The present study examined performance during 3 hr. of simulated sentry duty with and without the intermittent administration of low-level sensory stimuli (odor or vibration). For odor and control conditions, target-detection latency increased steadily over the course of the 3-hr. session. Administration of a tactile stimulus reduced the increase in detection latency compared to that found in odor and control conditions. For all conditions, there were no significant differences in target-detection frequency, shot accuracy, or friend–foe discrimination. Across all conditions, restlessness (motor activity) increased significantly the first hour and remained elevated for the rest of the session. Subjective measures of workload (NASA-TLX) indicated that the 3-hr. task rated high on physical demand, mental demand, frustration, and overall workload. These findings suggest that the intermittent delivery of a clearly detectable tactile stimulus can reduce reaction-time decrements that occur as time on task increases.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BaronR. A., & BronfenM. I. (1994) A whiff of reality: Empirical evidence concerning the effects of pleasant fragrances on work-related behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 1179–1203.
2.
BaronR. A., & KalsherM. J. (1996) Effects of a pleasant ambient fragrance on simulated driving performance: The sweet smell of… safety?Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 40, 1282.
3.
ByersJ. C.BittnerA. C.HillS. G.ZakladA. L., & ChristR. E. (1988) Workload assessment of remotely piloted vehicle (RPV) system. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society, 32, 1145–1149.
4.
GalinskyT. L.RosaR. R.WarmJ. S., & DemberW. N. (1993) Psychophysical determinants of stress in sustained attention. Human Factors, 35, 603–614.
5.
GouldA., & MartinG. N. (2001) “A good odour to breathe?” The effect of pleasant ambient odour on human visual vigilance. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 15, 225–232.
6.
HancockP. A. (1984) Environmental stressors. In WarmJ. S. (Ed.), Sustained attention in human performance.Chichester, UK: Wiley. Pp. 103–142.
7.
HartS. G., & StavelandL. E. (1988) Development of the NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. In HancockP. A. & MeshkatiN. (Eds.), Human mental workload.Amsterdam: North Holland, Elsevier. Pp. 139–183.
8.
JohnsonR. F. (1991) Rifle firing simulation: Effects of MOPP, heat, and medications on marksmanship. Proceedings of the 33rd annual conference of the Military Testing Association.San Antonio, TX: Military Testing Association. Pp. 530–535.
9.
JohnsonR. F. (2001) Statistical measures of marksmanship. (Technical Note TN-01/2) Natick, MA: U.S. Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine.
10.
JohnsonR. F., & McMenemyD. J. (1989a) Antihistamines and sentry duty: Effects of terfenadine and diphenhydramine on target detection and rifle marksmanship. In Proceedings of the 1989 Medical Defense Bioscience Review.Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD: U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Chemical Defense. Pp. 823–826.
11.
JohnsonR. F., & McMenemyD. J. (1989b) Target detection, rifle marksmanship, and mood during three hours of simulated sentry duty. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society, 33, 1414–1418.
12.
JohnsonR. F., & MerulloD. J. (1996) Effects of caffeine and gender on vigilance and marksmanship. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 40, 1217–1221.
13.
JohnsonR. F., & MerulloD. J. (1999) Friend–foe discrimination, caffeine, and sentry duty. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 43, 1348–1352.
14.
JohnsonR. F., & MerulloD. J. (2000) Caffeine, gender and sentry duty: Effects of a mild stimulant on vigilance and marksmanship. In FriedlK.LiebermanH.RyanD. H., & BrayG. A. (Eds.), Countermeasures for battlefield stressors.Vol. 10. (Pennington Center Nutrition Series) Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State Univer. Press. Pp. 272–289.
15.
JonesK. S.RuhlR. L.WarmJ. S., & DemberW. N. (1999) Olfaction and vigilance: The role of hedonic value. In ScerboM. W. & MoulouaM. (Eds.), Automation technology and human performance: Current research and trends.Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Pp. 193–197.
16.
MurphyC. (1987) Olfactory psychophysics. In FingerT. E. & SilverW. L. (Eds.), Neurobiology of taste and smell.New York: Wiley. Pp. 251–273.
17.
PoultonE. C. (1978) Increased vigilance with vertical vibration at 5 Hz: An alerting mechanism. Applied Ergonomics, 9, 73–76.
18.
SchohanB.RawsonH. E., & SolidayS. M. (1965) Pilot and observer performance in simulated low altitude high speed flight. Human Factors, 7, 257–265.
19.
SilverW. L. (1987) The common chemical sense. In FingerT. E. & SilverW. L. (Eds.), Neurobiology of taste and smell.New York: Wiley. Pp. 65–87.
Spartanics. (1994) Model 70 Weaponeer rifle marksmanship trainer operation manual for USA: First revision.Rolling Meadows, IL: Spartanics, Ltd.
22.
WarmJ. S. (1993) Vigilance and target detection. In HueyB. M. & WickensC. D. (Eds.), Workload transition: Implications for individual and team performance.Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Pp. 139–170.
23.
WarmJ. S.DemberW. N., & HancockP. A. (1996) Vigilance and workload in automated systems. In ParasuramanR. & MoulouaM. (Eds.), Automation and human performance: Theory and applications.Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Pp. 183–200.
24.
WarmJ. S.DemberW. N., & ParasuramanR. (1991) Effects of olfactory stimulation on performance and stress in a visual sustained attention task. Journal of the Society of Cosmetic Chemists, 42, 199–210.
