Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Duration of practice trial on a pursuit rotor task in contextual interference was investigated. Participants practiced at each of 4 angular velocities, with 24 participants completing 28 trials lasting 20 sec., and 24 participants completing 112 trials of 5 sec. Half of the participants in each trial-duration condition practiced in a blocked format and half practiced in a random format. After random practice posttest performance was better than blocked practice when practice-trial duration was 20 sec., but worse when practice-trial duration was 5 sec. This result is not consistent with theoretical explanations of the contextual interference effect and is discussed with reference to the task characteristics and demands of the pursuit rotor.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Brady

(1997) Contextual interference and teaching golf skills. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 84, 347–350.

Brady

(1998) A theoretical and empirical review of the contextual interference effect and the learning of motor skills. Quest, 50, 266–293.

Hall

K. G.

Domingues

D. A.

Cavasos

(1994) Contextual interference effects with skilled baseball players. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 78, 835–841.

Hebert

E. P.

Landin

Solmon

M. A.

(1996) Practice schedule effects on the performance and learning of high and low skilled students: An applied study. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Span, 67, 52–58.

Heitman

R. J.

Gilley

W. F.

(1989) Effects of blocked versus random practice by mentally retarded subjects on learning a novel skill. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 69, 443–447.

Immink

M. A.

Wright

D. L.

(2001) Motor programming during practice conditions high and low in contextual interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 423–437.

Lee

T. D.

Magill

R. A.

(1983) The locus of contextual interference in motor skill acquisition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9, 730–746.

Magill

R. A.

Hall

(1990) A review of the contextual interference effect in motor skill acquisition. Human Movement Science, 9, 241–289.

Mandler

(1980) Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence. Psychological Review, 87, 252–271.

10.

Shea

C. H.

Kohn

Indermill

(1990) Contextual interference: Contributions of practice. Acta Psychologica, 73, 145–157.

11.

Shea

J. B.

Zimny

(1988) Knowledge incorporation in motor representation. In Meijer

O. G.

Roth

(Eds.), Complex movement behavior. Amsterdam: North-Holland. Pp. 289–314.

12.

Shewokis

P. A.

(1997) Is the contextual interference effect generalizable to computer games? Perceptual and Motor Skills, 84, 3–15.

13.

Smith

P. J. K.

(1997) Attention and the contextual interference effect for a continuous task. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 84, 83–92.

14.

Smith

P. J. K.

Davies

(1995) Applying contextual interference to the Pawlata toll. Journal of Sports Sciences, 13, 455–462.

15.

Tsutsui

Lee

T. D.

Hodges

N. J.

(1998) Contextual interference in learning new patterns of bimanual coordination. Journal of Motor Behavior, 30, 151–157.

16.

Verdolini-Marston

Balota

D. A.

(1994) Role of elaborative and perceptual integrative processes in perceptual-motor performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 739–749.

17.

Whitehurst

Del Rey

(1983) Effects of contextual interference, task difficulty, and levels of processing on pursuit tracking. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 57, 619–628.

18.

Wright

D. L.

(1991) The role of intertask and intratask processing in acquisition and retention of motor skills. Journal of Motor Behavior, 23, 139–145.

19.

Wright

D. L.

Shea

C. H.

(2001) Manipulating generalized motor program difficulty during blocked and random practice does not affect parameter learning. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 72, 32–38.

Task Duration in Contextual Interference

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References