In the Deese-Roediger-McDermott-Read-Solso (DRMRS) procedure, participants study lists of words associated with central concepts (critical themes) that are not on the lists, then their memory is tested. Based on 224 estimates, the rate of False Recognition of the nonstudied critical themes was .59 (95% confidence interval of .56 to .61), which is smaller than the Hit rate of .75 for correct recognition of studied items (95% confidence interval of .73 to .77) but greater than various rates of False Alarms for other nonstudied items (ranging from .13 to .19). Ratings of subjective confidence were similar on Hits and on False Recognitions but higher than on False Alarms, confirming that false recognition was more like correct recognition than like other errors. The results from judgments of feeling of remembering or knowing, from the effects of intervening activities (particularly recall) between study and test, and from the effects of age suggest that False Recognition occurs because the critical theme is activated along with studied items during list presentation and perhaps also during recall. Invoking fuzzy trace theory, it is argued Hits are based on verbatim traces whereas False Recognition is based on gist traces and a failure of source memory. Proposals are made for research.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AnastasiJ. S.RhodesM. G., & BurnsM. C. (2000) Distinguishing between memory illusions and actual memories using phenomenological measurements and explicity warnings. American Journal of Psychology, 113, 1–26.
2.
ArndtJ., & HirshmanE. (1998) True and false recognition in MINERVA2: Explanations from a global matching perspective. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 371–379.*
3.
BrainerdC. J., & ReynaV. F. (1998) When things that were never experienced are easier to “remember” than things that were. Psychological Science, 9, 484–489.*
4.
BruceD., & WinogradE. (1998) Remembering Deese's 1959 articles: The Zeitgeist, the sociology of science, and false memories. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 615–624.
5.
CohenJ. (1977) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. (Rev. ed.) New York: Academic Press.
6.
DeeseJ. (1959) On the prediction of occurrence of particular verbal intrusions in immediate recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 17–22.
7.
DeffenbacherK. A. (1980) Eyewitness accuracy and confidence: Can we infer anything about the relationship?Law and Human Behavior, 4, 243–260.
8.
FreydJ. J., & GleavesD. H. (1996) “Remembering” words not presented in lists: Relevance to the current recovered/false memory controversy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 811–813.
9.
GalloD. A.RobertsM. J., & SeamonJ. G. (1997) Remembering words not presented on lists: Can we avoid creating false memories?Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 271–276.*
10.
Intons-PetersonM. J.RocchiP.WestT.McLellanK., & HackneyA. (1999) Age, testing at preferred or nonpreferred times (testing optimality), and false memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 23–40.*
11.
IsraelL., & SchachterD. L. (1997) Pictorial encoding reduces false recognition of semantic associates. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 577–581.*
12.
KensingerE. A., & SchachterD. L. (1999) When true memories suppress false memories: Effects of aging. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 16, 399–415.*
13.
KoutsaalW., & SchachterD. L. (1997) Gist-based recognition of pictures in older and younger adults. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 555–583.*
14.
KoutsaalW.SchachterD. L.GalluccioL., & StoferK. A. (1999) Reducing gist-based false memories in older adults: Encoding and retrieval manipulations. Psychology and Aging, 14, 220–237.*
15.
LampinenJ. M.NeuschatzJ. S., & PayneD. G. (1999) Source attributions and false memories: A test of the demand characteristics account. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6, 130–135.*
16.
LaVoieD. J., & MulstromT. (1998) False recognition effects in young and older adults' memory for text passages. Journal of Gerontology, 53B, P255–P262.
17.
MatherM.HenkelL. A., & JohnsonM. K. (1997) Evaluating characteristics of false memories: Remember/know judgments and memory characteristics questionnaire compared. Memory & Cognition, 25, 826–837.*
18.
McDermottK. B., & RoedigerH. L.III. (1998) Attempting to avoid illusory memories: Robust false recognition of associates persists under conditions of explicit warning and immediate testing. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 508–520.*
19.
McKelvieS. J. (1990) Effects of exposure time and inversion on the confidence-accuracy relationship in facial memory: A test of the optimality hypothesis. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 71, 32–34.
