Under-differentiating classificatory systems pose methodological problems for cultural domain analysis in particular, and ethnobiology in general. Our analysis suggests the Roviana people from the Western Solomon Islands do not have a word for the category “insects” and their classification scheme for little terrestrial animals is rather generic and undifferentiated in comparison to scientific taxonomy. In most cases the accuracy of cultural domain methods depends on the identification of homonymous categories between local and Western classificatory systems. This, as the case study illustrates, is not always possible due to under-differentiation, and analytical alternatives need to be considered for building and understanding indigenous biological classificatory systems.
ArnoldD.1996. The Problem of Nature: Environment, Culture and European Expansion. Blackwell. London.
2.
AswaniS.1999. Common Property Models of Sea Tenure: A Case Study from the Roviana and Vonavona Lagoons, New Georgia, Solomon Islands. Human Ecology27:417–453.
3.
AswaniS. and HamiltonR. J.. 2004. Integrating Indigenous Ecological Knowledge and Customary Sea Tenure with Marine and Social Science for Conservation of Bumphead Parrotfish (Bolbometopon Muricatum) in the Roviana Lagoon, Solomon Islands. Environmental Conservation31:1–15.
4.
AswaniS. and LauerM.. 2006. Incorporating Fishermen's Local Knowledge and Behavior into Geographical Information Systems (GIS) for Designing Marine Protected Areas in Oceania. Human Organization65:81–102.
5.
AswaniS. and SheppardP.. 2003. The archaeology and ethnohistory in precolonial and colonial Roviana: Gifts, commodities, and inalienable possessions. Current Anthropology44:S51–S78.
6.
AswaniS. and VaccaroI.. 2008. Lagoon Ecology and Social Strategies: Habitat Diversity and Ethnobiology. Human Ecology36(3):325–341.
7.
BentleyJ. W. and RodriguezG.. 2001. Honduran Folk Entomology. Current Anthropology42(2):285–303.
8.
BerlinB., BreedloveD. E., and RavenP. H.. 1974. Principles of Tzeltal Plant Classification: An Introduction to the Botanical ethnography of a Mayan-speaking People of Highland, Chiapas. Academic Press. New York.
9.
BrookfieldH. C. and HartD.. 1971. Melanesia: A Geographical Interpretation of an Island World. Methuen. London.
10.
BrownC.1979. Folk Zoological Life-Forms: Their Universality and Growth. American Anthropologist81(4):791–817.
11.
CrononW.1996. Uncommon Ground: Rethinking the Human Place in Nature. Norton. New York.
12.
DiamondJ.1966. Zoological Classification System of a Primitive People. Science151:1102–1104.
13.
DoughertyJ.1978. Salience and relativity in classification. American Ethnologist5:66–80.
14.
FleckD.2007. Field linguistics meets biology: How to obtain scientific designations for plant and animal names. Sprachtypol. Univ. Forsch (STUF)60:81–91.
15.
GonzalezR. J.2001. Zapotec Science: Farming and Food in the Northern Sierra of Oaxaca. University of Texas Press. Austin.
16.
GreensladeP. J. M.1969. Insect Distribution Patterns in the Solomon Islands. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences255:271–284.
17.
GullanP. J. and CranstonP. S.. 2005. The Insects: An Outline of Entomology, 3rd ed. Blackwell Publishing. Malden.
18.
GurungA.2003. Insects – a mistake in God's creation? Tharu farmers’ perception and knowledge of insects: A case study of Gobardiha Village Development Committee, Dang-Deukhuri, Nepal. Agriculture and Human Values20:337–370.
19.
HarawayD.1988. Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspectives. Feminist Studies14:575–599.
20.
HunnE.1975. A measure of the degree of correspondence of folk to scientific biological classification. American Ethnologist2:309–327.
21.
HunnE.1982. The Utilitarian Factor in Folk Biological Classification. American Anthropologist84:830–847.
22.
HunnE.2008. A Zapotec Natural History: Trees, Herbs and Flowers, Birds, Beasts and Bugs in the Life of San Juan Gbëë. University of Arizona Press. Tucson.
23.
JohannesR. E.1981. Words of the Lagoon: Fishing and Marine Lore in the Palau District of Micronesia. University of California Press. Berkeley.
24.
JohannesR. E.1998. The Case for Data-less Marine Resource Management: Example from Tropical Nearshore Finfisheries. Trends in Ecology and Evolution13:243–246.
25.
JohannesR. E.2002. The renaissance of community-based marine resource management in Oceania. Annual Review of Ecological Systems33:317–340.
26.
LauerM. and AswaniS.. 2009. Indigenous Ecological Knowledge as Situated Practices: Understanding Fishers’ Knowledge in the Western Solomon Islands. American Anthropologist111:317–328.
27.
MartinG. J.2004. Ethnobotany: A Methods Manual. Earthscan. London.
28.
NazareaV.1999. Ethnoecology: Situated Knowledge/ Located Lives. University of Arizona Press. Tucson.
29.
OngA. and CollierS.. 2005. Global Assemblages: Technology, Politics, and Ethics as Anthropological Problems. Blackwell. London.
30.
PoseyD.1978. Ethnoentomological Survey of Amerindian Groups in Lowland Latin America. The Florida Entomologist61(4):225–229.
31.
PoseyD.1983. Folk Apiculture of the Kayapo Indians of Brazil. Biotropica15(2):154–158.
32.
RussellB.2002. Research Methods in Anthropology: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Altamira. New York.
33.
SillitoeP.1996. A place Against Time: Land and Environment in the Papua New Guinea Highlands. Harwood Academic. Amsterdam.
34.
StantonR. L. and BellJ. D.. 1969. Volcanic and Associated Rocks of the New Georgia Group, British Solomon Islands Protectorate. Overseas Geology and Mineral Resources10:113–145.
35.
WhitmoreT. C.1969. Geography of the Flowering Plants. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences255:549–566.
36.
WymanL. and BaileyF.. 1964. Navaho Indian Ethnoentomology. University of New Mexico Press. Santa Fe.
