Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Background

The purpose of this study was to describe the posterior lacrimal sac approach in endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) performed at our institute and report perioperative results achieved with this procedure.

Methods

A prospective clinical study was performed of 35 adult patients with nasolacrimal duct obstruction who underwent posterior lacrimal sac approach DCR from March 1998 to May 2005. Follow-up period ranged from 13 to 30 months (average, 17.5 months; SD, 6.8 months). “Surgical success” was defined as complete relief of epiphora and patent surgical ostium on endoscopic assessment.

Results

Surgical success was achieved in 30/35 (85.7%) patients after the primary surgery. Of 5 unsuccessful patients who complained of occasional epiphora, 4 patients had formed stenosis and 1 patient had granulation around the surgical opening, and all had revision surgery. Four of 5 (80.0%) patients achieved surgical success. Thus, including the result of revision surgery, 34/35 (97.1%) patients were successful.

Conclusion

Posterior lacrimal sac approach in endoscopic DCR has several advantages: good sac accessibility, a low complication rate, and a relatively high success rate. Therefore, the posterior lacrimal sac approach appears to offer a useful alternative approach for the surgical treatment of nasolacrimal duct obstruction.

Keywords

Dacryocystorhinostomy endoscope epiphora lacrimal sac maxillary line nasolacrimal duct uncinate process

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Caldwell

G.W.

Two new operations for obstruction of the nasal duct with preservation of the canaliculi and an incidental description of a new lacrimal probe.

NY Med Y 67: 581, 1983.

West

J.M.

A Window resection of the nasal duct in cases of stenosis.

Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 12: 654, 1914.

Massaro

B.M.

Gonering

R.S.

and Harris

G.J.

Endonasal laser dacryocystorhinostomy: A new approach to nasolacrimal duct obstruction.

Arch Ophthalmol 108: 1172–1176, 1990.

Husler

and Caversaccio

Microsurgical endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy with long-term insertion of bicanalicular silicone tubes.

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 125: 188–191, 1998.

Rebeiz

K.E.

Shapshay

S.M.

Bowlds

J.H.

and Pancratov

M.M.

Anatomic guidelines for dacryocystorhinostomy.

Laryngoscope 102: 1181–1184, 1992.

Yung

M.W.

and Logan

B.M.

The anatomy of the lacrimal bone at the lateral wall of the nose: Its significance to the lacrimal surgeon.

Clin Otolaryngol 24: 262–265, 1999.

Talks

S.J.

and Hopkisson

The frequency of entry into an ethmoidal sinus when performing a dacryostorhinotomy.

Eye 10: 742–743, 1996.

Metson

Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy—An update on techniques.

Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 6: 217–220, 1995.

Metson

Endoscopic surgery for lacrimal obstruction.

Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 104: 473–479, 1991.

10.

Hofmann

Lackner

Muellner

Endolacrimal KTP laser-assisted dacryocystorhinostomy.

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 129: 329–332, 2003.

11.

Javate

R.M.

Campomanes

B.S.

Jr. , Co

N.D.

The endoscope and the radiofrequency unit in DCR surgery.

Opthal Plast Reconstr Surg 11: 54–58, 1995.

12.

Linberg

J.V.

Anderson

R.L.

Bumsted

R.M.

Study of intranasal ostium in external dacryocystorhinostomy.

Arch Ophthalmol 100: 1758–1762, 1992.

13.

Metson

Woog

J.J.

and Puliafito

C.A.

Endoscopic laser dacryocystorhinostomy.

Laryngoscope 104: 269–274, 1994.

14.

McDonogh , and Meiring

J.H.

Endoscopic transnasal dacryocystorhinostomy.

J Laryngol Otol 103: 585–587, 1989.

15.

Kashkouli

M.B.

Parvaresh

Modarreszadeh

Factors affecting the success of external dacryocystorhinostomy.

Orbit 22: 247–255, 2003.

16.

Park

J.H.

Lee

S.D.

Lee

Y.B.

Endoscopic laser dacryocystorhinostomy.

Korean J Otolaryngol 36: 953–959, 1993.

17.

Nussbaumer

Schreiber

and Yung

M.W.

Concomitant nasal procedures in endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy.

J Laryngol Otol 118: 267–269, 2004.

18.

Wormald

P.J.

Powered endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy.

Laryngoscope 112: 69–72, 2002.

19.

Unlu

H.H.

Toprak

Aslan

and Guler

Comparison of surgical outcomes in primary endoscopic dacryocystorhi-nostomy with and without silicone intubation.

Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 111: 704–709, 2002.

20.

Hehar

S.S.

Jones

N.S.

Sadiq

and Dwnes

R.N.

Endoscopic laser dacryocystorhinostomy-safe and effective as a day-case procedure.

J Laryngol Otol 111: 1056–1059, 1997.

21.

Fayet

Racy

and Assouline

Complications of standardized endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy with unciformetomy.

Opthalmology 111: 837–845, 2004.

Outcomes of Posterior Lacrimal Sac Approach in Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy: Review of 35 cases

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References