AakerJ.L. (1997) Dimensions of brand personality.Journal of Marketing Research, 35, 3, pp. 347–356.
2.
AakerJ.L., & SchmittB. (2001) Culture-dependent assimilation and differentiation of the self: preferences for consumption symbols in the United States and China.Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32, 5, pp. 561–576.
3.
AakerJ.L., FournierS., AllenD.E., & OlsonJ. (1995) A brand as a character, a partner and a person: three perspectives on the question of brand personality.Advances in Consumer Research, 22, pp. 391–395.
4.
AilawadiK.L., & KellerK.L. (2004). Understanding retail branding: conceptual insights and research priorities.Journal of Retailing, 80, 4, pp. 331–342.
5.
AzoulayA., & KapfererJ.-N. (2003) Do brand personality scales really measure brand personality?Brand Management, 11, 2, pp. 143–155.
6.
BelkR.W. (1988) Possessions and the extended self.Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 2, pp. 139–186.
7.
BlackettT., BoadB., CowperP., & KumarS. (1999) The future of co-branding, in BlackettT., & BoadB. (eds) Co-branding: The Science of Alliance.London: Macmillan Press, pp. 113–123.
8.
ChoiS.M., & RifonN. (2012) It is a match: the impact of congruence between celebrity image and consumer ideal self on endorsement effectiveness.Psychology & Marketing, 29, 9, pp. 639–650.
9.
ClaiborneC.B., & SirgyM.J. (1990) Self-congruity as a model of attitude formation and change: conceptual review and guide for future research, in DunlapB.J. (ed.) Developments in Marketing Science, vol. 13. Cullowhee, NC: Academy of Marketing Science, pp. 1–7.
10.
ElliottR., & WattanasuwanK. (1998) Brands as symbolic resources for the construction of identity.International Journal of Advertising, 17, 2, pp. 131–144.
11.
EscalasJ.E., & BettmanJ.P. (2003) You are what they eat: the influence of reference groups on consumers' connections to brands.Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13, 3, pp. 339–348.
12.
FournierS. (1998) Consumers and their brands: developing relationship theory in consumer research.Journal of Consumer Research, 24, 3, pp. 343–373.
13.
HeineS.J., FosterJ.A., & SpinaR. (2009) Do birds of a feather universally flock together? Cultural variation in the similarity-attraction effect.Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 12, pp. 247–258.
14.
KressmanF., SirgyJ.M., HerrmannA., HuberF., HuberS., & LeeD. (2006) Direct and indirect effects of self-image congruence on brand loyalty.Journal of Business Research, 59, 9, pp. 955–964.
15.
MarkusH., & KitayamaS. (1991) Culture and the self: implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation.Psychological Review, 98, pp. 224–253.
16.
NgS., & HoustonM.J. (2006) Exemplars or beliefs? The impact of self-view on the nature and relative influence of brand associations.Journal of Consumer Research, 32, 4, pp. 519–529.
17.
PlummerJ.T. (1985). How personality makes a difference.Journal of Advertising Research, 24, 6, pp. 27–31.
18.
SingelisT.M. (1994) The measurement of independent and interdependent self-construals.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 5, pp. 580–591.
19.
SirgyM.J. (1982) Self-concept in consumer behaviour: a critical review.Journal of Consumer Research, 9, 3, pp. 287–300.
20.
SirgyJ.M., & SuC. (2000) Destination image, self-congruity and travel behaviour: toward an integrative model.Journal of Travel Research, 38, 4, pp. 340–352.
21.
SirgyM.J., JoharJ.S., SamliA.C., & ClaiborneC.B. (1991) Self-congruity versus functional congruity: predictors of consumer behavior.Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 19, 4, pp. 363–375.
22.
SujanM., & BettmanJ.R. (1989) The effects of brand positioning strategies on consumers' brand and category perceptions: some insights from schema research.Journal of Marketing Research, 26, 4, pp. 454–467.
23.
SungY., & ChoiM.S. (2012) The influence of self-construal on self-brand congruity in the United States and Korea.Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 43, 1, pp. 151–166.
24.
TriandisH.C. (2001) Individualism-collectivism and personality.Journal of Personality, 69, 6, pp. 907–924.
25.
TrumpR.K., & BrucksM. (2012) Overlap between mental representations of self and brand.Self and Identity, 11, 4, pp. 454–471.