Behavior states and related developmental and medical variables were observed during all or part of the first 4 years of life for 34 infants identified with severe cognitive and multiple disabilities. Eight infants died before 1 year of age. Extensive data were then collected for an additional group of 8 infants who were observed through the age of 4 years. Findings demonstrated emerging state profiles during this time period that were consistent with those found among older populations observed in previous investigations. Different behavior state profiles at age 4 years were indicated by several developmental skills in the first year of life. These results suggest the need for specific, early interventions with infants whose state patterns are inconsistent with optimal learning and development.
AlsH. (1986). A syntactive model of neonatal behavioral organization: Framework for the assessment of neurobehavioral development in the premature infant and for support of infants and parents in the neonatal intensive care environment. Physical and Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 6, 3–55.
2.
AndersT.KeenerM. (1985). The developmental course of nighttime sleep-wake patterns in full-term and premature infants. Sleep, 8, 173–192.
3.
ArthurM. (1998). Behaviour states in students with the most severe and multiple disabilities. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Macquarie University, New South Wales, Australia.
4.
AultM. M.GuyB.GuessD.BashinskiS.RobertsS. (1995). Analyzing behavior state and learning environments: Application in instructional settings. Mental Retardation, 33(5), 304–316.
5.
BayleyN. (1993). Manual for the Bayley Scales of Infant Development (2nd ed.). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
6.
BrazeltonT. B. (1973). Brazelton neonatal behavioral assessment scale. Philadelphia: Lippincott.
7.
ColomboJ.HorowitzF. D. (1987). Behavioral state as a lead variable in neonatal research. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 33, 423–437.
8.
ColomboJ.MossM.HorowitzF. D. (1989). Neonatal state profiles: Reliability and short-term prediction of neurobehavioral status. Child Development, 60(5), 1102–1110.
9.
FinneyR. (1996). Pubreli [Computer software]. Lawrence, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Computer Application Unit, Lifespan Institute.
10.
GrossmanH. J., (Ed.) (1983). Classification in mental retardation. Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Deficiency.
11.
GuessD. (2000). Serving persons with severe and profound disabilities: A work in progress. In WehmeyerM.PattonJ. (Eds.), Mental retardation in the 21st century (pp. 91–111). Austin, TX: Pro-ed.
12.
GuessD.RobertsS.BehrensG. A.RuesJ. (1998). Response to Mudford, Hogg, and Roberts on continuous recording of behavior state. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 103, 75–79.
13.
GuessD.RobertsS.GuyB. (1999). Implications of behavior state for the assessment and education of students with profound disabilities. In ReppA.HornerR. (Eds.), Functional analysis of problem behavior: From effective assessment to effective support (pp. 338–394). Boston: Wadsworth.
14.
GuessD.RobertsS.Siegel-CauseyE.AultM. M.GuyB.ThompsonB.RuesJ. (1993). An analysis of behavior state conditions and associated environmental variables among students with profound handicaps. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 97, 634–653.
15.
GuessD.RobertsS.Siegel-CauseyE.RuesJ. (1995). Replication and extended analysis of behavior state, environmental events, and related variables in profound disabilities. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 100, 36–51.
16.
GuessD.Siegel-CauseyE.RobertsS.GuyB.AultM. M.RuesJ. (1993). Analysis of state organizational patterns among students with profound disabilities. The Journal of Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 18(2), 93–108.
17.
GuessD.Siegel-CauseyE.RobertsS.RuesJ.ThompsonB.Siegel-CauseyD. (1990). Assessment and analysis of behavior state and related variables among students with profoundly handicapping conditions. The Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 15(4), 211–230.
18.
JonesR.ReidJ.PattersonG. (1975). Naturalistic observation in clinical assessment. In McReynoldsP. (Ed.), Advances in psychological assessment (Vol. 3, pp. 42–95). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
19.
Landesman-DwyerS.SackettG. P. (1978). Behavioral changes in nonambulatory, mentally retarded individuals. In MeyersC. E. (Ed.), Quality of life in severely and profoundly mentally retarded people: Research foundations for improvement (pp. 55–144). Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Deficiency.
20.
PattersonG. R.ReidJ. B. (1973). Intervention for families of aggressive boys: A replication study. Behavior Research and Therapy, 11, 383–394.
21.
PattersonG. R.McNealS.HawkinsN.PhelpsR. (1967). Reprogramming the social environment. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 8, 181–195.
22.
PrechtlH. F. R. (1974). The behavioral states of the newborn infant (a review). Brain Research, 76, 185–212.
23.
PrechtlH. F. R.TheorellK.BlairA. W. (1973). Behavioural state cycles in abnormal infants. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 15, 606–615.
24.
ReeceR. M. (1997). Biobehavioral analysis of SIB in a person with profound handicaps. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 12, 87–94.
25.
RichardsS.SternbergL. (1993). Corroborating previous findings: Laying stepping stones in the analysis of biobehavioral states in students with profound disabilities. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 28, 262–268.
26.
RobertsS.RuesJ. (1999). Using cueing strategies and behavior state analysis to increase alertness and responsiveness among infants with severe cognitive and multiple disabilities. (Model Demonstration Project, H324M990015) Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
27.
ThelenE. (1990). Dynamical systems and the generation of individual differences. In ColomboJ.FaganJ. (Eds.), Individual differences in infancy: Reliability, stability, prediction (pp. 19–43). Hillsdale, NJ: Erblaum.
28.
ThomanE. B.WhitneyM. P. (1990). Behavioral states in infants: Individual differences and individual analyses. In ColomboJ.FagenJ. (Eds.), Individual differences in infancy: Reliability, stability, prediction (pp. 113–135). Hillsdale, NJ: Erblaum.
29.
WetherbyA. M.PrizantB. M. (1993). Communication and symbolic behavior scales. Chicago: Riverside Publishing.
30.
WolffP. H. (1959). Observations on newborn infants. Psychosomatic Medicine, 22, 110–118.
31.
WolffP. H. (1993). Behavioral and emotional states in infancy: A dynamic perspective. In SmithL.ThelenE. (Eds.), A dynamic systems approach to development (pp. 189–208). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
