Previous cross-cultural studies of shyness have generally reported a higher level of shyness among adults in Japan than in the United States. This study examined two aspects of culture potentially related to different levels of shyness among the Americans and the Japanese: complementary relationship orientation, a tendency to maximize the status difference during communication, and family interdependence, a dependent tendency between a child and a parent. The survey included the 13-item version of Cheek's Shyness Scale and Sakuragi's Complementary Relationship Orientation Scale, and the Family Interdependence Scale. Analysis of responses by 166 American university students (76 men, 90 women) and 187 Japanese (81 men, 106 women) indicated that complementary relationship orientation was significantly related to shyness for both the Americans and the Japanese. No significant relationship, however, was found between scores on family interdependence and shyness.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AikawaA. (1991) A study of the reliability and validity of a scale to measure shyness as a trait. Japanese Journal of Psychology, 62, 149–155.
2.
BrislinR. W. (1976) Comparative research methodology: Cross-cultural research. International Journal of Psychology, 11, 215–229.
3.
BussA. H. (1980) Self-consciousness and social anxiety.San Francisco, CA: Freeman.
4.
BussA. H. (1986) A theory of shyness. In JonesW. H.CheekJ. M., & BriggsS. R. (Eds.), Shyness: Perspectives on research and treatment.New York: Plenum. Pp. 39–46.
5.
CheekJ. M. (1983) The Revised Cheek and Buss Shyness scale. Unpublished manuscript, Wellesley College, Wellesley, MA.
6.
CheekJ. M., & BriggsS. R. (1990) Shyness as a personality trait. In CrozierW. R. (Ed.), Shyness and embarrassment: Perspectives from social psychology.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univer. Press. Pp. 315–338.
7.
CheekJ. M., & BussA. H. (1981) Shyness and sociability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 330–339.
8.
DoiT. (1973) The anatomy of dependence.Tokyo: Kodansha International.
9.
HofstedeG. (1980) Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values. (Abridged ed.) Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
10.
HuiC. H. (1984) Individualism–collectivism: Theory, measurement, and its relation to reward allocation. (Doctoral dissertation, Univer. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign) Dissertation Abstracts International, 45, 3656.
11.
HuiC. H. (1988) Measurement of individualism–collectivism. Journal of Research in Personality, 22, 17–36.
12.
HuiC. H., & TriandisH. C. (1986) Individualism–collectivism: A study of cross-cultural researchers. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 17, 225–248.
13.
IshiiS. (1987) Taijin kankei to ibunka komyunikeesyon [Interpersonal relations and intercultural communication]. In FurutaG. (Ed.), Ibunka komyunikeesyon [Intercultural communication].Tokyo: Yuhikaku. Pp. 121–140.
14.
JacksonT.FlahertyS. R., & KosuthR. (2000) Culture and self-presentation as predictors of shyness among Japanese and American female college students. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 90, 475–482.
15.
KagitcibasiC. (1994) Individualism–collectivism: Theory, method, and applications. In KimU.TriandisH. C.KagitcibasiC.ChoiS. & YoonG. (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method, and applications.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Pp. 52–65.
16.
KeatenJ.KellyL., & PribylC. B. (1997) Communication apprehension in Japan: Grade school through secondary school. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 21, 319–343.
17.
KlopfD. W., & CambraR. E. (1979) Communication apprehension among college students in America, Australia, Japan, and Korea. Journal of Psychology, 102, 27–31.
18.
McCroskeyJ. C. (1978) Measures of communication bound anxiety. Speech Monographs, 45, 192–203.
19.
McCroskeyJ. C.GudykunstW. B., & NishidaT. (1985) Communication apprehension among Japanese students in native and second language. Communication Research Reports, 2, 11–15.
20.
MillsR. S., & RubinK. H. (1993) Socialization factors in the development of social withdrawal. In RubinK. H. & AssendorpfJ. B. (Eds.), Social withdrawal, inhibition, and shyness in childhood.Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Pp. 117–148.
21.
MiyakeK., & YamazakiK. (1995) Self-conscious emotions, child rearing, and child psychopathology in Japanese culture. In TangneyJ. P. & FischerK. W. (Eds.), Self-conscious emotions: The psychology of shame, guilt, embarrassment, and pride.New York: Guilford. Pp. 488–504.
22.
OlsonD. H. (1979) Circumplex model of marital and family systems: 1. Cohesion and adaptability dimensions, family types, and clinical applications. Family Process, 18, 3–28.
23.
OlsonD. H.McCubbinH. I.BarnesH. L.LarsenA. S.MuxenM. J., & WilsonM. A. (1989) Families: What makes them work. (Updated ed.) Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
24.
RobinsonJ. P.ShaverP. R., & WrightsmanL. S. (Eds.) (1991) Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes.San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
25.
SakuragiT. (1994) Family independence/dependence and symmetrical/complementary relationship orientation as cultural values: Their measurement and relation to communicative predispositions. (Doctoral dissertation, Univer. of Minnesota) Dissertation Abstracts International, 55, 3352.
26.
TriandisH. C.BontempoR.VillarealM. J.AsaiM., & LuccaN. (1988) Individualism and collectivism: Cross-cultural perspectives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 323–338.
27.
TriandisH. C.LeungK.VillarealM., & ClarkF. (1985) Allocentric vs ideocentric tendencies: Convergent and discriminant validation. Journal of Research in Personality, 19, 395–415.
28.
TriandisH. C.McCuskerC., & HuiC. H. (1990) Multimethod probes of individualism and collectivism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1006–1020.
29.
WatzlawickP.BavelasJ. B., & JacksonD. D. (1967) Pragmatics of human communication: A study of interactional patterns, pathologies, and paradoxes.New York: Norton.
30.
ZimbardoP. G. (1977) Shyness: What it is, what to do about it.Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
