BrunoM. C.2006. A Morphological Approach to Documenting the Domestication of Chenopodium in the Andes. InDocumenting Domestication: New Genetic and Archaeoiogical Paradigms, edited by ZederM. A., BradleyD. G., EmshwillerE., and SmithB. D., pp. 32– 45. University of California Press, Berkeley.
2.
FullerD.2002. Fifty Years of Archaeobotanical Studies in India: Laying a Solid Foundation. InIndian Archaeology in Retrospect, Volume III. Archaeology and Interactive Disciplines, edited by SettarS. and KorisettarR., pp. 247– 364. Publications of the Indian Council for Historical Research, New Delhi, Manohar.
3.
FullerD. Q., and MadellaM.. 2001. Issues in Harappan Archaeobotany: Retrospect and Prospect. InIndian Archaeology in Retrospect Vol. II, edited by SettarS. and KorisettarR., pp. 317– 390. Protohistory Publications of the Indian Council for Historical Research, New Delhi, Manohar.
4.
FullerD. Q, and WeberS. A.. 2005. Formation Processes and Paleoethnobotanical Interpretation in South Asia. Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies in History and Archaeology2: 93– 115.
5.
GiosanL., OrsiW., CoolenM., WutcherC., DunleaA., ThirumalaiK., MunozS. E., CliftP. D., DonnellyJ. P., GalayV., and FullerD. Q.. 2018. Neoglacial Climate Anomalies and the Harappan Metamorphosis. Climate of the Past Discussions.[online] URL: https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-2018-37.
6.
JarrigeJ. F.1985. Continuity and Change in the North Kachi Plain at the Beginning of the Second Millenium BC. InSouth Asian Archaeology 1983, edited by SchotsmanJ. and TaddeiM., pp. 35– 68. ISMEO, Naples.
7.
MeadowR.1989. Continuity and Change in the Agriculture of the Greater Indus Valley: The Paleoethnobotanical and Zooarchaeological Evidence. InOld Problems and New Perspectives in the Archaeology of South Asia, edited by KenoyerJ. M., pp. 61– 74. Prehistory Press, Madison, WI.
8.
MeadowR.1991. The Domestication and Exploitation of Plants and Animals in the Greater Indus Valley, 2nd–7th Millenium BC. InForgotten Cities on the Indus, edited by JansenM. M. and UrbanG., pp. 51– 58. Verlag Phillip Zabern, Mainz.
9.
MeyerJ. C.2003. Understanding Hearth Function: An Approach from Harappa. Asian Perspectives42: 287– 303.
10.
PartapT., and KapoorP.. 1985a. The Himalayan Grain Chenopods. I. Distribution and Ethnobotany. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment14: 185– 199.
11.
PartapT., and KapoorP.. 1985b. The Himalayan Grain Chenopods. II. Comparative Morphology. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment14: 201– 220.
12.
PenningtonH. L., and WeberS. A.. 2004. Paleoethnobotany: Modern Research Connecting Ancient Plants and Ancient Peoples. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences23: 13– 20.
13.
PetrieC. A., and BatesJ.. 2017. ‘Multi-cropping’, Intercropping and Adaptation to Variable Environments in Indus South Asia. Journal of World Prehistory30: 81– 130.
14.
PossehlG. L.1986. African Millets in South Asian Prehistory. InStudies in the Archaeology of India and Pakistan, edited by JacobsonJ., pp. 237– 256. IBH Publishing Company, New Delhi.
15.
WeberS. A.1986. The Development of a Society: An Introduction to the Special Issue. Journal of Ethnobiology6: 1– 5.
16.
WeberS. A.1990. Millets in South Asia: Rojdi as a Case Study. InSouth Asian Archaeology 1987, edited by TaddeiM. and CallieriP., pp. 333– 348. Istituto Italiano per I'Africa e I'Oriente, Rome.
17.
WeberS. A.1992. Plants and Harappan Subsistence: An Example of Stability and Change from Rojdi.Westview Press, CO.
18.
WeberS. A.1998Out of Africa: The Initial Impact of Millets in South Asia. Current Anthropology39: 267– 274.
19.
WeberS. A.1999. Seeds of Urbanism: Palaeoethnobotany and the Indus Civilization. Antiquity73: 813– 826.
20.
WeberS. A.2003. Archaeobotany at Harappa: Indications for Change. InIndus Ethnobiology: New Perspectives from the Field, edited by WeberS. A. and BelcherB., pp. 175– 198. Lexington Books, Lanham, MD.
21.
WeberS. A., and FullerD. Q.. 2008. Millets and Their Role in Early Agriculture. Pradghara18: 69– 90.
22.
WeberS., and KashyapA.. 2014. Panicum sumatrense: The Forgotten Millet. InNew Lives for Ancient and Extinct Crops, edited by MinnisP. E., pp. 236– 253. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.
23.
WeberS., KashyapA., and HarrimanD.. 2010a. Rice or Millets: Early Farming Strategies in Prehistoric Central Thailand. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences2: 79– 88.
24.
WeberS. A., KashyapA., and HarrimanD.. 2010b. Does Size Matter: The Role and Significance of Cereal Grains in the Indus Civilization. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences2: 35– 43.
25.
WeberS. A., LehmanH., and BarelaT.. 2010c. Ecological Continuity: An Explanation for Agricultural Diversity in the Indus Civilization and Beyond. Man and EnvironmentXXXV: 62– 75.
26.
WeberS., KashyapA., and MounceL.. 2011. Archaeobotany at Farmana: New Insights into Harappan Plant Use Strategies. InExcavations at Farmana, edited by ShindeV., OsadaT., and KumarM., pp. 808– 823. RIHN Nakanish Printing, Kyoto, Japan.
27.
WhitingA. F., WeberS. A., and SeamanP. D.. 1985. Havasupai Habitat: A. F. Whiting's Ethnography of a Traditional Indian Culture.University of Arizona Press, Tucson.
28.
XueY.2010. 云南剑川海门口遗址植物遗存初步研究 Yunnan Jianchuan Haimenkou Yizhi Zhiwu Yicun Chubu Yanjiu [A Preliminary Investigation on the Archaeobotanical Material from the Site of Haimenkou in Jianchuan County, Yunnan], Unpublished Master's Thesis, Department of Archaeology and Museology, Peking University.
29.
YangX., and LiuC.. 2009. 汉阳陵外藏坑农作物遗存分析及西汉早期农业Han Yangling Waizengkeng Nongzuowu Yicun Fenxi Ji Xihan Zaoqi Nongye [Early Agriculture in the Western Han: Analysis of the Agricultural Products from the Han Yanling Tomb]. Kexue Tongbao2009: 1917– 1921.
30.
ZhaoZ., and ChenJ.. 2011. 四川茂县营盘山遗址浮选结果及分析 Sichuan Maoxian Yingpanshan Yizhi Fuxuan Jieguo ji Fenxi [Results of the Flotation Carried out at the Site of Yingpanshan in Maoxian County, Sichuan], Nanfang Wenwu2011: 60– 67.