This paper presents a review of extant literature about virtual worlds market research. We discuss the need for greater recognition of differences to traditional online and e-commerce web services, including social media. Our review considers what makes virtual worlds different and of particular interest to market researchers, including an overview of Second Life. We examine the issues faced and analyse how these link to research processes. We conclude that there is a need for a deep understanding of how user-participants behave ‘in-world’. This article contributes by raising awareness and informing the market research community of pertinent issues.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AtkinsC. (2008) Virtual experience: observations in Second Life. In PurvisM., & BastinT.R.S. (eds) Computer-mediated Social Networking.New Zealand: First International Conference, ICCMSN.
2.
AtlasS.A. (2008) Inductive metanomics: economic experiments in virtual worlds.Journal of Virtual Worlds Research. Available online at: http://journals.tdl.org/jvwr/article/view/281/235 (accessed 15 January 2010).
3.
BarnesS., & MattssonJ. (2008) Brand value in virtual worlds: an axiological approach.Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 9, 3, pp. 195–206.
4.
BarnesS.J., & MattssonJ. (2011) Exploring the fit of real brands in the Second Life virtual world.Journal of Marketing Management, 27, 9-10, pp. 934–958.
5.
BeaulieuA. (2010) From co-location to co-presence: shifts in the use of ethnography for the study of knowledge.Social Studies of Science, 40, pp. 453–470.
6.
BeaulieuA., & EstalellaA. (2009) Rethinking research ethics for mediated settings. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on e-Social Science. Cologne, Germany: National Centre for E-Social Science, pp. 1–15.
BoellstorffT. (2008) Coming of Age in Second Life.An Anthropologist explores the Virtually Human.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
9.
BonsuS.K., & DarmodyA. (2008) Co creating Second Life: market consumer cooperation in contemporary economy.Journal of Macromarketing, 28, pp. 355–366.
10.
BookB. (2004) In moving beyond the game: social virtual worlds.Conference paper. State of Play 2: Reloaded. New York Law School, 28-30 October.
11.
BradyM., SarenM., & TzokasN. (2002) Integrating information technology into marketing practice: the IT reality of contemporary marketing practice.Journal of Marketing Management, 18, pp. 555–577.
12.
CagninaM.R., & PoianM. (2009) Beyond e-business models: the road to virtual worlds.Electronic Commerce Research, 9, pp. 49–75.
13.
CastronovaE. (2001) Virtual worlds: a first-hand account of market and society on the cyberian frontier.CESifo working paper, p. 618.
14.
CastronovaE. (2004) The right to play.New York Law School Law Review, 49, pp. 185–210.
15.
CastronovaE.W. (2010) Studying beehives. Paper presented at the Federal Consortium for Virtual Worlds, 3rd Annual Conference, Second Life. Available online at: http://www.ndu.edu/icollege/fcvw/index.htm (accessed 7 June 2012).
16.
ChandraY., & LeendersM.A.A.M. (2012) User innovation and entrepreneurship in the virtual world: a study of Second Life residents.Technovation, 32, 7-8, pp. 464–476.
17.
CiaramitaroB. (2010) Virtual Worlds and e-Commerce: Technologies and Applications for Building Customer Relationships.Hershey: IGI Global.
18.
CypherM., & RichardsonI. (2006) An actor-network approach to games and virtual environments. International Conference on Games Research and Development, Perth, Australia.
19.
DannS. (2003) Internet Commerce: Digital Models for Business (3rd edn). London: John Wiley & Sons.
20.
DeanE., CookS., KeatingM., & MurphyJ. (2009) Does this avatar make me look fat? Obesity and interviewing in Second Life.Journal of Virtual Worlds Research, North America. Available online at: https://journals.tdl.org/jvwr/article/view/621/495 (accessed 15 July 2010).
21.
de Souza e SilvaA. (2006) From cyber to hybrid: mobile technologies as interfaces of hybrid spaces.Space & Culture, 9, 3, pp. 261–278.
FetscherinM., & LattermannC. (2008) User acceptance of virtual worlds.Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 9, pp. 231–242.
24.
FyratF.A., & VicdanH. (2008) A new world of literacy, information technologies, and the incorporeal selves. Implications for macromarketing thought.Journal of Macromarketing, 24, pp. 381–396.
25.
HarrisH., BailensonJ.N., NielsenA., & YeeN. (2009) The evolution of social behavior over time in Second Life.PRESENCE: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 18, 6, pp. 294–303.
HempP. (2006) Avatar-based marketing.Harvard Business Review, June, pp. 48–57.
28.
HindmarshJ., HeathC., & FraserM. (2006) (Im)materiality, virtual reality and interaction: grounding the ‘virtual’ in studies of technology in action.Sociological Review, 54, 4, pp. 795–817.
29.
HineC. (2005) Virtual methods and the sociology of cyber-social-scientific knowledge.Virtual Methods. Issues in Social Research on the Internet.Oxford, UK: Berg.
30.
HoggM.K., MaclaranP., & CurasiC.F. (2006) Mapping the different purposes for integrating off-line and on-line data sets in discovery oriented consumer research.European Advances in Consumer Research, 7, pp. 559–564.
31.
HowardJ. (2008) Quests: Design, Theory and History in Games and Narratives.Wellesley: A.K. Peters.
32.
JankowskiN. (1999) Review essay: in search of methodological innovation in new media research.Communications, 24, 3, pp. 367–374.
