Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors (NMDARs) are a family of ionotropic glutamate receptors mainly known to mediate excitatory synaptic transmission and plasticity. Interestingly, low-dose NMDAR antagonists lead to increased, instead of decreased, functional connectivity; and they could cause schizophrenia- and/or antidepressant-like behavior in both humans and rodents. In addition, human genetic evidences indicate that NMDAR loss of function mutations underlie certain forms of epilepsy, a disease featured with abnormal brain hyperactivity. Together, they all suggest that under certain conditions, NMDAR activation actually lead to inhibition, but not excitation, of the global neuronal network. Apparently, these phenomena are rather counterintuitive to the receptor's basic role in mediating excitatory synaptic transmission. How could it happen? Recently, this has become a crucial question in order to fully understand the complexity of NMDAR function, particularly in disease. Over the past decades, different theories have been proposed to address this question. These include theories of “NMDARs on inhibitory neurons are more sensitive to antagonism”, or “basal NMDAR activity actually inhibits excitatory synapse”, etc. Our review summarizes these efforts, and also provides an introduction of NMDARs, inhibitory neurons, and their relationships with the related diseases. Advances in the development of novel NMDAR pharmacological tools, particularly positive allosteric modulators, are also included to provide insights into potential intervention strategies.

Keywords

N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor synaptic transmission inhibition excitation brain disease positive allosteric modulator

1 Introduction

Glutamate is the major excitatory neurotransmitter in the mammalian central nervous system. It acts via activating two types of receptors: metabotropic glutamate receptor (mGluR) and ionotropic glutamate receptor (iGluR). iGluRs include three types: a-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionate receptors (AMPARs), N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors (NMDARs) and Kainate receptors (KARs) [1]. NMDARs are glutamate-gated cation channels permeable to sodium, calcium, and potassium. Importantly, the calcium influx through NMDARs serves as a trigger for several types of synaptic plasticity and is critical for many other NMDAR-evoked physiological and pathological signaling events [2]. NMDAR dysfunction contributes to various brain disorders, such as schizophrenia, depression and epilepsy, etc. [3]. However, the precise role of NMDARs in these diseases remains elusive.

1.1 NMDARs subunit composition and distribution

In the 1980s, based on patch-clamp studies of neuronal activity it was first proposed that NMDARs were composed of different subtypes [1, 3, 4]. Subsequent cloning and expression studies revealed that there are seven different subtypes, including GluN1, four GluN2 (A-D), and two GluN3 (A and B). NMDARs are heterotetramers assembled from two obligatory GluN1 subunits plus two GluN2 or GluN3 subunits. NMDARs containing GluN3 form either di-heteromeric (GluN1/GluN3) or tri-heteromeric (GluN1/GluN2/GluN3) complexes [1]. Among these subunits, GluN1 is encoded by one single gene with 8 different isoforms (GluN1-1a/2a/3a/4a and GluN1-1b/2b/3b/4b) produced by alternative mRNA splicing. The “b” isoforms possess an additional extracellular 21-amino-acid stretch encoded by exon 5. This additional fragment significantly affects gating and pharmacological properties of NMDARs [5]. GluN1 shows about 25%–28% homology to other iGluR subunits [6]. The four GluN2 subunits are encoded by four different genes sharing 18%–20% homology to GluN1 [7]. GluN3A and 3B are also encoded by two different genes. GluN3A shows a higher homology (57%) to GluN3B and a lower homology to GluN1 (27%) and GluN2 (24%–29%) [8]. GluN3B is only 17%–21% homologous to GluN1 and GluN2 [9].

Ligand-binding studies have revealed that NMDARs are distributed throughout the brain with a higher expression level in the forebrain. The distribution patterns of NMDAR subunits in brain have been described with molecular techniques [4, 10, 11]. Specifically, in adult rodents, GluN1 mRNA is expressed ubiquitously throughout the brain. Among eight GluN1 splice variants, GluN1-1(a and b) and GluN1-4 (a and b) show a complementary expression pattern, with the former being concentrated in the hippocampus and cortex whereas the latter primarily in caudal regions such as the thalamus and cerebellum. Notably, the regions expressing GluN1-a and GluN1-b variants are largely overlapping; however, their relative abundances vary across different regions. For instance, the GluN1-a isoform is expressed in all pyramidal neurons in hippocampus, whereas GluN1-b is mainly located in the CA3 region of hippocampus [4, 12].

Rodent data indicate that distributions of GluN2 subunits vary across different regions of the brain. GluN2A exhibits a widespread distribution throughout the adult brain, especially in the cortex, hippocampus, and cerebellum [13]. In contrast, the expression of GluN2B is relatively restricted in the forebrain and mostly distributed in cerebral cortex, hippocampus, olfactory bulb, and caudate putamen. GluN2C is largely restricted to cerebellum and olfactory bulb. GluN2D is weakly expressed and mostly distributed within the diencephalon and mesencephalon.

GluN3A and GluN3B are the two isoforms of the GluN3 subunit, exhibiting restricted spatio-temporal distributions. Previously, it was recognized that GluN3A is more widely expressed than GluN3B [9]. GluN3A exhibits high abundancy in olfactory bulb, cerebellum, CA1 region of the hippocampus, hypothalamus, nuclei of amygdala and certain parts of cortex [14, 15], while GluN3B expression is restricted to hippocampus, spinal cord, brain stem and cerebellum [16, 17]. GluN3B was also found to be expressed in the forebrain, including cerebral cortex, hippocampus, caudoputamen, and nucleus accumbens. [8, 18].

2 Switching of NMDAR expression pattern during development

The NMDAR subunits undergo changes in their expression patterns during development. Although GluN1 subunit is ubiquitously expressed since the early embryonic stage, its expression level varies. In situ hybridization experiments demonstrate that GluN1 expression starts at embryonic stage 14 (E14), rises to peak around the third postnatal week [19–21], and then decreases to a relatively stable level. All GluN1 isoforms follow the similar expression profile during development [22].

The GluN2 subunits impact functional heterogeneity of NMDARs, and show prominently different spatiotemporal expression profiles [13]. In the embryonic rodent brain, only GluN2B and GluN2D are expressed. Their expression starts as early as E14 and gradually increases with development. GluN2B expression reaches a relatively high level after birth and continues to increase until it peaks around P7-10. Within the first postnatal week, GluN2B becomes widely distributed in the brain, but after P7-10, its expression is restricted to forebrain, including cortex, hippocampus, striatum, and olfactory bulb. GluN2D, in contrast to the widely-distributed and highly-expressed GluN2B, exhibits a striking decrease in the expression after birth and in the adulthood. It only expresses at low levels in diencephalon and brainstem [4]. Both GluN2A and GluN2C start to express in hippocampus and cerebellum after birth. Whereas the expression of the GluN2A increases sharply during the first two postnatal weeks and gradually spreads out to the whole CNS in adulthood, the expression of GluN2C is mainly confined to cerebellum and olfactory bulb.

Among the four GluN2 subunits, GluN2A and GluN2B are the predominant subunits found in the cortex and the hippocampus. During the early developmental stages, GluN2B-containing NMDARs are the primary types at synapses. After birth, during the second postnatal week, the GluN2A subunits start to express and gradually replace GluN2B from the synapses [2, 4].

The GluN3A and GluN3B subunits also have distinct expression patterns. GluN3A starts expressing at around E15 within the spinal cord, tegmentum, hypothalamus, and thalamus. Its expression gradually increases and peaks at around P8, then rapidly declines to the adult level by P20 [14, 23]. GluN3B expression begins during early postnatal stages, peaks at around P14, and then stays plateaus throughout adulthood. GluN3B distribution was initially thought to be confined to brainstem and spinal cord, but it has been lately discovered to be ubiquitously distributed [14, 15, 18].

3 GABAergic inhibitory interneurons

Neuronal microcircuits are composed of both excitatory and inhibitory neurons. The fine balance of excitation and inhibition is critical for many brain functions. The vast majority of neurons in the cerebral cortex (about 80%) are excitatory glutamatergic neurons, also called principal neurons. These neurons have long axons and can project across different brain regions. Inhibitory neurons account for about 20% of cortical neurons. Compared with principal neurons, inhibitory neurons generally have smaller soma, shorter axons, and project locally; therefore, they are also called interneurons. Interneurons are GABAergic, releasing inhibitory neurotransmitter γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA). GABA acts on GABA-A type ionotropic receptors to mediate fast synaptic inhibition, generating hyperpolarization and, therefore, inhibition in the brain. It is the main source of inhibition in the mammalian brain.

3.1 Origin and classification of interneuron

Glutamatergic neurons are originated from the ventricular and sub-ventricular areas of the embryonic brain, while cortical GABAergic neurons are generated in medial ganglionic eminences (MGE) and caudal ganglionic eminences (CGE) in ventral telencephalon [24, 25]. Around E13.5, GABAergic neurons migrate tangentially to proper cortical regions crossing sub-ventricular zone (SVZ) and marginal zone (MZ), and then radially to the cortical plate (CP) [26, 27].

Cortical GABAergic inhibitory neurons exhibit tremendous diversity in morphology, electro-physiological properties, molecular expression profiles, and input and output connectivity [28–30]. Therefore, different criteria has been proposed to classify interneurons [31]. The most widely used classification is based on the expression of specific molecular markers, by which interneurons can be divided into three major types: calcium-binding protein parvalbumin (PV), neuropeptide somatostatin (Sst), or ionotropic serotonin receptor 5HT3a (5HT3aR) positive interneurons [32, 33]. PV interneurons are the most populous GABAergic interneurons in neocortex, accounting for ∼40%. Sst and 5HT3aR interneurons each account for ∼30% [33].

3.2 Interneuron function

GABAergic interneurons mainly provide inhibitory input to reduce excitability of principal neurons, which is critical for the maintenance of excitation-inhibition balance [34]. They could also inhibit other interneurons to cause disinhibition [35, 36]. For example, a subtype of vasoactiveintestinal peptide (VIP) interneurons mediates disinhibitory control in mouse auditory cortex (ACx) and medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) by transiently inhibiting Sst and PV interneurons [37].

Interneurons also contribute to synchronized oscillations [38]. Neural oscillations are rhythmic or repetitive patterns of neural activity in the central nervous system, and are thought to play an important role in processing of neural information, such as perception, motor control and memory [39]. It has been well-established that interneurons are involved in generation and propagation of cortical oscillations [40]. The hypothesis that excitatory-inhibitory feedback loop was first proposed to explain the contribution of interneurons to spike timing during fast oscillations [41, 42], which indicates synchronizing may be partially dependent on the ability of GABAergic interneurons to entrain the firing of principal neurons [43]. Inhibitory loop was later proposed [42]. Interneurons innervate not only the principal neurons, but also themselves and other interneurons. Such interneurons self-innervation can increase the precision and regulate oscillations generation [44]. The propagation of hippocampal oscillation is found to be dependent on excitatory connection onto interneurons, rather than excitatory-excitatory connection [45, 46]. Gamma oscillations, a kind of oscillations in the brain, are thought to underlie cognitive and motor functions [45, 47]. Mounting evidence supports that gamma oscillations critically relies on entrainment by a phasic inhibitory drive [48, 49], and fast-spiking interneurons expressing PV are critical to gamma oscillations [41, 44, 50]. For example, in knock-out (KO) animals of calcium-binding protein parvalbumin (PV), the power of kainate-induced gamma oscillations is approximately twice as much as that in wild-type (WT), suggesting that PV interneuron contributes to gamma oscillations [32].

Interneuronal dysfunctions have been implicated in a number of brain diseases. Schizophrenia is a severe psychiatric disorder, and traditionally thought to be caused by hyperfunction of dopaminergic neurotransmission, which cannot explain the negative symptoms and cognitive deficits of schizophrenia [51]. Pharmacological and genetic evidences suggest that disrupted glutamatergic function may underlie schizophrenia [52–55]. And it was proposed that dysfunction of PV interneurons in cerebral cortex results in glutamatergic deficits as seen in schizophrenia [56–58]. Expression of interneurons marker proteins PV and glutamate decarboxylase 67 kDa (GAD 67) are decreased in the brain of schizophrenia patients [59, 60]. Bipolar disorder (BPD) is a mental disorder and is one of the leading cause of disability [61]. Postmortem studies have reported that the density of hippocampal interneurons is decreased in bipolar disorder patients [61, 62]. Reduced expression of Sst and VIP is also seen in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex [63]. Epilepsy is a group of neurological disorders and thought to be due to the unbalanced excitation-inhibition in the brain. GABAA receptors play critical roles in inhibitory neurotransmission. Clinical and experimental evidences suggest that perturbation of GABAA signaling contributes to epilepsy [64]. In addition, many GABAA receptor mutations are known to cause early-life epilepsy, including loss of function mutations or deletions of GABAA receptor subunit genes [65, 66]. Dysfunction of interneurons is also related to autism spectrum disorders (ASDs). ASDs are neurodevelopmental syndromes characterized by cognitive deficits, impaired language skill and social behavior [34]. Genetic evidence also links ASDs to genes encoding the β3, α5 and γ3 subunits of GABAA receptors [67, 68]. Cortical PV interneurons [69] and GAD67 are both decreased in ASDs [70, 71].

