Using panel data from a census of public school students in the state of Florida, the authors examine the associations between students’ high school course-taking in various subjects and their 10th-grade test scores, high school graduation, entry into postsecondary institutions, and postsecondary performance. The authors use propensity score matching (based on 8th-grade test scores, other student characteristics, and school effects) within groups of students matched on the composition of the students’ course-taking in other subjects to estimate the differences in outcomes for students who take rigorous courses in a variety of subjects. The authors find substantial significant differences in outcomes for those who take rigorous courses, and these estimated effects are often larger for disadvantaged youth and students attending disadvantaged schools.
ACT. (2005). Courses count: Preparing students for postsecondary success. Iowa City, IA: ACT Policy Report.
2.
AdelmanC. (2006). The toolbox revisited: Paths to degree completion from high school through college. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
3.
AlexanderK. L.CookM. A. (1982). Curricula and coursework: A surprising ending to a familiar story. American Sociological Review, 47, 626–640.
4.
AltonjiJ. G. (1995). The effects of high school curriculum on education and labor market outcomes. The Journal of Human Resources, 30(3), 409–438.
5.
AttewellP.DominaT. (2008). Raising the bar: Curricular intensity and academic performance. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 30(1), 51–71.
6.
BishopJ. H.ManeF. (2004). The impacts of career-technical education on high school labour market success. Economics of Education Review, 23, 381–402.
7.
BlackD. A.SmithJ. A. (2004). How robust is the evidence on the effects of college quality? Evidence from matching. Journal of Econometrics, 121, 99–124.
8.
BrykA.LeeV.SmithJ. (1990). High school organization and its effects on teachers and students: An interpretive summary of the research. Choice and Control in American Education, 1, 135–227.
CameronA. C.TrivediP. K. (2005). Microeconometrics: Methods and applications. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
11.
CatsambisS. (1994). The path to math: Gender and racial-ethnic differences in mathematics participation from middle school to high school. Sociology of Education, 67(3), 199–215.
12.
CockingR. R.MestreJ. P. (1988). Linguistic and cultural influences on learning mathematics. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
13.
CoolV. A.KeithT. Z. (1991). Testing a model of school learning: Direct and indirect effects on academic achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 16(1), 28–44.
14.
CongerD.LongM. C.IatarolaP. (2009). Explaining race, gender, and poverty disparities in advanced course-taking. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 28(4), 555–576.
15.
DavenportE. C.Jr.DavisonM. L.KuangH.DingS.KimS.KwakN. (1998). High school mathematics course-taking by gender and ethnicity. American Educational Research Journal, 35(3), 497–514.
16.
DehejiaR. H.WahbaS. (2002). Propensity score-matching methods for nonexperimental causal studies. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 84(1), 151–161.
17.
DoughertyC.MellorL.JianS. (2006). Orange juice or orange drink: Ensuring that “advanced courses” live up to their labels. National Center for Educational Accountability Policy Brief No. 1. Retrieved from http://www.nc4ea.org/files/orange_juice_or_orange_drink_02-13-06.pdf
18.
GamoranA. (1987). The stratification of high school learning opportunities. Sociology of Education, 60(3), 135–155.
19.
GamoranA.HanniganE. C. (2000). Algebra for everyone? Benefits of college-preparatory mathematics for students with diverse abilities in early secondary school. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 22(3), 241–254.
20.
GamoranA.MareR. D. (1989). Secondary school tracking and educational inequality: Compensation, reinforcement, or neutrality?The American Journal of Sociology, 94(5), 1146–1183.
21.
GoodmanJ. (2008). The labor of division: Returns to compulsory math coursework. Unpublished manuscript.
22.
HanushekE. A.KainJ. F.MarkmanJ. M.RivkinS. G. (2001). Does peer ability affect student achievement? (National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper 8502). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
23.
HinsleyD. A.HayesJ. R.SimonH. A. (1977). From words to equations meaning and representation in algebra word problems. In CarpenterP. A.JustM. A. (Eds.), Cognitive process in comprehension (pp. 89–106). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
24.
HoxbyC. M. (2000). Peer effects in the classroom: Learning from gender and race variation (Working Paper 7867). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
25.
