The researchers examined the effects of reducing attentional demands on reading comprehension test scores. Third grade students (N = 939) completed two forms (T & S) of the Stanford 9 Reading Comprehension Test (54 items, 50 min.) in the spring of 1999. Form T (state-mandated) was administered following standardized procedures in one session. Form S (alternate) was administered in multiple, divided-time sessions, that is, the total test time and items were divided in halves and thirds per session to lessen attentional demands. A repeated-measure analysis of variance yielded significant effects for average and low readers. A resource match explanation and a metacognitive explanation are offered for the results, and educational implications are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdamsM. J. (1990) Beginning to read.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2.
AdelmanC. (1999) Why can't we stop talking about the SAT?The Chronicle of Higher Education, 46(11), B4–B5.
3.
AndersonR. C. (1982) Allocation of attention during reading. In FlanerA. & KintschW. (Eds.), Discourse processing.Amsterdam: North-Holland. Pp. 292–305.
4.
BarkleyR. A.GrodzinskyG., & DuPaulG. J. (1992) Frontal lobe functions in attention deficit disorder with and without hyperactivity: A review and research report. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 20, 163–188.
5.
BealeI.MatthewP.OliverS., & CorballisM. (1987) Performance of disabled and normal readers on the continuous performance test. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 15, 229–238.
6.
BoserU. (2000) States face limited choices in assessment market. Education Week, March 8, 22–23.
7.
BraceyG. W. (1999) The Ninth Bracey Report on the condition of public education. Phi Delta Kappan, 81, 147–168.
8.
BroadbentD. (1958) Perception and communication.London: Pergamon.
9.
BrownA. (1977) Knowing when, where, and how to remember: A problem of metacognition. (Technical Report No. 47) Urbana, IL: Univer. of Illinois, Center for the Study of Reading. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 146 562)
10.
BrownA. (1980) Metacognitive development and reading. In SpiroR.BruceB., & BrewerW. (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension: Perspectives from cognitive psychology, linguistics, artificial intelligence, and education.Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Pp. 453–481.
D'AgostinoJ. V. (2000) Achievement testing in American schools. In GoodT. (Ed.), American education: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow.Chicago, IL: National Society for the Study of Education. Pp. 313–338.
15.
DavisF. B. (1968) Research in comprehension in reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 3, 499–545.
16.
DevineT. (1986) Teaching reading comprehension: From theory to practice.Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
17.
DouglasV. (1983) Attentional and cognitive problems. In RutterM. (Ed.), Developmental neuropsychiatry.New York: Guilford. Pp. 280–329.
18.
Education Week. (1999) Lessons of a century: The assessment culture. [Electronic version] Education Week, 18(40), 21–27.
19.
FlavellJ. (1979) Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental. American Psychologist, 34, 906–911.
20.
GibsonE. J., & LevinH. (1975) The psychology of reading.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21.
GrabeM. (1986) Attentional processes in education. In PhyeG. & AndreT. (Eds.), Cognitive classroom learning: Understanding thinking, and problem solving.Orlando, FL: Academic Press. Pp. 49–82.
22.
GuthrieE. R. (1959) Association of contiguity. In KockS. (Ed.), Psychology: A study of a science.Vol. II. New York: McGraw-Hill. Pp. 114–178.
23.
GuthrieJ., & WigfieldA. (1999) How motivation fits into a science of reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3, 199–205.
HidiS. E. (1995) A reexamination of the role of attention in learning from text. Educational Psychology Review, 7, 323–350.
29.
HirschE. D.Jr. (2000) The tests we need. Education Week, February 2, 40–41.
30.
HornW. F., & PackardT. (1985) Early identification of learning problems: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 597–607.
31.
HueyE. (1908/1968) The psychology and pedagogy of reading.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
32.
HuntD., & RanhawaB. (1983) Cognitive processes and achievement. The Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 29, 206–215.
33.
JacobyL. L. (1983) Remembering the data: Analyzing interactive processes in reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 485–508.
34.
JamesW. (1890) The principles of psychology.Vol. 1. New York: Dover.