4 Why NMDAR blockade causes excitation instead of inhibition?

NMDARs are glutamate receptors mediating excitatory synaptic transmission. It is intuitive to predict that NMDAR blockade should inhibit neural circuit activity in the brain. Following this prediction, NMDAR antagonists, phencyclidine and ketamine, have been successfully utilized as anesthetics [72].

Interestingly, however, low doses of NMDAR inhibitors actually cause excitation instead of inhibition in the brain [73]. These observations contradict to the conventional knowledge about NMDAR function. Why does inhibition of an excitatory neurotransmitter receptor cause excitation instead of inhibition? The phenomenon has triggered profound interests ever since it was discovered, as the underlying mechanism might be critical in understanding the role of NMDARs in various brain disorders. Over the past decades, different mechanisms have been proposed to explain this paradox. For example, since both excitatory and inhibitory neurons receive excitatory inputs and have NMDARs at those synapses, one possibility is that NMDAR inhibitors at low doses preferentially act on interneurons in vivo [74], therefore they decrease interneuron activity and result in disinhibition of the neuronal network. An alternative explanation is that basal NMDAR activity suppresses neuronal activity in excitatory neurons; and when NMDAR inhibitors are applied, they alleviate this inhibition, therefore. causing disinhibition [75]. There are also other ways that NMDARs could impact inhibitory circuits. For example, recent studies have revealed that NMDARs on excitatory neurons are critical for the development of inhibitory synapses [76], and NMDARs at GABAergic synapses could impact GABAergic transmission [77, 78]. In addition, NMDARs are critical for the plasticity of GABAergic synapses onto excitatory neurons [79]. Each of these proposed mechanisms is discussed below.

4.1 NMDARs promote GABAergic synapse function and development in excitatory neurons to boost inhibition

Glutamate is the major excitatory neurotransmitter in mammalian central nervous system. During the fast synaptic transmission, glutamate activates AMPARs and NMDARs at the postsynaptic membrane. NMDARs are traditionally regarded as postsynaptic receptors; however, both anatomical and physiological evidences suggest existence of presynaptic NMDARs [80, 81]. While postsynaptic NMDARs mediate glutamatergic excitatory neurotransmission, presynaptic NMDARs modulate transmitter release in many brain regions, including cerebellum, entorhinal cortex, neocortex, and spinal cord [3], although the precise function of presynaptic NMDARs in excitatory synapses remains unclear. Interestingly, presynaptic NMDARs also exist at GABAergic presynaptic terminals in cerebellum and neocortex [77]. These presynaptic NMDARs modulate GABAergic synapses by increasing the size of GABAergic synaptic terminals and spontaneous GABA release [82] (Fig. 1, Mechanism B). Presynaptic NMDARs also facilitate GABAergic synaptic transmission in immature neocortex in a developmentally regulated manner, which involves GluN2B-containing NMDARs and impacts neocortical circuit development [78]. Activation of presynaptic NMDARs increases GABA release leading to an enhanced frequency of miniature inhibitory postsynaptic currents (mIPSCs) at cerebellar synapses between basket cells and purkinje cells [83–85].

Fig. 1

Proposed mechanisms of how NMDARs promote inhibition. Mechanism A: NMDARs at glutamatergic synapse on interneuron promote interneuron excitability. Mechanism B: NMDARs at presynaptic terminal of GABAergic synapse promote development/function of GABAergic synapse. Mechanism C: NMDARs on excitatory neurons promote development of GABAergic synapse or inhibitory long-term potentiation. Mechanism D: Synaptic NMDARs suppress excitatory synaptic transmission. Mechanism E: Ambient glutamate-activated extrasynaptic GluN2B-containing NMDARs suppress excitatory synaptic transmission. GABARA—GABAA receptor.

NMDARs play an important role in mediating plasticity at excitatory synapses. Interestingly, NMDARs are also critical to the plasticity of GABAergic synapses (Fig. 1, Mechanism C). GABAergic synapses can undergo inhibitory long-term potentiation (iLTP) or inhibitory long-term depression (iLTD), depending on the expression and function of GABAA receptors or the GABA release from presynaptic terminal[86]. iLTP or iLTD that relies on postsynaptic NMDARs has been reported in many brain regions, such as hippocampus [87], visual cortex and ventral tegment [88]. In visual cortex, presynaptic NMDARs have been shown to contribute to iLTD in developing optic tectum [79].

NMDARs also play a critical role in the regulation of GABAergic synapse development (Fig. 1, Mechanism C). Indeed, in the superior colliculus activation of NMDARs has been shown to stimulate GABAergic synapse development [89]. In addition, overexpression of a constitutively active NMDAR subunit increases GABAergic transmission in developing hippocampal neurons, indicating a cell-autonomous role of NMDARs in promoting development of GABAergic synapses [76]. On the other hand, genetic deletion of NMDARs in different types of neurons leads to a strong reduction of GABAergic transmission as well as inhibitory synapse density [76, 90], suggesting a necessary role of NMDARs in GABAergic synaptogenesis. Mechanistically, the regulation of formation of GABAergic connections by NMDARs in hippocampal neurons is dependent on the C0 domain of the GluN1 subunit and requires Ca²⁺-dependent calmodulin binding to the C0 domain [76], showing that the NMDAR acts a key signaling molecule for controlling inhibitory circuit wiring. Consistent with the functional data, a fraction of NMDARs has been found to co-localize with GABAA receptors at GABAergic synapses in developing brain [91–93], providing anatomic evidence for a role of NMDARs in GABAergic synapse development.

4.2 NMDARs promote excitability of GABAergic neurons to provide inhibition

Another explanation to the question “Why NMDAR blockade causes excitation?” is that, at low doses, NMDAR antagonists preferentially act on NMDARs on interneurons instead of those on excitatory neurons (Fig. 1, Mechanism A), therefore reducing interneuron activity and leading to a disinhibition effect on the overall network activity. This proposal is supported by the observation that MK-801 treatment leads to reduced activity of GABAergic interneurons and subsequent increased activity of excitatory principal neurons in rodent prefrontal cortex [73, 94]. It has also been reported that hippocampal GABAergic interneurons are more sensitive to NMDAR antagonists than excitatory neurons [95, 96]. One possible mechanism underlying this preferential effect of NMDAR antagonists on interneurons is that interneurons have generally higher frequency of firing compared with pyramidal neurons, which causes a higher NMDAR baseline activity through the depolarization-dependent removal of Mg²⁺ block. Therefore, more “alert” NMDARs may be more sensitive to antagonist blockade [97–99].

In addition, NMDARs ablation in interneurons has a comparable effect with NMDAR antagonists. Conditional knockout of GluN1 in inter-neurons not only leads to cortical disinhibition but also the schizophrenia-like behaviors, which display novelty-induced hyperlocomotion, deficits in nesting and short-term social memory [56, 100, 101]. These data also support the hypothesis that NMDAR loss-of-function in inter-neurons is important for NMDAR antagonist-induced cortical excitation and psychosis-like behaviors in rodents [102–105].

4.3 Basal NMDAR activity suppresses excitatory synaptic transmission

NMDARs are known to cause depolarization and contribute to excitatory synaptic transmission. However, there is also evidence suggesting that basal NMDAR activity suppresses excitatory transmission [75] (Fig. 1, Mechanism D). In this case, NMDAR blockade leads to attenuation of suppression on excitatory synaptic transmission, therefore promoting excitation and global neuronal activity.

In dissociated neuronal cultures, chronic (>12 hours) blockade of action potentials (APs) by tetrodotoxin (TTX) potentiates excitatory synaptic transmission by increasing membrane AMPAR insertion. This is called homeostatic scaling [106]. Interestingly, NMDAR selective antagonist AP5 increases mEPSC amplitude quickly (after one hour) in the presence of TTX. In addition, AP5 alone can also increase mEPSC amplitude after 3 hours treatment in the absence of TTX [75]. Increased miniature excitatory postsynaptic current (mEPSC) amplitude is found to be consistent with increased surface AMPAR insertion; and this increase depends on local protein synthesis [75]. Taking all these data into consideration, it is logical to propose that basal NMDAR activity suppresses excitatory transmission in principal neurons.

In addition, other studies have also found that blockade of NMDARs rapidly potentiates AMPAR-mediated synaptic transmission [107, 108]. In acute hippocampal slices, 30 minutes incubation of another NMDAR antagonist ketamine (20 μM) is sufficient to enhance AMPAR-mediated evoked field excitatory postsynaptic potential (fEPSPs), which sustains even after ketamine wash off [108]. The potentiation is not linked to increased presynaptic release probability because of the unaltered paired-pulse facilitation. A different NMDAR antagonist MK-801 has similar effect as ketamine, supporting that blockade of NMDAR is the underlying mechanism of the ketamine-induced synaptic potentiation [108]. NMDAR blockade-mediated synaptic potentiation requires the deactivation of eukaryotic elongation factor 2 (eEF2) kinase (also called CaMKIII), which triggers protein synthesis of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and increase of surface AMPAR insertion [107, 108]. These suggest that basal NMDAR activity indeed suppresses AMPAR-mediated synaptic transmission, and alleviation of which is sufficient to boost synaptic transmission in a fast and sustainable manner.

Genetic studies have also indicated that NMDARs suppress functional maturation of AMPAR-mediated synaptic transmission. In pyramidal neurons in hippocampus and cerebral cortex, genetic deletion of NMDARs causes a strong increase of AMPA EPSCs [109–113]. Similarly, knockout of the NMDAR GluN1 subunit in midbrain dopaminergic neurons significantly increases AMPAR-mediated transmission [114, 115]. A recent study on hippocampal neurogliaform cells has also demonstrated that NMDARs inhibit excitatory synaptic transmission [116]. Together, these studies show that NMDARs suppress the maturation of AMPAR-mediated synaptic transmission and maintain the silent status of developing glutamatergic synapses [110].

5 NMDAR dysfunction and diseases

Abnormal NMDAR activity underlies many brain disorders including psychosis, mood disorder, epilepsy and neurodegenerative diseases, etc. [4, 117, 118]. This part of the review will discuss the role of NMDAR in schizophrenia, depression and epilepsy. These three diseases are chosen because both NMDAR dysfunction and abnormalities in inhibition have been strongly implicated in their etiology.

5.1 NMDAR, schizophrenia, and anti-NMDAR encephalitis

Schizophrenia is a devastating mental disorder characterized by abnormal social behavior and failure to understand reality. It affects about 1% of the world's population [119]. Its clinical symptoms are summarized into three major categories: positive symptoms, negative symptoms and cognitive deficits. Positive symptoms include delusions, hallucinations, disordered thoughts, and speech. Negative symptoms are deficits of normal emotional response, including lack of motivation, inability to experience pleasure and poverty of speech. Cognitive deficits are also recognized as a core feature of schizophrenia, including dysfunction of work memory, long-term memory, attention, learning, etc. [120, 121].

Studies of schizophrenia pathology have mainly been focused on dopamine hyperfunction theory. This is supported by the finding that the affinity of dopamine D2 receptor antagonist correlates with their anti-psychotic potency [122, 123]. However, this hyperdopaminergic hypothesis can only be best used to explain positive symptoms of schizophrenia. Although the most common antipsychotic drugs nowadays are D2 dopamine receptor antagonists, they are only effective in treating positive symptoms, but not negative symptoms or cognitive deficits [124]. Therefore, it has been a hot topic to search for other hypothesis that could explain all symptoms of schizophrenia.

NMDAR antagonists can induce a psychotic state that resembles all three clusters of schizophrenic symptoms in healthy people and also may exacerbate the symptoms in schizophrenia patients [125, 126]. Reduced NMDAR activity caused by its antagonists results in schizophrenialike behaviors, which suggests that hypofunction of NMDARs might be one of the causes of schizophrenia, leading to the proposal of the NMDAR hypofunction hypothesis for schizophrenia [127, 128]. As NMDARs are expressed in both excitatory glutamatergic and inhibitory GABAergic neurons, it remains largely unclear whether the NMDAR hypofunction in excitatory neurons, inhibitory neurons, or both types of neurons cause schizophrenia.

Hypofunction of inhibitory neurotransmission has been implicated in schizophrenia pathology. Expression of key GABA signaling components is reduced in post-mortem brain of schizophrenia patients including PV and GAD67 [56,129–131]. Deletion of the GluN1 subunit in PV interneurons in mouse mimics some key behavioral features of schizophrenia [56, 100], and these mutant mice are more susceptible to MK-801 induced schizophrenia-like deficits [101]. This supports the idea that NMDAR hypofunction in PV interneurons contributes to schizophrenia.

Another evidence that supports NMDARs hypofunction hypothesis for schizophrenia comes from patients with anti-NMDARs encephalitis. Anti-NMDAR encephalitis is an autoimmune disorder featured with psychosis. This disease is caused by auto-antibodies targeting NMDARs, which could pass through blood-brain barrier (BBB) and lead to removal of NMDARs from synapses [132, 133]. Anti-NMDARs encephalitis has two major triggers, virus and tumors [134]. About 20% of patients infected with herpes simplex encephalitis (HSE) develop antibodies against NMDAR [135, 136]. Approximately 50% of young women with ovarian teratoma develop anti-NMDAR encephalitis. In addition, anti-NMDARs encephalitis patients usually benefit from removal of NMDARs as antigens in peripheral [132, 133]. This line of evidence also suggests that NMDAR loss-of-function contributes to psychosis and strongly supports the NMDA hypofunction hypothesis.

