Socio-ecological assessment frameworks like ecosystem services and nature's contributions to people help understanding complex human-nature couplings, but each with their own caveats. There has been little work done on understanding how human-nature couplings evolve through multiple generations, and how that impacts socio-ecological resilience. Mangroves, coupling high biological conservation values and various benefits provided to coastal communities, are ideal social-ecological systems to explore generational human-nature couplings. This study uses the Western Indian Ocean island of Mauritius to highlight the socio-political and cultural values attributed to local practices in mangroves. Through a socio-anthropological approach, information was collected on human practices in mangroves, their social, ontological and political relevance for mangroves-users, their local ecological knowledge (LEK), as well as the perceived changes in mangroves-human couplings. Two free listing methods on mangroves perception and linguistic diversity associated to fished species were also implemented in four coastal villages. The results show that mangroves are associated to multiple social, political and ontological values in Mauritius, notably cultural heritage values, LEK maintenance, matrilineal knowledge transmission systems, linguistic diversity and coastal socio-cultural activities. The presence of mangroves in small-scale seafood production systems also highlights their role in maintaining traditional coastal livelihoods. The narratives of changes within mangroves socio-ecosystems are either maintained or evolving through generations, as are the places of defined actors in coastal communities. Our findings suggest that without formal integration of relational values of mangrove at policy and governance levels, their decline will further produce economic and social insecurity for stewards and users of the coast.
AbibS.AppadooC.. 2021. “Local People and Mangroves: Ecosystem Perception and Valuation on the South West Coast of Mauritius.” Western Indian Ocean Journal of Marine Science20 (1): 11–19. https://doi.org/10.4314/wiojms.v20i1.2
AmbaliA.KabwaziH.MalekanoL.MwaleG.ChimwazaD.IngaingaJ.KadaY.. 2001. “Relationship Between Local and Scientific Names of Fishes in Lake Malawi/Nyasa.” African Study Monographs22 (3): 123–154.
4.
AnisimovA.MagnanA. K.DuvatV. K.. 2020. “Learning From Risk Reduction Pilot Projects for Enhancing Long-Term Adaptation Governance: The Case of Mauritius Island (Indian Ocean).” Environmental Science & Policy108: 93–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.03.016
5.
Anon. 1991. “State of the Environment in Mauritius. Ministry of Environment and Land Use.” Government of Mauritius3: 403.
AppadooC. 2003. “Status of Mangroves in Mauritius.” Journal of Coastal Development7 (1): 1–4.
8.
AppadooC.SultanR.SimierM.Tandrayen-RagooburV.CapelloM.. 2023. “Artisanal Fishers in Small Island Developing States and Their Perception of Environmental Change: The Case Study of Mauritius.” Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries33 (3): 611–628. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11160-022-09735-6
9.
AswaniS.LemahieuA.SauerW. H.. 2018. “Global Trends of Local Ecological Knowledge and Future Implications.” PloS One13 (4): e0195440.
10.
BandaranayakeW. M.1998. “Traditional and Medicinal Uses of Mangroves.” Mangroves And Salt Marshes2 (3): 133148.
11.
BeaudS.WeberF.. 1997. “Guide de l'enquête de terrain. Produire et analyser des données ethnographiques.” La Découverte: 328.
12.
BennettN. J.BlytheJ.WhiteC. S.CamperoC.. 2021. “Blue Growth and Blue Justice: Ten Risks and Solutions for the Ocean Economy.” Marine Policy125: 104387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2020.104387
13.
BerkströmC.PapadopoulosM.JiddawiN. S.NordlundL. M.. 2019. “Fishers’ local ecological knowledge (LEK) on connectivity and seascape management.” Frontiers in Marine Science6 (130). https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2019.00130
14.
Beymer-FarrisB. A.BassettT. J.. 2012. “The REDD Menace: Resurgent Protectionism in Tanzania's Mangrove Forests.” Global Environmental Change22 (2): 332–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.11.006
15.
BimrahK.DasguptaR.HashimotoS.SaizenI.DhyaniS.. 2022a. “Ecosystem Services of Mangroves: A Systematic Review and Synthesis of Contemporary Scientific Literature.” Sustainability14 (19): 12051. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912051
16.
