This study assessed the influence of favorite stimuli on indices of happiness, e.g., smiling or excited vocalizations, and aberrant behavior, e.g., cantilena-like vocalizations or hand waving, of two young adults with multiple disabilities during 5-min. treadmill sessions. Several favorite stimuli, e.g., music and vibratory events, were available for the participants. The stimuli were presented in a rotation fashion during the sessions. To control for the effects of the stimuli, treadmill sessions without stimuli were also conducted. Analysis showed that the treadmill sessions with stimuli led to higher indices of happiness and lower aberrant behavior for both participants, compared to the treadmill sessions without stimuli.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AngelopoulouN.MatziariC.TsimarasV.SakadamisA.SouftasV.MandroukasK. (2000) Bone mineral density and muscle strength in young men with mental retardation (with and without Down syndrome). Calcified Tissue International, 66, 176–180.
2.
CaouetteM.ReidG. (1991) Influence of auditory stimulation on the physical work output of adults who are severely retarded. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 26, 43–52.
3.
CarrJ. E.DozierC. L.PatelM. R.AdamsA.MartinN. (2002) Treatment of automatically reinforced object mouthing with noncontingent reinforcement and response blocking: experimental analysis and social validation. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 23, 37–44.
4.
CenterJ.BeangeH.McElduffA. (1998) People with mental retardation have an increased prevalence of osteoporosis: a population study. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 103, 19–28.
5.
CrawfordM. R.SchusterJ. W. (1993) Using microswitches to teach toy use. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 5, 349–368.
6.
FavellJ. A.RealonR. E.SuttonK. A. (1996) Measuring and increasing the happiness of people with profound mental retardation and physical handicaps. Behavioral Interventions, 11, 47–58.
7.
FischerS. M.IwataB. A.MazaleskiJ. L. (1997) Noncontingent delivery of arbitrary reinforcers as treatment for self-injurious behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30, 239–249.
8.
GreenC. W.ReidD. H. (1999) A behavioral approach to identifying sources of happiness and unhappiness among individuals with profound multiple disabilities. Behavior Modification, 23, 280–293.
9.
LancioniG. E.GiganteA.O'ReillyM. F.OlivaD.MontironiL. (2000) Indoor travel and simple tasks as physical exercise for people with profound multiple disabilities. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 91, 211–216.
10.
LancioniG. E.O'ReillyM. F. (1998) A review of research on physical exercise with people with severe and profound developmental disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 19, 477–492.
11.
LancioniG. E.SinghN. N.O'ReillyM. F.OlivaD.CampodonicoF.GroenewegJ. (2003) Assessing the effects of automatically delivered stimulation on the use of simple exercise tools with students with multiple disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 24, 475–483.
12.
LancioniG. E.SinghN. N.O'ReillyM. F.OlivaD.CampodonicoF.GroenewegJ. (2004) Impact of favorite stimuli on the behavior of persons with multiple disabilities while using a treadmill. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, 98, 304–309.
13.
LindbergJ. S.IwataB. A.RoscoeE. M.WorsdellA. S.HanleyG. P. (2003) Treatment efficacy of noncontingent reinforcement during brief and extended application. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 36, 1–19.
14.
MiltenbergerR. (1997) Behavior modification: principles and procedures. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
15.
RealonR. E.BligenR. A.La ForceA.HelselW. J.GoldmanV. (2002) The effects of the positive environment program (PEP) on the behaviors of adults with profound cognitive and physical disabilities. Behavioral Interventions, 17, 1–14.
16.
RichardsS. B.TaylorR. L.RamasamyR.RichardsR. Y. (1999) Single subject research: applications in educational and clinical settings. London: Wadsworth.
17.
SiegelS.CastellanN. J. (1988) Nonparametric statistics. (2nd ed.) New York: McGraw-Hill.
18.
SparrowS. S.BallaD. A.CicchettiD. V. (1984) Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Services.
19.
WagemansA. M.FioletJ. E.van der LindenE. S.MenheereP. P. (1998) Osteoporosis and intellectual disability: is there any relation?Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 42, 370–374.
20.
WilderD. A.FisherW. W.AndersB. M.CerconeJ. J.NeidertP. L. (2001) Operative mechanisms of noncontingent reinforcement at various magnitudes and schedules. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 22, 117–124.
21.
YuD. C. T.SpevackS.HiebertR.MartinT. L.GoodmanR.MartinT. G.HarapiakS.MartinG. L. (2002) Happiness indices among persons with profound and severe disabilities during leisure and work activities: a comparison. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 37, 421–426.