There is also human genetic evidence supporting NMDAR hypofunction hypothesis [137]. A recent genome-wide association study (GWAS) has linked NMDAR gene variances to risk in schizophrenia. Exome sequencing has identified de novo mutations of GluN2A and GluN2B in schizophrenia patients [138–140]. These schizophrenia-related mutations tend to be located at amino and carboxyl-termini [138, 139]. The functional impacts of these variances, although remain mostly unclear, will be critical for dissecting the role of NMDARs in schizophrenia.

5.2 NMDAR and depression

Depression is a widespread mental disorder, affecting more than 300 million people worldwide (WHO). It is also the major cause of suicide in adults. The most popular antidepressants are serotonin (5-HT) or norepinephrine (NE) reuptake inhibitors [141–143]. Although these drugs have benefited many, some obvious disadvantages remain. First, the antidepressant effects can only be observed after a few weeks of treatment [144, 145]. This suggests that 5-HT and NE system are unlikely the direct cause of depression. Second, about 30% patients are resistant to these drugs for reasons unknown [146, 147]. Third, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors [148] antidepressants may increase the risk of suicide [148, 149]. These caveats make current antidepressants unsatisfying.

Recent clinical studies have shown that a low sub-anesthetic dose of NMDAR antagonist ketamine can generate quick and sustainable anti-depressant effects on treatment-resistant depression patients [150–152]. In fact, it was first reported back in 1990 that NMDAR antagonists including competitive AP-7 and non-competitive MK-801 exhibited antidepressant actions in mice [153]. Scientists then proposed that direct NMDAR inhibition might lead to rapid anti-depression actions [153]. This breakthrough suggests a new mechanism of action for fast antidepressants, and indicates that the glutamatergic system malfunction may underlie depression. However, higher dose ketamine is psychogenic and could be abused for entertainment usage causing severe side effects [154]. Therefore, it would be extremely beneficial to understand the mechanism of ketamine antidepressant effect and therefore to instruct development of better antidepressant with fast action and less side effects.

Ketamine is a non-selective NMDAR antagonist, but whether its rapid antidepressant effect depends on NMDARs remains controversial. Zanos and coworkers [155] have indicated that a ketamine metabolite (2R,6R)-HNK (hydroxynorketamine) is essential to produce antidepressant effect in mice by increasing AMPAR-mediated excitatory post-synaptic potentials [156] in CA1 region, independent to its actions on NMDARs. However, Suzuki et al. [157] has reported that slightly higher concentration of (2R,6R)-HNK can significantly impair NMDAR function at rest in hippocampal slices and deactivates eEF2K, eliciting AMPAR-dependent synaptic potentiation to produce the anti-depression effect. Meanwhile, NMDAR-dependent lateral habenula (LHb) burst firing increases significantly in brain slice of depressed rats, and ketamine inhibits bursting in LHb to rapidly relieve depressed behaviors in animal models in an NMDAR-dependent manner [158].

NMDARs are mainly known to mediate excitatory synaptic transmission. However ketamine at sub-anesthetic doses significantly increases extracellular level of glutamate in the PFC in rats [94, 159], and can increase focal prefrontal activity in healthy volunteers [94, 159]. These findings are rather surprising, because one would expect that blockers of excitatory transmission should decrease excitability. These new evidences indicate that low dose ketamine may preferentially suppress NMDARs on inhibitory neurons to reduce principal neurons inhibition from inhibitory neurons and indirectly enhance overall neuronal activity to produce antidepressant effects [94, 99]. However, other studies have proposed that GABA receptor hypofunction may lead to depressive disorders, and enhancing GABAergic neurotransmission can induce antidepressant-like behaviors in rodents [160, 161]. Therefore, the NMDAR dysfunction hypothesis for depression requires further investigations [162].

Different subunits of NMDARs have different physiological and pathological functions. Which NMDAR subtype(s) plays the key role in the ketamine-evoked antidepressant actions is an interesting question. Hypermethylation of the GRIN2A gene has been observed by epigenomewide methylation analysis in human brain specimens [163]. Decreased GluN2A expression level in the prefrontal cortex, but increased in the lateral amygdala of majority depressed patients have been reported [164]. In animal models, the homozygous knock-in mice with a Tyr-1325-Phe mutation in GluN2A to prevent its phosphorylation/activation show antidepressantlike behaviors [165]. GluN2A KO mice also have anxiolytic and antidepressant-like behaviors. However, locomotion of GluN2A KO mice is also enhanced significantly. These observations complicate the interpretation of the role of NMDARs in the regulation of anxiolytic and antidepressantlike behaviors [166]. The administration of selective GluN2A antagonist NVP-AAM077 can elevate the release of glutamate and 5-HT, and rescue depressant-like activity in the forced-swim test [167]. These results support that GluN2A plays an important role in the regulation and treatment of depression. However, poor subtype selectivity of NVP-AAM077 makes it difficult to rule out the potential involvement of GluN2B.

GluN2B can also contribute to ketamine-induced fast antidepressant effect. GluN2B-containing NMDARs are activated under non-stimulated conditions by ambient glutamate and suppress excitatory transmission [168] (Fig. 1, Mechanism E), and its inhibition would promote protein synthesis and trigger antidepressant actions in an mTOR (the mammalian target of rapamycin)-dependent manner. Importantly, ketamine loses its efficacy in inducing anti-depressant-like behaviors in mice with GluN2B knockout in cortical principal neurons [168]. This suggests that GluN2B is necessary for ketamine-induced antidepressant effect. Meanwhile, GluN2B antagonists can also rapidly reverse the depression-like behavioral deficits in chronic unpredictable stress model. The rescue result is long-lasting, similar to the action of ketamine [169]. In addition, fluoxetine, serotonin reuptake inhibitor class of antidepressant, can selectively inhibit GluN2B-containing NMDARs [170]. A recent clinical study has shown that GluN2B selective antagonist CP-101,606 can significantly improve the patients’ mental status, although with a much slower onset after administration compared with ketamine [171]. These data support that GluN2B-containing NMDARs play a role in ketamine-induced antidepressant effect.

5.3 NMDAR and epilepsy

Epilepsy is a chronic and recurrent disorder caused by abnormal electrical activity in the brain. Epilepsy affects about 50 million people worldwide (WHO). The imbalance of inhibitory and excitatory neurotransmission [172, 173] plays a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of epilepsy. Abnormal GABAergic function is believed to be the key factor underlying epilepsy. Patients with temporal lobe epilepsy have a region-specific decrease of GABAA receptors [174], reduced hippocampal somatostatin and neuropeptide Y interneurons [175] and altered excitatory and inhibitory neurotransmission [176]. In animal models, GABA-immunoreactive cell density and the number of GABA-positive terminals are reduced during motor focal epilepsy in rats. Grafting of GABAergic progenitors decreases seizure activity and abnormal behaviors in mice [177]. Current GABA-based anti-epileptic drugs work well for many epilepsy patients. However, a significant portion of epilepsy patients are resistant to these treatments [178], suggesting that alternative mechanisms could exist in these treatment-resistant epilepsy patients.

Recently, NMDARs have drawn attention in the pathophysiology of epilepsy. The evidence comes from human genetic studies. Particularly, GRIN2A missense mutations cause epileptic aphasia and idiopathic focal epilepsy [117, 118, 179]. In addition, GluN2 mRNA increases in the hippocampus of temporal lobe epilepsy patients [180]. Blockade of GluN2C overexpression can rescue epileptogenesis in a tuberous sclerosis murine model [181]. These strongly support a critical role of NMDAR in these two forms of epilepsy and raise the possibility of a potential role of NMDAR in epilepsy in general.

The underlying mechanism however remains debatable. A key question is whether it is gain-of-function or loss-of-function of NMDARs that causes the disease. Interestingly, similar disease symptoms can be triggered by both increased and decreased NMDAR function. The missense mutations in GRIN2A, such as A243V [118], P552R [182], N615K [183], and L812M [184], enhance NMDAR function and cause neuronal hyper-excitation. However, other GluN2A variants I184S and R518H are rather loss-of-function mutants by reducing surface expression, current amplitude and opening time, while also increasing deactivation time [185]. Mutations P79R, C231Y, G483R and M705V also reduce the response to the co-agonists [186]. It is unclear why both gain-and loss-of-function mutations of NMDARs could cause epilepsy.

6 Pharmacological tools for NMDARs

NMDARs are widely distributed in the central nervous system with many critical physiological functions. Their hypo- or hyper-activation are associated with various brain diseases. Properly designed pharmacological tools can help reveal the NMDAR function and the associated mechanisms of related diseases, and will be potentially useful for clinical intervention. A few mostly used or newly developed compounds are discussed below. Structures of the mentioned compounds are summarized in Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Structures of selected pharmacological tools targeting NMDAR. Row 1: agonists and co-agonists; Row 2: antagonists; Row 3: GluN2A and 2B subtype selective antagonists: Row 4: PAMs.

6.1 Agonists and co-agonist transporter inhibitor

The activation of NMDA receptors requires not only glutamate binding to GluN2 but also a co-agonist (glycine or D-serine) binding to GluN1 [187, 188]. Agonists acting on the glutamate binding site of NMDARs cause excitotoxicity, therefore not useful to study NMDAR physiological function nor to treat patients [119, 189, 190]. Glycine and D-serine are endogenous co-agonists. They can increase the affinity of glutamate binding on GluN2 subunit [191] and might be useful to treat diseases caused by NMDAR hypofunction, such as schizophrenia [192]. D-serine acts on synaptic NMDARs, while glycine affects extrasynaptic receptors[193]. Synaptic NMDARs play an important role in long-term potentiation, while long-term depression requires both synaptic and extrasynaptic receptors [194].

Compared to agonists at the glutamate site, glycine site co-agonists are safer and do not usually cause excitotoxicity. GLYX-13, which acts at the glycine site, shows fast antidepressant effects and has no psychotomimetic effects [195, 196].

Glycine transporter (GlyT) is responsible to reuptake extracellular glycine and can play a critical role in regulating NMDAR signaling. GlyT has two distinct subtypes, GlyT-1 and GlyT-2. They are sodium-dependent transporters and can maintain local glycine concentrations at sub-saturation levels [197]. Studies on the GlyT-1 knockout mice have shown that GlyT-1 enhances hippocampal NMDAR function and cognition [198]. D-serine and GlyT-1 inhibitors can reverse pre-pulse inhibition [152] and latent inhibition (LI) in schizophrenia animal models [199, 200]. D'Souza et al. [201] have demonstrated that GlyT-1 inhibitor has the antipsychotic potential. However, GlyT-1 inhibitor phase 3 clinical trials on treating schizophrenia failed for lack of efficacy [202].

6.2 Antagonists

Excitotoxicity-induced neuronal death is mediated by hyperactivation of iGluRs, particularly NMDARs. It contributes to neuronal damage in many neurological disorders including stroke, traumatic brain injury, epilepsy, and neurodegenerative diseases. NMDAR antagonists could be useful in blocking excitotoxicity and neuronal damage.

MK-801, phencyclidine and ketamine are the non-competitive open channel blockers with limited subunit selectivity [203]. Phencyclidine was introduced as an anesthetic in 1957 but it caused a high rate of acute psychosis reactions and thus has never been approved for clinic application [204]. To reduce the side-effects, its analogue ketamine was developed. Ketamine has been used as the anesthetic for around 50 years and low dose ketamine has rapid and sustained anti-depressant effects in patients with treatment-resistant depression. MK-801, phencyclidine and ketamine have been used to induce animal models of schizophrenia [205, 206]. Low affinity channel blocker memantine has also been used to treat moderate to severe Alzheimer's disease [207].

2-amino-5-phosphonovaleric acid (AP5) and 4-(3-phosphonopropyl) piperazine-2-carboxylic acid (CPP) are common NMDAR competitive antagonists. AP5 is racemic mixture of D- and L-isomers. The D-isomer has higher potency and efficacy [208]. AP5 has been used to study NMDAR-dependent physiology and pathology, including epilepsy and memory impairments in the mammals [209–211], but its penetration of the blood-brain barrier is poor [212]. The CPP, an analogue of AP5, has the higher affinity for [³H]D-AP5 binding sites and is regarded as a potential anticonvulsant [213]. However, its clinical trials have failed [214, 215], as it can impair memory in healthy human [216].

Different NMDAR subtypes have different, sometime opposite physiological functions; therefore subunit-selective antagonists are also developed. The first subunit-selective NMDAR antagonist is GluN2B-selective antagonist ifenprodil. Ifenprodil and its derivatives bind to GluN2B amino terminal domain (ATD) [217, 218]. Ifenprodil has antiparkinsonian effects in the MPTP-Lesioned marmoset model [219]. CP101,606 and Ro25-6981 also are GluN2B selective antagonists [220, 221]. Remarkably, GluN2B-selective antagonists do not induce side effects often triggered by non-selective NMDAR antagonists in humans [222]. NVP-AAM077 preferentially acts on human GluN2A over GluN2B [223] and has been used to study GluN2A [224, 225]. However, selectivity of NVP-AAM077 is poor on rodent GluN2A, which limits its application in research [226]. GluN2A selective antagonists for animal studies will be very useful to demonstrate the role of GluN2A containing NMDARs.