BimrahK.DasguptaR.SaizenI.. 2022b. “Cultural Ecosystem Services of Mangroves: A Review of Models and Methods.” Assessing, Mapping and Modelling of Mangrove Ecosystem Services in the Asia-Pacific Region, 239–250. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2738-6_13
BosireJ. O.MangoraM. M.BandeiraS. O.RajkaranA.RatsimbazafyR.AppadooC.KairoJ. G.. 2015. “Mangroves of the Western Indian Ocean: Status and Management.” WIOMSA, Zanzibar Town, 161.
BoswellR.2006. Le Malaise Créole: Ethnic Identity in Mauritius. Berghahn Books, New York, USA, 26: 256.
22.
BrownK.FortnamM.. 2018. “Gender and Ecosystem Services: A Blind Spot.” In Ecosystem Services and Poverty Alleviation, 257–272. Routledge, Milton Park, United Kingdom.
23.
CadoretA.2017. “L’attachement aux lieux dans les conflits liés à l’environnement sur le littoral: Une ressource pour leur régulation.” VertigO-la Revue Électronique En Sciences De l'environnement17 (1). https://doi.org/10.4000/vertigo.18436
24.
CarlsenJ.JaufeerallyK.. 2003. “An Analysis of Tourism Trends in Mauritius 1979 to 1998.” Current Issues in Tourism6 (3): 235–249.
25.
Carrasco HenríquezN.Vergara-PintoF.. 2023. “Coastal Territorialities and Ontologies in Friction: A Review of Multiple Coastal Settlements in the Context of Climate Change.” Journal of Coastal Conservation27 (3): 17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11852-023-00947-x
26.
Carrasquilla-HenaoM.BanN.RuedaM.JuanesF.. 2019. “The Mangrove-Fishery Relationship: A Local Ecological Knowledge Perspective.” Marine Policy108: 103656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2019.103656
27.
ChekeA.HumeJ. P.. 2010. Lost Land of the Dodo: The Ecological History of Mauritius, Réunion and Rodrigues. Bloomsbury Publishing, London, United Kingdom. 464.
28.
ChekeA. S.BissessurP.ProbstJ.-M.. 2020. “The Rivulet Terre Rouge Estuary, a Mauritian Ramsar Site for Migrant Shorebirds, Sees a Serious Decline in Bird Numbers Over 25 Years.” Bulletin Phaethon51: 50–63.
29.
Cormier-SalemM.-C.1994. Dynamique et Usages de la Mangrove Dans les Pays des Rivières du sud, du Sénégal à la Sierra Leone. IRD Editions, 353.
30.
Cormier-SalemM. C.1999. “The Mangrove: An Area to Be Cleared…for Social Scientists.” Hydrobiologia413(0): 135–142.
31.
Cormier-SalemM. C. (Ed.). (2014). Rivières du Sud: Sociétés et Mangroves Ouest-Africaines. IRD Éditions, 416.
32.
Cormier-SalemM. C.2017. “Let the Women Harvest the Mangrove: Carbon Policy, and Environmental Injustice.” Sustainability9 (8): 1485.
33.
CrusolJ. (2007). Les îles à Sucre: De la Colonisation à la Mondialisation. Editions Les Perséides, Rennes, France, 542.
34.
DaviesE.AfsharF.. 1993. “The Sustainability of Traditional and Semi-Intensive Pond Aquaculture Systems: South Sulawesi, Indonesia.” Canadian Journal of Development Studies/Revue Canadienne D'études du Développement14 (1): 189–210.
35.
DawsonN.MartinA.. 2015. “Assessing the Contribution of Ecosystem Services to Human Wellbeing: A Disaggregated Study in Western Rwanda.” Ecological Economics117: 62–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.06.018
36.
DéjaE.DublinD.NatoriY.TakahashiY.. 2019. “Recognising the Local Values of Coastal Wetland Biodiversity for Sustainable Economic and Livelihood Development at Résidences La Chaux ‘Barachois’, Mauritius.” Satoyama Initiative Thematic Review5: 16–30.
37.
de Souza QueirozL.RossiS.Calvet-MirL.Ruiz-MallénI.García-BetorzS.Salvà-PratJ.de Andrade MeirelesA. J.. 2017. “Neglected Ecosystem Services: Highlighting the Socio-Cultural Perception of Mangroves in Decision-Making Processes.” Ecosystem Services26: 137–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.06.013
38.
