HughesC.RungL. L.WehmeyerM. A.AgranM.CopelandS. R.HungB. (2000). Self-prompted communication book use to increase social interaction among high school students. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 25, 167–174.
2.
LibertyK. A.HaringN. G. (1990). Introduction to decision rule systems. Remedial and Special Education, 11, 32–41.
3.
LibertyK. A.HaringN. G.WhiteO. R.BillingsleyF. F. (1988). A technology for the future: Decision rules for generalization. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 23, 315–326.
4.
SchwartzI. S.BaerD. M. (1991). Social validity assessments: Is current practice state of the art?Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, 189–204.
5.
SchwartzI.StaubD.GallucciC.PeckC. A. (1995). Blending qualitative and behavior analytic research methods to evaluate outcomes in inclusive schools. Journal of Behavioral Education, 5, 93–106.
6.
SnellM. E.BrownF. (2000). Instruction of students with severe disabilities (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
7.
TaberT. A.AlbertoP. A.HughesM.SeltzerA. (2002). A strategy for students with moderate disabilities when lost in the community. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 27, 141–152.
8.
WestlingD. L.FoxL. (2004). Teaching students with severe disabilities (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
9.
WolfM. M., (1978). Social validity: The case for subjective measurement, or how applied behavior analysis is finding its heart. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 203–214.