6.3 Positive allosteric modulators

Another novel pharmacological tool to enhance NMDAR activity is positive allosteric modulator (PAM). This family of compounds act at distinct sites as compared with agonists and do not directly activate the receptors. Instead, they enhance the receptor response to its agonists. In theory, they have several distinct advantages over agonists. PAMs usually display better subtype selectivity, because they could act on the sites that are less homologous compared with generally more conserved agonist binding pockets among different subtypes [227]. Also, PAM does not directly activate NMDARs, therefore may not cause excitotoxicity as agonists. In addition, PAM's potentiation depends on the endogenous agonists, therefore enhances NMDAR activity in a more physiologically relevant manner. This could be particularly important in maintaining endogenous neuronal activity pattern.

Hackos and colleagues published a family of orally available GluN2A selective PAMs using cell based high throughput screening of random chemical library and following lead optimization [228–231]. These compounds potentiate GluN2A-containing NMDAR response to their co-agonists in both cellular and brain slice assays with up to 20 nanomolar potency, with minimum activity on GluN2B and GluN2C. They bind to the GluN1-GluN2A dimer interface of the extracellular ligand-binding domains (LBD) and can enhance NMDAR-dependent synaptic plasticity [228]. These compounds provide promising tools to study GluN2A function.

Perszyk and colleagues reported a series of subtype nonselective PAMs, which were converted from NAMs (negative allosteric modulator) by subtle structural modifications. The effects of these compounds depend on the subtype of NMDARs and agonists concentration. Interestingly, these PAMs do not act at extracellular ATD of the receptor, suggesting multiple allosteric modification sites exist on NMDARs [232].

Some derivatives of carboxylated naphthalene and phenanthrene can also modulate NMDAR activity [233]. For example, UBP710 preferentially potentiates GluN2A and GluN2B. It also acts on GluN2C and GluN2D, but with a weaker efficacy at lower doses and leads to 2C and 2D inhibition at a higher dose. UBP608 inhibits all GluN2 subtypes. Whereas, UBP512 action is dependent on its dose. It potentiates GluN2A and inhibits GluN2C and 2D at high doses, but weakly inhibits GluN2A and 2B at lower doses. ATD is unnecessary for the action of all these compounds. In addition, S2 domain is important for UBP512 and UBP710, and S1 domain is vital for UBP608-induced inhibition.

Meanwhile, (3-chlorophenyl)(6,7-dimethoxy-1-((4-methoxyphenoxy)methyl)-3, 4-dihydroisoquinolin-2(1H)-yl)methanone (CIQ) can enhance activity of GluN2C/2D by increasing their channel open probability without affecting the open state, and its action requires Thr592 in the M1 region and the linker between the ATD and LBD [234].

NMDAR dysfunction or loss-of-function may be the cause underlying several brain diseases, such as schizophrenia and epilepsy, etc. Pharmacological tools enhancing NMDAR activity will be very useful to compensate the compromised NMDAR activity in these diseases and provide benefits as a novel treatment. However, this kind of drugs had not been available for a long time. As discussed above, NMDAR PAMs represent a new hope to solve this issue, which could serve as an unprecedented opportunity to treat these brain diseases in the future. However, most these compounds are still at their early stage of development. Although a few families of NMDAR PAMs have been developed to enhance NMDAR endogenous activity without evoking excitotoxicity, their behavioral benefits have remained to be addressed.

7 Summary

Why do NMDAR antagonists cause excitation instead of inhibition in the brain under certain conditions? This represents one of the most critical questions concerning NMDAR function. Its answer would be essential to address etiology of many related brain diseases, including psychosis, depression and certain forms of epilepsy. Our review summarizes recent explanations for this question. However, limited by available tools, the answers remain controversial and largely unclear. New emerging research tools, such as novel subtype selective pharmacological reagents (particularly gain of function tools like PAMs) together with new genetic models would be very useful to clarify this important question in the near future.

Footnotes

Acknowledgements

This work is sponsored by Shanghai Science and Technology Committee (No. 17DZ1205402).

All contributing authors have no conflict of interests.

Tonghui Su received the B.S. degree from the Institute of Tropical Agriculture and Forestry in Hainan University in June 2015. Now she is a Ph.D. candidate in Interdisciplinary Research Center on Biology and Chemistry, Shanghai Institute of Organic Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Her research focuses on understanding the role of NMDAR in brain function and how its deficits could cause psychiatric disorders. E-mail: suth@sioc.ac.cn

Yi Lu received the B.S. degree from the Institute of Traditional Chinese Pharmacy in China Pharmaceutical University in June 2015. Now she is a Ph.D. candidate in Interdisciplinary Research Center on Biology and Chemistry, Shanghai Institute of Organic Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences. She is interested in understanding how NMDAR dysfunction contributes to brain diseases. E-mail: luyi@sioc.ac.cn

Wei Lu obtained the Ph.D. degree in neuroscience and physiology from New York University School of Medicine (2006) and then received the postdoctoral training at UCSF. Currently he is a principal investigator at National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, USA (2012-present). His research interests focus on understanding development and function of inhibitory neural circuits. E-mail: luw4@mail.nih.gov

Yelin Chen received his Ph.D. degree in neuroscience from Vanderbilt University (2007) and his postdoctoral training from MIT. He then worked at Genentech Inc. before moving back Shanghai to start his own lab. He is now a principal investigator at Interdisciplinary Research Center on Biology and Chemistry, Shanghai Institute of Organic Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences. He works on the role of NMDARs in brain disorders and the mechanisms underlying Alzheimer's disease. E-mail: chenyelin@sioc.ac.cn

References

Traynelis

S.F.

, Wollmuth

L.P.

, McBain

C.J.

, Menniti

F.S.

, Vance

K.M.

, Ogden

K.K.

, Hansen

K.B.

, Yuan

H.J.

, Myers

S.J.

, Dingledine

Glutamate receptor ion channels: structure, regulation, and function. Pharmacol Rev 2010, 62(3): 405–496.

Sanz-Clemente

, Nicoll

R.A.

, Roche

K.W.

Diversity in NMDA receptor composition: many regulators, many consequences. Neuroscientist 2013, 19(1): 62–75.

Cull-Candy

S.G.

, Leszkiewicz

D.N.

Role of distinct NMDA receptor subtypes at central synapses. Science 2004, 2004(255): re16.

Paoletti

, Bellone

, Zhou

NMDA receptor subunit diversity: impact on receptor properties, synaptic plasticity and disease. Nat Rev Neurosci 2013, 14(6): 383–400.

Vance

K.M.

, Hansen

K.B.

, Traynelis

S.F.

GluN1 splice variant control of GluN1/GluN2D NMDA receptors. J Physiol 2012, 590(16): 3857–3875.

Ozawa

, Kamiya

, Tsuzuki

Glutamate receptors in the mammalian central nervous system. Progress Neurobiol 1998, 54(5): 581–618.

Blandini

, Armentero

M.T.

New pharmacological avenues for the treatment of _L-DOPA-induced dyskinesias in Parkinson's disease: targeting glutamate and adenosine receptors. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 2012, 212(2): 153–168.

Pérez-Otaño

, Larsen

R.S.

, Wesseling

J.F.

Emerging roles of GluN3-containing NMDA receptors in the CNS. Nat Rev Neurosci 2016, 17(10): 623–635.

Low

C.M.

, Wee

K.S.L.

New insights into the not-so-new NR3 subunits of N-methyl-_D-aspartate receptor: localization, structure, and function. Mol Pharmacol 2010, 78(1): 1–11.

10.

Monaghan

D.T.

, Holets

V.R.

, Toy

D.W.

, Cotman

C.W.

Anatomical distributions of four pharmacologically distinct ³H-L-glutamate binding sites. Nature 1983, 306(5939): 176–179.

11.

Monaghan

D.T.

, Yao

, Cotman

C.W.

Distribution of [³H]AMPA binding sites in rat brain as determined by quantitative autoradiography. Brain Res 1984, 324(1): 160–164.

12.

Paoletti

Molecular basis of NMDA receptor functional diversity. Eur J Neurosci 2011, 33(8): 1351–1365.

13.

Monyer

, Burnashev

, Laurie

D.J.

, Sakmann

, Seeburg

P.H.

Developmental and regional expression in the rat brain and functional properties of four NMDA receptors. Neuron 1994, 12(3): 529–540.

14.

Pachernegg

, Strutz-Seebohm

, Hollmann

GluN3 subunit-containing NMDA receptors: not just one-trick ponies. Trends Neurosci 2012, 35(4): 240–249.

15.

Henson

M.A.

, Roberts

A.C.

, Pérez-Otaño

, Philpot

B.D.

Influence of the NR3A subunit on NMDA receptor functions. Prog Neurobiol 2010, 91(1): 23–37.

16.

Matsuda

, Kamiya

, Matsuda

, Yuzaki

Cloning and characterization of a novel NMDA receptor subunit NR3B: a dominant subunit that reduces calcium permeability. Mol Brain Res 2002, 100(1-2): 43–52.

17.

Nishi

, Hinds

, Lu

H.P.

, Kawata

, Hayashi

Motoneuron-specific expression of NR3B, a novel NMDA-type glutamate receptor subunit that works in a dominant-negative manner. J Neurosci 2001, 21(23): RC185.

18.

Wee

K.S.L.

, Zhang

Y.B.

, Khanna

, Low

C.M.

Immunolocalization of NMDA receptor subunit NR3B in selected structures in the rat forebrain, cerebellum, and lumbar spinal cord. J Comp Neurol 2008, 509(1): 118–135.

19.

Watanabe

, Inoue

, Sakimura

, Mishina

Developmental changes in distribution of NMDA receptor channel subunit mRNAs. Neuroreport 1992, 3(12): 1138–1140.

20.

Laurie

D.J.

, Seeburg

P.H.

Regional and developmental heterogeneity in splicing of the rat brain NMDAR1 mRNA. J Neurosci 1994, 14(5): 3180–3194.

21.

Paupard

M.C.

, Friedman

L.K.

, Zukin

R.S.

Developmental regulation and cell-specific expression of N-methyl-_D-aspartate receptor splice variants in rat hippocampus. Neuroscience 1997, 79(2): 399–409.

22.

Ewald

R.C.

, Cline

H.T.

NMDA receptors and brain development. In Biology of the NMDA Receptor. Van Dongen

A.M.

, Ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2009.

23.

Wong

H.K.

, Liu

X.B.

, Matos

M.F.

, Chan

S.F.

, Pérez-Otaño

, Boysen

, Cui

J.K.

, Nakanishi

, Trimmer

J.S.

, Jones

E.G.

Temporal and regional expression of NMDA receptor subunit NR3A in the mammalian brain. J Comp Neurol 2002, 450(4): 303–317.

24.

Wonders

C.P.

, Anderson

S.A.

The origin and specification of cortical interneurons. Nat Rev Neurosci 2006, 7(9): 687–696.

25.

DeDiego

, Smith-Fernández

, Fairén

Cortical cells that migrate beyond area boundaries: characterization of an early neuronal population in the lower intermediate zone of prenatal rats. Eur J Neurosci 1994, 6(6): 983–997.

26.

Anderson

S.A.

, Eisenstat

D.D.

, Shi

, Rubenstein

J.L.

Interneuron migration from basal forebrain to neocortex: dependence on Dlx genes. Science 1997, 278(5337): 474–476.

27.

Sahara

, Yanagawa

, O'Leary

D.D.M.

, Stevens

C.F.

The fraction of cortical GABAergic neurons is constant from near the start of cortical neurogenesis to adulthood. J Neurosci 2012, 32(14): 4755–4761.

28.

Kawaguchi

, Kubota

GABAergic cell subtypes and their synaptic connections in rat frontal cortex. Cereb Cortex 1997, 7(6): 476–486.

29.

Kubota

Untangling GABAergic wiring in the cortical microcircuit. Currnt Opin Neurobiol 2014, 26: 7–14.

30.

Pfeffer

C.K.

, Xue

M.S.

, He

, Huang

Z.J.

, Scanziani

Inhibition of inhibition in visual cortex: the logic of connections between molecularly distinct interneurons. Nat Neurosci 2013, 16(8): 1068–1076.

31.

DeFelipe

, López-Cruz

P.L.

, Benavides-Piccione

, Bielza

, Larrañaga

, Anderson

, Burkhalter

, Cauli

, Fairén

, Feldmeyer

New insights into the classification and nomenclature of cortical GABAergic interneurons. Nat Rev Neurosci 2013, 14(3): 202–216.

32.

Freund

T.F.

Interneuron Diversity series: Rhythm and mood in perisomatic inhibition. Trends Neurosci 2003, 26(9): 489–495.

33.

Tremblay

, Lee

, Rudy

GABAergic interneurons in the neocortex: from cellular properties to circuits. Neuron 2016, 91(2): 260–292.

34.

