The persistent fear of physics by learners motivated the author to take action to increase all students’ interest in the subject via a new curriculum for introductory college physics that applies Greene’s model of Aesthetic Education to the study of contemporary physics, utilizing symmetry as the mathematical foundation of physics as well as the conceptual link between physics and the arts. The author describes the curriculum and suggests how students’ drawings and written commentaries can provide insights into students’ preferred learning modalities, promote understanding of abstract concepts through visualization, and reveal students’ preexisting attitudes toward science. Outcomes align with the goals of improving students’ attitudes toward physics, indicated by their comments, written work, and results of the Maryland Physics Expectations Survey.
AikenheadG. (2002). Whose scientific knowledge? The colonizer and the colonized. In RothW-M.DésautelsJ. (Eds.), Science education as/for sociopolitical action (pp. 151–166). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
AngellC.GuttersrudO.HenriksenE.IsnesA. (2004). Physics: Frightful, but fun: Pupils’ and teachers’ views of physics and physics teaching. doi:10.1002/sce.1014110.1002/sce.10141. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/sce.10141/abstract
BlickenstaffJ. C. (2005). Women and science careers: Leaky pipeline or gender filter?Gender and Education, 17(4), 369–386.
7.
BourdieuP. (1977). The economics of linguistic exchanges, Social Science Information, 16(6), 645–668.
8.
BrekkeS. E. (1995). Changes in the physics curriculum in American high schools from Revolutionary War to the present. U.S. Educational Services document, ED 393 655.
9.
BrownB. A.KloserM.HendersonJ. B. (2010, October). Building bridges towards cognition: Cultural continuity and the language-identity dilemma. Presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Denver, CO.
10.
BrooksM. (2009). Drawing, visualization and young children’s exploration of “big ideas.”International Journal of Science Education, 31(3), 319–341.
11.
ByersN. (1998). E. Noether’s discovery of the deep connection between symmetries and conservation laws. arXiv:physics/98070442(23), Sep1998.
12.
CampbellP. (2004). Seeing and seeing: Visual perception in art and science. Physics Education, 39(6), 473–479.
13.
ChambersD. W. (1983). Stereotypic images of the scientist: The draw-a-scientist test. Science Education, 67(2), 255–265.
14.
CorsonD. (2001). Language, diversity, and education. Newark, NJ: Erlbaum.
15.
CraftonL. K.SilversP.BrennanM. (2009). Creating a critical multiliteracies curriculum: repositioning art in the early childhood classroom. In NareyM. J. (Ed.), Making meaning: Constructing multimodal perspectives of language, literacy, and learning through arts-based early childhood education (pp. 31–52). New York, NY: Springer.
16.
DuschlR. A.SchweingruberH. A.ShouseA. W. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in Grades K-8. Report of the Committee on Science Learning, Kindergarten through Eighth Grade. National Academies Press. Retrieved from http://www.nap.edu/catalog/11625.html, 10/17/2011
17.
EdensK. M.PotterE. (2003). Using descriptive drawings as a conceptual change strategy in elementary science. School Science and Mathematics, 103(3), 135–144.
18.
EinsteinA. (2003). Physics and reality. Daedalus, 132(4), 22–25. (Original work published 1936)
19.
EisnerE. W. (2002). What can education learn from the arts about the practice of education?Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 18, 4–16.
20.
EschenbergK. (2006). Scientist as artist: The role of imagination. Physics Today, 59(7), 10.
21.
FelderR. (1993). Reaching the second tier: Learning and teaching styles in college science education. Journal of College Science Teaching, 23(5), 286–290.
22.
FelderR. M.SilvermanL. K. (1988). Learning and teaching styles in engineering education. Engineering Education, 78(7), 674–681.
23.
GetzelsJ. W.JacksonP. W. (1962). Creativity and intelligence: Explorations with gifted students. London: Wiley & Sons.
GreeneM. (2001). Variations on a blue guitar. Lincoln Center Institute Lectures on Aesthetic Education. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
26.
GumperzJ. J. (1968). The speech community. In International encyclopedia of the social sciences (pp. 381–386). New York, NY: MacMillan.
27.
HadamardJ. (1945). An essay on the psychology of invention in the mathematical field. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
28.
HanrahanM. (2002). Learning science: Revisiting humanist dimensions of intellectual engagement. The effect of learning environment factors on students’ motivation and learning. International Journal of Science Education, 20(6), 737–753.
29.
HazariZ.SonnertG.SadlerP. M.ShanahanM. C. (2010). Connecting high school physics experiences, outcome expectations, physics identity, and physics career choice: A gender study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47, 978–1003.
