This study implemented two procedures for the measurement of behavior state conditions of students with profound handicaps who spend a large portion of their school day in the state conditions of sleep, daze, or drowse. The purpose of the study was to determine if classroom measurement procedures of shorter duration would be as reliable as the longer duration research procedures. Both measurement procedures were implemented in four classrooms by observing six students who spent a large portion of their time asleep, dazed, or drowsed. The findings indicate that the more frequent measurements of shorter duration produced outcomes that were similar to the research procedures.
BakemanR.GottmanJ. M. (1986). Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.
2.
GuessD.AultM. M.RobertsS.StruthJ.Siegel-CauseyE.ThompsonB.BronickiG. J.GuyB. (1988). Implications of biobehavioral states for the education and treatment of students with the most profoundly handicapping conditions. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps13, 163–174.
3.
GuessD.RobertsS.Siegel-CauseyE.AultM. M.GuyB.ThompsonB. (in press). An analysis of behavior state conditions and associated environmental variables among students with profound handicaps. American Journal on Mental Retardation.
4.
GuessD.RobertsS.Siegel-CauseyE.Mulligan AultM.GuyB.ThompsonB.RuesJ. (1991). Investigations into the state behaviors of students with severe and profound handicapping conditions. Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas, Department of Special Education.
5.
GuessD.Siegel-CauseyE.RobertsS.RuesJ.ThompsonB.Siegel-CauseyD. (1990). Assessment and analysis of behavior state and related variables among students with profoundly handicapping conditions. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 15, 211–230.
6.
HelmJ. M.SimeonssonR. J. (1989). Assessment of behavioral state organization. In BaileyD. B.WoleryM. (Eds.), Assessing infants and preschoolers with handicaps (pp. 202–224). Columbus, OH: Merrill.
7.
HollanderM.WolfeD. A. (1973). Nonparametric statistical methods. London: John Wiley 8#x38; Sons.
8.
KornerA. F. (1972). State as variable, as obstacle, and as mediator of stimulation in infant research. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 18, 77–94.
9.
KraemerH. C.HoleW. T.AndersT. F. (1984). The detection of behavioral state cycles and classification of temporal structure in behavioral states. Sleep, 7, 3–17.
10.
RainforthB. (1982). Biobehavioral state and orienting: Implications for educating profoundly retarded students. Journal of the Association for the Severely Handicapped, 6, 33–37.
11.
SackettG. P. (1979). The lag sequential analysis for contigency and cyclicity behavioral interaction research. In OsofskyJ. D. (Ed.), Handbook of infant development (pp. 623–642). New York: John Wiley 8#x38; Sons.
12.
SackettG. P. (1980). Lag sequential analysis as a data reduction technique in social interaction research. In SawinD. B.HawkinsR. C.WalkerL. O.PenticuffJ. H. (Eds.), Exceptional Infant: Vol. 4. Psychosocial risks in infant-environment transactions (pp. 300–340). New York: Bruner/Mazel.
13.
SackettG. P. (1987). Analysis of sequential social interaction data: Some issues, recent developments, and a causal inference model. In OsofskyJ. D. (Ed.), Handbook of infant development (2nd ed., pp. 855–878). New York: John Wiley 8#x38; Sons.
14.
SailorW.GeeK.GoetzL.GrahamN. (1988). Progress in educating students with the most severe disabilities: Is there any?Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 13, 87–89.
15.
SiegelS.CastellanN. J. (1988). Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
16.
StrattonP. (1982). Rhythmic functions in the newborn. In StrattonP. (Ed.), Psychobiology of the human newborn (pp. 119–146). New York: John Wiley 8#x38; Sons.
17.
ThelenE. (1990). Dynamical systems and the generation of individual differences. In WorebeyJ.FagenJ. (Eds.), Individual differences in infancy: Reliability, stability, prediction (pp. 19–43). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
18.
ThomanE. B.WhitneyM. P. (1990). Behavioral states in infants: Individual differences and individual analyses. In ColomboJ.FaganJ. W. (Eds.), Individual differences in infancy: Reliability, stability, prediction (pp. 113–135). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
19.
ThomanE. B.DenenbergV. H.SievelJ.ZeidnerL. P. (1981). State organization in neonates: Developmental inconsistency indicates risk for developmental dysfunction. Neuropediatrics, 12, 45–54.