Marín

Interneuron dysfunction in psychiatric disorders. Nat Rev Neurosci 2012, 13(2): 107–120.

35.

Dávid

, Schleicher

, Zuschratter

, Staiger

J.F.

The innervation of parvalbumin-containing interneurons by VIP-immunopositive interneurons in the primary somatosensory cortex of the adult rat. Eur J Neurosci 2007, 25(8): 2329–2340.

36.

, Jeong

H.Y.

, Tremblay

, Rudy

Neocortical somatostatin-expressing GABAergic interneurons disinhibit the thalamorecipient layer 4. Neuron 2013, 77(1): 155–167.

37.

H.J.

, Hangya

, Kvitsiani

, Sanders

J.I.

, Huang

Z.J.

, Kepecs

Cortical interneurons that specialize in disinhibitory control. Nature 2013, 503(7477): 521–524.

38.

Lledo

P.M.

, Saghatelyan

, Lemasson

Inhibitory interneurons in the olfactory bulb: from development to function. Neuroscientist 2004, 10(4): 292–303.

39.

Fell

, Axmacher

The role of phase synchronization in memory processes. Nat Rev Neurosci 2011, 12(2): 105–118.

40.

Mann

E.O.

, Paulsen

Role of GABAergic inhibition in hippocampal network oscillations. Trends Neurosci 2007, 30(7): 343–349.

41.

Cobb

S.R.

, Buhl

E.H.

, Halasy

, Paulsen

, Somogyi

Synchronization of neuronal activity in hippocampus by individual GABAergic interneurons. Nature 1995, 378(6552): 75–78.

42.

Whittington

M.A.

, Traub

R.D.

, Jefferys

J.G.R.

Synchronized oscillations in interneuron networks driven by metabotropic glutamate receptor activation. Nature 1995, 373(6515): 612–615.

43.

Whittington

M.A.

, Traub

R.D.

Interneuron diversity series: inhibitory interneurons and network oscillations in vitro.

Trends Neurosci 2003, 26(12): 676–682.

44.

Bartos

, Vida

, Jonas

Synaptic mechanisms of synchronized gamma oscillations in inhibitory inter-neuron networks. Nat Rev Neurosci 2007, 8(1): 45–56.

45.

Csicsvari

, Jamieson

, Wise

K.D.

, Buzsáki

Mechanisms of gamma oscillations in the hippocampus of the behaving rat. Neuron 2003, 37(2): 311–322.

46.

Mann

E.O.

, Suckling

J.M.

, Hajos

, Greenfield

S.A.

, Paulsen

Perisomatic feedback inhibition underlies cholinergically induced fast network oscillations in the rat hippocampus in vitro. Neuron 2005, 45(1): 105–117.

47.

Engel

A.K.

, Fries

, Singer

Dynamic predictions: oscillations and synchrony in top-down processing. Nat Rev Neurosci 2001, 2(10): 704–716.

48.

Fisahn

, Pike

F.G.

, Buhl

E.H.

, Paulsen

Cholinergic induction of network oscillations at 40 Hz in the hippocampus in vitro.

Nature 1998, 394(6689): 186–189.

49.

Buzsáki

, Wang

X.J.

Mechanisms of gamma oscillations. Annu Rev Neurosci 2012, 35: 203–225.

50.

Freund

T.F.

, Buzsáki

Interneurons of the hippocampus. Hippocampus 1996, 6(4): 347–470.

51.

Howes

O.D.

, Murray

R.M.

Schizophrenia: an integrated sociodevelopmental-cognitive model. Lancet 2014, 383(9929): 1677–1687.

52.

Moghaddam

, Javitt

From revolution to evolution: the glutamate hypothesis of schizophrenia and its implication for treatment. Neuropsychopharmacology 2012, 37(1): 4–15.

53.

Kantrowitz

J.T.

, Javitt

D.C.

N-methyl-_D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor dysfunction or dysregulation: the final common pathway on the road to schizophrenia?. Brain Res Bull 2010, 83(3-4): 108–121.

54.

Barch

D.M.

, Ceaser

Cognition in schizophrenia: core psychological and neural mechanisms. Trends Cogn Sci 2012, 16(1): 27–34.

55.

Owen

M.J.

, Sawa

, Mortensen

P.B.

Schizophrenia. Lancet 2016, 388(10039): 86–97.

56.

Belforte

J.E.

, Zsiros

, Sklar

E.R.

, Jiang

Z.H.

, Yu

, Li

Y.Q.

, Quinlan

E.M.

, Nakazawa

Postnatal NMDA receptor ablation in corticolimbic interneurons confers schizophrenia-like phenotypes. Nat Neurosci 2010, 13(1): 76–83.

57.

Bitanihirwe

B.K.

, Lim

M.P.

, Kelley

J.F.

, Kaneko

, Woo

T.U.

Glutamatergic deficits and parvalbumin-containing inhibitory neurons in the prefrontal cortex in schizophrenia. BMC Psychiatry 2009, 9: 71.

58.

Carlen

, Meletis

, Siegle

J.H.

, Cardin

J.A.

, Futai

, Vierling-Claassen

, Ruhlmann

, Jones

S.R.

, Deisseroth

, Sheng

A critical role for NMDA receptors in parvalbumin interneurons for gamma rhythm induction and behavior. Mol Psychiatry 2012, 17: 537–548.

59.

Zhang

Z.J.

, Reynolds

G.P.

A selective decrease in the relative density of parvalbumin-immunoreactive neurons in the hippocampus in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res 2002, 55: 1–10.

60.

Heckers

, Stone

, Walsh

, Shick

, Koul

, Benes

F.M.

Differential hippocampal expression of glutamic acid decarboxylase 65 and 67 messenger RNA in bipolar disorder and schizophrenia. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2002, 59: 521–529.

61.

Konradi

, Zimmerman

E.I.

, Yang

C.K.

, Lohmann

K.M.

, Gresch

, Pantazopoulos

, Berretta

, Heckers

Hippocampal interneurons in bipolar disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2011, 68(4): 340–350.

62.

Benes

F.M.

, Berretta

GABAergic interneurons: implications for understanding schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Neuropsychopharmacology 2001, 25(1): 1–27.

63.

Fung

S.J.

, Fillman

S.G.

, Webster

M.J.

, Weickert

C.S.

Schizophrenia and bipolar disorder show both common and distinct changes in cortical interneuron markers. Schizophr Res 2014, 155(1-3): 26–30.

64.

Briggs

S.W.

, Galanopoulou

A.S.

Altered GABA signaling in early life epilepsies. Neural Plast 2011, 2011: 527605.

65.

Maljevic

, Krampfl

, Cobilanschi

, Tilgen

, Beyer

, Weber

Y.G.

, Schlesinger

, Ursu

, Melzer

, Cossette

A mutation in the GABA_A receptor α₁-subunit is associated with absence epilepsy. Ann Neurol 2006, 59(6): 983–987.

66.

Urak

, Feucht

, Fathi

, Hornik

, Fuchs

A GABRB3 promoter haplotype associated with childhood absence epilepsy impairs transcriptional activity. Hum Mol Genet 2006, 15(16): 2533–2541.

67.

Meguro-Horike

, Yasui

D.H.

, Powell

, Schroeder

D.I.

, Oshimura

, LaSalle

J.M.

, Horike

Neuron-specific impairment of inter-chromosomal pairing and transcription in a novel model of human 15q-duplication syndrome. Hum Mol Genet 2011, 20(19): 3798–3810.

68.

Hogart

, Nagarajan

R.P.

, Patzel

K.A.

, Yasui

D.H.

, LaSalle

J.M.

15q11–13 GABAA receptor genes are normally biallelically expressed in brain yet are subject to epigenetic dysregulation in autism-spectrum disorders. Hum Mol Genet 2007, 16(6): 691–703.

69.

Sadakata

, Washida

, Iwayama

, Shoji

, Sato

, Ohkura

, Katoh-Semba

, Nakajima

, Sekine

, Tanaka

Autistic-like phenotypes in Cadps2-knockout mice and aberrant CADPS2 splicing in autistic patients. J Clin Invest 2007, 117(4): 931–943.

70.

Fatemi

S.H.

, Halt

A.R.

, Stary

J.M.

, Kanodia

, Schulz

S.C.

, Realmuto

G.R.

Glutamic acid decarboxylase 65 and 67 kDa proteins are reduced in autistic parietal and cerebellar cortices. Biol Psychiatry 2002, 52(8): 805–810.

71.

Coghlan

, Horder

, Inkster

, Mendez

M.A.

, Murphy

D.G.

, Nutt

D.J.

GABA system dysfunction in autism and related disorders: from synapse to symptoms. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2012, 36(9): 2044–2055.

72.

Kurdi

M.S.

, Theerth

K.A.

, Deva

R.S.

Ketamine: Current applications in anesthesia, pain, and critical care. Anesth Essays Res 2014, 8(3): 283–290.

73.

Moghaddam

, Adams

, Verma

, Daly

Activation of glutamatergic neurotransmission by ketamine: a novel step in the pathway from NMDA receptor blockade to dopaminergic and cognitive disruptions associated with the prefrontal cortex. J Neurosci 1997, 17(8): 2921–2927.

74.

Widman

A.J.

, McMahon

L.L.

Disinhibition of CA1 pyramidal cells by low-dose ketamine and other antagonists with rapid antidepressant efficacy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2018, 115(13): E3007–E3016.

75.

Sutton

M.A.

, Ito

H.T.

, Cressy

, Kempf

, Woo

J.C.

, Schuman

E.M.

Miniature neurotransmission stabilizes synaptic function via tonic suppression of local dendritic protein synthesis. Cell 2006, 125(4): 785–799.

76.

X.L.

, Zhou

, Lu

An NMDA receptor-dependent mechanism underlies inhibitory synapse development. Cell Rep 2016, 14(3): 471–478.

77.

Paquet

, Smith

Presynaptic NMDA receptor subunit immunoreactivity in GABAergic terminals in rat brain. J Comp Neurol 2000, 423(2): 330–347.

78.

Mathew

S.S.

, Hablitz

J.J.

Presynaptic NMDA receptors mediate IPSC potentiation at GABAergic synapses in developing rat neocortex. PLoS One 2011, 6(2): e17311.

79.

Lien

C.C.

, Mu

Y.L.

, Vargas-Caballero

, Poo

M.M.

Visual stimuli-induced LTD of GABAergic synapses mediated by presynaptic NMDA receptors. Nat Neurosci 2006, 9(3): 372–380.

80.

Corlew

, Brasier

D.J.

, Feldman

D.E.

, Philpot

B.D.

Presynaptic NMDA receptors: newly appreciated roles in cortical synaptic function and plasticity. Neuroscientist 2008, 14(6): 609–625.

81.

Bouvier

, Bidoret

, Casado

, Paoletti

Presynaptic NMDA receptors: Roles and rules. Neuroscience 2015, 311: 322–340.

82.

Fiszman

M.L.

, Barberis

, Lu

C.Y.

, Fu

Z.Y.

, Erdélyi

, Szabó

, Vicini

NMDA receptors increase the size of GABAergic terminals and enhance GABA release. J Neurosci 2005, 25(8): 2024–2031.

83.

Glitsch

, Marty

Presynaptic effects of NMDA in cerebellar Purkinje cells and interneurons. J Neurosci 1999, 19(2): 511–519.

84.

Duguid

I.C.

, Smart

T.G.

Retrograde activation of presynaptic NMDA receptors enhances GABA release at cerebellar interneuron-Purkinje cell synapses. Nat Neurosci 2004, 7(5): 525–533.

85.

Glitsch

M.D.

Calcium influx through N-methyl-_D-aspartate receptors triggers GABA release at interneuron-Purkinje cell synapse in rat cerebellum. Neuroscience 2008, 151(2): 403–409.

86.

Moreau

A.W.

, Kullmann

D.M.

NMDA receptor-dependent function and plasticity in inhibitory circuits. Neuropharmacology 2013, 74: 23–31.

87.

McLean

H.A.

, Caillard

, Ben-Ari

, Gaiarsa

J.L.

Bidirectional plasticity expressed by GABAergic synapses in the neonatal rat hippocampus. J Physiol 1996, 496(2): 471–477.

88.

Nugent

F.S.

, Penick

E.C.

, Kauer

J.A.

Opioids block long-term potentiation of inhibitory synapses. Nature 2007, 446(7139): 1086–1090.

89.

Aamodt

S.M.

, Shi

, Colonnese

M.T.

, Veras

, Constantine-Paton

Chronic NMDA exposure accelerates development of GABAergic inhibition in the superior colliculus. J Neurophysiol 2000, 83(3): 1580–1591.

90.

X.L.

, Lu

Genetic deletion of NMDA receptors suppresses GABAergic synaptic transmission in two distinct types of central neurons. Neurosci Lett 2018, 668: 147–153.

91.

Cserép

, Szabadits

, Szőnyi

, Watanabe

, Freund

T.F.

, Nyiri

NMDA receptors in GABAergic synapses during postnatal development. PLoS One 2012, 7(5): e37753.

92.

Szabadits

, Cserép

, Szőnyi

, Fukazawa

, Shigemoto

, Watanabe

, Itohara

, Freund

T.F.