33.
JorgensenD.L. (1989) Participant Observation: A Methodology for Human Studies.London: Sage.
34.
KellyR.V. (2004) Massively Multiplayer Online Role-playing Games: The People, the Addiction and the Playing Experience.Jefferson: McFarland & Co.
35.
KendallL. (2009) A response to Christine Hine. In MarkhamA.N., & BaymN.K.Internet Inquiry: Conversations About Method.London: Sage.
36.
KimJ.W., ChoiJ., QuailsW., & HanK. (2008) It takes a marketplace community to raise brand commitment: the role of online communities.Journal of Marketing Management, 24, 3-4, pp. 409–431.
37.
KozinetsR. (1999) E-tribalised marketing? The strategic implications of virtual communities of consumption.Journal of Consumer Research, 29, 3, pp. 20–38.
38.
KozinetsR. (2002) The field behind the screen: using netnography for marketing research in online communities.Journal of Marketing Research, 39, February, pp. 61–72.
39.
KozinetsR. (2010) Netnography: Doing Ethnographic Research Online.London: Sage.
40.
KozinetsR.V., & KedizorR. (2009) I, avatar: auto-netnographic research in virtual worlds. In WoodN.T., & SolomonM.R. (eds) Virtual Social Identity and Social Behaviour.New York: M.E. Sharpe, pp. 3–19.
LehdonvirtaV., & ErnkvistM. (2011) Converting the virtual economy into development potential: knowledge map of the virtual economy.Washington, DC: infoDev/World Bank. Available online at: http://www.infodev.org/publications (accessed 15 April 2011).
MeadowsM.S. (2008) I, Avatar: The Culture and Consequences of Having a Second Life.Berkeley, CA: New Riders.
57.
MessingerPR., StrouliE., LyonsK., BoneM., NiuR.H., SmirnovK., & PerelgutS. (2009) Virtual worlds - past, present, and future: new directions in social computing.Decisions Support Systems, 47, pp. 204–228.
58.
Mind Candy (2012) Home page. Available online at: http://mindcandy.com/ (accessed 2 June 2012).
MuzellecL., LynnT., & LambkinM. (2012) Branding in fictional and virtual environments: introducing a new conceptual domain and research agenda.European Journal of Marketing, 46, 6, pp. 811–826.
NeslinS.A., NovakT.P., BakerK.R., & HoffmanD.L. (2009) An optimal contact model for maximizing online panel response rates.Management Science, 55, May, pp. 727–737.
65.
NovakT. (2010) eLab City: a platform for academic research on virtual worlds.Journal of Virtual Worlds Research, North America, 3 February. Available online at: https://journals.tdl.org/jvwr/article/view/832 (accessed 15 August 2010).
66.
OndrejkaC. (2007) Collapsing geography: Second Life, innovation and the future of national power.Innovations, Summer, pp. 27–54.
67.
PearceC., & Artemesia (2009) Communities of Play.Emergent Cultures in Multiplayer Games and Virtual Worlds.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
68.
RheingoldH. (1993) The Virtual Community: Homesteading in the Electronic Frontier.New York: HarperCollins.
69.
RoushP., NieM., & WheelerM. (2009) Between snapshots and avatars: using visual methodologies for fieldwork in Second Life.Journal of Virtual Worlds Research. Available online at: https://journals.tdl.org/jvwr/article/view/413/460 (accessed 15 January 2010).
70.
SalenK., & ZimmermanE. (2004) The Rules of Play: Game Design Fundamentals.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
71.
SanchezJ. (2009) A social history of virtual worlds.Library Technology Reports, 45, 2, February/March, pp. 9–12.
SmartJ., CascioJ., & PaffendorfJ. (2007) Metaverse Roadmap: Pathways to the 3D Web. Available online at: http://www.metaverseroadmap.org (accessed 19 September 2009).
75.
SmythJ.M. (2007) Beyond self-selection in video game play: an experimental examination of the consequences of massively multiplayer online role-playing game play.CyberPsychology & Behavior, 10, p. 717.
76.
StantonJ. (2010) Virtual worlds, the IRB and a user's bill of rights.Journal of Virtual Worlds Research, North America, 3, November. Available online at: https://journals.tdl.org/jvwr/article/view/1567/875 (accessed 15 January 2011).
WardJ.A., StoneT., & SarenM.A. (2011) Exploring service dominant-logic within computer mediated actor-networks.European Academy of Marketing Annual Conference, Slovenia.
83.
WaskoM., TeiglandR., LeidnerD., & JarvenpaaS. (2011) Stepping into the internet: new ventures in virtual worlds.MIS Quarterly, 35, 3, pp. 645–652.
84.
WilliamsD. (2010) The mapping principle and a research framework for virtual worlds.Communications Theory, 20, 4, pp. 451–470.
85.
WilliamsD., CaplanS., & XiongL. (2007) Can you hear me now? The impact of voice in an online gaming community.Human Communication Research, 33, pp. 427–449.
86.
WilliamsD., KennedyT., & MooreR. (2011) Behind the avatar: the patterns, practices and functions of role playing in MMOs.Games & Culture, 6, 2, pp. 171–200.
87.
YeeN., BailensonJ.N., UrbanekM., ChangF., & MergetD. (2007) The unbearable likeness of being digital: the persistence of nonverbal social norms in online virtual environments.Journal of CyberPsychology & Behavior, 10, pp. 115–121.
