BallC. (1997) A comparison of single-step and multiple-step transition analyses of multiattribute decision strategies.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69, 3, pp. 195–204.
3.
BettmanJ.R., LuceM.F., & PayneJ.W. (1998) Constructive consumer choice processes.Journal of Consumer Research: An Interdisciplinary Quarterly, 25, 3, pp. 187–217.
4.
BöckenholtU., & HynanL.S. (1994) Caveats on a process-tracing measure and a remedy.Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 7, 2, pp. 103–117.
5.
BradlowE.T. (2005) Current issues and a wish list for conjoint analysis: research articles.Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, 21, 4-5, pp. 319–323.
6.
ChandonP., HutchinsonJ.W., BradlowE.T., & YountS.H. (2007) Measuring the value of point-of-purchase marketing with commercial eye-tracking data. In: WedelM., & PietersR. (eds) Visual Marketing: From Attention to Action.Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 225–258.
7.
DenstadliJ.M., & LinesR. (2007) Conjoint respondents as adaptive decision makers.International Journal of Market Research, 49, 1, pp. 117–132.
8.
DeSarboW.S., LehmannD.R., & HollmanF.G. (2004) Modeling dynamic effects in repeated-measures experiments involving preference/choice: an illustration involving stated preference analysis.Applied Psychological Measurement, 28, 3, pp. 186–209.
9.
DeShazoJ.R., & FermoG. (2002) Designing choice sets for stated preference methods: the effects of complexity on choice consistency.Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 44, 1, pp. 123–143.
10.
DieckmannA., DippoldK., & DietrichH. (2009) Compensatory versus noncompensatory models for predicting consumer preferences.Judgment and Decision Making, 4, 3, pp. 200–213.
11.
FordJ.K., SchmittN., SchechtmanS.L., HultsB.M., & DohertyM.L. (1989) Process tracing methods: Contributions, problems, and neglected research questions.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 43, 1, pp. 75–117.
12.
GigerenzerG., & SeltenR. (eds) (2001) Bounded Rationality: The Adaptive Toolbox.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13.
GilbrideT.J., & AllenbyG.M. (2004) A choice model with conjunctive, disjunctive, and compensatory screening rules.Marketing Science, 23, 3, pp. 391–406.
14.
GlöcknerA., & BetschT. (2008) Multiple-reason decision making based on automatic processing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 5, pp. 1055–1075.
15.
GreenP.E., & SrinivasanV. (1990) Conjoint analysis in marketing: new developments with implications for research and practice.Journal of Marketing, 54, 4, pp. 3–19.
16.
HaaijerR., & WedelM. (2007) Conjoint choice experiments: general characteristics and alternative model specifications. In: GustafssonA., HerrmannA., & HuberF. (eds) Conjoint Measurement: Methods and Applications.Berlin: Springer, pp. 319–360.
17.
HarteJ.M., & KoeleP. (1995) A comparison of different methods for the elicitation of attribute weights: structural modeling, process tracing, and self-reports.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 64, 1, pp. 49–64.
18.
HarteJ.M., KoeleP., & van EngelenburgG. (1996) Estimation of attribute weights in a multiattribute choice situation.Acta Psychologica, 93, 1-3, pp. 37–55.
19.
HauserJ.R., & RaoV.R. (2004) Conjoint analysis, related modelling, and applications. In: WindY. J., & GreenP.E. (eds) Market Research and Modeling: Progress and Prospects.Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
20.
JasperJ.D., & ShapiroJ. (2002) MouseTrace: a better mousetrap for catching decision processes.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 34, pp. 364–374.
21.
JohnsonR.M., & OrmeB.K. (1996) How many questions should you ask in choice-based conjoint studies? Research paper series 153. Washington, DC: Sawtooth Software.
22.
LinesR., & DenstadliJ.M. (2004) Information overload on conjoint experiments.International Journal of Market Research, 46, pp. 297–310.