JoensenJ.NielsenH. (2009). Is there a causal effect of high school math on labor market outcomes?Journal of Human Resources, 44(1), 171–198.
26.
JonesE. B.JacksonJ. D. (1990). College grades and labor market rewards. Journal of Human Resources, 25(2), 253–266.
27.
KaneT. J.StaigerD. O. (2008). Estimating teacher impacts on student achievement: An experimental evaluation (Working Paper 14607). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
28.
KlopfensteinK. (2004). Advanced placement: Do minorities have equal opportunity?Economics of Education Review, 23, 115–131.
29.
LairdJ.LewS.DeBellM.ChapmanC. (2006). Dropout rates in the United States: 2002 and 2003 (NCES 2006-062). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
30.
LeeV. E.SmithJ. B. (1997). High school size: Which works best, and for whom?Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19(3), 205–227.
31.
LevineP. B.ZimmermanD. J. (1995). The benefit of additional high-school math and science classes for young men and women. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 13(2), 137–149.
32.
LeuvenE.SianesiB. (2003). PSMATCH2: Stata module to perform full Mahalanobis and propensity score matching, common support graphing, and covariate imbalance testing. Retrieved from http://ideas.repec.org/c/boc/bocode/s432001.html
33.
LongM. C.IatarolaP.CongerD. (2009). Explaining gaps in readiness for college-level math: The role of high school courses. Education Finance and Policy, 4(1), 1–33.
34.
LovelessT. (2008). The misplaced math student: Lost in eighth-grade algebra. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
35.
National Center for Education Statistics. (1997). Science proficiency and course taking in high school: The relationship of science course-taking patterns to increases in science proficiency between 8th and 12th grades (NCES 97-383). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
36.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2005). The condition of education (NCES 2005-094). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
37.
NomiT.AllensworthE. (2009). “Double-dose” algebra as an alternative strategy to remediation: Effects on students’ academic outcomes.”Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2, 111–148.
Riegle-CrumbC. (2006). The path through math: Course sequences and academic performance at the intersection of race/ethnicity and gender. American Journal of Education, 113(1), 1–17.
41.
RockD. A.PollackJ. M. (1995). The relationship between gains in achievement in mathematics and selected course taking behaviors. Washington, DC: US Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
42.
RockoffJ. E. (2004). The impact of individual teachers on student achievement: Evidence from panel data. American Economic Review, 94(2), 247–252.
43.
RoseH.BettsJ. R. (2004). The effect of high school courses on earnings. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 86(2), 497–513.
44.
RosenbaumP.RubinD. B. (1983). The central role of propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70, 41–55.
45.
RoystonP. (2004). Multiple imputation of missing values. Stata Journal, 4(3), 227–241.
46.
RubinD. B. (1987). Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. New York, NY: John Wiley.
47.
SchneiderB. (2003). Strategies for success: High school and beyond. In RavitchD. (Ed.), Brookings papers on education policy (pp. 55–94). Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press.
48.
SchneiderB.SwansonC. B.Riegle-CrumbC. (1998). Opportunities for learning: Course sequences and positional advantages. Social Psychology of Education, 2, 25–53.
49.
SebringP. A. (1987). Consequences of differential amounts of high school course work: Will the new graduation requirements help?Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 9, 258–273.
50.
ShettleC.RoeyS.MordicaJ.PerkinsR.NordC.TeodorovicJ.. . . KastbergD. (2007). The nation’s report card: America’s high school graduates (NCES 2007-467). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
51.
StevensonD. L.SchillerK. S.SchneiderB. (1994). Sequences of opportunities for learning. Sociology of Education, 67(3), 184–198.
52.
StiefelL.SchwartzA. E.IatarolaP.ChellmanC. (2009). Mission matters: The costs of small schools revisited. Economics of Education Review, 28, 585–599.
53.
U.S. Department of Education. (2006). No Child Left Behind: Expanding the advanced placement incentive program. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
ZeitzJ.PrathibhaJ. (2005). Academic choice behavior of high school students: Economic rationale and empirical evidence. Economics of Educational Review, 24, 297–308.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