DíazS.DemissewS.CarabiasJ.JolyC.LonsdaleM.AshN.ZlatanovaD.. 2015. “The IPBES Conceptual Framework—Connecting Nature and People.” Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability14: 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2014.11.002
DonatoD. C.KauffmanJ. B.MurdiyarsoD.KurniantoS.StidhamM.KanninenM.. 2011. “Mangroves among the Most Carbon-Rich Forests in the Tropics.” Nature Geoscience4 (5): 293297.
41.
DoorgaJ. R. S.Bernardie-TahirN.DeenapanrayP. N.DindoyalY.MycooM.MoncadaS.. 2024. “Surging Seas, Rising Sea Levels, and Sinking Communities: The Urgent Need for Climate Adaptation in Small Island States.” Environmental Science & Policy157: 103788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2024.103788
42.
DukeN. C.MeyneckeJ.-O.DittmannS.EllisonA. M.AngerK.BergerU.CannicciS.DieleK.EwelK. C.FieldC. D.. 2007. “A World Without Mangroves?” Science317 (5834): 41–42.
43.
EscobarA.2017. “Sustaining the Pluriverse: The Political Ontology of Territorial Struggles in Latin America.” The Anthropology of Sustainability: Beyond Development and Progress, 237–256. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-56636-2_14
44.
FacheE.PauwelsS.. 2020. “Tackling Coastal “Overfishing” in Fiji: Advocating for Indigenous Worldview, Knowledge, and Values to Be the Backbone of Fisheries Management Strategies.” Maritime Studies19 (1): 41–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40152-020-00162-6
45.
FairheadJ.LeachM.ScoonesI.. 2012. “Green Grabbing: A New Appropriation of Nature?” Journal of Peasant Studies39 (2): 237–261.
46.
FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations). (2020). “Global Forest Resources Assessment 2020: Main report. Rome, Italy.” 184. Available at: https://www.fao.org/documents/card/fr/c/ca9825en/ (Accessed 2 December 2021).
47.
FlorensF. B. V.2013. “Conservation in Mauritius and Rodrigues: Challenges and Achievements from Two Ecologically Devastated Oceanic Islands.” Conservation Biology: Voices From The Tropics, 40–50.
48.
FlorensF. B. V.BaiderC.MartinG. M. N.SeegoolamN. B.ZmanayZ.StrasbergD.. 2016. “Invasive Alien Plants Progress to Dominate Protected and Best-Preserved wet Forests of an Oceanic Island.” Journal for Nature Conservation34: 93–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2016.09.006
49.
Fluet-ChouinardE.StockerB. D.ZhangZ.MalhotraA.MeltonJ. R.McIntyreP. B., et al.2023. “Extensive Global Wetland Loss Over the Past Three Centuries.” Nature614: 281–286. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05572-6
50.
FreireK. M.PaulyD.. 2005. “Richness of Common Names of Brazilian Marine Fishes and Its Effect on Catch Statistics.” Journal of Ethnobiology25 (2): 279–296.
51.
FriessD. A.2016. “Ecosystem Services and Disservices of Mangrove Forests: Insights from Historical Colonial Observations.” Forests7 (9): 183. https://doi.org/10.3390/f7090183
52.
FriessD. A.RogersK.LovelockC. E.KraussK. W.HamiltonS. E.LeeS. Y.ShiS.. 2019. “The State of the World's Mangrove Forests: Past, Present, and Future.” Annual Review of Environment and Resources44: 89–115. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-101718-033302
53.
GlotzbachS.BaumgartnerS.. 2012. “The Relationship Between Intragenerational and Intergenerational Ecological Justice.” Environmental Values21 (3): 331–355. https://doi.org/10.3197/096327112X13400390126055
54.
GodoyM. D.de LacerdaL. D.. 2015. “Mangroves Response to Climate Change: A Review of Recent Findings on Mangrove Extension and Distribution.” Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências87: 651667. https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765201520150055
55.
GoslingW. D.de KruifJ.NorderS. J.de BoerE. J.HooghiemstraH.RijsdijkK. F.McMichaelC. N.. 2017. “Mauritius on Fire: Tracking Historical Human Impacts on Biodiversity Loss.” Biotropica49(6): 778–783. https://doi.org/10.1111/btp.12490
56.
GrégoireE.HookoomsingV. Y.LemoineG. (Eds.) 2011. Maurice: De L'île Sucrière à L'île des Savoirs. ELP Publications, Vacoas, Mauritius. 357.
57.
GroveR. H.1996. Green Imperialism: Colonial Expansion, Tropical Island Edens and the Origins of Environmentalism, 1600-1860. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom. 560.
