Abstract
Students' current use of backpacks to carry heavy loads of school material has promoted concern about musculoskeletal discomfort and postural problems. The purpose of this study was (a) to compare ratings of perceived comfort between subjects' personal backpacks and an experimental backpack and (b) to compare the data from two comfort rating scales. College-aged students (N = 19) in a random ordered, cross-over design rated their personal, traditional backpacks and experimental backpacks for perceived neck, shoulder, back, and overall comfort on a 100-mm Visual Analog Scale and on an Anatomical Illustration Rating Scale. Analysis indicated no significant difference in comfort ratings of backpacks on Visual Analog Scale but, on the Anatomical Illustration Rating Scale the experimental backpack was significantly (p<.05) more comfortable for the back. Further comparisons of backpacks, based on median splits of subjects' weight, height, and body mass index, indicated that body size is related to comfort ratings of backpacks. Special features of the experimental backpack may have contributed to greater comfort in selected areas based on body proportion. Subjective rating systems are not equally sensitive in distinguishing comfort. While backpacks with unique features may improve comfort, manufacturers should consider the size of the users in developing backpack designs.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.