, Nyiri

NMDA receptors in hippocampal GABAergic synapses and their role in nitric oxide signaling. J Neurosci 2011, 31(16): 5893–5904.

93.

Gundersen

, Holten

A.T.

, Storm-Mathisen

GABAergic synapses in hippocampus exocytose aspartate on to NMDA receptors: quantitative immunogold evidence for co-transmission. Mol Cell Neurosci 2004, 26(1): 156–165.

94.

Homayoun

, Moghaddam

NMDA receptor hypofunction produces opposite effects on prefrontal cortex interneurons and pyramidal neurons. J Neurosci 2007, 27(43): 11496–11500.

95.

Ling

D.S.F.

, Benardo

L.S.

Activity-dependent depression of monosynaptic fast IPSCs in hippocampus: contributions from reductions in chloride driving force and conductance. Brain Res 1995, 670(1): 142–146.

96.

Grunze

H.C.

, Rainnie

D.G.

, Hasselmo

M.E.

, Barkai

, Hearn

E.F.

, McCarley

R.W.

, Greene

R.W.

NMDA-dependent modulation of CA1 local circuit inhibition. J Neurosci 1996, 16(6): 2034–2043.

97.

Lewis

D.A.

, Moghaddam

Cognitive dysfunction in schizophrenia: convergence of γ-aminobutyric acid and glutamate alterations. Arch Neurol 2006, 63(10): 1372–1376.

98.

Nakazawa

, Zsiros

, Jiang

Z.H.

, Nakao

, Kolata

, Zhang

S.Q.

, Belforte

J.E.

GABAergic interneuron origin of schizophrenia pathophysiology. Neuropharmacology 2012, 62(3): 1574–1583.

99.

Cohen

S.M.

, Tsien

R.W.

, Goff

D.C.

, Halassa

M.M.

The impact of NMDA receptor hypofunction on GABAergic neurons in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia. Schizophr Res 2015, 167(1-3): 98–107.

100.

Korotkova

, Fuchs

E.C.

, Ponomarenko

, von Engelhardt

, Monyer

NMDA receptor ablation on parvalbumin-positive interneurons impairs hippocampal synchrony, spatial representations, and working memory. Neuron 2010, 68(3): 557–569.

101.

Bygrave

A.M.

, Masiulis

, Nicholson

, Berkemann

, Barkus

, Sprengel

, Harrison

P.J.

, Kullmann

D.M.

, Bannerman

D.M.

, Katzel

Knockout of NMDA-receptors from parvalbumin interneurons sensitizes to schizophrenia-related deficits induced by MK-801. Transl Psychiatry 2016, 6(4): e778.

102.

Newcomer

J.W.

, Krystal

J.H.

NMDA receptor regulation of memory and behavior in humans. Hippocampus 2001, 11(5): 529–542.

103.

Gonzalez-Burgos

, Lewis

D.A.

NMDA receptor hypofunction, parvalbumin-positive neurons, and cortical gamma oscillations in schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull 2012, 38(5): 950–957.

104.

Coyle

J.T.

NMDA receptor and schizophrenia: a brief history. Schizophr Bull 2012, 38(5): 920–926.

105.

Zhou

, Sheng

NMDA receptors in nervous system diseases. Neuropharmacology 2013, 74: 69–75.

106.

Turrigiano

G.G.

, Nelson

S.B.

Homeostatic plasticity in the developing nervous system. Nat Rev Neurosci 2004, 5(2): 97–107.

107.

Autry

A.E.

, Adachi

, Nosyreva

, Na

E.S.

, Los

M.F.

, Cheng

P.F.

, Kavalali

E.T.

, Monteggia

L.M.

NMDA receptor blockade at rest triggers rapid behavioural antidepressant responses. Nature 2011, 475(7354): 91–95.

108.

Nosyreva

, Szabla

, Autry

A.E.

, Ryazanov

A.G.

, Monteggia

L.M.

, Kavalali

E.T.

Acute suppression of spontaneous neurotransmission drives synaptic potentiation. J Neurosci 2013, 33(16): 6990–7002.

109.

Ultanir

S.K.

, Kim

J.E.

, Hall

B.J.

, Deerinck

, Ellisman

, Ghosh

Regulation of spine morphology and spine density by NMDA receptor signaling in vivo.

Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007, 104(49): 19553–19558.

110.

Adesnik

, Li

G.N.

, During

M.J.

, Pleasure

S.J.

, Nicoll

R.A.

NMDA receptors inhibit synapse unsilencing during brain development. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008, 105(14): 5597–5602.

111.

, Gray

J.A.

, Granger

A.J.

, During

M.J.

, Nicoll

R.A.

Potentiation of synaptic AMPA receptors induced by the deletion of NMDA receptors requires the GluA2 subunit. J Neurophysiol 2011, 105(2): 923–928.

112.

Hall

B.J.

, Ripley

, Ghosh

NR2B signaling regulates the development of synaptic AMPA receptor current. J Neurosci 2007, 27(49): 13446–13456.

113.

Gray

J.A.

, Shi

, Usui

, During

M.J.

, Sakimura

, Nicoll

R.A.

Distinct modes of AMPA receptor suppression at developing synapses by GluN2A and GluN2B: single-cell NMDA receptor subunit deletion in vivo. Neuron 2011, 71(6): 1085–1101.

114.

Engblom

, Bilbao

, Sanchis-Segura

, Dahan

, Perreau-Lenz

, Balland

, Parkitna

J.R.

, Lujan

, Halbout

, Mameli

Glutamate receptors on dopamine neurons control the persistence of cocaine seeking. Neuron 2008, 59(3): 497–508.

115.

Zweifel

L.S.

, Argilli

, Bonci

, Palmiter

R.D.

Role of NMDA receptors in dopamine neurons for plasticity and addictive behaviors. Neuron 2008, 59(3): 486–496.

116.

Chittajallu

, Wester

J.C.

, Craig

M.T.

, Barksdale

, Yuan

X.Q.

, Akgül

, Fang

, Collins

, Hunt

, Pelkey

K.A.

Afferent specific role of NMDA receptors for the circuit integration of hippocampal neurogliaform cells. Nat Commun 2017, 8: 152.

117.

Carvill

G.L.

, Regan

B.M.

, Yendle

S.C.

, O'Roak

B.J.

, Lozovaya

, Bruneau

, Burnashev

, Khan

, Cook

, Geraghty

GRIN2A mutations cause epilepsy-aphasia spectrum disorders. Nat Genet 2013, 45(9): 1073–1076.

118.

Lemke

J.R.

, Lal

, Reinthaler

E.M.

, Steiner

, Nothnagel

, Alber

, Geider

, Laube

, Schwake

, Finsterwalder

Mutations in GRIN2A cause idiopathic focal epilepsy with rolandic spikes. Nat Genet 2013, 45(9): 1067–1072.

119.

Lewis

D.A.

GABAergic local circuit neurons and prefrontal cortical dysfunction in schizophrenia. Brain research. Brain Res Rev 2000, 31(2-3): 270–276.

120.

Lewis

D.A.

, Hashimoto

, Volk

D.W.

Cortical inhibitory neurons and schizophrenia. Nat Rev Neurosci 2005, 6(4): 312–324.

121.

Bozikas

V.P.

, Andreou

Longitudinal studies of cognition in first episode psychosis: a systematic review of the literature. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2011, 45(2): 93–108.

122.

Creese

, Burt

D.R.

, Snyder

S.H.

Dopamine receptors and average clinical doses. Science 1976, 194(4264): 546.

123.

Snyder

S.H.

Dopamine receptors, neuroleptics, and schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry 1981, 138(4): 460–464.

124.

Perez

S.M.

, Lodge

D.J.

New approaches to the management of schizophrenia: focus on aberrant hippocampal drive of dopamine pathways. Drug Des Dev Ther 2014, 8: 887–896.

125.

Krystal

J.H.

, Karper

L.P.

, Seibyl

J.P.

, Freeman

G.K.

, Delaney

, Bremner

J.D.

, Heninger

G.R.

, Bowers

M.B.

Jr. , Charney

D.S.

Subanesthetic effects of the non-competitive NMDA antagonist, ketamine, in humans. Psychotomimetic, perceptual, cognitive, and neuroendocrine responses. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1994, 51(3): 199–214.

126.

Newcomer

J.W.

, Farber

N.B.

, Jevtovic-Todorovic

, Selke

, Melson

A.K.

, Hershey

, Craft

, Olney

J.W.

Ketamine-induced NMDA receptor hypofunction as a model of memory impairment and psychosis. Neuropsychopharmacology 1999, 20(2): 106–118.

127.

Coyle

J.T.

Glutamate and schizophrenia: beyond the dopamine hypothesis. Cell Mol Neurobiol 2006, 26(4-6): 363–382.

128.

Lindsley

C.W.

, Shipe

W.D.

, Wolkenberg

S.E.

, Theberge

C.R.

, Williams

D.L.

Jr. , Sur

, Kinney

G.G.

Progress towards validating the NMDA receptor hypofunction hypothesis of schizophrenia. Curr Top Med Chem 2006, 6(8): 771–785.

129.

Akbarian

, Huang

H.S.

Molecular and cellular mechanisms of altered GAD1/GAD67 expression in schizophrenia and related disorders. Brain Res Rev 2006, 52(2): 293–304.

130.

Inan

, Petros

T.J.

, Anderson

S.A.

Losing your inhibition: linking cortical GABAergic interneurons to schizophrenia. Neurobiol Dis 2013, 53: 36–48.

131.

Eyles

D.W.

, McGrath

J.J.

, Reynolds

G.P.

Neuronal calcium-binding proteins and schizophrenia. Schizophr Res 2002, 57(1): 27–34.

132.

Kayser

M.S.

, Dalmau

Anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis in psychiatry. Curr Psychiatry Rev 2011, 7(3): 189–193.

133.

Titulaer

M.J.

, McCracken

, Gabilondo

, Armangué

, Glaser

, Iizuka

, Honig

L.S.

, Benseler

S.M.

, Kawachi

, Martinez-Hernandez

Treatment and prognostic factors for long-term outcome in patients with anti-N-Methyl-D-Aspartate (NMDA) receptor encephalitis: a cohort study. Lancet Neurol 2013, 12(2): 157–165.

134.

Dalmau

NMDA receptor encephalitis and other antibody-mediated disorders of the synapse: The 2016 Cotzias Lecture. Neurology 2016, 87(23): 2471–2482.

135.

Armangue

, Leypoldt

, Málaga

, Raspall-Chaure

, Marti

, Nichter

, Pugh

, Vicente-Rasoamalala

, Lafuente-Hidalgo

, Macaya

Herpes simplex virus encephalitis is a trigger of brain autoimmunity. Ann Neurol 2014, 75(2): 317–323.

136.

Mohammad

S.S.

, Sinclair

, Pillai

, Merheb

, Aumann

T.D.

, Gill

, Dale

R.C.

, Brilot

Herpes simplex encephalitis relapse with chorea is associated with autoantibodies to N-Methyl-D-aspartate receptor or dopamine-2 receptor. Mov Disord 2014, 29(1): 117–122.

137.

Hardingham

G.E.

, Do

K.Q.

Linking early-life NMDAR hypofunction and oxidative stress in schizophrenia pathogenesis. Nat Rev Neurosci 2016, 17(2): 125–134.

138.

Tarabeux

, Kebir

, Gauthier

, Hamdan

F.F.

, Xiong

, Piton

, Spiegelman

, Henrion

, Millet

, Fathalli

Rare mutations in N-methyl-D-aspartate glutamate receptors in autism spectrum disorders and schizophrenia. Transl Psychiatry 2011, 1(11): e55.

139.

Myers

R.A.

, Casals

, Gauthier

, Hamdan

F.F.

, Keebler

, Boyko

A.R.

, Bustamante

C.D.

, Piton

A.M.

, Spiegelman

, Henrion

A population genetic approach to mapping neurological disorder genes using deep resequencing. PLoS Genet 2011, 7(2): e1001318.

140.

Freunscht

, Popp

, Blank

, Endele

, Moog

, Petri

, Prott

E.C.

, Reis

, Rübo

, Zabel

Behavioral phenotype in five individuals with de novo mutations within the GRIN2B gene. Behav Brain Funct 2013, 9: 20.

141.

Carvalho

A.F.

, Sharma

M.S.

, Brunoni

A.R.

, Vieta

, Fava

G.A.

The safety, tolerability and risks associated with the use of newer generation antidepressant drugs: a critical review of the literature. Psychother Psychosom 2016, 85(5): 270–288.

142.

Yohn

C.N.

, Gergues

M.M.

, Samuels

B.A.

The role of 5-HT receptors in depression. Mol Brain 2017, 10: 28.

143.

Moret

, Briley

The importance of norepinephrine in depression. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 2011, 7(S1): 9–13.

144.

Mitchell

A.J.

Two-week delay in onset of action of antidepressants: new evidence. Br J Psychiatry 2006, 188(2): 105–106.

145.

Bauer

, Bschor

, Pfennig

, Whybrow

P.C.

, Angst

, Versiani

, Möller

H.J.