35.
JohnstonP. (1983) Reading comprehension assessment: A cognitive basis.Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
36.
JollyS. J.JohnsonR.JonesB. J.AbalosJ., & GramenzG. W. (1987) The effect of test speededness on the validity of reading comprehension scores. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 323 238)
37.
JonesM. G.JonesB. D.HardinB.ChapmanL.YarbroughT., & DavisM. (1999) The impact of high-stakes testing on teachers and students in North Carolina. Phi Delta Kappan, 81, 199–203.
38.
JustM. A., & CarpenterP. A. (1987) The psychology of reading and language comprehension.Newton, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
39.
KahnemanD. (1973) Attention and effort.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
40.
KinnunenR.VaurasM., & NiemiP. (1998) Comprehension monitoring in beginning readers. Scientific Studies of Reading, 2, 353–375.
41.
KirchnerG. L., & KnopfI. J. (1974) Differences in the vigilance performance of second-grade children as related to sex and achievement. Child Development, 45, 490–495.
42.
KupietzS. (1990) Sustained attention in normal and in reading-disabled youngsters with and without ADHD. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 18, 357–372.
43.
LaBergeD., & SamuelsS. J. (1974) Toward a history of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293–323.
44.
LahaderneH. (1968) Attitudinal and intellectual correlates of attention: A study of four sixth grade classrooms. Journal of Educational Psychology, 59, 320–324.
45.
LamC., & BealeI. (1991) Relations among sustained attention, reading performance, and teachers' ratings of behavior problems. Remedial and Special Education, 12(2), 40–47.
46.
LambertN. M., & NicollR. C. (1977) Conceptual model for nonintellectual behavior and its relationship to early reading achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 69, 481–490.
47.
LinnR. (2000) Assessments and accountability. Educational Researcher, 29(2), 4–16.
48.
LoydB., & HooverH. D. (1980) Relationship of elementary and secondary school achievement test scores to later academic focus. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 40, 1117–1124.
49.
MadausG., & RaczekA. (1996) The extent and growth of educational testing in the United States: 1956–1994. In GoldsteinH. & LewisT. (Eds.), Assessment: Problems, developments, and statistical issues.Chichester, Eng.: Wiley. Pp. 145–165.
50.
MargolisJ. (1973) Academic correlates of sustained attention. (Doctoral dissertation, Univer. of California, Los Angeles, 1972) Dissertation Abstracts International, 33A, 5555-A.
51.
MayerR. (1998) The promise of educational psychology: Learning in the content areas.Columbus, OH: Prentice-Hall.
52.
MilichR. (1984) Cross-sectional and longitudinal observations of activity level and sustained attention in a normative sample. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 12, 261–276.
53.
National Research Council. (1998) Preventing reading difficulties in young children.Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
54.
PashlerH. (1999) The psychology of attention.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
PurvisK., & TannockR. (1997) Language abilities in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, reading disabilities, and normal controls. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 25, 133–144.
57.
ReynoldsR. E. (2000) Attentional resource emancipation: Toward understanding the interaction of word identification and comprehension processes in reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 4, 169–195.
58.
Riverside Publishing. (1996) Iowa Tests of Basic Skills.Itasca, IL: Author.
59.
SchulmanH. G., & GreenbergS. N. (1971) Perceptual deficit due to division of attention between memory and perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 88, 171–176.
60.
SchunkD. H. (2000) Learning theories, an educational perspective. (3rd ed.) Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
TitchenerE. (1908) Lectures on the elementary psychology of feeling and emotion.New York: Macmillan.
63.
TreismanA., & GeladeG. (1980) A feature integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97–136.
64.
UnderwoodG., & BattV. (1996) Reading and understanding: An introduction to the psychology of reading.Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
65.
United States Department of Education. (1997) Education and the economy: An indicators report. (The National Center for Education Statistics; NCES 97–939) Washington, DC: Author.
66.
United States Department of Education. (1999) NAEP 1998 Reading report card for the nation and the states. (NCES 1999–500) Jessup, MD: Author.
