The present study evaluated the interaction between preference for a focus of attention and instructions for focusing attention. 4 experienced billiard players had to shoot a billiard ball into a target area and received a focus instruction either corresponding or opposite to their preferred focus of attention. Two-dimensional error scores of accuracy and consistency were obtained. Accuracy of performance increased between Phase 1 without instructions and Phase 2 with focus instructions, independent of preference or instruction. However, participants with a preference for an external focus receiving an internal focus instruction showed less consistent performance.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
HancockG. R.ButlerM. S.FischmanM. G. (1995) On the problem of two-dimensional error scores: measures and analyses of accuracy, bias and consistency. Journal of Motor Behavior, 27, 241–250.
2.
MastersR. S. W. (2000) Theoretical aspects of implicit learning in sport. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 31, 530–541.
3.
Perkins-CeccatoN.PassmoreS. R.LeeT. D. (2003) Effects of focus of attention depend on golfers' skill. Journal of Sports Sciences, 21, 593–600.
4.
WeissS. M.ReberA. S.OwenD. R. (submitted) The locus of focus: attentional strategies in the acquisition of sensorimotor skills.
5.
WulfG.PrinzW. (2001) Directing attention to movement effects enhances learning: a review. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 8, 648–660.
6.
WulfG.SheaC. H. (2002) Principles derived from the study of simple skills do not generalize to complex skill learning. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 9, 185–211.
7.
WulfG.SheaC. H.ParkJ-H. (2001) Attention in motor learning: preferences for and advantages of an external focus. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 72, 335–344.
