RobertsR. D. (2012). Noncognitive skills in education: Emerging research and applications in a variety of international contexts. Learning and Individual Differences, 22(2), 173–177.
30.
MalmerG. (2000). Mathematics and dyslexia: An overlooked connection. Dyslexia, 6(4), 223–230.
31.
MayesS. D.CalhounS. L. (2007). Challenging the assumptions about the frequency and coexistence of learning disability types. School Psychology International, 28(4), 437–448.
32.
MehanH.HertweckA.MeihlsJ. L. (1986). Handicapping the handicapped: Decision making in students’ educational careers. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
33.
MorganP. L.FriscoM.FarkasG.HibelJ. (2010). A propensity score matching analysis of the effects of special education services. Journal of Special Education, 43(4), 236–254.
34.
MullerC.SchillerK. (2000). Leveling the playing field? Students’ educational attainment and states’ performance testing. Sociology of Education, 73(3), 196–218.
35.
OchoaA. M.PachecoR.OmarkD. R. (1988). Addressing the learning disability needs of limited English proficient students: Beyond language and race issues. Learning Disability Quarterly, 11(3), 257–264.
36.
Ong-DeanC. (2006). High roads and low roads: Learning disabilities in California, 1976–1998. Sociological Perspectives, 49(1), 91–113.
37.
PlankS. (2001). A question of balance: CTE, academic courses, high school persistence, and student achievement. Journal of Vocational Education Research, 26(3), 279–327.
38.
ReesD. I.SabiaJ. J. (2010). Sports participation and academic performance: Evidence from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health. Economics of Education Review, 29(5), 751–759.
39.
ReidD. K.KnightM. G. (2006). Disability justifies exclusion of minority students: A critical history grounded in disability studies. Educational Researcher, 35(6), 18–23.
40.
SchneiderB.StevensonD. (1999). The ambitious generation: America’s teenagers, motivated but directionless. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
41.
SchneiderB.SwansonC. B.Riegle-CrumbC. (1998). Opportunities for learning: Course sequences and positional advantages. Social Psychology of Education, 2(1), 25–53.
42.
ShettleC.RoeyS.MordicaJ.PerkinsR.NordC.TeodorovicJ.KastbergD. (2007). The nation’s report card: America’s high school graduates. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
43.
ShifrerD.MullerC.CallahanR. (2011). Disproportionality and learning disabilities: Parsing apart race, socioeconomic status, and language. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 44(3), 246–257.
44.
SkibaR. J.SimmonsA. B.RitterS.GibbA. C.RauschM. K.CuadradoJ.ChungC.-G. (2008). Achieving equity in special education: History, status, and current challenges. Exceptional Children, 74(3), 264–288.
45.
SleeterC. E. (2010). Why is there learning disabilities? A critical analysis of the birth of the field in its social context. Disability Studies Quarterly, 30(2), 210–237. (Original work published 1987)
46.
SpellingsM.KnudsenW. W.GuardP. J. (2007). 27th annual (2005) report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, Vol. 1. Washington, DC: Office of Special Education Programs, Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services, U.S. Department of Education.
47.
StuebingK. K.FletcherJ. M.LeDouxJ. M.LyonG. R.ShaywitzS. E.ShaywitzB. A. (2002). Validity of IQ-discrepancy classifications of reading disabilities: A meta-analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 39(2), 469–518.
48.
WagnerM.BlackorbyJ. (1996). Transition from high school to work or college: How special education students fare. The Future of Children: Special Education for Students with Disabilities, 6(1), 103–120.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
