A comprehensive review of research was conducted on teaching science to students with significant cognitive disabilities. Guidelines from the National Science Education Standards were used to identify categories of studies based on the strands of science. A total of 11 studies were identified from the 20 years of literature searched. In general, work in the area of science is sparse for students with significant cognitive disabilities. Eight of the 11 studies fell in Content Standard F: Science in Personal and Social Perspectives. Single subject experimental designs were the methodology used in all of the studies and outcomes suggest that this population benefits from instruction in highly specific skills with modeling and errorless learning strategies like time delay. The interventions found in the 11 studies that linked to science incorporated systematic response prompting methods similar to those found in evidence-based reading and math research for students with significant cognitive disabilities. Additional research is needed to identify methods to teach science to this population that includes both broader content and additional skills that link to state standards.
American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1990). Project 2061: Science for all Americans. New York: Oxford University Press.
2.
BrowderD. M.ShearS. M. (1996). Interspersal of known items in a treatment package to teach sight words to students with behavior disorders. Journal of Special Education, 29, 400–413.
3.
BrowderD. M.SpoonerF., (Eds.) (2006). Teaching reading, math, and science to students with significant cognitive disabilities. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
4.
BrowderD. M.SpoonerF.Ahlgrim-DelzellL.HarrisA.WakemanS. (2007). A comprehensive review of research on teaching math to students with significant cognitive disabilities. Manuscript in preparation.
5.
BrowderD. M.WakemanS.SpoonerF.Ahlgrim-DelzellL.AlgozzineB. (2006). Research on reading for students with significant cognitive disabilities. Exceptional Children, 72, 392–408.
6.
CollinsB. C.GriffenA. K. (1996). Teaching students with moderate disabilities to make safe responses to product warning labels. Education & Treatment of Children, 19, 30–45.
7.
CollinsB. C.StinsonD. M. (1995). Teaching generalized reading of product warning labels to adolescents with mental disabilities through the use of key words. Exceptionality, 5, 163–181.
8.
CollinsB. C.StinsonD. M.LandL. (1993). A comparison of in vivo and simulation prior to in vivo instruction in teaching generalized safety skills. Education and Treatment in Mental Retardation, 28, 128–142.
9.
Cooper-DuffyK.PerlmutterD. G. (2006). Developing math and science skills in general education contexts. In BrowderD. M.SpoonerF. (Eds.), Teaching reading, math, and science to students with significant cognitive disabilities (pp. 245–265). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
10.
GastD. L.WinterlingV.WoleryM.FarmerJ. A. (1992). Teaching first-aid skills to students with moderate handicaps in small group instruction. Education & Treatment of Children, 15, 101–124.
11.
Individuals With Disabilities Education Act Amendments of 1997, Pub. L. No. 105-17, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq.
12.
Marchand-MartellaN. E.MartellaR. C.ChristensenA. M.AgranM.YoungK. R. (1992). Teaching a first aid skill to students with disabilities using two training programs. Education & Treatment of Children, 15, 15–31.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). National mathematics content standards and expectations. Retrieved February 27, 2006, from http://www.nctm.org/standards.
16.
National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
17.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110, 115 Stat. 1425 (2002).
18.
Siegel-CauseyE.McMorrisC.McGowenS.Sands-BussS. (1998). In junior high you take earth science: Including a student with severe disabilities into an academic class. Exceptional Children, 31, 66–72.
19.
SnellM. E.BrownF., (Eds.) (2006). Instruction of students with severe disabilities (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
20.
SpoonerF.StemB.TestD. W. (1989). Teaching first aid skills to adolescents who are moderately mentally handicapped. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 24, 341–351.
21.
TaberT. A.AlbertoP. A.HughesM.SeltzerA. (2002). A strategy for students with moderate disabilities when lost in the community. Research & Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 27, 141–152.
22.
TaberT. A.AlbertoP. A.SeltzerA.HughesM. (2003). Obtaining assistance when lost in the community using cell phones. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 28, 105–116.
23.
U.S. Department of Education. Title 1-Improving the academic achievement of the disadvantaged; Final rule, 68 Fed. Reg. 236 (December 9, 2003).
24.
UtleyC. A.ReddyS. S.DelquadriJ. C.GreenwoodC. R.MortweetS. L.BowmanV. (2001). Classwide peer tutoring: An effective teaching procedure for facilitating the acquisition of health education and safety facts with students with developmental disabilities. Education & Treatment of Children, 24, 1–27.
25.
WatsonM.BainA.HoughtonS. (1992). A preliminary study in teaching self-protective skills to children with moderate and severe mental retardation. Journal of Special Education, 26, 181–194.
26.
WehmeyerM. L.PalmerS. B.AgranM.MithaugD.MartinJ. (2000). Promoting causal agency: The self-determined learning model of instruction. Exceptional Children, 66, 439–453.
27.
WinterlingV.GastD. L.WoleryM.FarmerJ. A. (1992). Teaching safety skills to high school students with moderate disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 217–227.