, WFSBP Task Force on Unipolar Depressive Disorders. World federation of societies of biological psychiatry (WFSBP) guidelines for biological treatment of unipolar depressive disorders in primary care. World J Biol Psychiatry 2007, 8(2): 67–104.

146.

Trivedi

M.H.

, Rush

A.J.

, Wisniewski

S.R.

, Nierenberg

A.A.

, Warden

, Ritz

, Norquist

, Howland

R.H.

, Lebowitz

, McGrath

P.J.

Evaluation of outcomes with citalopram for depression using measurement-based care in STAR*D: implications for clinical practice. Am J Psychiatry 2006, 163(1): 28–40.

147.

Hirschfeld

R.M.

, Montgomery

S.A.

, Aguglia

, Amore

, Delgado

P.L.

, Gastpar

, Hawley

, Kasper

, Linden

, Massana

Partial response and nonresponse to antidepressant therapy: current approaches and treatment options. J Clin Psychiatry 2002, 63(9): 826–837.

148.

Lapierre

Y.D.

Suicidality with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors: Valid claim?. J Psychiatry Neurosci 2003, 28(5): 340–347.

149.

Teicher

M.H.

, Glod

, Cole

J.O.

Emergence of intense suicidal preoccupation during fluoxetine treatment. Am J Psychiatry 1990, 147(2): 207–210.

150.

Hasin

D.S.

, Goodwin

R.D.

, Stinson

F.S.

, Grant

B.F.

Epidemiology of major depressive disorder: results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcoholism and Related Conditions. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2005, 62(10): 1097–1106.

151.

Berlim

M.T.

, Fleck

M.P.

, Turecki

Current trends in the assessment and somatic treatment of resistant/ refractory major depression: an overview. Ann Med 2008, 40(2): 149–159.

152.

Berman

R.M.

, Cappiello

, Anand

, Oren

D.A.

, Heninger

G.R.

, Charney

D.S.

, Krystal

J.H.

Antidepressant effects of ketamine in depressed patients. Biol Psychiatry 2000, 47(4): 351–354.

153.

Skolnick

, Layer

R.T.

, Popik

, Nowak

, Paul

I.A.

, Trullas

Adaptation of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors following antidepressant treatment: implications for the pharmacotherapy of depression. Pharmacopsychiatry 1996, 29(1): 23–26.

154.

Domino

E.F.

, Chodoff

, Corssen

Pharmacologic effects of CI-581, a new dissociative anesthetic, in man. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1965, 6(3): 279–291.

155.

Zanos

, Moaddel

, Morris

P.J.

, Georgiou

, Fischell

, Elmer

G.I.

, Alkondon

, Yuan

P.X.

, Pribut

H.J.

, Singh

N.S.

NMDAR inhibition-independent antidepressant actions of ketamine metabolites. Nature 2016, 533(7604): 481–486.

156.

Kaiser

K.M.

, Lübke

, Zilberter

, Sakmann

Postsynaptic calcium influx at single synaptic contacts between pyramidal neurons and bitufted interneurons in layer 2/3 of rat neocortex is enhanced by back-propagating action potentials. J Neurosci 2004, 24(6): 1319–1329.

157.

Suzuki

, Nosyreva

, Hunt

K.W.

, Kavalali

E.T.

, Monteggia

L.M.

Effects of a ketamine metabolite on synaptic NMDAR function. Nature 2017, 546(7659): E1–E3.

158.

Yang

, Cui

Y.H.

, Sang

K.N.

, Dong

Y.Y.

, Ni

Z.Y.

, Ma

S.S.

, Hu

H.L.

Ketamine blocks bursting in the lateral habenula to rapidly relieve depression. Nature 2018, 554(7692): 317–322.

159.

Breier

, Malhotra

A.K.

, Pinals

D.A.

, Weisenfeld

N.I.

, Pickar

Association of ketamine-induced psychosis with focal activation of the prefrontal cortex in healthy volunteers. Am J Psychiatry 1997, 154(6): 805–811.

160.

Fuchs

, Jefferson

S.J.

, Hooper

, Yee

P.H.

, Maguire

, Luscher

Disinhibition of somatostatin-positive GABAergic interneurons results in an anxiolytic and antidepressant-like brain state. Mol Psychiatry 2017, 22(6): 920–930.

161.

Frankowska

, Filip

, Przegaliński

Effects of GABA_B receptor ligands in animal tests of depression and anxiety. Pharmacol Rep 2007, 59(6): 645–655.

162.

Zanos

, Gould

T.D.

Mechanisms of ketamine action as an antidepressant. Mol Psychiatry 2018, 23(4): 801–811.

163.

Kaut

, Schmitt

, Hofmann

, Hoffmann

, Schlaepfer

T.E.

, Wüllner

, Hurlemann

Aberrant NMDA receptor DNA methylation detected by epigenome-wide analysis of hippocampus and prefrontal cortex in major depression. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2015, 265(4): 331–341.

164.

Feyissa

A.M.

, Chandran

, Stockmeier

C.A.

, Karolewicz

Reduced levels of NR2A and NR2B subunits of NMDA receptor and PSD-95 in the prefrontal cortex in major depression. Prog Neuro-Psychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 2009, 33(1): 70–75.

165.

Taniguchi

, Nakazawa

, Tanimura

, Kiyama

, Tezuka

, Watabe

A.M.

, Katayama

, Yokoyama

, Inoue

, Izumi-Nakaseko

Involvement of NMDAR2A tyrosine phosphorylation in depression-related behaviour. EMBO J 2009, 28(23): 3717–3729.

166.

Boyce-Rustay

J.M.

, Holmes

Genetic inactivation of the NMDA receptor NR2A subunit has anxiolytic-and antidepressant-like effects in mice. Neuropsychopharmacology 2006, 31(11): 2405–2414.

167.

Jimenez-Sanchez

, Campa

, Auberson

Y.P.

, Adell

The role of GluN2A and GluN2B subunits on the effects of NMDA receptor antagonists in modeling schizophrenia and treating refractory depression. Neuropsychopharmacology 2014, 39: 2673–2680.

168.

Miller

O.H.

, Yang

L.L.

, Wang

C.C.

, Hargroder

E.A.

, Zhang

Y.H.

, Delpire

, Hall

B.J.

GluN2B-containing NMDA receptors regulate depression-like behavior and are critical for the rapid antidepressant actions of ketamine. eLife 2014, 3: e03581.

169.

N.X.

, Liu

R.J.

, Dwyer

J.M.

, Banasr

, Lee

, Son

, Li

X.Y.

, Aghajanian

, Duman

R.S.

Glutamate N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonists rapidly reverse behavioral and synaptic deficits caused by chronic stress exposure. Biol Psychiatry 2011, 69(8): 754–761.

170.

Kiss

J.P.

, Szasz

B.K.

, Fodor

, Mike

, Lenkey

, Kurkó

, Nagy

, Vizi

E.S.

GluN2B-containing NMDA receptors as possible targets for the neuroprotective and antidepressant effects of fluoxetine. Neurochem Int 2012, 60(2): 170–176.

171.

Preskorn

S.H.

, Baker

, Kolluri

, Menniti

F.S.

, Krams

, Landen

J.W.

An innovative design to establish proof of concept of the antidepressant effects of the NR2B subunit selective N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist, CP-101, 606, in patients with treatment-refractory major depressive disorder. J Clin Psychopharmacol 2008, 28(6): 631–637.

172.

McDonald

J.W.

, Garofalo

E.A.

, Hood

, Sackellares

J.C.

, Gilman

, McKeever

P.E.

, Troncoso

J.C.

, Johnston

M.V.

Altered excitatory and inhibitory amino acid receptor binding in hippocampus of patients with temporal lobe epilepsy. Ann Neurol 1991, 29(5): 529–541.

173.

During

M.J.

, Spencer

D.D.

Extracellular hippocampal glutamate and spontaneous seizure in the conscious human brain. Lancet 1993, 341(8861): 1607–1610.

174.

Johnson

E.W.

, de Lanerolle

N.C.

, Kim

J.H.

, Sundaresan

, Spencer

D.D.

, Mattson

R.H.

, Zoghbi

S.S.

, Baldwin

R.M.

, Hoffer

P.B.

, Seibyl

J.P.

“Central” and “peripheral” benzodiazepine receptors: opposite changes in human epileptogenic tissue. Neurology 1992, 42(4): 811.

175.

de Lanerolle

N.C.

, Kim

J.H.

, Robbins

R.J.

, Spencer

D.D.

Hippocampal interneuron loss and plasticity in human temporal lobe epilepsy. Brain Res 1989, 495(2): 387–395.

176.

Mathern

G.W.

, Mendoza

, Lozada

, Pretorius

J.K.

, Dehnes

, Danbolt

N.C.

, Nelson

, Leite

J.P.

, Chimelli

, Born

D.E.

Hippocampal GABA and glutamate transporter immunoreactivity in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy. Neurology 1999, 52(3): 453–472.

177.

Hunt

R.F.

, Girskis

K.M.

, Rubenstein

J.L.

, Alvarez-Buylla

, Baraban

S.C.

GABA progenitors grafted into the adult epileptic brain control seizures and abnormal behavior. Nat Neuroscie 2013, 16(6): 692–697.

178.

Schachter

S.C.

Currently available antiepileptic drugs. Neurotherapeutics 2007, 4(1): 4–11.

179.

Lesca

, Rudolf

, Bruneau

, Lozovaya

, Labalme

, Boutry-Kryza

, Salmi

, Tsintsadze

, Addis

, Motte

GRIN2A mutations in acquired epileptic aphasia and related childhood focal epilepsies and encephalopathies with speech and language dysfunction. Nat Genet 2013, 45(9): 1061–1066.

180.

Mathern

G.W.

, Pretorius

J.K.

, Kornblum

H.I.

, Mendoza

, Lozada

, Leite

J.P.

, Chimelli

L.M.

, Fried

, Sakamoto

A.C.

, Assirati

J.A.

Human hippocampal AMPA and NMDA mRNA levels in temporal lobe epilepsy patients. Brain 1997, 120(11): 1937–1959.

181.

Lozovaya

, Gataullina

, Tsintsadze

, Pallesi-Pocachard

, Minlebaev

, Goriounova

N.A.

, Buhler

, Watrin

, Shityakov

Selective suppression of excessive GluN2C expression rescues early epilepsy in a tuberous sclerosis murine model. Nat Commun 2014, 5: 4563.

182.

Ogden

K.K.

, Chen

W.J.

, Swanger

S.A.

, McDaniel

M.J.

, Fan

L.Z.

, Hu

, Tankovic

, Kusumoto

, Kosobucki

G.J.

, Schulien

A.J.

Molecular mechanism of disease-associated mutations in the pre-M1 Helix of NMDA receptors and potential rescue pharmacology. PLoS Genet 2017, 13: e1006536.

183.

Marwick

, Skehel

, Hardingham

, Wyllie

Effect of a GRIN2A de novo mutation associated with epilepsy and intellectual disability on NMDA receptor currents and Mg²⁺ block in cultured primary cortical neurons. Lancet 2015, 385 Suppl 1: S65.

184.

Yuan

H.J.

, Hansen

K.B.

, Zhang

, Pierson

T.M.

, Markello

T.C.

, Fajardo

K.V.

, Holloman

C.M.

, Golas

, Adams

D.R.

, Boerkoel

C.F.

Functional analysis of a de novo GRIN2A missense mutation associated with early-onset epileptic encephalopathy. Nat Commun 2014, 5: 3251.

185.

Sibarov

D.A.

, Bruneau

, Antonov

S.M.

, Szepetowski

, Burnashev

, Giniatullin

Functional properties of human NMDA receptors associated with epilepsy-related mutations of GluN2A subunit. Front Cell Neurosci 2017, 11: 155.

186.

Addis

, Virdee

J.K.

, Vidler

L.R.

, Collier

D.A.

, Pal

D.K.

, Ursu

Epilepsy-associated GRIN2A mutations reduce NMDA receptor trafficking and agonist potency-molecular profiling and functional rescue. Sci Rep 2017, 7: 66.

187.

Kleckner

N.W.

, Dingledine

Requirement for glycine in activation of NMDA-receptors expressed in Xenopus oocytes. Science 1988, 241(4867): 835–837.

188.

Johnson

J.W.

, Ascher

Glycine potentiates the NMDA response in cultured mouse brain neurons. Nature 1987, 325(6104): 529–531.

189.

Choi

D.W.

Glutamate receptors and the induction of excitotoxic neuronal death. Prog Brain Res 1994, 100: 47–51.

190.

Reynolds

I.J.

, Hastings

T.G.

Glutamate induces the production of reactive oxygen species in cultured forebrain neurons following NMDA receptor activation. J Neurosci 1995, 15(5): 3318–3327.

191.

Fadda

, Danysz

, Wroblewski

J.T.

, Costa

Glycine and D-serine increase the affinity of N-methyl-D-aspartate sensitive glutamate binding sites in rat brain synaptic membranes. Neuropharmacology 1988, 27(11): 1183–1185.

192.

Yang

C.R.

, Svensson

K.A.

Allosteric modulation of NMDA receptor via elevation of brain glycine and D-serine: the therapeutic potentials for schizophrenia. Pharmacol Ther 2008, 120(3): 317–332.

193.