58.
Gurib-FakimA.BrendlerT.. 2004. Medicinal and Aromatic Plants of Indian Ocean Islands: Madagascar, Comoros, Seychelles and Mascarenes. Medpharm GmbH Scientific Publishers, 567.
59.
HammondD. S.GondV.BaiderC.FlorensF. B. V.PersandS.LauranceS. G.. 2015. “Threats to Environmentally Sensitive Areas from Peri-Urban Expansion in Mauritius.” Environmental Conservation42 (3): 256–267. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892914000411
60.
HauzerM.DeardenP.MurrayG.. 2013. “The Fisherwomen of Ngazidja Island, Comoros: Fisheries Livelihoods, Impacts, and Implications for Management.” Fisheries Research140: 28–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2012.12.001
61.
HimesA.MuracaB.. 2018. “Relational Values: The key to Pluralistic Valuation of Ecosystem Services.” Current Opinion In Environmental Sustainability35: 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2018.09.005
62.
Himes-CornellA.GroseS. O.PendletonL.. 2018. “Mangrove Ecosystem Service Values and Methodological Approaches to Valuation: Where Do We Stand?” Frontiers in Marine Science5: 376. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2018.00376
63.
HogarthP. J.2015. The Biology of Mangroves and Seagrasses. Oxford University Press, London, United Kingdom, 300.
HollupO.2000. “Structural and Sociocultural Constraints for User-Group Participation in Fisheries Management in Mauritius.” Marine Policy24 (5): 407–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-597X(00)00016-6
66.
HolmesG.ClemoesJ.MarriotK.Wynne-JonesS.. 2022. “The Politics of the Rural and Relational Values: Contested Discourses of Rural Change and Landscape Futures in West Wales.” Geoforum133: 153–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2022.05.014
67.
IPBES.2016. “The Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services on Pollinators, Pollination and Food Production.” In IPBES Secretariat, edited by PottsS.G.Imperatriz-FonsecaV. L.NgoH. T., 552. Bonn, Germany. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3402856
68.
IPBES.2022. “Methodological Assessment Report on the Diverse Values and Valuation of Nature of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services.” In IPBES secretariat, edited by BalvaneraP.PascualU.ChristieM.BaptisteB.González-JiménezD., 1144. Bonn, Germany. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6522522
69.
JacobsS.KelemenE.O’FarrellP.MartinA.SchaafsmaM.DendonckerN.GunimedaH.. 2023. “The Pitfalls of Plural Valuation.” Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability64: 101345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2023.101345
70.
JamesG. K.AdegokeJ. O.OsagieS.EkechukwuS.NwiloP.AkinyedeJ.. 2013. “Social Valuation of Mangroves in the Niger Delta Region of Nigeria.” International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management9 (4): 311–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/21513732.2013.842611
71.
JauzeJ. M.2017. “Patrimoine et Tourisme à Maurice: Quel Lien?” Tsingy: Revue de L'Association des Professeurs D'histoire et de Géographie de Madagascar20: 127–142.
72.
KikiloiK.2003. “Une Nouvelle Synthèse de la Domestication Océanique : Le Développement Symbiotique de L’aquaculture Loko I ‘a en Océanie Avant L’arrivée des Européens.” Ressources Marines et Traditions - Bulletin de la CPS15: 3–10.
73.
KumarP. (Ed), 2011. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Ecological and Economic Foundations. TEEB: The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity. England: Earthscan, 456.
74.
LalljeeB.VelmuruganA.SinghA. K.. 2018. “Climate Resilient and Livelihood Security–Perspectives for Mauritius Island.” In Biodiversity and Climate Change Adaptation in Tropical Islands, 403–431. Academic Press.
75.
LauJ. D.ScalesI. R.. 2016. “Identity, Subjectivity and Natural Resource Use: How Ethnicity, Gender and Class Intersect to Influence Mangrove Oyster Harvesting in the Gambia.” Geoforum69: 136–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2016.01.002
76.
LauranceS. G.BaiderC.FlorensF. B. V.RamrekhaS.SevathianJ. C.HammondD. S.. 2012. “Drivers of Wetland Disturbance and Biodiversity Impacts on a Tropical Oceanic Island.” Biological Conservation149 (1): 136–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2011.12.015
77.
LongépéeE.AbdallahA. A.. 2022. “The social representation of the mangrove in Mayotte Island.” 12th Scientific Symposium WIOMSA-Coasts, Ocean and People, South Africa.
