AAPOR (2010) AAPOR report on online panels.Public Opinion Quarterly, 74, pp. 711–781.
2.
BlackG.S., & TerhanianG. (1998) Using the internet for election forecasting.The Polling Report, 26 October.
3.
CapeP., & CavallaroK. (2010) White Paper: understanding data quality in survey results with Dynamix.Survey Sampling International.
4.
DedekerK. (2006) Presentation at the Research Industry Summit: Improving Respondent Cooperation, Chicago.
5.
ESOMAR (2010) Global Market Research: ESOMAR Industry Report.ESOMAR: Amsterdam.
6.
GittlemanS., & TrimarchiE. (2010) Online research … and all that jazz: the practical adaptation of old tunes to make new music. ESOMAR Online Conference, Berlin.
7.
KellnerP. (2007) Down with random samples.Research World, June, p. 31.
8.
KishL. (1987) Statistical Design for Research.New York: Wiley.
9.
LeeS., & ValliantR. (2009) Estimation for volunteer panel web surveys using propensity score adjustment and calibration adjustment.Sociological Methods and Research, 37, pp. 319–343.
10.
O'MuircheartaighC. (1997) Measurement error in surveys: a historical perspective. In LybergL., BiemerP., CollinsM., de LeeuwE., DippoC., SchwarzN., & TrewinD. (eds) Survey Measurement and Process Quality.New York: Wiley.
11.
TaylorH. (2007) The case for publishing (some) online polls. Polling report available online at http://www.pollingreport.com/htonline.htm (accessed 31 August 2009).
12.
WalkerR., & PettitR. (2009) ARF Foundations of Quality: Results Preview.New York: Advertising Research Foundation.
13.
YeagerD.S., KrosnickJ.A., ChangL., JavitzH.S., LevinduskyM.S., SimpserA., & WangR. (2009) Comparing the accuracy of RDD telephone surveys and internet surveys conducted with probability and nonprobability samples.Stanford University.
14.
GravesP. (2010) Consumer.ology.London: Nicholas Brealey Publishing.