IzmirliO.BairdB. (2002). A model for integrating arts and technology in a liberal arts college. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 17(6), 102–109.
36.
John-SteinerV. (1997). Notebooks of the mind: Explorations of thinking (Rev. ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
37.
KatzP.McGinnisJ. R.HestnessE.RiedingerK.Marbach-AdG.DaiA.PeaseR. (2011). Professional identity development of teacher candidates participating in an informal science education internship: A focus on drawings as evidence. International Journal of Science Education, 33(9), 1169–1197.
38.
KendrickM.McKayR. (2002). Uncovering literacy narratives through children’s drawings. Canadian Journal of Education, 27(1), 45–60.
39.
KesselsU.RauM.HannoverB. (2006). What goes well with physics? Measuring and altering the image of science. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(4), 761–780.
LeeO. (2003). Equity for linguistically and culturally diverse students in science education: A research agenda. Teachers College Record, 105(3), 465–489.
44.
LemkeJ. (2000). Multimedia literacy demands of the scientific curriculum. Linguistics and Education, 10(3), 247–271.
MayD. B.EtkinaE. (2002). College physics students’ epistemological self reflection and its relationship to conceptual learning. American Journal of Physics, 70(12), 1249–1258.
48.
MillerA. I. (1989). Imagery and intuition in creative scientific thinking: Albert Einstein’s invention of the Special Theory of Relativity. In WallaceD.GruberH. (Eds.), Creative people at work (pp. 171–185). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
49.
NosekB. A.BanajiM.GreenwaldA. G. (2002). Math = male, me = female, therefore math ≠ me. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(1), 44–59. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.83.1.4410.1037/0022-3514.83.1.44
50.
OsborneJ. (1990). Sacred cows in physics—Towards a redefinition of physics education. Physics Education, 25, 189–195.
51.
PestalozziJ. (1894). How Gertrude teaches her children an attempt to help mothers to teach their children and an account of the method (HollandL.TurnerF., trans.). London; Syracuse: Swann Sonnenschein. (Original work published 1805).
52.
PetersonR. W. (2005). Crossing bridges that connect the arts, cognitive evelopment, and the brain. Journal for Learning through the Arts, 1(1). Retrieved from http://escholarship.org/uc/item/8jm7t2x8
53.
PhelanP. KDavidsonA. L.YuH. C. (1993). Students’ multiple worlds: Navigating the boundaries of family, peer, and school cultures. In PhelanP. K.DavidsonA. L. (Eds.), Renegotiating cultural diversity in American schools (pp. 52–88). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
54.
RedishE. F.SaulJ. M.SteinbergR. N. (1998). Student expectations in introductory physics. American Journal of Physics, (66)3, 212–224.
55.
RinneL.GregoryE.YarmolinskayaJ.HardimanM. (2011). Why arts integration improves long-term retention of content. Mind, Brain, and Education, 5(2), 89–96. doi:10.1111/j.1751-228X.2011.01114.x10.1111/j.1751-228X.2011.01114.x
56.
Root-BerensteinR. S. (1985). Visual thinking: The art of imagining reality. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, 75(6), 50–67.
SheH-C. (1995). Elementary and middle school students’ image of science and scientists related to current science textbooks in Taiwan. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 4(4), 283–294.
59.
SjøbergS.SchreinerC. (2007). Science education and youth’s identity construction—Two incompatible projects? In CorriganD.DillonJ.GunstoneR. (Eds.), The re-emergence of values in the science curriculum. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
StuverA. (2001). Analysis of the undergraduate curriculum department of physics (Unpublished master’s thesis). Pennsylvania State University, University Park.
62.
SwellerJ. (1999). Instructional design. Camberwell, Victoria, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research Ltd.
63.
TobiasS. (1990). They’re not dumb, they’re different: Stalking the second tier. Tucson, AZ: Research Corporation.
64.
TobiasS. (2006). Letter to the editor. Physics Today, 59(7), 10.
65.
TraweekS. (1988). Beamtimes and lifetimes. The world of high energy physicists. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
66.
van der VeenJ. (2007). Symmetry and aesthetics in introductory physics: An experiment in interdisciplinary physics and fine arts education (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of California, Santa Barbara.
67.
WeinbergS. (1992). Dreams of a final theory. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
68.
WeisskopfV. (1976). Is physics human?Physics Education, 11(2), 75–79.
69.
ZeeA. (2007) Fearful symmetry. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1999)
