I recognize four phases of ethnobiology: I, II, III, and IV. Ethnobiology I begins well before the formal naming of ethnobiology as a scholarly endeavor at the end of the 19th century. This initial phase has been widely characterized, albeit over simply, as essentially utilitarian. Ethnobiology II was elaborated in the cognitive/linguistic anthropology of the 1960s. Ethnobiology III integrates knowledge with practice, stressing the ecological consequences of knowledge applied to make a living. Ethnobiology IV emphasizes the rights of indigenous peoples to control their traditional knowledge. I elaborate this framework here and consider how these diverse perspectives might be integrated more effectively in the future.
AdamsK. R.2001. Looking back through time: Southwestern U.S. archaeobotany at the new millennium. InFordR. I., editor. ed. Ethnobiology at the millennium: Past promise and future prospects. 49–99.University of Michigan Museum of Anthropology. Ann Arbor.
2.
BaléeW.1994. Footprints of the forest: Ka'apor ethnobotany —The historical ecology of plant utilization by an Amazonian people. Columbia University Press. New York.
3.
BerkesF.1999. Sacred ecology: Traditional ecological knowledge and resource management. Taylor & Francis. Philadelphia.
4.
BerlinB., BreedloveD. E., and RavenP. H.. 1974. Principles of Tzeltal plant classification: An introduction to the botanical ethnography of a Mayan-speaking community of Highland Chiapas. Academic Press. New York.
5.
BerlinB.1992. Ethnobiological classification: Principles of categorization of plants and animals in traditional societies. Princeton University Press. Princeton, NJ.
6.
BrushS. B.1996. Is common heritage outmoded?InBrushS. B. and StabinskyD., editors. eds. Valuing local knowledge: Indigenous people and intellectual property rights. 143–164.Island Press. Washington, D.C.
7.
BulmerR. N. H.1974. Folk biology in the New Guinea highlands. Social Science Information13:9–28.
8.
CastetterE. F.1944. The domain of ethnobiology. American Naturalist78:158–170.
9.
ClémentD.1998. The historical foundations of ethnobiology (1860–1899). Journal of Ethnobiology18:161–187.
10.
CliffordJ. and MarcusG. E., editors. 1986. Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography. University of California Press. Berkeley.
11.
ConklinH. C.1954. The relation of Hanunóo culture to the plant world. Ph.D. Dissertation. Yale University. New Haven.
12.
CrosbyA. W.1972. The Columbian Exchange: Biological and cultural consequences of 1492. Greenwood Press. Westport, CT.
13.
De la CruzM.1964. del PozoE. C., editor. Libellus de Medicinalibus Indorum Herbis. IMSS. México (original 1552).
14.
DoughertyJ.1979. Learning names for plants and plants for names. Anthropological Linguistics21:298–315.
15.
EllenR.1982. Environment, subsistence, and system: The ecology of small-scale social formations. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, UK.
16.
EllenR.1986. Ethnobiology, cognition and the structure of prehension: Some general theoretical notes. Journal of Ethnobiology6:83–98.
17.
EscobarA.1999. After nature: Steps to an antiessentialist political ecology. Current Anthropology40:1–30.
18.
FowlerC. S.2001. In the field with people, plants and animals: A look at methods. InFordR. I., editor. ed. Ethnobiology at the millennium: Past promise and future prospects149–161.
19.
HarshbergerJ. W.1896. The purposes of ethnobotany. The American Antiquarian17:73–81.
20.
HaysT. E.1979. Plant classification and nomenclature in Ndumba, Papua New Guinea Highlands. Ethnology18:253–270.
21.
HaysT. E.1991. Interest, use, and interest in uses in folk biology. InPawleyA., editor. ed. Man and a half: Essays in Pacific anthropology and ethnobiology in honour of Ralph Bulmer. 109–114.The Polynesian Society. Aukland, New Zealand.
22.
HernándezF.1959. Historia natural de la Nueva España. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. 2 volumes.México (original 1577).
23.
HunnE. S.1982. The utilitarian factor in folk biological classification. American Anthropologist84:830–847.
24.
HunnE. S.1999. The value of subsistence for the future of the world. InNazareaV., editor. ed. Ethnoecology: Situated knowledge/ located lives. 23–36.University of Arizona Press. Tucson.
25.
HunnE. S.2002. Traditional environmental knowledge: Alienable or inalienable intellectual property. InSteppJ. R., WyndhamF. S., and ZargerR. K., editors. eds. Ethnobiology and biocultural diversity. 3–10.University of Georgia Press. Athens.
26.
JonesV.1941. The nature and status of ethnobotany. Chronica Botanica6:219–221.
27.
KrechS.III1999. The ecological Indian: Myth and history. W. W. Norton. New York.
28.
Lévi-StraussC.1966. The savage mind. Weidenfeld and Nicolson. London.
29.
MalinowskiB.1974. Magic, science and religion. Souvenir Press. London (original edition 1925).
30.
MarxK.1964. Pre-capitalist economic formations. International Publishers. New York.
31.
MinnisP.2001. One possible future of paleoethnobotany. InFordR. I., editor. ed. Ethnobiology at the millennium: Past promise and future prospects. 35–48.University of Michigan Museum of Anthropology. Ann Arbor.
32.
MurrayS. O.1983. Group formation in social science. Linguistic Research. Edmonton, Alberta.
33.
Ortiz de MontellanoB. R.1990. Aztec medicine, health, and nutrition. Rutgers University Press. New Brunswick, NJ.
34.
PoseyD.1990. Intellectual property rights and just compensation for indigenous knowledge. Anthropology Today6:13–16.
35.
RandallR. A.1976. How tall is a taxonomic tree? Some evidence for dwarfism. American Ethnologist8:229–242.
36.
RobbinsW. W., HarringtonJ. P., and Freire-MarrecoB.. 1916. Ethnobotany of the Tewa Indians. U. S. Bureau of American Ethnology Bulletin55:1–118.
37.
RothP.1971 [1969]. Portnoy's complaint. Bantam Books. New York.
38.
Saem MajnepI. and BulmerR. N. H.. 1977. Mňmon Yad Kalam Yakt. Birds of my Kalam Country. Auckland University Press and Oxford University Press. Auckland, New Zealand.
39.
SahagúnBde1956. GaribayA. M., editor. Historia general de las cosas de la Nueva España. Porrua. México (original 1793).
40.
SahagúnBde1950–1969. Florentine Codex. General history of the things of New Spain. University of Utah Press. Salt Lake City (original 1577). Edited and translated by C.E. Dibble and A.J.O. Anderson, 12 books.
41.
SalickJ., editor. 2003. Intellectual imperatives in ethnobiology: NSF biocomplexity workshop report. Missouri Botanical Garden. St. Louis.
42.
SturtevantW. C.1964. Studies in ethnoscience. American Anthropologist66:99–113.
43.
TodorovT.1999. The conquest of America: The question of the other. University of Oklahoma Press. Norman.
44.
ToledoV. M.1992. What is ethnoecology? Origins, scope and implications of a rising discipline. Etnoecologicá1:5–21.
45.
VestalP. A. and SchultesR. E.. 1939. The economic botany of the Kiowa Indians as it relates to the history of the tribe. Harvard University Botanical Museum. Cambridge.
46.
WilliamsN. M. and BainesG., editors. 1993. Ecologies for the 21st Century: Traditional ecological knowledge, wisdom for sustainable development. Report of the Traditional Ecological Knowledge Workshop, Centre for Resources and Environmental Studies,. Australian National University. Canberra, Australia.
