Researchers and policymakers often assume that teacher turnover harms student achievement, though recent studies suggest this may not be the case. Using a unique identification strategy that employs school-by-grade level turnover and two classes of fixed-effects models, this study estimates the effects of teacher turnover on over 850,000 New York City fourth- and fifth-grade student observations over 8 years. The results indicate that students in grade levels with higher turnover score lower in both English language arts (ELA) and math and that these effects are particularly strong in schools with more low-performing and Black students. Moreover, the results suggest that there is a disruptive effect of turnover beyond changing the distribution in teacher quality.
AbelsonM. A.BaysingerB. D. (1984). Optimal and dysfunctional turnover: Toward an organizational level model. The Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 331–341.
2.
BarnesG.CroweE.SchaeferB. (2007). The costs of turnover in five districts. A pilot study. Washington, DC: National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future.
3.
BoydD.LankfordH.LoebS.RonfeldtM.WyckoffJ. (2011a). The effect of school neighborhoods on teacher career decisions. In MurnaneR.DuncanG. (Eds.), Whither opportunity? Rising inequality and the uncertain life chances of low-income children. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
4.
BoydD.LankfordH.LoebS.RonfeldtM.WyckoffJ. (2011b). The role of teacher quality in retention and hiring: Using applications-to-transfer to uncover preferences of teachers and schools. Journal of Policy and Management, 30(1), 88–110.
5.
BoydD.LankfordH.LoebS.WyckoffJ. (2005). Explaining the short careers of high-achieving teachers in schools with low-performing students. American Economic Review, 95(2), 166–171.
6.
BrykA. S.CamburnE.Seashore LouisK. (1999). Professional community in Chicago elementary schools: Facilitating factors and organizational consequences. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35, 751–781.
7.
BrykA. S.LeeV. E.HollandP. B. (1993). Catholic schools and the common good. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8.
BrykA. S.SchneiderB. (2002). Trust in schools: A core resource for improvement. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
9.
CarrollS.ReichardtR.GuarinoC. (2000). The distribution of teachers among California’s school districts and schools. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
10.
ClotfelterC. T.LaddH. F.VigdorJ. L.WheelerJ. (2007). High-poverty schools and the distribution of teachers and principals (CALDER Working Paper 1). Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
11.
Darling-HammondL.SykesG. (2003). Wanted: A national teacher supply policy for education: The right way to meet the “Highly Qualified Teacher” challenge. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 11(33). Retrieved from http://epaa.asu/epaa/v11n33/
12.
GoldhaberD.GrossB.PlayerD. (2007). Are public schools really losing their “best”? Assessing the career transitions of teachers and their implications for the quality of the teacher workforce. Washington, DC: National Center for Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Education Research.
13.
GuinK. (2004). Chronic teacher turnover in urban elementary schools. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12(42), 1–25.
HanushekE. A.KainJ. F.RivkinS. G. (1999). Do higher salaries buy better teachers? (Working Paper No. 7082). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
16.
HanushekE.KainJ.RivkinS. (2004). Why public schools lose teachers. Journal of Human Resources, 39(2), 326–354.
17.
HanushekE.RivkinS. (2010). Constrained job matching: Does teacher job search harm disadvantaged urban schools? (Working Paper No. 15816). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
18.
HemphillC.NauerK.ZelonH.JacobsT. (2009). The new marketplace: How small-school reforms and school choice have reshaped New York City’s high schools. New York, NY: The New School Center for New York City Affairs.
19.
HenkeR.ChenX.GeisS.KnepperP. (2000). Progress through the teacher pipeline: 1992–1993 college graduates and elementary/secondary school teaching as of 1997. Washington, DC: National Center for Educational Statistics.
20.
IngersollR. (2001). Teacher turnover and teacher shortages: An organizational analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 499–534.
21.
IngersollR. (2003). Is there really a teacher shortage?Washington, DC: Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy.
22.
IngersollR.RossiR. (1995). Which types of schools have the highest teacher turnover? (Policy Brief 95-778). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
23.
JacksonK. (2010). Match quality, worker productivity, and worker mobility: Direct evidence from teachers (Working Paper No. 15990). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
LittleJ. W. (1982). Norms of collegiality and experimentation: Workplace conditions of school success. American Educational Research Journal, 19(3), 325–340.
26.
LouisK. S.MarksH. M. (1998). Does professional community affect the classroom? Teachers’ work and student experiences in restructuring schools. American Journal of Education, 106, 532–575.
27.
McCaffreyD. F.LockwoodJ. R.KoretzD.LouisT. A.HamiltonL. (2004). Models for value-added modeling of teacher effects. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 29(1), 67–101.
28.
MurnaneR. J. (1984). Selection and survival in the teacher labor market. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 66(3), 513–518.
29.
NewmanF.SmithB.AllensworthE.BrykA. S. (2001). School instructional program coherence: Benefits and challenges. Chicago, IL: Consortium on Chicago School Research.
30.
ScafidiB.StinebricknerT.SjoquistD. L. (2003). The relationship between school characteristics and teacher mobility. Working paper, Georgia State University.
31.
ShieldsP. M.EschC.HumphreyD. C.YoungV. M.GastonM.HuntH. (1999). The status of the teaching profession: Research findings and policy recommendations. Santa Cruz, CA: The Center for the Future of Teaching and Learning.
32.
ShieldsP. M.HumphreyD. C.WechslerM. E.RielL. M.Tiffany-MoralesJ.WoodworthK.. . . PriceT. (2001). The status of the teaching profession 2001. Santa Cruz, CA: The Center for the Future of Teaching and Learning.