78.
LongépéeE.AbdallahA. A.JeansonM.GollétyC.. 2021. “Local Ecological Knowledge on Mangroves in Mayotte Island (Indian Ocean) and Influencing Factors.” Forests12 (1): 53.
79.
López-AngaritaJ.RobertsC. M.TilleyA.HawkinsJ. P.CookeR. G.. 2016. “Mangroves and People: Lessons from a History of use and Abuse in Four Latin American Countries.” Forest Ecology and Management368: 151–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2016.03.020
80.
LutzW.WilsA. B.. 1994. “People on Mauritius: 1638–1991.” In Population—Development—Environment: Understanding Their Interactions in Mauritius, 75–97. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.
81.
MagalhãesA.da CostaR. M.da SilvaR.PereiraL. C. C.. 2007. “The Role of Women in the Mangrove Crab (Ucides cordatus, Ocypodidae) Production Process in North Brazil (Amazon Region, Pará).” Ecological Economics61 (2–3): 559–565.
82.
MagnanA.2007. “Tourisme et Réserves D’espaces Pour les Pratiques Locales sur les Littoraux de L’île Maurice.” Archives De Sciences Sociales Des Religions240 (4): 341–372.
83.
McCauleyD. J.2006. “Selling out on Nature.” Nature443 (7107): 27–28.
84.
MEA.2005b. “Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Wetlands and Water Synthesis.” In Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Series, 80. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
85.
MEA.2005. “A Report of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment.” In Ecosystems and Human Well-Being, 155. Washington, DC: Island Press.
86.
MervenR.AppadooC.FlorensF. B. V.IranahP.. 2023. “Dependency on Mangroves Ecosystem Services is Modulated by Socioeconomic Drivers and Socio-Ecological Changes – Insights from a Small Oceanic Island.” Human Ecology51 (6): 1141–1156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-023-00464-3
87.
MojiolA. R.LintangahW.IsmenyahM.AlamjuriR. H.JaafarC. S. Z.. 2016. “Mangroves Forest Produce (Mfp): Importance and Contribution to the Local Communities at Banggi Island Malaysia Using Free Listing.” International Journal of Agriculture, Forestry and Plantation3 (6): 89–94.
88.
MooreA. C.HierroL.MirN.StewartT.. 2022. “Mangrove Cultural Services and Values: Current Status and Knowledge Gaps.” People and Nature4 (5): 1083–1097. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10375
89.
NagendraH. (2009). “Reforestation and Regrowth in the Human Dominated Landscapes of South Asia.” In Reforesting Landscapes. Springer, 149174.
90.
NaggeaJ.WieheE.MonroseS.. 2021. “Inequity in Unregistered Women’s Fisheries in Mauritius Following an oil Spill.” SPC Women in Fisheries Information Bulletin33: 50–55.
91.
NahuelhualL.OchoaF. B.RojasF.DíazG. I.CarmonaA.. 2016. “Mapping Social Values of Ecosystem Services: What Is Behind the Map?” Ecology and Society21 (3):24. 10.5751/ES-08676-210324
92.
National Audit Office.2018. “Moving towards sustainable artisanal fishery in Mauritius. Ministry of Ocean Economy, Marine Resources, Fisheries and Shipping, Mauritius.” 73. Available at : https://nao.govmu.org/Documents/Reports/P04_Artnal_Fishery.pdf
93.
O'DonoghueR.Sandoval-RiveraJ. C. A.PayyappallimanaU.. 2019. “Landscape, Memory and Learning to Change in Changing Worlds: Contemplating Intergenerational Learning and Traditional Knowledge Practices Within Social-Ecological Landscapes of Change.” Southern African Journal of Environmental Education35: 46–76.
94.
Olivier de SardanJ. P.1995. “La Politique du Terrain. Sur la Production des Données en Anthropologie.” Enquête, Archives de la Revue Enquête1: 71–109.
95.
Olivier de SardanJ. P.2008. “La rigueur du qualitatif: les contraintes empiriques de l'interprétation socio-anthropologique.” La rigueur du qualitatif, 365.
96.
OllivierL.1993. “Les Pêches Artisanales Mauriciennes. Mutations Récentes D'une Activité Séculaire.” Les Cahiers D'Outre-Mer46 (183): 325–348.
97.
OllivierL.1997. “Pratiques et Gestion de L’environnement Aquatique à L’île Maurice.” Espaces Tropicaux15 (6): 413–428.
