Several studies have shown significant correlations among factors such as sex, age, and hormone levels with performance on mental rotation tasks. To perform spatial rotation also seems to be related to cognitive abilities such as musical skills. The present experiment investigated a possible relationship for enhanced spatial abilities, as observed in near-sighted subjects, with mental rotation performance. 39 near-sighted and 21 normal-sighted subjects were tested on a mental rotation task using two-dimensional representations of three-dimensional objects. Near-sighted subjects displayed fewer errors in possible rotations than normal-sighted subjects. There was no difference in errors between groups in identification of mirror images (“impossible rotations”). Results were interpreted in terms of a relation between enhanced reliance on nonvisual information by near-sighted subjects and improved spatial representation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AshmeadD. H.WallR. S.EbingerK. A.EatonS. B.Snook-HillM. M.YangX. (1998) Spatial hearing in children with visual disabilities. Perception, 27, 105–122.
2.
BandG.KokA. (2000) Age effects on response monitoring in a mental-rotation task. Biological Psychology, 51, 201–221.
3.
CarpenterP. A.EisenbergP. (1978) Mental rotation and the frame of reference in blind and sighted individuals. Perception & Psychophysics, 23, 117–124.
4.
ChabrisC. F. (1999) Prelude or requiem for the Mozart effect. Nature, 400, 826–827.
5.
CupchikG. C.PhillipsK.HillD. S. (2001) Shared processes in spatial rotation and musical permutation. Brain and Cognition, 46, 373–382.
HintonG. E.ParsonsL. M. (1988) Scene-based and viewer-centered representations for comparing shapes. Cognition, 30, 1–35.
8.
ItoA.KawabataH.FujimotoN.Adachi-UsamiE. (2001) Effect of myopia on frequency-doubling perimetry. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 42, 1107–1110.
9.
KerkmanD. D.WiseJ. C.HarwoodE. A. (2000) Impossible “mental rotation” problems: a mismeasure of women's spatial abilities?Learning Individual Differences, 12, 253–269.
10.
KollerG.HaasA.ZulaufM.KoernerE.MojonD. (2001) Influence of refractive correction on peripheral visual field in static perimetry. Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 239, 759–762.
11.
LansmanM.DonaldsonG.HuntE.YamtisS. (1982) Ability factors and cognitive processes. Intelligence, 6, 347–386.
12.
LessardM.ParèF.LeporeM.LassondeM. (1998) Early-blind human subjects localize sound sources better than sighted subjects. Nature, 395, 278–280.
13.
MarmorG. S.ZabackL. A. (1976) Mental rotation by the blind does mental rotation depend on visual imagery?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2, 515–521.
14.
MillarS. (1981) Crossmodal and intersensory perception in blind. In WalkR. D.PickH. L. (Eds.), Intersensory perception and sensory integration. New York: Academic Press. Pp. 281–315.
15.
MillarS. (1982) The problem of imagery and spatial development in the blind. In de GelderB. (Ed.). Knowledge and representation. Andover, Hants: Routledge & Kegan Paul. Pp. 111–120.
16.
MillarS. (1988) Models in sensory deprivation: the nature/nurture dichotomy and spatial representation in the blind. International Journal of Behavioural Development, 11, 69–87.
17.
PhillipsK.SilvermanI. (1997) Differences in the relationship of menstrual cycle phase to spatial performance on two- and three-dimensional tasks. Hormones and Behaviour, 32, 167–175.
18.
RauscheckerJ. P.KorteM. (1993) Auditory compensation of the effects of visual deprivation in the cat's superior anterior ectosylvian cortex. Journal of Neurosciences, 13, 4538–4558.
19.
RauscherF. H.ShawG. L.KyK. N. (1993) Music and spatial task performance. Nature, 365, 611.
RudnickaA. R.EdgarD. F. (1995) Automated static perimetry in myopes with peripapillary crescents: Part I. Ophthalmologic and Physiological Optics, 15, 409–412.
22.
SadatoN.Pascual-LeoneA.GrafmanJ.IbañezV.DeiberM-P.DoldG.HallettM. (1996) Activation of the primary visual cortex by Braille reading in blind subjects. Nature, 380, 526–528.
23.
SandersB.SoaresM. P.D'AquilaJ. M. (1982) The sex difference on one test of spatial visualization: a nontrivial difference. Child Development, 53, 1106–1110.
24.
ShepardR.MetzlerJ. (1971) Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science, 171, 701–703.
25.
SilvermanI.KastukD.ChoiJ.PhillipsK. (1999) Testosterone levels and spatial ability in men. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 24, 813–822.
26.
SilvermanI.PhillipsK. (1993) Effects of estrogen changes during the menstrual cycle on spatial performance. Ethological Sociobiology, 14, 257–270.
27.
TapleyM.BrydenM. (1977) An investigation of sex differences in spatial ability: mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 31, 122–130.
28.
TarrM. J.PinkerS. (1989) Mental rotation and orientation-dependence in shape recognition. Cognitive Psychology21, 233–282.
29.
UngarS.BladesM.SpencerC. (1995) Mental rotation of a tactile layout by young visually impaired children. Perception, 24, 891–900.
30.
WexlerM.KosslynS. M.BerthosA. (1998) Motor processes in mental rotation. Cognition, 68, 77–94.
