Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2010-7
Quantification of Transcripts from Depth Interviews,Open Ended Responses and Focus Groups: Challenges,Accomplishments,New Applications and Perspectives for Market Research
BartunekJ.M., & SeoM.G. (2002) Qualitative research can add new meanings to quantitative research.Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, pp. 237–242.
2.
BasowS.A. (1980) Sex-role Stereotypes: Traditions and Alternatives.Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
3.
BelisleP. (1996) CATPAC – neural network for qualitative analysis of text.Imprints, May, pp. 6–10.
4.
CatterallM., & MaclaranP. (1998) Using computer software for the analysis of qualitative market research data.Journal of the Market Research Society, 40, 3, pp. 207–222.
5.
ChakrapaniC. (1995) Neural net analysis of qualitative data.Canadian Journal of Marketing Research, 14, pp. 110–111.
6.
DoerfelM.L., & BarnettG.A. (1999) A semantic network analysis of the International Communication Association.Human Communication Research, 25, 4, pp. 589–603.
HigginsS., FordK., & OberskiI. (1996) Computer aided qualitative analysis of interview data: some recommendations for collaborative working. Paper presented at British Educational Research Conference, Lancaster (September).
9.
JohnsonK.A., ZimmerM.R., & GoldenL.L. (1987) Object relations theory: male and female differences in visual information processing.Advances in Consumer Research, 14, 1, pp. 83–88.
10.
JörgensenP. (2005) Incorporating context in text analysis by interactive activation with competition artificial neural networks.Information Processing and Management, 41, pp. 1081–1099.
11.
KikuchiA., & RyanC. (2007) Street markets as tourist attractions – Victoria Market, Auckland, New Zealand.International Journal of Tourism Research, 9, pp. 297–300.
12.
MooreK., BurbachR., & and HeelerR. (1995) Using neural nets to analyze qualitative data.Marketing Research, 7, 1, pp. 34–39.
13.
MostellerF., & WallaceD.L. (1963) Inference in an authorship problem.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58, June, pp. 275–309.
14.
PeacockJ.D., & WhiteT.W. (1994) Participants say the darndest things. Paper presented at Second Worldwide Electronic and Broadcast Audience Research Symposium, Paris.
15.
SaresT.A. (1998) Social viewpoints as narrated by family and educational background.The Journal of Social Psychology, 138, 5, 637–44.
16.
SchmidtM. (2001) Using an ANN-approach for analyzing focus groups.Qualitative Market Research, 4, 2, pp. 100–111.
17.
SegallM.H., CampbellD.T., & HerskovitsM.J. (1966) The Influence of Culture on Visual Perception.New York: Bobbs-Merrill.
18.
TarskiA. (1977) Einführung in die Mathematische Logik.Göttingen, Germany: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht.
19.
ThistedR., & EfronB. (1987) Did Shakespeare write a newly-discovered poem?Biometrika, 74, 3, pp. 445–455.
20.
ToblerW., & WineburgS. (1971) A Cappadocian speculation.Nature, 231, May, pp. 39–41.
21.
TollinK., & JonesR. (2009) Marketing logics for competitive advantage?European Journal of Marketing, 43, 3-4, pp. 523–560.
22.
VentrisM., & ChadwickJ. (1953) Evidence for Greek dialect in the Mycenaean archives.Journal of Hellenic Studies, 73, pp. 84–103.
23.
WassmannD.A. (1992) Using CATPAC to read qualitative data. Paper presented at the Advanced Research Techniques Forum of the American Marketing Association, Lake Tahoe.
24.
WoelfelJ. (1993) Artificial neural networks in policy research: a current assessment.Journal of Communication, 43, 1, pp. 63–80.
25.
WoelfelJ., & StoyanoffN. (undated) CATPAC: a neural network for qualitative analysis of text. Working paper, University of New York at Buffalo.