98.
OmukotoJ. O.OwitiH.MwakhaV. A.MungaC. N.WamukotaA. W.. 2018. “Participatory Assessment of Priority Fishery Profiles in an Overfished Urban Inshore Seascape in Kenya.” Western Indian Ocean Journal of Marine Science17 (2): 79–92. 10.4314/wiojms.v17i2.7
99.
OslenderU.2019. “Geographies of the Pluriverse: Decolonial Thinking and Ontological Conflict on Colombia’s Pacific Coast.” Annals of the American Association of Geographers109 (6): 1691–1705. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2019.1572491
100.
ParkerC.ScottS.GeddesA.. 2019. Snowball Sampling. Sage Research Methods Foundations, 1–13.
101.
PascualU.BalvaneraP.DíazS.PatakiG.RothE.StensekeM.WatsonR. T., et al.2017. “Valuing Nature’s Contributions to People: The IPBES Approach.” Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability26-27: 7–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2016.12.006
102.
PearsonJ.McNamaraK. E.NunnP. D.. 2019. “Gender-Specific Perspectives of Mangrove Ecosystem Services: Case Study from Bua Province, Fiji Islands.” Ecosystem Services38: Article 100970. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100970
103.
PelletierT. S.2012. Le barachois de Mont-Louis, un témoin privilégié des pêcheries sédentaires dans le Canada de la Nouvelle-France. Univeristé Laval, Québec: Master of Arts Thesis.
104.
PetitcorpsC. L.2020. “Les sociétés de plantation dans l’économie globale des services domestiques. Le cas de l’Île Maurice.” Cidades Comunidades e Territórios (40): 1-15.
105.
RaiN. D.DevyM. S.GaneshT.GanesanR.SettyS. R.HiremathA. J.RajanP. D.. 2021. “Beyond Fortress Conservation: The Long-Term Integration of Natural and Social Science Research for an Inclusive Conservation Practice in India.” Biological Conservation254: Article 108888.
106.
RambareeK.2013. “Social Work and Sustainable Development: Local Voices from Mauritius.” Australian Social Work66 (2): 261–276.
107.
RambareeK.BåldM.Backlund RambareeB.. 2020. “Worlds Apart! Environmental Injustices in Mauritius, Peru and Sweden.” International Social Work65 (1): Article 0020872819889391.
108.
RaymondC. M.SinghG. G.BenessaiahK.BernhardtJ. R.LevineJ.NelsonH.TurnerN. J.NortonB.TamJ.ChanK. M.. 2013. “Ecosystem Services and Beyond: Using Multiple Metaphors to Understand Human–Environment Relationships.” BioScience63 (7): 536–546. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2013.63.7.7
109.
RedfordK. H.AdamsW. M.. 2009. “Payment for Ecosystem Services and the Challenge of Saving Nature.” Conservation Biology23: 785–787. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01271.x
110.
Reis-FilhoJ. A.HarveyE. S.GiarrizzoT.. 2019. “Impacts of Small-Scale Fisheries on Mangrove Fish Assemblages.” ICES Journal of Marine Science76 (1): 153–164.
111.
RidderB.2008. “Questioning the Ecosystem Services Argument for Biodiversity Conservation.” Biodiversity and Conservation17 (4): 781–790. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-008-9316-5
112.
RönnbäckP.BrycesonI.KautskyN.. 2002. “Coastal Aquaculture Development in Eastern Africa and the Western Indian Ocean: Prospects and Problems for Food Security and Local Economies.” AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment31 (7): 537–542. https://doi.org/10.1579/0044-7447-31.7.537
113.
SagoffM.2008. “On the Economic Value of Ecosystem Services.” Environmental Values17 (2): 239–257.
114.
SalverdaT. (2015). The Franco-Mauritian Elite: Power and Anxiety in the Face of Change. Berghahn Books, New York, USA. 37, 240.
115.
SandilyanS.KathiresanK.. 2015. “Mangroves as Bioshield: An Undisputable Fact.” Ocean & Coastal Management103: 94–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2014.11.011
116.
SauerJ. D.1962. “Effects of Recent Tropical Cyclones on the Coastal Vegetation of Mauritius.” The Journal of Ecology, 275–290.
117.
SauerW.RotsaertE.. 2011. “Revitalization of Fisheries Research in Mauritius.” In Indian Ocean Commission–SmartFish Program, Ebene, Mauritius, Indian Ocean Commission, 58.