23.
LohseG.L., & JohnsonE.J. (1996) A comparison of two process tracing methods on choice tasks.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 68, 1, pp. 28–43.
24.
MyersJ.H., & AlpertM.I. (1968) Determinant buying attitudes: meaning and measurement.Journal of Marketing, 32, 4, pp. 13–20.
NewellB., & BröderA. (2008) Cognitive processes, models and metaphors in decision research.Judgment and Decision Making, 3, pp. 195–204.
27.
NormanE., & Schulte-MecklenbeckM. (2009) Take a quick click at that! Mouselab and eye-tracking as tools to measure intuition. In: GlöcknerA., & WittemannC.L.M. (eds) Tracing Intuition: Recent Methods in Measuring Intuitive and Deliberate Processes in Decision Making.London: Psychology Press/Routledge.
28.
OlshavskyR., & AcitoF. (1980) An information processing probe into conjoint analysis.Decision Sciences, 11, 3, pp. 451–470.
29.
PayneJ.W. (1976) Task complexity and contingent processing in decision making: an information search and protocol analysis.Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16, 2, pp. 366–387.
30.
PayneJ.W., & BettmanJ.R. (1994) The costs and benefits of alternative measures of search behavior: comments on Böckenholt and Hynan.Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 7, 2, pp. 119–122.
31.
PayneJ.W., BettmanJ.R., & JohnsonE.J. (1988) Adaptive strategy selection in decision making.Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition, 14, 3, pp. 534–552.
32.
PayneJ.W., BettmanJ.R., & JohnsonE.J. (1993) The Adaptive Decision Maker.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33.
PietersR., & WarlopL. (1999) Visual attention during brand choice: the impact of time pressure and task motivation.International Journal of Research in Marketing, 16, 1, pp. 1–16.
34.
QuelchJ. (1979) Measurement of the relative importance of product attribute information: a review of the information display approach.Journal of Consumer Policy, 3, 3, pp. 232–245.
35.
ReisenN., HoffrageU., & MastF.W. (2008) Identifying decision strategies in a consumer choice situation.Judgment and Decision Making, 3, 8, pp. 641–658.
36.
RussoJ.E., & LeclercF. (1994) An eye-fixation analysis of choice processes for consumer nondurables.Journal of Consumer Research, 21, 2, pp. 274–290.
37.
RussoJ.E., & RosenL. (1975) An eye fixation analysis of multi-alternative choice.Memory and Cognition, 3, pp. 267–276.
38.
Sawtooth Software (2005a) The CBC/HB system for hierarchical Bayes estimation. Technical Paper Series. Sequim, WA: Sawtooth Software Inc.
39.
Sawtooth Software (2005b) Report on conjoint analysis usage among Sawtooth Software customers. Technical Paper Series. Sequim, WA: Sawtooth Software Inc.
40.
Sawtooth Software (2008) CBC v6.0 technical paper. Technical Paper Series. Sequim, WA: Sawtooth Software Inc.
41.
SimonsonI. (1989) Choice based on reasons: the case of attraction and compromise effects.Journal of Consumer Research: An Interdisciplinary Quarterly, 16, 2, pp. 158–174.
42.
SimonsonI. (2008) Will I like a ‘medium’ pillow? Another look at constructed and inherent preferences.Journal of Consumer Psychology, 18, 3, pp. 155–169.
43.
SwaitJ., & AdamowiczW. (2001) The influence of task complexity on consumer choice: a latent class model of decision strategy switching.Journal of Consumer Research, 28, 1, pp. 135–148.
44.
WedelM., & PietersR. (2007) A review of eye-tracking research in marketing. In: MalhotraN.K. (ed.) Review of Marketing Research.New York: M.E. Sharpe, pp. 123–147.
45.
WedellD.H., & SenterS.M. (1997) Looking and weighting in judgment and choice.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 70, 1, pp. 41–64.