Product placement is fiercely being courted by firms as a consequence of the declining credibility of traditional broadcast advertising and the ‘30-second spot’. Very little research analysing its economic worth exists outside of the realm of film, however. This paper responds by applying a consistent measure of placement effectiveness to television through use of event analyses. It finds a mean cumulative abnormal return of 0. 79% in a sample of 264 placements from the 2011-12 prime-time season, confirming that product placement in television is positively and significantly associated with movement in firms' stock prices. Placement in a season premiere has significantly higher mean returns than in a non-pivotal episode, irrespective of whether the firm places the product in both episodes. A cross-sectional analysis of placement, episode and show factors suggests that the duration of placement and one-hour show length are positively associated with stock price movement. Placement in a show's debut season is adversely associated to worth.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AakerD.A. (1996) Measuring brand equity across products and markets. California Management Review, 38, 3 (Spring), 31, 2, pp. 102–120.
2.
AakerD.A., & JacobsonR. (1994) The financial information content of perceived quality. Journal of Marketing Research, pp. 191–201.
3.
Amazon.com Company (n.d.) Internet Movie Database. Available online at: www.imdb.com (accessed 9 March 2012).
4.
ArmitageS. (1995) Event study methods and evidence on their performance. Journal of Economic Surveys, 8, 4, pp. 25–84.
5.
BalasubramanianSiva K. (1994) Beyond advertising and publicity: hybrid messages and public policy issues. Journal of Advertising23, 4, pp. 29–46.
6.
CarhartM.M. (1997) On persistence in mutual fund performance. Journal of Finance, 52, 1, pp. 57–82.
7.
CeberM., SharpB., & KennedyR. (2008) A closer look at TV's desirable audience: the light TV viewer. ANZMAC, Sydney: Australia and New Zealand Marketing Society, pp. 1–7.
8.
CowanA.R. (2007) Eventus Version 8.0 User's Guide.Ames, January.
DeLormeD.E., & ReidL.N. (1999) Moviegoers' experiences and interpretations of brands in films revisited. Journal of Advertising, 28, 2, pp. 71–95.
11.
DempseyJ. (2005) Plug springs a leak: network on bring of topping point as product placement triples in primetime. Variety Magazine, 25 September. Available online at: www.variety.com/article/VR1117929584?refCatId=14 (accessed 3 August 2012).
12.
EngleR. (2011) GARCH 101: the use of ARCH/GARCH models in applied econometrics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15, 4, pp. 157–168.
13.
Entertainment, CBS (n.d.) TV.com. Available online at: www.tv.com (accessed 9 March 2012).
14.
FamaE.F. (1991) Efficient capital markets: II. Journal of Finance, 46, 5, pp. 1575–1617.
15.
FamaE.F., & FrenchK.R. (1996) Multifactor explanations of asset pricing anomalies. Journal of Finance, 51, 1, pp. 55–84.
16.
GelmanA. (2006) Multilevel (hierarchical) modeling: what it can and cannot do. American Statistical Association and the American Society for Quality TECHNOMETRICS, 48, 3, pp. 432–435.
17.
GodesD., & MayzlinD. (2004) Using online conversations to study word-of-mouth. Marketing Science, 23, 4, pp. 545–560.
18.
Interbrand (2011) 2011 Ranking of the Top 100 Brands.New York: Interbrand.
KarniouchinaE.V., UslayC., & ErenburgG. (2011) Do marketing media have life cycles? The case of product placement in movies. Journal of Marketing, 75, pp. 27–48.
22.
KarrhJ.A., Brittain McKeeC., & PardunC.J. (2003) Practitioners' evolving views on product placement effectiveness. Journal of Advertising Research43, 2, pp. 138–149.
La FerleC., & EdwardsS.M. (2006) Product placement: how brands appear on television. Journal of Advertising35, 4, pp. 65–86.
25.
LehuJ.-M. (2007) Branded Entertainment: Product Placement & Brand Strategy in the Entertainment Business.Philadelphia, PA: Kogan Page.
26.
MacKinlayA.C. (1997) Event studies in economics and finance. Journal of Economic Literature, 35, 1, pp. 13–39.
27.
Nielsen (2011a) DVR Use in the US.State of the Media Report. New York: The Nielsen Company.
28.
Nielsen (2011b) Television Audience 2010 & 2011.Viewing Report. New York: The Nielsen Company.
29.
Nielsen (2011c) Trends in TV Viewing – 2011 TV Upfronts.State of the Media Report. New York: The Nielsen Company.
30.
Nielsen (2014) Nielsen TV: Loyal TV Viewers are the Desirable Viewers (interview). New York: The Nielsen Company.
31.
Nielsenwire (2011) Nielsen's Tops of 2011: Advertising.Placement Disclosure. New York: Nielsen.
32.
OsborneJ.W. (2000) Advantages of hierarchical linear modeling. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation7, 1, p. 3.
33.
PQ Media (2010) Global Branded Entertainment Marketing Forecast 2010–2014.Forecast. Stamford: PQ Media LLC.
34.
PQ Media (2012) Global Product Placement Spending Forecast 2012–2016.Forecast. Stamford: PQ Media.
35.
RaudenbushS., BrykA., CheongY.F., CongdonR., & du ToitM. (2011) HLM7: Hierarchical Linear and Non Linear Modeling.Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
36.
RecchiaA. (2010) R-squared measures for two-level hierarchical linear models using SAS. Journal of Statistics Software, 32, pp. 1–9.
RussellC.A. (2002) Investigating the effectiveness of product placements in television shows: the role of modality and plot connection congruence on brand memory and attitude. Journal of Consumer Research, 29, pp. 306–318.
40.
SawyerA.G. (2006) Possible psychological processes underlying the effectiveness of brand placements. International Journal of Advertising, 25, 1, pp. 110–111.
41.
SharpB. (2010) How Brands Grow.South Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
42.
SiddarthS., & ChattopadhyayA. (1998) To zap or not to zap: a study of the determinants of channel switching during commercials. Marketing Science, 17, 2, pp. 124–138.
43.
SrivastavaR.K., ShervaniT.A., & FaheyL. (1998) Market-based assets and shareholder value: a framework for analysis. Journal of Marketing, 62, pp. 2–18.
TV By the Numbers (2011) Overnight Broadcast Television Ratings.New York: The Nielsen Company.
47.
WeinbergerJ., & O'DellJ. (2012) Primetime Shows with the Most Product Placement.Placement Disclosure. New York: CNBC.
48.
WilesM.A., & DanielovaA. (2006) The impact of film product placement on the market value of the firm. AMA Winter Educators' Conference Proceedings.St Petersburg: American Marketing Association, p. 54.
49.
WilesM.A., & DanielovaA. (2009) The worth of product placement in successful films: an event study analysis. Journal of Marketing, 73, pp. 44–63.
50.
WilliamsK., PetroskyA., HernandezE., & PageR.Jr. (2011) Product placement effectiveness: revisited and renewed. Journal of Management and Marketing Research, 7, pp. 1–24.