118.
SchnepelB. (2018). Guests Without a Host: The Indian Diaspora(s) in Mauritius. India beyond India: Dilemmas of belonging, 131.
119.
SeetahK.ManfioS.BalboA.FarrR. H.FlorensF. B. V.. 2022. “Colonization During Colonialism: Developing a Framework to Assess the Rapid Ecological Transformation of Mauritius’s Pristine Ecosystem.” Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution10: 791539. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2022.791539
120.
ShackletonR. T.WaltersG.BluwsteinJ.DjoudiH.FritzL.Lafaye de MicheauxF.KullC. A.. 2023. “Navigating Power in Conservation.” Conservation Science and Practice5 (3): e12877. https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.12877
121.
SimpsonE. H.1949. “Measurement of Diversity.” Nature163 (4148): 688.
122.
SoondronS. (2010). Coastal Livelihoods in the Republic of Mauritius. NOSF Forum, University of Mauritius, Réduit, Mauritius, 84.
123.
Statistics Mauritius. 2011. “Volume IX – Relative Development in Electoral regions.” Housing and Population Census, Republic of Mauritius.
124.
StausbergM.2021. “Free-listing.” In The Routledge Handbook of Research Methods in the Study of Religion, 554–564. Routledge, Milton Park, United Kingdom.
125.
TEEB (The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity). 2010. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the economics of nature. A synthesis of the approach, conclusions and recommendations of TEEB. Sukhdev, P. (TEEB Study Leader). UNEP, Nairobi, Kenya, 36.
The Fisheries and Marine Resources Act of 2007. The Ministry of Blue Economy, Marine Resources, Fisheries and Shipping. Available at: https://faolex.fao.org/docs/pdf/mat85779.pdf (Accessed 24 February 2024).
129.
TreviñoM.2022. “The Mangrove Is Like a Friend": Local Perspectives of Mangrove Cultural Ecosystem Services among Mangrove Users in Northern Ecuador.” Human Ecology50 (5): 863–878.
130.
TurnerR. K.Van den BerghJ. C. J. M.SoderqvistT.BarendregtA.Van der StraatenJ.MaltbyE.Van IerlandE. C.. 2000. “Ecological-Economic Analysis of Wetlands: Scientific Integration for Management and Policy.” Ecological Economics35: 7–23.
131.
TurnhoutE.WatertonC.NevesK.BuizerM.. 2013. “Rethinking Biodiversity: From Goods and Services to «Living with».” Conservation Letters6 (3): 154–161. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-263X.2012.00307.x
132.
UddinM. S.van SteveninckE. D. R.StuipM.ShahM. A. R.. 2013. “Economic Valuation of Provisioning and Cultural Services of a Protected Mangrove Ecosystem: A Case Study on Sundarbans Reserve Forest, Bangladesh.” Ecosystem Services5: 88–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.07.002
133.
UNDP. 2023. “Women in Ocean-Based Activities in Mauritius and the Seychelles.” Gendered Voices3 (6): 1–13.
134.
UNEP.2014. “The Importance of Mangroves to People: A Call to Action.” In United Nations Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre, edited by van BochoveJ.SullivanE.NakamuraT., 128. Cambridge:UNEP.
135.
WaltersB. B.RönnbäckP.KovacsJ. M.CronaB.HussainS. A.BadolaR.PrimaveraJ. H.BarbierE.Dahdouh-GuebasF.. 2008. “Ethnobiology, Socio-Economics and Management of Mangrove Forests: A Review.” Aquatic Botany89 (2): 220236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquabot.2008.02.009
136.
WengerE.1998. “Communities of Practice: Learning as a Social System.” Systems Thinker9 (5): 2–3.
WortmanT.DonaldsonR.van WestenG.. 2016. “They Are Stealing My Island’: Residents’ Opinions on Foreign Investment in the Residential Tourism Industry in Tamarin, Mauritius.” Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography37 (2): 139157. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjtg.12151
142.
YangY. E.PassarelliS.LovellR. J.RinglerC.. 2018. “Gendered Perspectives of Ecosystem Services: A Systematic Review.” Ecosystem Services31: 58–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.03.015
143.
ZafarA.2011. “Mauritius: An Economic Success Story.” In Yes Africa Can: Success Stories from a Dynamic Continent, The World Bank, Washington, D.C., USA. 91–106.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