20.
McKelvieS. J. (2001) Effect of free and forced retrieval instructions on false recall and recognition. The Journal of General Psychology, 128, 261–278.*
21.
McKelvieS. J. (2003) False recall with the DRMRS (“Drummers”) procedure: A quantitative summary and review. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 97, 1011–1030.
22.
MillerM. B., & WolfordG. L. (1999) Theoretical commentary: The role of criterion shift in false memory. Psychological Review, 106, 398–405.*
23.
MookD. G. (1983) In defense of external invalidity. American Psychologist, 38, 379–387.
24.
NormanK. A., & SchachterD. L. (1997) False recognition in younger and older adults: Exploring the characteristics of illusory memories. Memory & Cognition, 25, 838–848.*
25.
PayneD. G.ElieC. J.BlackwellJ. M., & NeuschatzJ. S. (1996) Memory illusions: Recalling, recognizing, and recollecting events that never occurred. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 261–285.*
26.
PlattR. D.LaceyS. C.IobstA. D., & FinkelmanD. (1998) Absorption, dissociation, and fantasy-proneness as predictors of memory distortion in autobiographical and laboratory-generated memories. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 12, S77–S89.*
27.
RobinsonK. J., & RoedigerH. L.III. (1997) Associative processes in false recall and false recognition. Psychological Science, 8, 231–237.*
28.
RoedigerH. L.III, & McDermottK. B. (1995) Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented on lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 803–814.*
29.
SchachterD. L.IsraelL., & RacineC. (1999) Suppressing false recognition in younger and older adults: The distinctiveness heuristic. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 1–24.*
30.
SchachterD. L.VerfaellieM.AmesM. D., & RacineC. (1998) When true recognition suppresses false recognition: Evidence from amnesic patients. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 668–679.*
31.
SchachterD. L.VerfaellieM., & PradreD. (1996) The neuropsychology of memory illusions: False recall and recognition in amnesic patients. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 319–334.*
32.
SeamonJ. G.GoodkindM. S.DumeyA. D.DickE.AufseeserM. S.StricklandS. E.WoulfinJ. R., & FungN. S. (2003) “If I didn't write it, why would I remember it?” Effects of encoding, attention, and practice on accurate and false memory. Memory & Cognition, 31, 455–457.
33.
SeamonJ. G.LuoC. R., & GalloD. A. (1998) Creating false memories of words with or without recognition of list items: Evidence for nonconscious processes. Psychological Science, 9, 20–26.*
34.
SeamonJ. G.LuoC. R.KopeckyJ. J.PriceC. A.RothschildL.FungN. S., & SchwartzM. A. (2002) Are false memories more difficult to forget than accurate memories? The effect of retention interval on recall and recognition. Memory & Cognition, 30, 1054–1064.
35.
SnodgrassJ. G., & CorwinJ. (1988) Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: Applications to dementia and amnesia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 34–50.
36.
StadlerM. A.RoedigerH. L.III, & McDermottK. B. (1999) Norms for word lists that create false memories. Memory & Cognition, 27, 494–500.*
37.
ThaparA., & McDermottK. B. (2001) False recall and false recognition induced by presentation of associated words: Effects of retention interval and level of processing. Memory & Cognition, 29, 424–432.
38.
TunP. A.WingfieldA.RosenM. J., & BlanchardL. (1998) Response latencies for false memories: Gist-based processes in normal aging. Psychology and Aging, 13, 230–241.*
39.
TussingA. A., & GreeneR. L. (1997) False recognition of associates: How robust is the effect?Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 572–576.*
40.
WellsG. L., & OlsonE. A. (2003) Eyewitness testimony. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 277–295.
41.
WesterbergC. E., & MarsolekC. J. (2003) Sensitivity reductions in false recognition: A measure of false memories with stronger theoretical implications. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 747–759.
42.
WinogradE.PelusoJ. P., & GloverT. A. (1998) Individual differences in susceptibility to memory illusions. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 12, S5–S27.*
