AffleckJ. Q.MadgeS.AdamsA.LowenbraunS. (1988). Integrated classroom versus resource model: Academic viability and effectiveness. Exceptional Children, 54, 339–348.
2.
BiklenD.BogdanR.FergusonD.SearlS.TaylorS. J. (1985). Achieving the complete school: Strategies for effective mainstreaming. New York: Teachers College Press.
3.
CarlbergC.KavaleK. (1980). The efficacy of special education versus regular education class placement for exceptional children: A meta-analysis. Journal of Special Education, 14, 295–309.
4.
CastagneraE.FisherD.RodiferK.SaxC.FreyN. (2003). Deciding what to teach and how to teach It: Connecting students through curriculum and instruction (2nd ed.). Colorado: PEAK Parent Center.
5.
ColeD. A.MeyerL. H. (1991). Social integration and severe disabilities: A longitudinal analysis of child outcomes. Journal of Special Education, 25, 340–351.
6.
CopelandS. R.CosbeyJ. (2008/2009). Making progress in the general curriculum: Rethinking effective instructional practice. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 33–34, 214–227.
7.
DunnL. M. (1968). Special education for the mildly retarded-Is much of it justifiable?Exceptional Children, 35, 0–22.
8.
GiangrecoM. F.DennisR.CloningerC. J.EdelmanS.SchatmannR. (1998). I've counted John: Tranformational experiences of teachers educating students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 59, 359–373.
9.
GrossmanH. (1973). Manual on terminology and classification in mental retardation (Special publication series, No. 2). Washington: American Association on Mental Deficiency.
10.
Hayes-JacobsH. (1997). Mapping the big picture: Integrating curriculum and assessment k-12. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
11.
HuntP. (1992). Acquisition of communication and motor skills within the context of cooperative learning groups in general education classrooms. San Francisco State University: CA. California Research Institute. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 365 061).
12.
Individuals With Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, Pub. L. No. 108–446, U.S.C. 1400 et seq.
13.
JoyceB.WeilM. (2009). Models of teaching (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Allyn & Bacon.
14.
KatimsD. (2000). The quest for literacy: Curriculum and instructional procedures for teaching reading and writing to students with mental retardation and developmental disabilities (MRDD Prism series). Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
15.
KaufmanA. S.DoppeltJ. E. (1976). Analysis of WISC-R standardization data in terms of the stratification variables. Child Development, 47, 165–171.
16.
KishiG. S.MeyerL. H. (1994). What children report and remember: A six year follow-up of the effects of social contact between peers with and without severe disabilities. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 19, 277–289.
17.
KliewerC.BiklenD. (2001). “School's not really a place for reading”: An analysis of the literate lives of people with severe disabilities. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 26, 1–12.
18.
LipskyD. K.GartnerA. (1989). Beyond separate education: Quality education for all. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
19.
MackieR. (1969). Special education in the United States: Statistics 1948–1966. New York: Teachers College Press.
20.
MacMillanD. L. (1971). Special education for the mildly retarded: Servant or savant?Focus on Exceptional Children, 2, 1–11.
21.
McCookJ. E. (2006). The RTI guide: Developing and implementing a model in your schools. Horsham, PA: LRP Publications.
22.
McLaneK. (2007). What is curriculum-based measurement and what does it mean to my child?Washington, DC: National Center on Student Progress Monitoring. Retrieved August 20, 2009, from www.studentprogress.org.
23.
McMasterK.FuchsD.FuchsL. S.ComptonD. L. (2002). Monitoring the academic progress of children who are unresponsive to generally effective early reading intervention. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 27, 23–33.
24.
National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Retrieved August 28, 2009, from http://www.nationalreadingpanel.org/Publications/summary.htm.
25.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110, 115 Stat. 1425, 20 U.S.C. § 6301 et seq.
26.
OsgoodR. (2005). The history of inclusion in the United States. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
27.
RyndakD. L.MooreM. A.OrlandoA.-M.DelanoM. (2008/2009). Access to the general curriculum: The mandate and the role of context in research-based practice for students with extensive support needs. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 33–34, 199–213.
28.
RyndakD. L.MorrisonA. P.SommersteinL. (1999). Literacy before and after inclusion: A case study. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 24, 5–22.
29.
RyndakD. L.WardT. (2003). Adapting environments, materials, and instruction to facilitate inclusion and learning. In RyndakD. L.AlperS. (Eds.), Curriculum and instruction for students with significant disabilities in inclusive settings (2nd ed.). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
30.
SchnorrR. (1990). Peter? He comes and goes…: First graders' perspectives on a part-time mainstream student. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 15, 231–140.
31.
ShankerA. (1994, January 14). Where we stand: On the rush to inclusion. New York State Teacher and the American Federation of Teachers. Column in the New York Times.
32.
SharpeM. N.YorkJ. L.KnightJ. (1994). Effects of inclusion on the academic performance of classmates without disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 15, 281–287.
33.
ShoresC.BenderW. N. (2007). Response to intervention: A practical guide for every teacher (A joint publication with the Council for Exceptional Children). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
34.
SmelterR. W.RaschB. W.YudewitzG. J. (1994). Thinking of inclusion for all special needs students? Better think again. Phi Delta Kappan, 76, 35–38.
35.
StainbackW.StainbackS. (1984). A rationale for the merger of special and regular education. Exceptional Children, 51, 102–111.
36.
StaubD.SchwartzI. S.GallucciC.PeckC. A. (1994). Four portraits of friendship at an inclusive school. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 19, 314–325.
37.
ThurlowM. L. (2000). Standards-based reform and students with disabilities: Reflections on a decade of change. Focus on Exceptional Children, 33–34, 1–16.
38.
TomlinsonC. A. (2004). How to differentiate instruction in mixed ability classrooms (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
39.
TylerR. (1949). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
40.
VaughnS.Linan-ThompsonS.Hickman-DavisP. (2003). Response to treatment as a means for identifying students with reading/learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 69, 391–410.
41.
VillaR.ThousandJ. (1992). Restructuring for a caring and effective education. An administrative guide to creating heterogeneous schools. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
42.
WangM. C.BakerE. T. (1985–1986). Mainstreaming programs: Design features and effects. Journal of Special Education, 19, 503–521.
43.
WangM. C.BirchJ. W. (1984). Comparison of a full-time mainstreaming program and a resource room approach. Exceptional Children, 51, 33–40.
44.
WillM. (1986). Educating students with learning problems: A shared responsibility. Washington, DC: United States Department of Education.
45.
WonK. (1993). The effects of integration on the challenging behavior of students with severe disabilities. San Francisco State University, California. California Research Institute. (ERIC Document Reproduction No. ED 365062).
46.
ZemelmanS.DanielsH.HydeA. (2005). Best practice: Today's standards for teaching and learning in America's schools. New Hampshire: Heinemann.