Karolewicz

, Szebeni

, Gilmore

, Maciag

, Stockmeier

C.A.

, Ordway

G.A.

Elevated levels of NR2A and PSD-95 in the lateral amygdala in depression. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 2009, 12(2): 143–153.

194.

Papouin

, Ladépêche

, Ruel

, Sacchi

, Labasque

, Hanini

, Groc

, Pollegioni

, Mothet

J.P.

, Oliet

S.H.

Synaptic and extrasynaptic NMDA receptors are gated by different endogenous coagonists. Cell 2012, 150(3): 633–646.

195.

Preskorn

, Macaluso

, Mehra

D.O.

, Zammit

, Moskal

J.R.

, Burch

R.M.

, GLYX-13 Clinical Study Group. Randomized proof of concept trial of GLYX-13, an N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor glycine site partial agonist, in major depressive disorder nonresponsive to a previous antidepressant agent. J Psychiatr Pract 2015, 21(2): 140–149.

196.

Burgdorf

, Zhang

X.L.

, Nicholson

K.L.

, Balster

R.L.

, Leander

J.D.

, Stanton

P.K.

, Gross

A.L.

, Kroes

R.A.

, Moskal

J.R.

GLYX-13, a NMDA receptor glycine-site functional partial agonist, induces antidepressant-like effects without ketamine-like side effects. Neuropsychopharmacology 2013, 38(5): 729–742.

197.

Berger

A.J.

, Dieudonné

, Ascher

Glycine uptake governs glycine site occupancy at NMDA receptors of excitatory synapses. J Neurophysiol 1998, 80(6): 3336–3340.

198.

Tsai

, Ralph-Williams

R.J.

, Martina

, Bergeron

, Berger-Sweeney

, Dunham

K.S.

, Jiang

Z.C.

, Caine

S.B.

, Coyle

J.T.

Gene knockout of glycine transporter 1: characterization of the behavioral phenotype. Proc Natl Acad f Sci USA 2004, 101(22): 8485–8490.

199.

Le Pen

, Kew

, Alberati

, Borroni

, Heitz

M.P.

, Moreau

J.L.

Prepulse inhibition deficits of the startle reflex in neonatal ventral hippocampal-lesioned rats: reversal by glycine and a glycine transporter inhibitor. Biol Psychiatry 2003, 54(11): 1162–1170.

200.

Lipina

, Labrie

, Weiner

, Roder

Modulators of the glycine site on NMDA receptors, _D-serine and ALX 5407, display similar beneficial effects to clozapine in mouse models of schizophrenia. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2005, 179(1): 54–67.

201.

D'Souza

D.C.

, Singh

, Elander

, Carbuto

, Pittman

, de Haes

J.U.

, Sjogren

, Peeters

, Ranganathan

, Schipper

Glycine transporter inhibitor attenuates the psychotomimetic effects of ketamine in healthy males: preliminary evidence. Neuropsychopharmacology 2012, 37(4): 1036–1046.

202.

Bugarski-Kirola

, Blaettler

, Arango

, Fleischhacker

W.W.

, Garibaldi

, Wang

, Dixon

, Bressan

R.A.

, Nasrallah

, Lawrie

Bitopertin in negative symptoms of schizophrenia-results from the phase III FlashLyte and DayLyte studies. Biol Psychiatry 2017, 82(1): 8–16.

203.

Strong

K.L.

, Jing

, Prosser

A.R.

, Traynelis

S.F.

, Liotta

D.C.

NMDA receptor modulators: an updated patent review (2013–2014). Expert Opin Ther Pat 2014, 24(12): 1349–1366.

204.

Winters

W.D.

, Ferrar-Allado

, Guzman-Flores

, Alcaraz

The cataleptic state induced by ketamine: a review of the neuropharmacology of anesthesia. Neuropharmacology 1972, 11(3): 303–315.

205.

Frohlich

, Van Horn

J.D.

Reviewing the ketamine model for schizophrenia. J Psychopharmacol 2014, 28: 287–302.

206.

Rung

J.P.

, Carlsson

, Ryden Markinhuhta

, Carlsson

M.L.

(+)-MK-801 induced social withdrawal in rats; a model for negative symptoms of schizophrenia. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 2005, 29: 827–832.

207.

Marder

Memantine approved to treat moderate to severe Alzheimer's disease. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 2004, 4(5): 349–350.

208.

Davies

, Watkins

J.C.

Actions of D and L forms of 2-amino-5-phosphonovalerate and 2-amino-4-phosphonobutyrate in the cat spinal cord. Brain Res 1982, 235(2): 378–386.

209.

Davis

, Butcher

S.P.

, Morris

R.G.

The NMDA receptor antagonist _D-2-amino-5-phosphonopentanoate (_D-AP5) impairs spatial learning and LTP in vivo at intra-cerebral concentrations comparable to those that block LTP in vitro.

J Neurosci 1992, 12(1): 21–34.

210.

Yamada

, Shimizu

, Kawabe

, Ichitani

Hippocampal AP5 treatment impairs both spatial working and reference memory in radial maze performance in rats. Eur J Pharmacol 2015, 758: 137–141.

211.

Živanović

, Šušić

, Stanojlović

The anticonvulsant potency of (+/-)-2-Amino-7-phosphonoheptanoic acid and (+/-)-2-amino-5-phosphonovaleric acid against metaphit-induced audiogenic seizures in rats. Pharmacol Res 1998, 38(5): 347–352.

212.

Tonkiss

, Rawlins

J.N.P.

The competitive NMDA antagonist AP5, but not the non-competitive antagonist MK801, induces a delay-related impairment in spatial working memory in rats. Exp Brain Res 1991, 85(2): 349–358.

213.

Davies

, Evans

R.H.

, Herrling

P.L.

, Jones

A.W.

, Olverman

H.J.

, Pook

, Watkins

J.C.

CPP, a new potent and selective NMDA antagonist. Depression of central neuron responses, affinity for [³H]_D-AP5 binding sites on brain membranes and anticonvulsant activity. Brain Res 1986, 382(1): 169–173.

214.

Löscher

, Nolting

, Hönack

Evaluation of CPP, a selective NMDA antagonist, in various rodent models of epilepsy. Comparison with other NMDA antagonists, and with diazepam and phenobarbital. Eur J Pharmacol 1988, 152(1-2): 9–17.

215.

Sveinbjornsdottir

, Sander

Jwas

, Upton

, Thompson

P.J.

, Patsalos

P.N.

, Hirt

, Emre

, Lowe

, Duncan

J.S.

The excitatory amino acid antagonist _D-CPP-ene (SDZ EAA-494) in patients with epilepsy. Epilepsy Res 1993, 16(2): 165–174.

216.

Rockstroh

, Emre

, Tarral

, Pokorny

Effects of the novel NMDA-receptor antagonist SDZ EAA 494 on memory and attention in humans. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1996, 124(3): 261–266.

217.

Williams

Ifenprodil discriminates subtypes of the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor: selectivity and mechanisms at recombinant heteromeric receptors. Mol Pharmacol 1993, 44(4): 851–859.

218.

Perin-Dureau

, Rachline

, Neyton

, Paoletti

Mapping the binding site of the neuroprotectant ifenprodil on NMDA receptors. J Neurosci 2002, 22(14): 5955–5965.

219.

Nash

J.E.

, Fox

S.H.

, Henry

, Hill

M.P.

, Peggs

, McGuire

, Maneuf

, Hille

, Brotchie

J.M.

, Crossman

A.R.

Antiparkinsonian actions of ifenprodil in the MPTP-lesioned marmoset model of Parkinson's disease. Exp Neurol 2000, 165(1): 136–142.

220.

Menniti

, Chenard

, Collins

, Ducat

, Shalaby

, White

CP-101,606, a potent neuroprotectant selective for forebrain neurons. Eur J Pharmacol 1997, 331(2-3): 117–126.

221.

Fischer

, Mutel

, Trube

, Malherbe

, Kew

J.N.

, Mohacsi

, Heitz

M.P.

, Kemp

J.A.

Ro 25–6981, a highly potent and selective blocker of N-methyl-_D-aspartate receptors containing the NR2B subunit. Characterization in vitro.

J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1997, 283(3): 1285–1292.

222.

Kemp

J.A.

, McKernan

R.M.

NMDA receptor pathways as drug targets. Nat Neurosci 2002, 5 Suppl: 1039–1042.

223.

Auberson

Y.P.

, Allgeier

, Bischoff

, Lingenhoehl

, Moretti

, Schmutz

5-Phosphonomethylquinoxalinediones as competitive NMDA receptor antagonists with a preference for the human 1A/2A, rather than 1A/2B receptor composition. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 2002, 12(7): 1099–1102.

224.

Liu

L.D.

, Wong

T.P.

, Pozza

M.F.

, Lingenhoehl

, Wang

Y.S.

, Sheng

, Auberson

Y.P.

, Wang

Y.T.

Role of NMDA receptor subtypes in governing the direction of hippocampal synaptic plasticity. Science 2004, 304(5673): 1021–1024.

225.

Kollen

, Dutar

, Jouvenceau

The magnitude of hippocampal long term depression depends on the synaptic location of activated NR2-containing N-methyl-_D-aspartate receptors. Neuroscience 2008, 154(4): 1308–1317.

226.

Frizelle

P.A.

, Chen

P.E.

, Wyllie

D.J.A.

Equilibrium constants for (R)-[(S)-1-(4-bromo-phenyl)-ethylamino]-(2,3-dioxo-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroquinoxalin-5-yl)-methyl]-phosphonic acid (NVP-AAM077) acting at recombinant NR1/NR2A and NR1/NR2B N-methyl-_D-aspartate receptors: Implications for studies of synaptic transmission. Mol Pharmacol 2006, 70(3): 1022–1032.

227.

Christopoulos

Allosteric binding sites on cell-surface receptors: novel targets for drug discovery. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2002, 1(3): 198–210.

228.

Hackos

D.H.

, Lupardus

P.J.

, Grand

, Chen

Y.L.

, Wang

T.M.

, Reynen

, Gustafson

, Wallweber

H.J.A.

, Volgraf

, Sellers

B.D.

Positive allosteric modulators of GluN2A-containing NMDARs with distinct modes of action and impacts on circuit function. Neuron 2016, 89(5): 983–999.

229.

Villemure

, Volgraf

, Jiang

, Wu

G.S.

, Ly

C.Q.

, Yuen

P.W.

, Lu

A.J.

, Luo

X.F.

, Liu

M.C.

, Zhang

GluN2A-selective pyridopyrimidinone series of NMDAR positive allosteric modulators with an improved in vivo profile. ACS Med Chem Lett 2017, 8(1): 84–89.

230.

Yao

L.L.

, Zhou

Enhancing NMDA receptor function: recent progress on allosteric modulators. Neural Plast 2017, 2017: 2875904.

231.

Volgraf

, Sellers

B.D.

, Jiang

, Wu

G.S.

, Ly

C.Q.

, Villemure

, Pastor

R.M.

, Yuen

P.W.

, Lu

A.J.

, Luo

X.F.

Discovery of GluN2A-selective NMDA receptor positive allosteric modulators (PAMs): tuning deactivation kinetics via structure-based design. J Med Chem 2016, 59(6): 2760–2779.

232.

Perszyk

, Katzman

B.M.

, Kusumoto

, Kell

S.A.

, Epplin

M.P.

, Tahirovic

Y.A.

, Moore

R.L.

, Menaldino

, Burger

, Liotta

D.C.

, An NMDAR positive and negative allosteric modulator series share a binding site and are interconverted by methyl groups. Elife 2018, 2018: 7.

233.

Costa

B.M.

, Irvine

M.W.

, Fang

G.Y.

, Eaves

R.J.

, Mayo-Martin

M.B.

, Skifter

D.A.

, Jane

D.E.

, Monaghan

D.T.

A novel family of negative and positive allosteric modulators of NMDA receptors. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2010, 335(3): 614–621.

234.

Mullasseril

, Hansen

K.B.

, Vance

K.M.

, Ogden

K.K.

, Yuan

H.J.

, Kurtkaya

N.L.

, Santangelo

, Orr

A.G.

, Le

, Vellano

K.M.

A subunit-selective potentiator of NR2C- and NR2D-containing NMDA receptors. Nat Commun 2010, 1: 90.

How could N-Methyl-D-Aspartate Receptor Antagonists Lead to Excitation Instead of Inhibition?

Abstract

Keywords

1 Introduction

1.1 NMDARs subunit composition and distribution

2 Switching of NMDAR expression pattern during development

3 GABAergic inhibitory interneurons

3.1 Origin and classification of interneuron

3.2 Interneuron function

4 Why NMDAR blockade causes excitation instead of inhibition?

4.1 NMDARs promote GABAergic synapse function and development in excitatory neurons to boost inhibition

4.3 Basal NMDAR activity suppresses excitatory synaptic transmission

5 NMDAR dysfunction and diseases

5.1 NMDAR, schizophrenia, and anti-NMDAR encephalitis

5.2 NMDAR and depression

5.3 NMDAR and epilepsy

6 Pharmacological tools for NMDARs

6.2 Antagonists

6.3 Positive allosteric modulators

7 Summary

Footnotes

Acknowledgements

References